Exploring Parental Involvement in Education: The Experiences of Single Mothers in a Developing Country

Year 2025, Volume: 12 Issue: 5, 275 - 291, 01.09.2025

Melike Yiğit , Serafettin Gedik

https://doi.org/10.17275/per.25.73.12.5

Abstract

In the current study, we tried to explore how single mothers in Türkiye define and experience parental involvement in their children’s education, addressing a gap in the literature that often overlooks non-dominant family structures. Using an interpretive qualitative research design, we conducted semi-structured interviews with ten single mothers to gain in-depth insights into their lived experiences. Guided by Epstein’s parental involvement model, our thematic analysis revealed that while participants recognized most of Epstein’s six dimensions, they frequently reinterpreted these forms of involvement as personal responsibilities rather than collaborative efforts with schools. Notably, none of the participants reported involvement in school decision-making processes. Moreover, a new form of involvement entitled "Sacrifice to Fill the Void" emerged, reflecting the emotional, financial, and logistical commitments these mothers undertook to compensate for the absence of a father as the second parent. Despite significant challenges, participants demonstrated a strong commitment to their children’s education, underscoring the need to acknowledge and support diverse forms of family engagement. Our findings call for culturally sensitive and inclusive definitions of parental involvement that reflect the realities of single-mother households. We advocate for educational policies and school practices that validate the unique contributions of single mothers and create equitable opportunities for engagement, ensuring that all families, regardless of structure, can play a meaningful role in their children’s educational journeys.

Keywords

parental involvement , single parent involvement , school-family partnership , single mother

Ethical Statement

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Scientific Research Ethics Committee of Amasya University with the decision dated 07.03.2022 and numbered E-30640013-108.01-63007. In addition, research permission was obtained from the Turkish Ministry of National Education prior to data collection.

Thanks

We thank all our participants for their support and availability, which made this work possible.

References

• Abugalı, G. (2018). Türk ve Rus hukukunda çocuğun velayeti [Guardianship of children in Turkish and Russian law]. Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi [Selçuk Law Review], 26(3), 331-392.
• Ahmed, A. (2015). Somali parents' involvement in the education of their children in American middle schools: A case study in Portland (Publication No. 2402), [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Maine]. Fogler Library.
• Aksakal, S. (2003). Boşanmadan sonra çocuğun velayeti [Child custody after divorce]. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi [Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Faculty of Theology Journal], (1), 167-190.
• Auerbach, S. (2010). Beyond coffee with the principal: Toward leadership for authentic school–family partnerships. Journal of School Leadership, 20(6), 728-757.
• Baquedano-López, P., Alexander, R. A., & Hernandez, S. J. (2013). Equity issues in parental and community involvement in schools: What teacher educators need to know. Review of research in education, 37(1), 149-182.
• Baxter, G., & Kilderry, A. (2022). Family school partnership discourse: Inconsistencies, misrepresentation, and counter narratives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, 103561.
• Bæck, U. D. K. (2021). Understanding the space for parental voices in school governance: Perspectives from Norway. In School Governance in Global Contexts (pp. 51-65). Routledge.
• Bilaloğlu, R. G., & Arnas, Y. A. (2019). Barriers to Parental Involvement in Preschool Education and Problems Encountered in Process. H. U. Journal of Education, 34(3), 804-823.
• Blake Berryhill, M. (2018). Single mothers’ home-based school involvement: a longitudinal analysis. Journal of Family Studies, 24(2), 187-202.
• Boutte, G. S., & Johnson, G. L., Jr. (2014). Community and family involvement in urban schools. In H. R. Milner IV & K. Lomotey (Eds.), Handbook of urban education (pp. 167-187). Routledge.
• Boylu, A. A., & Öztop, H. (2013). Tek ebeveynli aileler: Sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri [Single parent families: problems and solutions]. Sosyoekonomi, 19(19).
• Bozatay, A.Ş. (2011). Sosyoloji. Beta Yayınları.
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard university press.
• Colpin*, H., Vandemeulebroecke, L., & Ghesquiere, P. (2004). Supporting the educational career of children from divorced families: parents' experiences and the role of the school. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(3), 275-289.
• DeMatthews, D. E., Edwards Jr, D. B., & Rincones, R. (2016). Social justice leadership and family engagement: A successful case from Ciudad Juárez, Mexico. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(5), 754-792.
• DeMatthews, D. E., Kotok, S., & Serafini, A. (2020). Leadership preparation for special education and inclusive schools: Beliefs and recommendations from successful principals. Journal of Research on leadership Education, 15(4), 303-329.
• Demir, S. ve Çelebi, Ş. (2017). The Problems of Single-Parent Families: A Qualitative Research. Yalova Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(13), 111-128.
• Desmarchelier, R., Bryce, I., Schaffer, K., Lawrence, J., & Cantrell, K. (2024). Separated parents’ experiences with the Australian school system: an overview. The Australian Educational Researcher, 51(1), 255-274.
• Edwards, D. B., DeMatthews, D., Spear, A., & Hartley, H. (2020). Connecting parental involvement, adult education, and community organizing through social justice leadership: Lessons from Ciudad Juarez, Mexico. In Community Participation with Schools in Developing Countries (pp. 75-87). Routledge.
• Epstein, J. (1995). School/family/community partnerships: Caring for the children we serve. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(9), 701-712.
• Epstein, J. L. (2011). School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action. Westview Press.
• Gedik, S. (2021). Promoting a traditional home-school partnership: a teacher's efforts to involve families in a Turkish urban school. School Community Journal, 31(1), 283-312.
• Gil, E. (2019). Leadership for youth empowerment within a family-based community program. Journal of School Leadership, 29(6), 515-537.
• Gil, E., & Johnson, A. (2024). “We, as parents, do have a voice”: Learning from community-based programs effectively engaging parents in urban communities. Urban Education, 59(4), 1048-1077.
• Gladding, S. T. (2012). Aile terapisi: tarih kuram ve uygulamalar [History, theory, and practice of family therapy]. (İ. Keklik, & İ. Yıldırım, Trans.). Ankara: Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Derneği Yayınları.
• Grant, K. B., & Ray, J. A. (Eds.). (2018). Home, school, and community collaboration: Culturally responsive family engagement. Sage.
• Green, T. L. (2015). Leading for urban school reform and community development. Educational administration quarterly, 51(5), 679-711.
• Gumus, S., & Akcaoglu, M. (2013). Instructional leadership in Turkish primary schools: An analysis of teachers’ perceptions and current policy. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(3), 289-302.
• Hakyemez, S. (2015). Turkish early childhood educators on parental involvement. European Educational Research Journal, 14(1), 100-112.
• Ho, E. S. C. (2009). Educational leadership for parental ınvolvement in an Asian context: Insights from Bourdieu's theory of practice. School Community Journal, 19(2), 101-122.
• Huberman, A. (2014). Qualitative data analysis a methods sourcebook. Sage
• Ishimaru, A. (2014). Rewriting the rules of engagement: Elaborating a model of district-community collaboration. Harvard Educational Review, 84(2), 188-216.
• Jeynes, W. H. (2011). Parental involvement research: Moving to the next level. School Community Journal, 21(1), 9.
• Johnson, L. (2006). “Making her community a better place to live”: Culturally responsive urban school leadership in historical context. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 5(1), 19-36.
• Johnson, L. (2015). Rethinking parental involvement: A critical review of the literature. Urban Education Research & Policy Annuals, 3(1).
• Kalkavan, İ., & Büken, E. (2017). Boşanma davalarında çocuğun velayet hakkı için uygun ebeveynin belirlenmesi [Determining the suitable parent on children’s custody cases]. Adli Tıp Bülteni [The Bulletin of legal medicine], 22(1), 54-63.
• Karakaya, S. (2004). A comparative study: English and Turkish teachers' conceptions of their professional responsibility. Educational Studies, 30(3), 195-216.
• Kim, Y. (2009). Minority parental involvement and school barriers: Moving the focus away from deficiencies of parents. Educational research review, 4(2), 80-102.
• Khalifa, M. (2012). A re-new-ed paradigm in successful urban school leadership: Principal as community leader. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(3), 424-467.
• Lareau, A. (1987). Social class differences in family-school relationships: The importance of cultural capital. Sociology of Education, 73-85.
• Leddy, H. G. (2018). Involved minority parents enhance the quality of elementary school programs in a diverse community. Multicultural Education, 25, 37-40.
• Martindale, S. E., & Lacey, R. E. (2017). Parental separation in childhood and adult smoking in the 1958 British birth cohort. The European Journal of Public Health, 27(4), 723-72.
• McKenna, M. K., & Millen, J. (2013). Look! Listen! Learn! Parent narratives and grounded theory models of parent voice, presence, and engagement in K-12 education. School Community Journal, 23(1), 9-48.
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
• Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
• Meyers, B., Dowdy, J., & Paterson, P. (2000). Finding the missing voices: Perspectives of the least visible families and their willingness and capacity for school engagement. Current Issues in Middle Level Education, 7(2), 59-79.
• Nonoyama‐Tarumi, Y. (2017). Educational achievement of children from single‐mother and single‐father families: The case of Japan. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79(4), 915-931.
• OECD. (2018). How decentralised are education systems, and what does it mean for schools?. OECD Publishing.
• OECD. (2024, June). SF1.2: Children in families. OECD Family Database. https://www.oecd.org/els/family/database.htm
• Demircan, H. Ö. (2018). Expanding the parent involvement framework in early childhood education: parent “engagement, partnership, involvement and education”. Elementary Education Online, 17(4), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2019.507008
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Sage.
• Robinson, K., & Harris, A. L. (2014). The broken compass: Parental involvement with children's education. Harvard University Press.
• Shaked, H. (2022). How instructional leaders promote parental involvement: the Israeli case. International Journal of Educational Management, 36(7), 1193-1205.
• Sharma, R. (2013). The family and family structure classification redefined for the current times. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 2(4), 306-310.
• Slaughter, D. T., & Epps, E. G. (1987). The home environment and academic achievement of Black American children and youth: An overview. The Journal of Negro Education, 56(1), 3-20.
• Talay, M. (2022). The problems experienced by single parent families in child raising and methods of coping with these problems (Publication NO. 738816). (Master Thesis, Van Yüzüncü Yıl University). Turkish Council of Higher Education.
• Tekin Epik, M., Çiçek, Ö., ve Altay, S. (2017). Changing and unchanging roles of family in the historical process as a medium of social policy. Journal of Social Policy Studies, 17(38), 35-58.
• Townsend, T., & Bayetto, A. (2022). Reaching out from Tasmanian schools: Leadership for learning to support family and community engagement to improve reading. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 21(3), 458-482.
• Tsz-lok Lee, T. (2023). Towards a textural sociological approach to single mothers’ voices: a study of Hong Kong mothers. Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of education, 44(4), 548-561.
• TÜİK [Turkish Statistical Institute]. (2019, May 8). İstatistiklerle aile, 2024 [Family statistics, 2024]. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Statistics-on-Family-2018-30726&utm_source=chatgpt.com
• Ürkmez, B., Gedik, S., ve Güzen, M. (2023). Experiences of parents of children with ASD: Implications for ınclusive parental engagement. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 32(3), 951-964.
• Van Voorhis, F. L. (2003). Interactive homework in middle school: Effects on family engagement and science achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 96(6), 323–338.
• Wilder, S. (2023). Effects of parental involvement on academic achievement: a meta-synthesis. In J. Martin, M. Bowl, & G. Banks (Eds.), Mapping the field (pp. 137-157). Routledge.
• Yapıcı, Ş. (2010). Relationship between family and education in the Turkish society. Turkish Studies, 5(4), 1544-1570.