Civilian Powers and the Use of Force: The Evolution of Germany as a ‘Realist Civilian Power’

Abstract

Because of Germany’s rising economic and political clout not only in European but also in global politics, it is worth analysing the dynamics of change and continuity in Germany’s policy towards the use of force. This article aims to critically examine the evolution of Germany’s civilian power characteristics based on three case studies of Kosovo, Afghanistan, and the uprisings in the Middle East, by using the theoretical framework of realist constructivism. The article tries to answer the following research questions: To what extent has Germany been able to maintain its traditional peaceful foreign policy in the new “global disorder”? Which factors affect its decision to be involved or not in military interventions in various regional and global conflicts? What does the German case tell us about the evolution of civilian powers in the current global circumstances?

Keywords

• Realist Constructivism, Civilian Powers, Use of Force, Germany, Kosovo, Afghanistan, Libya.

References

1. Angela Merkel, “Deutschland weiss um seine Verantwortung in der Welt”, at https:// www.bundeskanzlerin.de/ContentArchiv/DE/Archiv17/Reden/2011/09/2011-09-09- rede-merkel-au%C3%9Fen-u-sicherheitspolitik.html (last visited 8 August 2017).
2. Frank-Walter Steinmeier, “Germany’s New Global Role. Berlin Steps Up”, Foreign Affairs, July-August 2016, at https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/europe/2016-06-13/ germany-s-new-global-role (last visited 15 August 2017).
3. The concept of national role conception is based on K. J. Holsti. He defines it as the perceptions of decisionmakers about appropriate kind of decisions, attitudes, and behaviours of their states. See K. J. Holsti, “National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 14, No. 3 (1970), pp. 233-309.
4. For an analysis of Japan’s changing foreign and security policy see Bahadır Pelivantürk, “From Peace State to Peacekeeping State: Japan’s Changing National Role Conception and Foreign Policy Norms”, Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 21, No. 1 (Spring 2016), pp. 63- 82.
5. Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe. A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign And Security Policy, European Union, at https://europa.eu/globalstrategy/ en/shared-vision-common-action-stronger-europe (last visited 14 August 2017).
6. Further information on EU missions is available at https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/ headquarters-homepage/430/military-and-civilian-missions-and-operations_en (last visited 10 August 2017).
7. Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) Factsheet, at https://eeas.europa.eu/ headquarters/headquarters-homepage_en/34226/Permanent%20Structured%20 Cooperation%20(PESCO)%20-%20Factsheet (last visited 13 December 2017).
8. J. Samuel Barkin, “Realist Constructivism”, International Studies Review, Vol. 5, No 3 (2003), pp. 325-342; J. Samuel Barkin, “Realist Constructivism and Realist- Constructivisms”, International Studies Review, Vol. 6, No 2 (2004), pp. 349- 352.

9. François Duchêne, “Europe’s Role in World Peace”, in Richard Mayne (ed.), Europe Tomorrow: Sixteen Europeans Look Ahead, London, Fontana, 1972, p. 47. 10 Ibid.
10. Duchêne, “Europe’s Role in World Peace”, p. 43.
11. François Duchêne, “The European Community and the Uncertainties of Interdependence”, in Max Kohnstamm and Wolfgang Hager (eds.), A Nation Writ Large, Foreign Policy Problems Before the European Community, London, Macmillan, 1973, pp. 19-20.
12. Hanns W. Maull, “Germany and Japan: The New Civilian Powers”, Foreign Affairs, pp. 92-93.
13. Maull, “Germany and Japan: The New Civilian Powers”, p. 93.
14. Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany, at https://www.cvce.eu/content/ publication/1999/1/1/7fa618bb-604e-4980-b667-76bf0cd0dd9b/publishable_en.pdf (last visited 4 August 2017). 16 Ibid.
15. Scott Erb, German Foreign Policy, p. 24.
16. For a personal account of Germany’s Westpolitik and its integration efforts see Konrad Adenauer, “Germany and the Problems of our Time”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 28, No. 2 (1952), pp. 156-161.
17. R. Newham, “Economic Linkage and Willy Brandt’s Ostpolitik: The Case of the Warsaw Treaty”, German Politics, Vol. 16, No. 2 (2007), pp. 247-263.
18. Wilfried von Bredow and Thomas Jäger, “Die Aussenpolitik Deutschlands, Alte Herausforderungen und neue Probleme”, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, No. B1-2/91, 4 January 1991, p. 37.
19. For a comprehensive discussion on normalisation-liberalisation debate see Birgül Demirtaş-Coşkun, “Systemic Changes and State Identity: Turkish and German Responses”, Insight Turkey, Vol. 10, No. 1 (2008), pp. 31-54; Birgül Demirtaş-Coşkun, Turkey, Germany and the Wars in Yugoslavia: A Search for Reconstruction of State Identities?, Berlin, Logos, 2006, pp. 128-136.
20. Demirtaş-Coşkun, “Systemic Changes and State Identity”, pp. 31-54; Demirtaş- Coşkun, Turkey, Germany and the Wars in Yugoslavia pp. 128-136.
21. John J. Mearscheimer, “Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After the Cold War”, International Security, Vol. 15, No. 4 (1990), pp. 5-56.
22. The decision of the German Constitutional Court is available at “Germany, Ruling on use of German troops outside of NATO Area”, Keesing’s Record of World Events, News Digest for July 1994, p. 40115, “Urteil des Bundesverfassunsgerichts zur Teilnahme der Bundeswehr an Kampfeinsätzen der UNO”, Archiv der Gegenwart, 20 July 1994, pp. 39155-39156; “Urteil des Bundesverfassunsgerichts über die Verfassungsbeschwerden gegen internationale Einsätze der Bundeswehr, verkündet in Karlsruhe am 12. Juli 1994”, Europa-Archiv, No. 15 (1994), pp. D 428- 431.
23. For analysis of the salami tactics in evolution of German foreign policy see Rainer Baumann and Gunther Hellmann, “Germany and the Use of Military Force: ‘Total War’, the ‘Culture of Restraint’ and the Quest for Normality”, in Douglas Webber (ed.), New Europe, New Germany, Old Foreign Policy?, London, Frank Cass, 2001, p. 64.
24. For a comprehensive discussion on the evolution of German foreign policy towards the Kosovo conflict see Birgül Demirtaş-Coşkun, Turkey, Germany and the Wars in Former Yugoslavia, A Search for Reconstruction of State Identities?, Berlin, Logos, 2006, pp. 283- 299.
25. Hanns W. Maull, “Germany and the Use of Force: Still a Civilian Power?”, Trierer Arbeitspapiere zur Internationalen Politik, No. 2 (November, 1999), p. 29, Footnote 57.
26. Hanns W. Maull, “Germany and the Use of Force: Still a Civilian Power?,” Survival, Vol. 42, No. 2 (Summer 2000): p. 77; Adrian Hyde-Price, “Germany and the Kosovo War: Still a Civilian Power,” German Politics, Vol. 10, No. 1 (April 2001), p. 32.
27. “Schröder lehnte Einsatz von Bodentruppen ab,” Süddeutsche Zeitung, 19 May 1999.
28. Quoted in Stephen F. Szabo, Parting Ways, The Crisis in German-American Relations, Washington D.C., Brookings Institution Press, 2004, p. 22; See also Hanns W. Maull, “Germany and the Use of Force: Still a Civilian Power”, ISA Convention, Montreal, 17- 20 March 2004.
29. For an analysis see Tuomas Forsberg, “German Foreign Policy and The War on Iraq: Anti-Americanism, Pacifism or Emancipation?”, Security Dialogue, Vol. 36, No 2 (2005), pp. 213- 231.
30. h t t p s : / / w w w. b u n d e s t a g . d e / d o k u m e n t e / t e x t a r c h i v / 3 2 2 4 7 4 3 0 _ misstrauensvotum06/203232 (last visited 13 December 2017).
31. “Die Sprüche des Peter Struck. Die Kann Mich Mal”, Spiegel Online, at http://www. spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/peter-struck-die-praegnantesten-zitate-a-873892.html (last visited 9 August 2017).
32. Weissbuch 2006 zur Sicherheitspolitik Deutschlands und zur Zukunft der Bundeswehr, at weissbuch2006/WB_2006.09.28.pdf, pp. 24-25 (last visited 1 August 2017).
33. It should be noted that the official website of the German Army does not indicate any number with regard to the number of casualties in the Kundus affair, just stating that “…the number of people killed or injured in the airstrike can not be clearly determined”; “2009. Ausgewählte Ereignisse des Jahres 2009 in chronologischer Reihenfolge”, at https://www.bundeswehr. de/portal/a/bwde/start/einsaetze/afghanistan/rueckblick/ ut/p/z1/hY4xD4IwFIR_ iwNrX4FYq1tNillh0KgRupgCtWgqWbVSf741jGq87d377nLAoQDeieGihLuYTuh
34. w15ycljTf58k8SaYZJZgd4i0hGGY3xisDxH8DDG_8Qw7BrJJShY_azgwYIOPC rGMQT9cY6LR0S9XshlK3oGi03pmajsQautKnG6ayrUqqAW3mWVlr0sMFun evviwhH2HuPlDFKS1SbG3I2wt9Srbk7KD5g6G-Fx-lUDzmbvABp5vcs/dz/d5/ L2dBISEvZ0FBIS9nQSEh/#Z7_B8LTL29225E860AU1Q66E81080 (last visited 8 August 2017).
35. Quoted in Timo Noetzel, “The German Politics of War: Kunduz and the War in Afghanistan”, International Affairs, Vol. 87, No. 2 (2011), p. 397. 38 Ibid., p. 401. 39 Ibid., p. 402.
36. Deutscher Bundestag, 210. Sitzung, Berlin, 22 December 2001, p. 20826.
37. “Regierungserklärung von Bundeskanzlerin Merkel zu den aktuellen Ereignissen in Afghanistan”, at https://www.bundesregierung.de/Content/DE/ Regierungserklaerung/2009/2009-09-08-regerkl-merkel-afghanistan.html (last visited 8 August 2017). 42 Ibid.
38. “Minister Jung Resigns Amid Afghanistan Airstrike Scandal”, Der Spiegel, 27 November 2009.
39. “German President Horst Köhler Resigns”, Der Spiegel, 31 May 2019.
40. “Tabu-Bruch, Guttenberg spricht von Krieg in Afghanistan”, Der Spiegel, 4 April 2010.
41. Baumann and Hellmann, “Germany and the Use of Military Force”.
42. Stephan Bierling, Vormacht Wider Willen, Deutsche Aussenpolitik von der Wiedervereinigung bis zur Gegenwart, Verlag C. H. Beck, München, 2014, p. 162.
43. Speech by the Federal Minister of Defence, Thomas de Maizière, on the occasion of the 49th Munich Security Conference, Munich, at https://www.securityconference. de/fileadmin/user_upload/data/pdf/2013-02-01_Mu%CC%88siKo_Englisch.pdf (last visited 11 August 2017).
44. Patrick Keller, “German Hard Power: Is There a There There?”, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, No. 4 (October 2013), at http://www.aei.org/ publication/german-hard-power-is-there-a-there-there/ (last visited 3 August 2017).
45. Timo Noetzel, “The German Politics of War: Kunduz and the War in Afghanistan”, International Affairs, Vol. 87, No. 2 (2011), p. 412
46. “62 Prozent der Deutschen für Militärschlag”, Die Welt, 20 March 2011.
47. “Germany’s Last Conscripts Report for Military Service”, at http://www.dw.com/en/ germanys-last-conscripts-report-for-military-service/a-14749220, 3 January 2011 (last visited 13 August 2017).
48. The full text of the Resolution 1973 of the UNSC is available at https://www.un.org/ press/en/2011/sc10200.doc.htm (last visited 14 August 2017). US, UK, France, Lebanon, Bosnia Herzegovina, Colombia, Portugal, Nigeria, South Africa and Gabon voted “yes”. Abstaining countries were Germany, China, Russia, Brazil and India.
49. Frank-Walter Steinmeier, “Germany’s New Global Role. Berlin Steps Up”, Foreign Affairs, July-August 2016, at https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/europe/2016-06-13/ germany-s-new-global-role (last visited 15 August 2017).
50. “Explanation of vote by Ambassador Wittig on the Security Council Resolution on Libya”, at Permanent Mission of Germany to the UN, New York, http://www.new- york-un.diplo.de/Vertretung/newyorkvn/en/__pr/speeches-statements/2011/20110317 _20Explanation_20of_20vote_20-_20Libya.html (last visited 14 August 2017).
51. Adrian G. V. Hyde-Price, “The ‘Sleep Walking Giant’ Awakes: Resetting German Foreign and Security Policy”, European Security, Vol. 24, No. 4 (2015), p. 601.
52. J. Wolff, “Democracy Promotion and Civillian Power: The Example of Germany’s ‘Value-Oriented’ Foreign Policy”, German Politics, Vol. 22, No. 4 (2013), pp. 477- 493.
53. Anonymous, “Almanya Kürtlere Silah Gönderiyor”, Deutsche Welle, at http://www. dw.com/tr/almanya-k%C3%BCrtlere-silah-g%C3%B6nderiyor/a-17892089 , (last visited 5 June 2016).
54. Douglas Peifer, “Why Germany Won’t Be Dropping Bombs on Syria, Iraq or Mali”, Orbis, Vol. 660, No. 2 (2016), pp. 266-279. Because of the vairous problems in Ankara- Berlin relations, Germany decided to withdraw its soldiers and military equipment from İncirlik and transfer them to a military base in Jordan. See, “Bundestag beschliesst Abzug der Bundeswehr aus İncirlik”, Deutsche Welle, at http://www.dw.com/de/bundestag- beschlie%C3%9Ft-abzug-der-bundeswehr-aus-incirlik/a-39341212 (last visited 25 June 2017).
55. “Deutsche Lehnen Staerkeres Engagement in der Welt Ab”, at http://www.spiegel. de/politik/deutschland/umfrage-deutsche-lehnen-auslandseinsaetze-der-bundeswehr- ab-a-970463.html (last visited 13 December 2017).
56. “SIPRI Arms Transfers Database”, at https://www.sipri.org/databases/armstransfers (last visited 13 December 2017); Aude Fleurant, Pieter D. Wezeman, Siemon T. Wezeman and Nan Tian, “Trends in International Arms Transfers”, at https://www.sipri.org/sites/ default/files/Trends-in-international-arms-transfers-2016.pdf (last visited 7 August 2017).