The Validity And Reliability Of The Turkish Version Of The Online Counseling And Face-To-Face Counseling Attitudes Scale

Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1 1 Eylül 2014
  • İbrahim Demirci
  • Ali Haydar Şar
  • Abdullah Manap
PDF İndir
EN

The Validity And Reliability Of The Turkish Version Of The Online Counseling And Face-To-Face Counseling Attitudes Scale

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Online Counseling Attitudes Scale OCAS and Face-to-Face Counseling Attitudes Scale OCAS Rochlen, Beretvas, & Zack, 2004 . OCAS and FCAS loaded on four factors and the factors were named Value of Online Counseling OC-V , Discomfort with Online Counseling OC-D , Value of Face-to-Face Counseling FC-V and Discomfort with Face-to-Face Counseling FC-D . The results of confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the four dimensional model was well fit x²=323.61, df=157, p=0.00000, RMSEA=.056, NFI=.94, CFI=.96, IFI=.96, RFI=.92, GFI=.91, and SRMR=.071 . Factor loadings ranged from .47 to .88. The internal consistency coefficients of four subscales were .84, .80, .88 and .78. Overall, findings demonstrated that OCAS and FCAS may be used as a valid and reliable instrument in order to assess attitudes toward online counseling and face to face counseling of individuals.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Austin, D., & Kiropoulos, L. (2007). An Internet‐based investigation of the catastrophic misinterpretation model of panic disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22(2), 233–242. DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.01.013.
  2. Barak, A. (1999). Psychological applications on the internet: A discipline on the threshold of a new millennium.
  3. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 8, 231‐246. DOI: 10.1016/S0962‐1849(05)80038‐1.
  4. Barak, A., Hen, L., Boniel‐Nissim, M., & Shapira, N. (2008). A comprehensive review and a meta‐analysis of the effectiveness of internet‐based psychotherapeutic interventions. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 26, 109–60. DOI: 10.1080/15228830802094429.
  5. Beattie, A., Shaw, A., Kaur, S., & Kessler, D. (2009). Primary‐care patients expectations and experiences of online cognitive behavioral therapy for depression: a qualitative study. Blackwell Publishing Ltd Health Expectations, 12, 45–59. DOI: 10.1111/j.1369‐7625.2008.00531.x.
  6. Bentler, P. M. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 419‐456. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002223.
  7. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588‐606. DOI: 10.1037/0033‐2909.88.3.588.
  8. Berger, T., Caspar, F., Richardson, R., Kneubühler, B., Sutter, D., & Andersson, G. (2011). Internet‐based treatment of social phobia: A randomized controlled trial comparing unguided with two types of guided self‐help. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49(3), 158‐169. DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.12.007.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

-

Yazarlar

İbrahim Demirci Bu kişi benim

Ali Haydar Şar Bu kişi benim

Abdullah Manap Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Eylül 2014

Gönderilme Tarihi

-

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2014 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Demirci, İ., Şar, A. H., & Manap, A. (2014). The Validity And Reliability Of The Turkish Version Of The Online Counseling And Face-To-Face Counseling Attitudes Scale. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 1(1), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.17220/ijpes.2014.01.002