An investigation of technology-rich lesson plans: Science teachers’ views on technology integration

Year 2025, Volume: 12 Issue: 1, 264 - 286

Murat Gezer , Levent Durdu

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.25.14.12.1

Abstract

Numerous studies have extensively explored technology integration in instructional processes, covering learning outcomes, barriers, administrative support, and teachers' technological proficiency. However, limited research has specifically investigated teachers' perceptions of technology-rich instructional methods. This study involved a collaborative effort between a researcher and three science educators to develop technology-rich lesson plans. It aimed to investigate science teachers' perspectives on technology integration, encompassing aspects such as professional satisfaction, preparation time, provision of pre-designed lesson plans and materials, and preferences for technology-rich teaching approaches across distinct demographic variables. Utilizing a design-based research approach with a mixed-method design, this study employed a sequential triangulation model. The quantitative phase engaged sixty-three science teachers, complemented by a qualitative phase with three participants. Data collection methods included the Technology-rich Lesson Plan Evaluation Survey and semi-structured interviews. Teachers assessed three lesson plans for instructional appropriateness and technology integration dimensions. The Chi-Square test analyzed variations in teachers' opinions towards technology integration based on demographic characteristics such as gender, work experience, and self-reported computer competency. While not statistically significant, the results suggest that pre-designed technology-rich lesson plans positively impact professional satisfaction and reduce lesson preparation time. Teachers emphasized the necessity of providing such pre-designed lesson plans and materials for all learning outcomes, indicating a clear intention towards technology-rich teaching methodologies over traditional.

Keywords

professional satisfaction, science teachers, technology integration, technology-rich lesson plans

Ethical Statement

According to the decision dated 04.03.2021 with reference number E.29623 from the Kocaeli University Social and Human Sciences Ethics Committee, a unanimous decision was made that there are no ethical concerns regarding the implementation of this study from the perspective of scientific research and publication ethics. The participants were informed about the research and data collection procedure and signed a written informed consent, indicating their willingness.

Supporting Institution

No funds, grants, or other support was received. The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.

Thanks

We would like to thank all participants who voluntarily participated in the study.

References

• Abbitt, J. T. (2011). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge in preservice teacher education: A review of current methods and instruments. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 281-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782573
• Akram, H., Abdelrady, A. H., Al-Adwan, A. S., & Ramzan, M. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of technology integration in teaching-learning practices: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 920317. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920317
• Alemdag, E., Cevikbas, S. G., & Baran, E. (2020). The design, implementation and evaluation of a professional development programme to support teachers’ technology integration in a public education centre. Studies in Continuing Education, 42(2), 213-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2019.1566119
• Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahaya, N., Aldraiweesh, A. A., Alamri, M. M., Aljarboa, N. A., Alturki, U., & Aljeraiwi, A. A. (2019). Integrating technology acceptance model with innovation diffusion theory: An empirical investigation on students’ intention to use e-learning systems. IEEE Access, 7, 26797-26809. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2899368
• Antonietti, C., Cattaneo, A., & Amenduni, F. (2022). Can teachers’ digital competence influence technology acceptance in vocational education?. Computers in Human Behavior, 132, 107266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107266
• Ardıç, M. A. (2021). Determination of the secondary education teachers' views regarding the utilization of technology in education and technology integration levels. Journal of Kazım Karabekir Education Faculty, 42, 391-414. https://doi.org/10.33418/ataunikkefd.841528
• Atsoglou, K., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2011). Teachers’ decisions to use ICT in classroom practice: An investigation based on decomposed theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence, 3(2), 20-37. https://doi.org/10.4018/jdldc.2012040102
• Backfisch, I., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Lachner, A. (2021). Teachers’ technology use for teaching: Comparing two explanatory mechanisms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 104, 103390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103390
• Banerjee, N., Stearns, E., Moller, S., & Mickelson, A. A. (2017). Teacher job satisfaction and student achievement: The roles of teacher professional community and teacher collaboration in schools. American Journal of Education, 123(2), 203-241. https://doi.org/10.1086/689932
• Baran, E., & Canbazoğlu Bilici, S. (2015). A review of the research on technological pedagogical content knowledge: The case of Turkey. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 30(1), 15-32. http://efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/yonetim/icerik/makaleler/18-published.pdf
• Barton, E. A., & Dexter, S. (2020). Sources of teachers’ self-efficacy for technology integration from formal, informal, and independent professional learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09671-6
• Baturay, M. H., Gökçearslan, Ş., & Ke, F. (2017). The relationship among pre-service teachers' computer competence, attitude towards computer-assisted education, and intention of technology acceptance. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 9(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2017.084084
• Bauer, J., & Kenton, J. (2005). Toward technology integration in the schools: Why it isn’t happening. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 519-546. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/4728
• Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M., & Tsai, Y-M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133-180. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157
• Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Ripley, M., Rumble, M., & Miller-Ricci, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17-66). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2
• Boadu, G., Awuah, M., Ababio, A. M., & Eduaquah, S. (2014). Tailoring history to technology: The history teacher’s perspective. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(12), 116-121. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/RHSS/article/view/13621
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2023). Data analysis handbook for social sciences: Statistics, research design, SPSS applications and interpretation (30th ed.). Pegem.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2019). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Pegem.
• Çakıroğlu, Ü. (2018). Integration of instructional technologies into learning environments. In K. Çağıltay & Y. Göktaş (Eds.). Foundations of Instructional Technologies: Theories, research, trends (pp. 571-589). Pegem.
• Carle, A. C., Jaffee, D., & Miller, D. (2009). Engaging college science students and changing academic achievement with technology: A quasi-experimental preliminary investigation. Computers & Education, 52(2), 376-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.09.005
• Chen, C. H. (2010). Why do teachers not practice what they believe regarding technology integration? The Journal of Educational Research, 102(1), 65-75. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.102.1.65-75
• Cheng, S. L., & Xie, K. (2018). The relations among teacher value beliefs, personal characteristics, and TPACK in intervention and non-intervention settings. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74, 98-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.04.014
• Cheok, M. L., & Wong, S. L. (2015). Predictors of e-learning satisfaction in teaching and learning for school teachers: A literature review. International Journal of Instruction, 8(1), 75-90. https://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2015_1_6.pdf
• Cheok, M. L., Wong, S. L., Mohd Ayub, A. F., & Mahmud, R. (2016). Understanding teacher educators' beliefs and use of information and communication technologies in teacher training institute. In J. Luaran, J. Sardi, A. Aziz, & N. Alias (Eds.), Envisioning the future of online learning (pp. 11-21). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0954-9_2
• Christ, T., Arya, P., & Liu, Y. (2019). Technology integration in literacy lessons: Challenges and successes. Literacy Research and Instruction, 58(1), 49-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2018.1554732
• Çiftçi, S., Taşkaya, S. M., & Alemdar, M. (2013). The opinions of classroom teachers about FATIH Project. Elementary Education Online, 12(1), 227-240. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ilkonline/issue/8586/106681
• Cober, R., Tan, E., Slotta, J., So, H. J., & Könings, K. D. (2015). Teachers as participatory designers: Two case studies with technology-enhanced learning environments. Instructional Science, 43(2), 203-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9339-0
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
• Crompton, H., & Sykora, C. (2021). Developing instructional technology standards for educators: A design-based research study. Computers and Education Open, 2, 100044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100044
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
• Dorner, H., & Kumar, S. (2017). Pre- and inservice teacher satisfaction with online collaborative mentoring for technology integration: Applying the Kano quality attributes. Online Learning, 21(4), 283-301. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i4.1020
• Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/bf02299597
• Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/bf02504683
• Ertmer, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
• Eteokleous, N. (2008). Evaluating computer technology integration in a centralized school system. Computers & Education, 51(2), 669-686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.07.004
• Farjon, D., Smits, A., & Voogt, J. (2019). Technology integration of pre-service teachers explained by attitudes and beliefs, competency, access, and experience. Computers & Education, 130, 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.11.010
• Gagné, R. (1985). The conditions of learning (4th Ed.). Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
• Gerard, L. F., Spitulnik, M., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Teacher use of evidence to customize inquiry science instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 1037-1063. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20367
• Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572-2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864
• Gülbahar, Y. (2007). Technology planning: A roadmap to successful technology integration in schools. Computers & Education, 49, 943-956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.12.002
• Hernandez-Ramos, P. (2005). If not here, where? Understanding teachers’ use of technology in Silicon Valley schools. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(1), 39–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2005.10782449
• Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K–12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
• Holmes, K., Bourke, S., Preston, G., Shaw, K., & Smith, M. (2013). Supporting innovation in teaching: What are the key contextual factors? International Journal of Quantitative Research in Education, 7(1), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJQRE.2013.055644
• Howard, S. K. (2013). Risk-aversion: Understanding teachers’ resistance to technology integration. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22(3), 357-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2013.802995
• Hu, P. J-H., Clark, T. H. K., & Ma, W. W. (2003). Examining technology acceptance by school teachers: A longitudinal study. Information & Management, 41(2), 227-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00050-8
• Hur, J. W., Shannon, D., & Wolf, S. (2016). An investigation of relationships between internal and external factors affecting technology integration in classrooms. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 32(3), 105-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2016.1169959
• Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 137-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9132-y
• Instefjord, E. J., & Munthe, E. (2017). Educating digitally competent teachers: A study of integration of professional digital competence in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 37-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.016
• ISTE. (2021). ISTE standards: Educators. https://www.iste.org/standards/iste-standards-for-teachers
• Jääskelä, P., Häkkinen, P., & Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2017). Teacher beliefs regarding learning, pedagogy, and the use of technology in higher education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(3-4), 198-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2017.1343691
• Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (5th Ed.). SAGE Publications.
• Kadel, R. (2005). How teacher attitudes affect technology integration. Learning & Leading with Technology, 32(5), 34-35. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ697309
• Kavak, Y., Arık, G., Çakır, M., & Arslan, S. (2016). Evaluation of Fatih project in the context of national and international education technology policies. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(2), 308-321. http://www.jret.org/FileUpload/ks281142/File/30.yuksel_kavak.pdf
• Khan, Md. S. H., Bibi, S., & Hasan, M. (2016). Australian technical teachers’ experience of technology integration in teaching. SAGE Open, 6(3), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016663609
• Kirkscey, R. (2012). Secondary school instructors’ perspectives on the integration of information and communication technologies (ICT) with course content. American Secondary Education, 40(3), 17-33. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/89315/
• Ko, W-H., & Chung, F-M. (2014). Teaching quality, learning satisfaction, and academic performance among hospitality students in Taiwan. World Journal of Education, 4(5), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v4n5p11
• Lee, H-Y., Chung, C-Y., & Wei, G. (2022). Research on technological pedagogical and content knowledge: A bibliometric analysis from 2011 to 2020. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.765233
• Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2008). Teachers’ views on factors affecting effective integration of information technology in the classroom: Developmental scenery. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(2), 233-263. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/22950
• Li, M., & Yu, Z. (2022). Teachers’ satisfaction, role, and digital literacy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(3), Article 1121. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031121
• Li, X., Troutt, M. D., Brandyberry, A., & Wang, T. (2011). Decision factors for the adoption and continued use of online direct sales channels among SMEs. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00255
• Liu, Y., & Huang, C. (2005). Concerns of teachers about technology integration in the USA. European Journal of Teacher Education, 28(1), 35-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619760500039928
• Lowther, D. L., Inan, F. A., Strahl, J. D., & Ross, S. M. (2008). Does technology integration “work” when key barriers are removed? Educational Media International, 45(3), 195-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980802284317
• Mailizar, M., Almanthari, A., & Maulina, S. (2021). Examining teachers’ behavioral intention to use e-learning in teaching of mathematics: An extended TAM model. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(2), Article ep298. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/9709
• Martin, B. (2015). Successful implementation of TPACK in teacher preparation programs. International Journal on Integrating Technology in Education, 4(1), 17-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.5121/ijite.2015.4102
• Meagher, M., Ozgun-Koca, A., & Edwards, M. T. (2011). Pre-service teachers’ experiences with advanced digital technologies: The interplay between technology in a pre-service classroom and in field placements. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 11(3), 243-270.
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
• Morse, J. M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative & quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40(2), 120-123. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-199103000-00014
• Moursund, D., & Bielefeldt, T. (1999). Will new teachers be prepared to teach in a digital age? A national survey on information technology in teacher education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED428072
• Muhammad, A., Edirisingha, P., Ali, R., & Shehzad, S. (2020). Teachers’ Practices in Blended Learning Environment: Perception of Students at Secondary Education Level. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v7i2.19
• Norris, C., Sullivan, T., Poirot, J., & Soloway, E. (2003). No access, no use, no impact: Snapshot surveys of educational technology in K‐12. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2003.10782400
• Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Glazewski, K. D., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing professional and student needs. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1321-1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.002
• Perrotta, C. (2013). Do school-level factors influence the educational benefits of digital technology? A critical analysis of teachers’ perceptions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2), 314–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01304.x
• Pons Lelardeux, C., Galaup, M., Pingaud, H., Mercadier, C., & Lagarrigue, P. (2020). A method to balance educational game content and lesson duration: The case of a digital simulation game for nurse training. In: Auer, M., Hortsch, H., Sethakul, P. (Eds), Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (pp. 125–136). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40274-7_13
• Reid, P. (2017). Supporting instructors in overcoming self-efficacy and background barriers to adoption. Education and Information Technologies, 22, 369-382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9449-6
• Reiser, R. A. (2001). A history of instructional design and technology: Part I: A history of instructional media. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49, 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504506
• Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
• Rosenberg, J. M., & Koehler, M. J. (2015). Context and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A systematic review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(3), 186-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2015.1052663
• Russell, M., Bebell, D., O‟Dwyer, L., & O‟Connor, K. (2003). Examining teacher technology use: Implications for preservice and inservice teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297-310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487103255985
• Şad, S. N., & Şahiner, Y. K. (2016). Students’ teachers’ and parents’ views about transition from basic education to secondary education (bese) system. Elementary Education Online, 15(1), 53-76. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ilkonline/issue/25780/271855
• Salam, M., Iskandar, D. N. A., Ibrahim, D. H. A., & Farooq, M. S. (2019). Technology integration in service-learning pedagogy: A holistic framework. Telematics and Informatics, 38, 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.02.002
• Salinas, M. F. (2008). From Dewey to Gates: A model to integrate psychoeducational principles in the selection and use of instructional technology. Computers & Education, 50(3), 652-660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.08.002
• Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
• Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2020). All the same or different? Revisiting measures of teachers' technology acceptance. Computers & Education, 143, Article 103656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103656
• Syh-Jong, J. (2008). Innovations in science teacher education: Effects of integrating technology and team-teaching strategies. Computers & Education, 51(2), 646-659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.07.001
• Taimalu, M., & Luik, P. (2019). The impact of beliefs and knowledge on the integration of technology among teacher educators: A path analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 79, 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.12.012
• Tanel, Z. (2020). Technology integration in education. In F. Orhan, A. A. Kurt ve S. Bardakcı (Eds.), Mixed articles on technology integration in the learning-teaching process (pp.1-23). Pegem.
• Teo, T. (2009). Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52(1), 302-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006
• Teo, T., Fan, X., & Du, J. (2015). Technology acceptance among pre-service teachers: Does gender matter?. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1672
• Tjørve, K. M. C., Sutterud, E., Midtskogen, B., Krüger, A. F., Fulton, N., & Ellefsen, S. (2010). The use of technology in teaching: student satisfaction and perceived learning. Uniped, 33(3), 56-64. http://hdl.handle.net/11250/144660
• Tondeur J., van Braak J., Sang S., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.009
• Tondeur, J., Hermans, R., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). Exploring the link between teachers’ educational belief profiles and different types of computer use in the classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2541-2553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.020
• Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2020). Enhancing pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A mixed-method study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 319-343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09692-1
• Tweed, S. (2013). Technology implementation: Teacher age, experience, self-efficacy, and professional development as related to classroom technology integration [Unpublished dissertation]. East Tennessee State University (Johnson City, TN).
• UNESCO. (2018). ICT competency framework for teachers. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265721
• Valiande, S., & Tarman, B. (2011). Differentlated teaching and constructive learning approach by the implemetation of ICT in mixed ability classrooms. Journal of Ahi Evran University Kırşehir Faculty of Education, 12(1), 169 – 184. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/kefad/issue/59498/855245
• Vannatta, R. A., & Nancy, F. (2004). Teacher dispositions as predictors of classroom technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 253-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2004.10782415
• Vongkulluksn, V. W., Xie, K., & Bowman, M. A. (2018). The role of value on teachers’ internalization of external barriers and externalization of personal beliefs for classroom technology integration. Computers & Education, 118, 70-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.009
• Voogt, J., & McKenney, S. (2017). TPACK in teacher education: Are we preparing teachers to use technology for early literacy? Technology. Pedagogy and Education, 26(1), 69-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1174730
• Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge – a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
• Wahyudi, R., Poernomo, D., & Puspitaningtyas, Z. (2018). Effect of information technology, satisfaction and motivation to teacher performance. The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 5(1), 4370- 4378. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsshi/v5i1.19
• Wang, L., Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2004). Increasing preservice teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 231-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2004.10782414
• Wang, Q., & Woo, H. L. (2007). Systematic planning for ICT integration in topic learning. Educational Technology & Society, 10(1), 148-156. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.10.1.148
• Wang, W., Schmidt-Crawford, D., & Jin, Y. (2019). Preservice teachers' TPACK development: A review of literature. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(4), 234-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2018.1498039
• Webb, M. E. (2005). Affordances of ICT in science learning: Implications for an integrated pedagogy. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 705–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500038520
• Weisberger, M., Grinshtain, Y., & Blau, I. (2021). How do technological changes in formal education shape the social roles of teachers who are mothers? Teaching and Teacher Education, 103, 103344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103344
• Wozney, L., Venkatesh, V., & Abrami, P. C. (2006). Implementing computer technologies: Teachers’ perceptions and practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 173-207.
• Wu, Y. T. (2013). Research trends in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) research: A review of empirical studies published in selected journals from 2002 to 2011. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), E73-E76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01349.x
• Xie, K., & Hawk, N. (2017). Technology’s role and place in student learning: What we have learned from research and theories. In J. G. Cibulka, & B. S. Cooper (Eds.), Technology in school classrooms: how it can transform teaching and student learning today (pp. 1e17). Rowman & Littlefield.
• Zhang, W., & Tang, J. (2021). Teachers’ TPACK development: A review of literature. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 9(7), 367-380. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2021.97027