EN
The Validity And Reliability Of The Turkish Version Of The Online Counseling And Face-To-Face Counseling Attitudes Scale
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Online Counseling Attitudes Scale OCAS and Face-to-Face Counseling Attitudes Scale OCAS Rochlen, Beretvas, & Zack, 2004 . OCAS and FCAS loaded on four factors and the factors were named Value of Online Counseling OC-V , Discomfort with Online Counseling OC-D , Value of Face-to-Face Counseling FC-V and Discomfort with Face-to-Face Counseling FC-D . The results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the four dimensional model was well fit x²=323.61, df=157, p=0.00000, RMSEA=.056, NFI=.94, CFI=.96, IFI=.96, RFI=.92, GFI=.91, and SRMR=.071 . Factor loadings ranged from .47 to .88. The internal consistency coefficients of four subscales were .84, .80, .88 and .78. Overall, findings demonstrated that OCAS and FCAS may be used as a valid and reliable instrument in order to assess attitudes toward online counseling and face to face counseling of individuals.
Keywords
References
- Austin, D., & Kiropoulos, L. (2007). An Internet‐based investigation of the catastrophic misinterpretation model of panic disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22(2), 233–242. DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.01.013.
- Barak, A. (1999). Psychological applications on the internet: A discipline on the threshold of a new millennium.
- Applied and Preventive Psychology, 8, 231‐246. DOI: 10.1016/S0962‐1849(05)80038‐1.
- Barak, A., Hen, L., Boniel‐Nissim, M., & Shapira, N. (2008). A comprehensive review and a meta‐analysis of the effectiveness of internet‐based psychotherapeutic interventions. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 26, 109–60. DOI: 10.1080/15228830802094429.
- Beattie, A., Shaw, A., Kaur, S., & Kessler, D. (2009). Primary‐care patients expectations and experiences of online cognitive behavioral therapy for depression: a qualitative study. Blackwell Publishing Ltd Health Expectations, 12, 45–59. DOI: 10.1111/j.1369‐7625.2008.00531.x.
- Bentler, P. M. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 419‐456. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002223.
- Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588‐606. DOI: 10.1037/0033‐2909.88.3.588.
- Berger, T., Caspar, F., Richardson, R., Kneubühler, B., Sutter, D., & Andersson, G. (2011). Internet‐based treatment of social phobia: A randomized controlled trial comparing unguided with two types of guided self‐help. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49(3), 158‐169. DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.12.007.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
-
Publication Date
September 1, 2014
Submission Date
-
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2014 Volume: 1 Number: 1
APA
Demirci, İ., Şar, A. H., & Manap, A. (2014). The Validity And Reliability Of The Turkish Version Of The Online Counseling And Face-To-Face Counseling Attitudes Scale. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 1(1), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.17220/ijpes.2014.01.002
AMA
1.Demirci İ, Şar AH, Manap A. The Validity And Reliability Of The Turkish Version Of The Online Counseling And Face-To-Face Counseling Attitudes Scale. IJPES. 2014;1(1):15-22. doi:10.17220/ijpes.2014.01.002
Chicago
Demirci, İbrahim, Ali Haydar Şar, and Abdullah Manap. 2014. “The Validity And Reliability Of The Turkish Version Of The Online Counseling And Face-To-Face Counseling Attitudes Scale”. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies 1 (1): 15-22. https://doi.org/10.17220/ijpes.2014.01.002.
EndNote
Demirci İ, Şar AH, Manap A (September 1, 2014) The Validity And Reliability Of The Turkish Version Of The Online Counseling And Face-To-Face Counseling Attitudes Scale. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies 1 1 15–22.
IEEE
[1]İ. Demirci, A. H. Şar, and A. Manap, “The Validity And Reliability Of The Turkish Version Of The Online Counseling And Face-To-Face Counseling Attitudes Scale”, IJPES, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 15–22, Sept. 2014, doi: 10.17220/ijpes.2014.01.002.
ISNAD
Demirci, İbrahim - Şar, Ali Haydar - Manap, Abdullah. “The Validity And Reliability Of The Turkish Version Of The Online Counseling And Face-To-Face Counseling Attitudes Scale”. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies 1/1 (September 1, 2014): 15-22. https://doi.org/10.17220/ijpes.2014.01.002.
JAMA
1.Demirci İ, Şar AH, Manap A. The Validity And Reliability Of The Turkish Version Of The Online Counseling And Face-To-Face Counseling Attitudes Scale. IJPES. 2014;1:15–22.
MLA
Demirci, İbrahim, et al. “The Validity And Reliability Of The Turkish Version Of The Online Counseling And Face-To-Face Counseling Attitudes Scale”. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, Sept. 2014, pp. 15-22, doi:10.17220/ijpes.2014.01.002.
Vancouver
1.İbrahim Demirci, Ali Haydar Şar, Abdullah Manap. The Validity And Reliability Of The Turkish Version Of The Online Counseling And Face-To-Face Counseling Attitudes Scale. IJPES. 2014 Sep. 1;1(1):15-22. doi:10.17220/ijpes.2014.01.002