The Enhancement of Prospective Teachers’ Competence and Awareness in the Understanding by Design

Year 2023, Volume: 10 Issue: 5, 214 - 232, 01.09.2023

Oktay Akbaş , Onur Başaran

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.83.10.5

Abstract

In this study, a group of participants found the process of designing backward thinking distressing. Furthermore, the lack of practical strategies in schools and the absence of resources related to planning can lead to inadequacy in teachers' planning skills. This research aimed to enhance prospective teachers' competence and awareness of Understanding by Design. A case study was conducted with the participation of 17 teacher candidates from Kırıkkale University, Faculty of Education in Türkiye. The selection of candidates was voluntary. A 30-hour course on the theory and stages of backward design used in Understanding by Design was implemented from May 16th to 19th, 2022. This qualitative research employed data collection tools such as pre- and post-study open-ended questionnaires and performance tasks assessing lesson designs. The Understanding by Design template lesson plan and thought process were used to teach backward design in planning the training activity. The evaluation revealed that the pre-service teachers effectively utilized critical concepts associated with Understanding by Design, expressing their intention to incorporate understanding-based design into their future lessons and projects. The participants also emphasized the importance of all teachers adopting this instructional approach. Ultimately, the research suggests that the participants' competence and awareness of understanding-based design significantly improved throughout the course.

Keywords

Understanding by design, Backward design, prospective teachers, Enhance competence and awareness.

References

• Bowen, R. S. (2017). Understanding by Design. Vanderbilt University, Center for Teaching. Retrieved [todaysdate] from https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/understanding-by-design/.
• Boozer, A. (2014). Planning backwards to go forward: Examining pre-service teachers’ use of backward design to plan and deliver instruction. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation), Arizona State University, Arizona.
• Bruner, J. S. (2021). The process of education. (Translate. Emir Rüzgar).Pegem Akademi Publication.
• Christensen, L. B., Johnson, B. & Turner, L. A. (2015). Research methods, design, and analysis. (Translate. Ed. Ahmet Aypay). Anı Publication.
• Covey, S. R. (2002). The 7 habits of highly effective people. (Translate.Osman Deniztekin ve Filiz Nayır Deniztekin). Varlık Publication.
• Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
• Ellis, K. (2015). Exemplars of curriculum theory. (Translate. Ed. Asım Arı). Eğitim Publication.
• Gürbüz, Ö., Koçak, F. K. & Yurtseven, N. (2022). The investigatıon of the effect of UbD based developmental design on students’ mathematics achievement. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 51(233), 581-601. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.791938
• Graff, N. (2011). An effective and agonizing way to learn: backwards design and new teachers preparation for planning curriculum. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(3), 151-168.
• Jonsson, A. & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational research review, 2(2), 130-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002
• Kumar, R. (2011). Research methodology: a step-by-step guide for beginners. Sage Publications.
• Leung C (2012) Outcomes-based language teaching. In: Burns A, Richards JC (Eds) The Cambridge guide to pedagogy and practice in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press,
• Lumbreras Jr, R. & Rupley, W. H. (2020). Pre-service teachers application of Understanding by Design in lesson planning. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(3), 594-599. http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i3.20491
• McTighe, (2019). The fundamentals of backward planning. September 1, 2019 Vol. 77. No. 1. https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/the-fundamentals-of-backward-planning.
• McTighe, J. (2021). Understanding by Design. https://www.teacherspd.net/episode-63-how-to-set-desired-learning-results/Episode 63 How to set desired learning results – TeachersPD
• Spady, W. G. (1994). Outcome-based education: Critical ıssues and answers. American Association of School Administrators.
• Ocriciano, M. (2021). Backwards design for course and school (re)development. https://www.modernenglishteacher.com/backwards-design-for-course-and-school-re-development
• Ozyurt, M., Kan, H., & Kıyıkcı, A. (2021). The Effectiveness of Understanding by Design model in science teaching: A quasi-experimental study. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research (EJER), (94). DOI: 10.14689/ejer.2021.94.1
• Reddy, Y. M., & Andrade, H. (July 01, 2010). A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 4, 435-448. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902862859
• Richards, J. C. (2013). Curriculum approaches in language teaching: Forward, central, and backward design. Relc Journal, 44(1), 5-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212473293
• Tyler, R. W. (2013). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. University of Chicago press.
• Uluçinar, U. (2021). Findings of qualitative studies on Understanding by Design: A meta-synthesis. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies, 11(2), 167-194. https://doi.org/10.31704/ijocis.2021.009
• Walters, R. D. (2018). Investigating the combined impact of cognitively guided instruction and Backward Design model in mathematics on teachers of grade 3 students. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Toronto, Canada.
• Wiggins, G. & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
• Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2018). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Seçkin Publishing.
• Yurtseven, N. (2016). The investıgatıon of the reflectıons of actıon research based UbD implementatıons on teachers and students in EFL teaching. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Yıldız Teknik University, Institute of Social Sciences, İstanbul.
• Yurtseven, N. & Altun, S. (2017). Understanding by Design UbD in EFL teaching: Teachers’ professional development and students’ achievement. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17 (2). https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2017.2.0226
• Wiese, J., Buehler, R., & Griffin, D. (2016). Backward planning: Effects of planning direction on predictions of task completion time. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(2), 147-167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500007269