An Examination of the Effects of Information Technology Course on Computational Thinking Skills and Technology-Mediated Learning

Year 2024, Volume: 11 Issue: H. Ferhan Odabaşı Gift Issue, 168 - 187, 31.12.2024

Şenay Ozan Deniz , Fatma Akgün

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.24.100.11.6

Abstract

The study aimed to determine the effect of the information technologies course on students' computational thinking skills and technology-mediated learning process. The study was conducted on 237 first-year students of the Faculty of Education who were enrolled in the information technology course, and a one-group pretest-posttest design was used. Dependent t-test, independent t-test, and correlation analysis were used to analyze the data. In the results obtained from the study, it was found that the information technologies course did not make a significant difference on the students' computational thinking skills, while it made a significant difference on the effect of technology-mediated learning on the learning process. When the effect of the information technologies course on computational thinking skills and technology-mediated learning process in terms of gender factor was considered as pre-test and post-test, there was a significant difference in favor of male students in terms of computational thinking skills and technology-mediated learning process within the scope of pre-test data, while there was no significant difference within the scope of post-test data. The study also showed that there was a positive and moderate relationship between students' computational thinking skills and their attitudes toward the technology-mediated learning process. In the context of this finding, it can be stated that technology-enhanced learning environments can have a positive effect on the development of computational thinking skills, and that lessons delivered in such learning environments can contribute to the development of students' creativity, algorithmic thinking, critical thinking, problem solving and collaborative working skills.

Keywords

Computational thinking skills, technology-mediated learning, information technologies course, teacher candidate.

References

• Akbulut, Y. (2010). SPSS Applications in Social Sciences. Ideal Culture Publishing.
• Akgün, F. (2020). An evaluation of pre-service teacher’s information and communications technology competency and computational thinking skills in terms of different variables. Trakya University Journal of Social Science, 22(1), 629-654. https://doi.org/10.26468/trakyasobed.679581
• Akkaya, A., & Akpinar, Y. (2022). Experiential serious-game design for development of knowledge of object-oriented programming and computational thinking skills. Computer Science Education, 32(4), 476-501. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2022.2044673
• Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Research commentary: Technology-mediated learning—A call for greater depth and breadth of research. Information systems research, 12(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.12.1.1.9720
• Alsancak Sırakaya, D. (2019). The effect of programming teaching on computational thinking. The Journal of Turkish Social Research, 23(2), 575-590. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/779583
• Armstrong, R.A. (2014). When to use the bonferroni correction. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 34, 502 - 508. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12131
• Atiker, B. (2019). Effects of computational thinking skills to the success of secondary school students in programming instruction. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Istanbul University.
• Atman Uslu, N., Mumcu, F., & Eğin, F. (2018). The effect of visual programming activities on secondary school students’ computational thinking skills. Journal of Ege Education Technologies, 2(1), 19-31. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/511326
• Atmatzidou, S., & Demetriadis, S. (2016). Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: A study on age and gender relevant differences. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 661-670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2015.10.008
• Aziz, T., Khan, M. B., & Singh, R. (2010). Effects of information technology usage on student learning: An empirical study in the United States. International Journal of Management, 27(2), 205. https://www.proquest.com/openview/fd49191397468bdfe24e50c13cc18549/1?cbl=5703&pq-origsite=gscholar
• Babacan, N., & Güler, Ç. (2022). Investigation of university students' attitudes towards the effect of technology-mediated learning on the learning process. Futuristic Implementations of Research in Education (FIRE), 3(1), 18-29. https://firejournal.org/index.php/fire/article/view/65/37
• Bal, N. (2019). The effect of basic robotic education on secondary school students '21st-century skills and computational thinking skills. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Hatay Mustafa Kemal University.
• Bhat, R.A. (2023). The impact of technology integration on student learning outcomes: a comparative study. International Journal of Social Science, Educational, Economics, Agriculture Research and Technology (IJSET), 592-596. doi:10.54443/ijset.v2i9.218
• Bower, M. (2019). Technology‐mediated learning theory. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1035-1048. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12771
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2012). Scientific Research Methods. Pegem Academy Publications.
• Cai, Z., Fan, X., & Du, J. (2017). Gender and attitudes toward technology use: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 105, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.003
• Cheng, Y. P., Lai, C. F., Chen, Y. T., Wang, W. S., Huang, Y. M., & Wu, T. T. (2023). Enhancing student's computational thinking skills with student-generated questions strategy in a game-based learning platform. Computers & Education, 200, 104794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104794
• Conole, G., & Jones, C. (2010). Sharing practice, problems and solutions for institutional change: Comparing different forms of representation. Technology-Enhanced Learning, 277-295. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789460910623_017
• Computer Science Teachers Association & International Society for Technology in Education (2011). Computational thinking in K–12 Education leadership toolkit. https://cdn.iste.org/www-root/2020-10/ISTE_CT_Leadership_Toolkit_booklet.pdf
• Cueva, A. & Inga, E. (2022). Information and communication technologies for education considering the flipped learning model. Eduation Sciences., 12, 207. https://doi.org/10.3390/ educsci12030207
• Çakır, E., & Yaman, S. (2018). The effect of flipped classroom model on students’ science success and computational thinking skills. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 38(1), 75-99. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/462732
• Çimentepe, E. (2019). The effect of STEM activities on academic achievement, scientific process skills and computational thinking skills. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Niğde Omer Halisdemir University.
• Delal, H., & Oner, D. (2020). Developing middle school students’ computational thinking skills using unplugged computing activities. Informatics in Education, 19(1), 1-13. doi: 10.15388/infedu.2020.01
• Demir, Ü., & Cevahir, H. (2020). Investigation of the relationship between algorithmic thinking capability and problem solving skills: The case of Vocational and Technical Anatolian High School. Kastamonu Education Journal, 28(4), 1610-1619. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.4179
• Doğan, U., & Kert, S. B. (2016). The effect of computer game development process to the critical skills and academic success of secondary school students. Boğaziçi University Journal of Education, 33(2), 21-42. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/buje/issue/29693/319507
• Dong, W., Li, Y., Sun, L., & Liu, Y. (2024). Developing pre-service teachers’ computational thinking: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 34(1), 191-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-023-09811-3
• Ece, F., & Çendek, M. H. (2022). Examining the attitudes of secondary school students towards İnformation technologies and software course. Journal of Göbeklitepe Education and Sports Sciences, 1(1), 12-22. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/gesd/issue/73745/1223097
• Ergin, H., & Arıkan, Y. D. (2023). The effect of project based learning approach on computational thinking skills and programming self-efficacy beliefs. Academic Journal of Information Technology (AJIT-e), 14(55), 320-334. https://doi.org/10.5824/ajite.2023.04.001.x
• Ferrer, J., Ringer, A., Saville, K., A Parris, M., & Kashi, K. (2022). Students’ motivation and engagement in higher education: The importance of attitude to online learning. Higher Education, 83(2), 317-338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00657-5
• Funk, P. (2021, 27 January). Technology in education. Figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20444103.v1
• Gonda, D., Ďuriš, V., Tirpáková, A., & Pavlovičová, G. (2022). Teaching algorithms to develop the algorithmic thinking of informatics students. Mathematics, 10(20), 3857. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10203857
• Gunbatar, M. S., & Turan, B. (2019). The effect of block-based programming on the computational thinking skills of middle school students [Special issue]. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2, 335-339. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED603404
• Gupta, K. D., & Goel, S. (2024). Integration of technology into education and its effects on student learning. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research, 6 (2). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i02.15586
• Gülbahar, Y., Kert, S. B. ve Kalelioğlu, F. (2019). The self-efficacy perception scale for computational thinking skill: validity and reliability study. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 10(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.16949/turkbilmat.385097
• Gülmez, A., & Somyürek, S. (2022). Pre-service computer education and instructional technology teachers’ perceptions of their professional competence. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 37(1), 58-75. doi: 10.16986/HUJE.2020063851
• Gündoğdu, B. (2020). The effect of algorithm teaching on vocational high school students' computational thinking, cognitive load and achievement. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Atatürk University.
• Hardaway, D. E. & Scamell, R. W., (2005). Use of a technology-mediated learning instructional approach for teaching an introduction to information technology course. Journal of Information Systems Education, 16(2), 137-146. Available at: https://aisel.aisnet.org/jise/vol16/iss2/3
• Hsu, T.C., Chang, S.C., & Hung, Y.T. (2018). How to learn and how to teach computational thinking: suggestions based on a review of the literature. Computers & Education, 126, 296-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.004
• Hu, L. (2024). Exploring gender differences in computational thinking among k-12 students: a meta-analysis investigating influential factors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62 (5). https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241240670
• Hylén, J. (2015). Mobile learning and social media in adult learning. European Commission: Vocational Training and Adult Education. https://janhylen.se/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Mobile-Learning-and-Social-Media-in-Adult-Learning-1.pdf
• International Society for Technology in Education & Computer Science Teachers Association & International Society for Technology in Education, (2011a). Computational thinking in K–12 education teacher resources (second edition) J. Harrison, J. Jane, & C. Sykora, (Eds.). https://cdn.iste.org/www-root/2020-10/ISTE_CT_Teacher_Resources_2ed.pdf
• International Society for Technology in Education (2015). ISTE standards for students. https://iste.org/standards/students
• Karaçam Duman, N. F. (2020). Text-based programming education: investigation of computational thinking skills and academic achievements on secondary school students. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Bahçeşehir University.
• Kert, S. B., Yeni, S., & Fatih Erkoç, M. (2022). Enhancing computational thinking skills of students with disabilities. Instructional Science, 50(4), 625-651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09585-6
• Kılıç, M. Y. (2022). Analysis of teacher candidates 'perceptions of computer self-efficiency and attitudes towards E-Learning. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty (GUJGEF), 42(1), 239-272. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.942359
• Kılıç, S. (2022). The effect of robotics programming on the computational thinking skill development of associate degree students. Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Social Sciences, 24(2), 480-494. https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.919479
• Korkmaz, Ö., Çakir, R., & Özden, M. Y. (2017). A validity and reliability study of the computational thinking scales (CTS). Computers in human behavior, 72, 558-569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.005
• Kukul, V. (2018). The effect of different structured processes on students' computational thinking skills, self-efficacy levels and programming achievements in programming teaching. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Gazi University.
• Kruchinina, G. A., Tararina, L. I., Sokolova, E. E., Limarova, E. V., Muskhanova, I. V., Arsaliyev, S. M., Bazayeva, F. U., & Tagirova, N. P. (2016). Information and communication technologies in education as a factor of students motivation. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(2), 104-109. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/366807
• Kwon, K., Jeon, M., Zhou, C., Kim, K., & Brush, T. A. (2024). Embodied learning for computational thinking in early primary education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 56(4), 410-430. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2158146
• Liu, S., Peng, C., & Srivastava, G. (2023). What influences computational thinking? A theoretical and empirical study based on the influence of learning engagement on computational thinking in higher education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 31(6), 1690-1704. http://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22669
• Malik, S. I., Shakir, M., Eldow, A., & Ashfaque, M. W. (2019). Promoting algorithmic thinking in an introductory programming Course. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i01.9061
• Mills, K.A., Cope, J., Scholes, L., & Rowe, L. (2024). Coding and computational thinking across the curriculum: a review of educational outcomes. Review of Educational Research. 1-38. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465432412413
• Oluk, A., Korkmaz, Ö. & Oluk, H. A. (2018). Effect of scratch on 5th graders’ algorithm development and computational thinking skills Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 9 (1), 54-71. https://doi.org/10.16949/turkbilmat.399588
• Paf, M., & Dincer, B. (2021). A study of the relationship between secondary school students' computational thinking skills and creative problem-solving skills. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 20(4), 1-15. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1313467
• Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books: A Division of Harper Collins Publishers. https://kvantti.kapsi.fi/Documents/LCL/mindstorms-chap1.pdf
• Pellas, N., & Peroutseas, E. (2016). Gaming in second life via scratch4sl: engaging high school students in programming courses. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(1), 108-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115612785
• Pucer, P., Trobec, I., & Žvanut, B. (2014). An information communication technology based approach for the acquisition of critical thinking skills. Nurse Education Today, 34(6), 964-970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.01.011
• Saadé, R. G., Morin, D., & Thomas, J. D. (2012). Critical thinking in e-learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1608-1617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.025
• Sırakaya, D. A. (2019). The effect of programming teaching on computational thinking. The Journal of Turkish Social Research, 23(2), 575-590. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/779583
• Stamatios, P. (2024). Can preschoolers learn computational thinking and coding skills with ScratchJr? A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Reform, 33(1), 28-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879221076077
• Su, J., & Yang, W. (2023). A systematic review of integrating computational thinking in early childhood education. Computers and Education Open, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100122
• Sun, L., Guo, Z., & Hu, L. (2023). Educational games promote the development of students’ computational thinking: a meta-analytic review. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(6), 3476-3490. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1931891
• Sun, L., Hu, L., & Zhou, D. (2022). Programming attitudes predict computational thinking: Analysis of differences in gender and programming experience. Computers & Education, 181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104457
• Tabachnick B. G., Fidell L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). MA: Pearson.
• Tikva, C., & Tambouris, E. (2021). Mapping computational thinking through programming in K-12 education: A conceptual model based on a systematic literature Review. Computers & Education, 162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104083
• Top, O., & Arabacıoğlu, T. (2021). Computational thinking: a systematic literature review. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, 34(2), 527-567. https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.850325
• Tosik-Gün, E., & Güyer, T. (2019). A systematic literature review on assessing computational thinking. Journal of Ahmet Keleşoğlu Education Faculty, 1(2), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.38151/akef.597505
• Uğur, N. & Çakiroglu, U. (2024). Implementing reflective thinking in computer science unplugged to enhance computational thinking. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science (IJTES), 8(2), 196-218. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.515
• Usta, N., & Düzalan, N. (2021). Thematic analysis of studies on computational thinking in education in Turkey and Abroad. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention (IJHSSI), 10(8), 22-38. doi: 10.35629/7722-1008022238
• Üzümcü, O., & Bay, E. (2021). The effect of computational thinking skill program design developed according to interest driven creator theory on prospective teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 565-583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10268-3
• Üzümcü, Ö., & Bay, E. (2018). A new 21st-century skill in education: computational thinking. International Journal of Social Sciences in Turkish Cultural Geography, 3(2), 1-16. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/752455
• Wang, S., Zhang, K., Du, M., and Wang, Z. (2018). Development and measurement validity of an instrument for the impact of technology-mediated learning on learning processes. Computers & Education, 121, 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.006
• Wieking, B.A. (2016). Technology integration and student learning motivation (Unpublished master's thesis). Northwestern College. http://nwcommons.nwciowa.edu/education_masters/5/
• Wing, J. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.111821
• Yağcı, M. (2019). A valid and reliable tool for examining computational thinking skills. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 929-951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9801-8
• Yang, K., Liu, X., & Chen, G. (2020). The influence of robots on students’ computational thinking: A literature review. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(8), 627-631. https://www.ijiet.org/vol10/1435-ET023.pdf
• Yılmaz, M., Üredi, L. & Akbaşlı, S. (2015). The identification of preservice teachers’ level of computer competency and their perception of technology use in teaching. International Journal of Humanities and Education, 1(1), 105-121. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/357543
• Yolcu, V., & Demirer, V. (2023). The effects of educational robotics in programming education on students' programming success, computational thinking, and transfer of learning. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 31(6), 1633-1647. doi: 10.1002/cae.22664
• Yünkül, E., Durak, G., Çankaya, S., & Mısırlı, Z. A. (2017). The effects of scratch software on students’ computational thinking skills. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 502-517. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.373424
• Zeng, Y., Yang, W., & Bautista, A. (2023). Computational thinking in early childhood education: Reviewing the literature and redeveloping the three-dimensional framework. Educational Research Review, 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100520