Adaptation of the Short Form of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory to Turkish

Year 2020, Volume: 7 Issue: 3, 26 - 33, 12.09.2020

İbrahim Duman , Mehmet Barış Horzum , Christoph Randler

Abstract

Intrinsic motivation has a crucial role in students’ learning and should therefore be taken into
consideration in educational activities. In this study, the short scale of intrinsic motivation scale
developed by Wilde et al. in 2009 was adapted to Turkish Culture. This is an intrinsic motivation
scale, which is an adapted, time-economic version of the “Intrinsic Motivation Inventory” introduced
by Deci and Ryan. The short scale has four factors, namely interest/enjoyment, perceived
competence, perceived choice and pressure/tension with three items each. Data were collected from
230 high school students in two public high schools in Northwestern Turkey in order to analyze the
scale's factorial and construct validity. The linguistic equivalence step was carried out by consulting
expert opinion because intrinsic motivation differs from one context to another. Results from a
confirmatory factor analysis, construct validity and tests for reliability showed that its version
adapted to Turkish is a good and time-saving assessment tool for measuring intrinsic motivation during lessons.

Keywords

Motivation, Intrinsic Motivation, Adaptation, Inventory.

References

• Akgun, S., & Ciarrochi, J. (2003). Learned resourcefulness moderates the relationship between academic stress and academic performance. Educational Psychology, 23(3), 287-294. doi: 10.1080/0144341032000060129
• Amabile, T., Hill, K.G., Hennesey, B.A., Tighe, E.M. (1994). The work preference inventory: Assesing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 950- 967.
• Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94. Başaran, İ. E. (1982). Örgütsel davranış: Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi yayınları.
• Bentler, P. M. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual review of psychology, 31(1), 419-456.
• Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological bulletin, 88(3), 588.
• Brophy, J. (1983). Conceptualizing student motivation. Educational Psychologist, Vol. 18, 200-215.
• Brown, M., & Cudeck, R. (1993). EQS structural equations program manual. Multivariate Software Inc., Los Angeles.
• Byrne, B. M., & Campbell, T. L. (1999). Cross-cultural comparisons and the presumption of equivalent measurement and theoretical structure: A look beneath the surface. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30(5), 555-574.
• Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
• Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (Eds.) (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester:University of Rochester.
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). Intrinsic motivation inventory. Self-determination theory, 267.
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of marketing research, 18(3), 382-388.
• Gagne, M. & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362. doi: 10.1002/job.322
• Gagné, M., Forest, J., Gilbert, M., Aubé, C., Morin, E. & Angela, M. (2010). The motivation at work scale: Validation evidence in two languages. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(4), 628-646. doi: 10.1177/0013164409355698
• Genç, N. (2012). Yönetim ve organizasyon: Çağdaş sistemler ve yaklaşımlar (4. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S. and Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of educational psychology, 93(1), 3-13. doi: 10.1037//0022-0663.93.1.3
• Hambleton, R. K. (2005). Issues, Designs and Technical Guidelines for Adapting Tests Into Multiple Languages and Cultures. In R. K. Hambleton, P. F. Merenda and C. D. Spielberger (Eds.). Adapting Psychological and Educational Tests for Cross-Cultural Assessment. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Heckhausen, H. (1991). Motivation and action. New York: Springer.
• Jöreskog, K. & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International/Erlbaum.
• Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., Artelt, C., Baumert, J., & Peschar, J. L. (2006). OECD's brief self-report measure of educational psychology's most useful affective constructs: Cross-cultural, psychometric comparisons across 25 countries. International Journal of Testing, 6(4), 311-360.
• Mayo, R.J. (1976). The development and construct validation of a measure of intrinsic motivation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University.
• Moldovan, O. D. (2014). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation to primary school children. J Educatia Plus, 10(1), 203-211.
• Mottaz, C.J. (1985). The relative importance of intrinsic and extrinsic rewards as determinants of work satisfaction, Sociological Quartely, 26(3), 365-385.
• Pintrich, P. R. & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice-Hall.
• Randler, C., Hummel, E., Glaser-Zikuda, M., Vollmer, C., Bogner, F. X., & Mayring, P. (2011). Reliability and Validation of a Short Scale to Measure Situational Emotions in Science Education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 6(4), 359-370.
• Richard, P. B., & Youjae, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.
• Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67. doi:10.1006/ceos,1999.1020.
• Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of psychological research online, 8(2), 23-74.
• Snow, R.E. & Farr, M.J. (1983). Cognitive-affective processes in aptitude, learning, and instruction: An introduction. Conative and affective process analysis, 3, 1-10
• Vallerand, R. J. & Ratelle, C. F. (2002). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A hierarchical model. Handbook of self-determination research, 128, 37-63.
• Wilde, M., Bätz, K., Kovaleva, A., & Urhahne, D. (2009). Überprüfung einer Kurzskala intrinsischer Motivation (KIM). Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 15: 31-45.
• Wüst-Ackermann, P., Vollmer, C., Itzek-Greulich, H., & Randler, C. (2018). Invertebrate disgust reduction in and out of school and its effects on state intrinsic motivation. Palgrave Communications, 4(1), 1-9. doi: 10.1057/s41599-018-0122-8