Supporting Diverse Learners in Flipped Classrooms: Prior Knowledge and Engagement for Pre-service EFL Teachers

Year 2025, Volume: 12 Issue: 3, 72 - 87, 01.05.2025

Ika Wahyuni Lestari

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.25.34.12.3

Abstract

This study explores the perceptions of pre-service EFL teachers regarding the flipped classroom model, focusing on its influence on their motivation and engagement and examining the role of prior pedagogical knowledge in their adaptation to the instructional approach. Employing a qualitative phenomenological design, data were collected from nine pre-service EFL teachers at an Indonesian teacher training institution through individual interviews and focus group discussions. The findings revealed that the flipped classroom model enhanced students’ motivation and engagement by fostering autonomy, active participation, and practical relevance. However, students with limited pedagogical experience initially struggled with the self-directed nature of pre-class preparation, while those with prior pedagogical knowledge adapted more readily, leveraging the model to bridge theory and practice. Peer-led teaching demonstrations and feedback sessions emerged as essential scaffolds, particularly for students lacking prior pedagogical experience, as they facilitated collaborative learning and skill acquisition. The study highlights the importance of scaffolding and structured pre-class activities to support diverse learner needs in flipped classroom settings. Implications suggest that teacher education programs can enhance pre-service teacher training by adopting the flipped classroom model, with adjustments to accommodate students' varying levels of experience. Future research could explore the long-term impact of flipped classrooms on teaching efficacy and examine specific scaffolding strategies to optimize adaptation for novice learners.

Keywords

flipped classroom , motivation , pre-service EFL teachers , prior pedagogical knowledge , teacher education

Ethical Statement

Ethical research conduct has been met through voluntary basis of participation and anonymity of the participants.

Supporting Institution

Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

References

• Ankora, C. (2021, April). Implementing flipped classroom with digital students. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2331, No. 1). AIP Publishing.
• Arshad, M., & Romatoski, R. R. (2021, July). Effective learning strategies: Design of course structure for engineering courses aimed for hybrid classes. In 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access.
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
• Brown, C.J. (2018). Flipping the ESL/EFL Academic Reading Classroom: A Group Leader Discussion Activity. In: Mehring, J., Leis, A. (eds) Innovations in Flipping the Language Classroom. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6968-0_11
• Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Harvard University Press
• Castronova, J. A. (2002). Discovery learning for the 21st century: What is it and how does it compare to traditional learning in effectiveness in the 21st century. Action Research Exchange, 1(1), 1-12
• Chang, Y. H., Yan, Y. C., & Lu, Y. T. (2022). Effects of combining different collaborative learning strategies with problem-based learning in a flipped classroom on program language learning. Sustainability, 14(9), 5282. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095282
• Chen, K.C & Chuang, K.W. (2016). Building a cooperative learning environment in a flipped classroom. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 20(2), 8-15
• Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publication, Inc.
• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications, Inc.
• Dori, Y. J., Kohen, Z., & Rizowy, B. (2020). Mathematics for computer science: A flipped classroom with an optional project. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(12). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9149
• Flores, Ò., del-Arco, I., & Silva, P. (2016). The flipped classroom model at the university: Analysis based on professors’ and students’ assessment in the educational field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0022-1
• Gu, J., Tang, L., Liu, X., & Xu, J. (2022). Promoting pre-service teacher students’ learning Engagement: Design-based research in a flipped Classroom. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 810275. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.810275
• Hava, K. (2021). The effects of the flipped classroom on deep learning strategies and engagement at the undergraduate level. Participatory Educational Research, 8(1), 379-394. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.22.8.1
• Head, M., Aloupis, C., Hanson, J., & Jayne, A. (2022, August). Promoting student learning and teaching in the virtual environment and in-person. In 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.
• Hoang Oanh, T. T. (2020). The impact of a flipped classroom on student learning achievements in EFL classrooms. Education, Language and Sociology Research, 1(2), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.22158/elsr.v1n2p13
• Jumaat, N. F., & Lah, N. H. C. (2022). A framework for scaffolding learners' self-regulation in a flipped classroom learning environment. KnE Social Sciences, 759-766. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i19.12495
• Kwong, R., Kwok, M. L. J., & Wong, H. (2024). Autonomous and controlled motivation in a flipped-classroom approach. Asia Pacific Education Review, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-024-09983-0
• Lestari, I. W. (2021). Flipped classroom in Indonesian higher education: A mixed-method study on students' attitudes and experiences. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(1), 243-257. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i1.17636
• Li, Z., & Li, J. (2022). Using the flipped classroom to promote learner engagement for the sustainable development of language skills: A mixed-methods study. Sustainability, 14(10), 5983.https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105983
• Lo, C., & Hew, K. (2021). Student engagement in mathematics flipped classrooms: Implications of journal publications from 2011 to 2020. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672610
• Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22–38). Routledge.
• Namaziandost, E., & Çakmak, F. (2020). An account of EFL learners’ self-efficacy and gender in the Flipped Classroom Model. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 4041-4055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10167-7
• Namdaran, H., & Akbari, O. (2021). The effect of flipped learning model on EFL learners' academic achievement, self-esteem and self-confidence. IJET (Indonesian Journal of English Teaching), 10(2), 158-168. https://doi.org/10.15642/ijet2.2021.10.2.158-168
• Oudbier, J., Spaai, G., Timmermans, K., & Boerboom, T. (2022). Enhancing the effectiveness of flipped classroom in health science education: A state-of-the-art review. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 34.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-03052-5
• Pinto, M., & Leite, C. (2020). Digital technologies in support of students learning in Higher Education: literature review. Digital education review, 37, 343-360.
• Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2023). Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 2371-2391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1884886
• Resch, K., & Schrittesser, I. (2023). Using the service-learning approach to bridge the gap between theory and practice in teacher education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 27(10), 1118-1132. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1882053
• Röhl, A., Reddy, S., & Shannon, G. J. (2013). The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning strategies. Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 105, 44–49. https://doi.org/10.14307/JFCS105.2.12
• Sevimli-Celik, S. (2021). Moving between theory and practice: Preparing early childhood pre-service teachers for teaching physical education. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 42(3), 281-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2020.1735588
• Shi, Y., Ma, Y., MacLeod, J., & Yang, H. (2020). College students’ cognitive learning outcomes in flipped classroom instruction: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Journal of Computers in Education, 7, 79–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40692-019-00142-8
• Shin, Y., Kim, D., & Song, D. (2020). Types and timing of scaffolding to promote meaningful peer interaction and increase learning performance in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(3), 640-661. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119877134
• Sun, Z., & Xie, K. (2020). How do students prepare in the pre-class setting of a flipped undergraduate math course? A latent profile analysis of learning behavior and the impact of achievement goals. The Internet and Higher Education, 46, 100731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100731
• Teng, F. (2018). Flip your classroom to improve efl students’ speaking skills. In: Mehring J., Leis A. (eds) Innovations in Flipping the Language Classroom. Springer, Singapore. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-10-6968-0_9
• Tohei A.A. (2018). Flipping EFL classes for future teachers. In: Mehring J., Leis A. (eds) Innovations in Flipping the Language Classroom. Springer, Singapore. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-10-6968-0_8
• Umar, M., & Ko, I. (2022). E-learning: Direct effect of student learning effectiveness and engagement through project-based learning, team cohesion, and flipped learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(3), 1724. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031724
• White, H. A., Highfill, L., Johnston, L. C., & Kalimi, A. (2024). Cognitive calisthenics: Pre-lecture cognitive exercise boosts learning. Teaching of Psychology, 51(2), 180-187. https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283221084907
• Witt, C. M., Trivedi, C., & Aminalroayae, F. (2021). Using flipped instruction in a technology-enhanced learning environment: The case for scaffolding. Issues in Information Systems, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.48009/2_iis_2021_52-62
• Xin, X., & Zhang, M. (2024). Effects of flipped English learning designs on learning outcomes and cognitive load: Workload of out‐of‐class activities versus during‐class activities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(4), 1745-1765. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12978
• Yang, J. S. M. (2020). Promoting student engagement and preparation in flipped learning’s pre-class activities: A systematic review. In S. Gregory, S. Warburton, & M. Parkes (Eds.), ASCILITE’s First Virtual Conference. Proceedings ASCILITE 2020 in Armidale (pp. 125–133). https://doi.org/10.14742/ascilite2020.0106.
• Zainuddin, Z., & Halili, S. H. (2016). Flipped classroom research and trends from different fields of study. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 17(3), 313–340. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2274
• Zhu, M., Bonk, C. J., & Berri, S. (2022). Fostering self-directed learning in MOOCs: Motivation, learning strategies, and instruction. Online Learning, 26(1), 153-173.