Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Pore Characterization of Volcanic Tuffs Used as Building Stone in Afyonkarahisar (Turkey)

Year 2018, , 101 - 112, 31.03.2018
https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.385929

Abstract

The tuffs have been used as a
building material for hundreds of years. The physical and mechanical properties
of tuffs are affected by the amount of pore and its geometry. The pore
characteristics of the building natural stone of Seydiler and Ayazini
(Afyonkarahisar-Turkey) tuffs were investigated in this article. For
determination of the mineralogical and petrographical properties of the tuff; a
polarizing optical microscope, X-ray diffractometry and scanning electron
microscope (SEM) were used. Tuffs are composed of a mineral assemblage of
various crystals including quartz, feldspar; mafic mineral is biotite and rock
particles with glass cement. SEM images show the presence of numerous voids in
tuffs. The mean value of effective porosity of the Ayazini and Seydiler tuffs
was 37.3% and 36.0%. Mercury porosimetry was used to determine the pore size
distribution. Ayazini tuffs have pore sizes ranging from about 200.000 to 10 nm
and Seydiler tuffs ranging from about 7.000 to 10 nm.  

References

  • [1] Yasar E., Tolgay A. and Teymen A., “Industrial usage of Nevsehir-Kayseri (Turkey) tuff stone”, World Appl Sci J, 7(3):271-284, (2009).
  • [2] Francalanci L., Innocenti F., Manetti P. and Savaşçın M.Y., “Neogene alkaline volcanism of the Afyon – Isparta area, Turkey: petrogenesis and geodynamic implications”, Miner Petrol, 70:285-312, (2000).
  • [3] Yıldırım D. and Altunkaynak Ş., Geochemistry of Neogene-Quaternary alkaline volcanism in western Anatolia, Turkey and implications for the Aegean mantle, Int Geol Rev, 52:579-607, (2010).
  • [4] Besang C., Eckhardt F.J., Harre W., Kreuzer H. and Muller P. “Radiometricshe altersbestimmungen an Neogenen eruptivgesteinen der Turkei”, Geol Jb B, 25:3-36, (1977)
  • [5] Keller J. and Villari L., “Rhyolitic ignimbrites in the region of Afyon (Central Anatolia)”, Bull Volcan, 36:342-358, (1972).
  • [6] Metin S., Genç Ş. and Bulut V., “The geology of Afyon”, MTA Report Nu: 8103, (not Published) (in Turkish), (1987).
  • [7] Kavas T. and Çelik M.Y., “Usability of the Ayazini (Afyon) tuffs as trass material for cement production”, Madencilik, 40(2-3):39-46. (in Turkish), (2001).
  • [8] Kuşçu M. and Yıldız A., “Usability of the Ayazini (Afyon) tuffs as building stone”, Turkey III. Marble Symposium Afyon, 85-98, (in Turkish), (2001).
  • [9] Demir İ., Başpınar M.S. and Görhan G., “Mechanical properties of the natural construction stone of Ayazini Tuffs-Afyonkarahisar”, MERSEM’2006 Turkey V. Marble and Natural Stone Symposium, 31-38. (in Turkish), (2006).
  • [10] Tuğrul A., “The effect of weathering on pore geometry and compressive strength of selected rock types from Turkey”, Eng Geol, 75:215-227, (2004).
  • [11] Torok A., Forgo L.Z., Vogt T., Lobens S., Siegesmund S. and Weiss, T. “The influence of lithology and pore-size distribution on the durability of acid volcanic tuffs, Hungary”, Spec Publ Geol Soc Lond, 271:251-260, (2007).
  • [12] Topal T. and Doyuran V. “Analyses of deterioration of the Cappadocian tuff, Turkey”, Environ Geol, 34(1):5-20, (1998).
  • [13] Topal T. and Sözmen B. “Deterioration mechanisms of tuffs in Midas Monument”, Eng Geol, 68:201-223, (2003).
  • [14] Chen T.C., Yeung M.R. and Mori N., “Effect of water saturation on deterioration of welded tuff due to freeze–thaw action”, Cold Reg Sci Technol, 38:127–136, (2004).
  • [15] Steindlberger E., “Volcanic tuffs from Hesse (Germany) and their weathering behavior”, Environ Geol, 46:378-390, (2004).
  • [16] Erguler Z.A., “Field-based experimental determination of the weathering rates of the Cappadocian tuffs”, Eng Geol, 105:186-199, (2009).
  • [17] Yavuz A.B., “Durability assessment of the Alaçatı tuff (Izmir) in western Turkey”, Environ Earth Sci, 67:1909-1925, (2012).
  • [18] Topal T. and Doyuran V., “Engineering geological properties and durability assessment of the Cappadocian tuff”, Eng Geol, Vol.47(1-2):175-187, (1997).
  • [19. Chigira M., Nakamoto M. and Nakata E., “Weathering mechanisms and their effects on the landsliding of ignimbrite subject to vapor-phase crystallization in the Shirakawa pyroclastic flow, Northern Japan”, Eng Geol, 66:111-125, (2002).
  • [20] Entwisle D.C., Hobbs P.R.N., Jones L.D., Gunn D. and Raines M.G., “The relationships between effective porosity, uniaxial compressive strength and sonic velocity of intact Borrowdale volcanic group core samples from Sellafield”, Geotech Geol Eng, 23:793-809, (2005).
  • [21] Emir E., Konuk A. and Daloğlu G., “Strength enhancement of Eskisehir tuff ashlars in Turkey”, Constr Build Mater, 25(7):3014-3019, (2011).
  • [22] Pola A., Crosta G.B., Fusi N., Barberini V., Norini G. and Pola Villasenor A., “Influence of alteration on physical properties of volcanic rocks”, Tectonophysics, 566–567:67-86, (2012).
  • [23] Palchik V., “Influence of porosity and elastic modulus on uniaxial compressive strength insoft brittle porous sandstones”, Rock Mech Rock Eng, 32(4):303–309, (1999).
  • [24] Vásárhelyi B., “Influence of the water saturation on the strength of volcanic tuffs”, ISRM International Symposium - EUROCK 2002, November 25 - 27, 2002; Madeira, Portugal, (2002).
  • [25] Palchik V. and Hatzor Y.H., “The influence of porosity on tensile and compressive strength of porous chalk”, Rock Mech Rock Eng, 37(4):331–341, (2004).
  • [26] Kahraman S., Gunaydin O. and Fener M., “The effect of porosity on the relation between uniaxial compressive strength and point load index”, Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 42(4):584-589, (2005).
  • [27] Vasarhelyi B. and Van P., “Influence of Water Content on the Strength of Rock”, Eng Geol, 84:70–74, (2006).
  • [28] Ju Y., Yang Y.M., Song Z.D. and Xu WJ., “A statistical model for porous structure of rocks”, Sci China Ser E, 51:11:2040-2058, (2008).
  • [29] Nimmo J.R., “Porosity and pore size distribution”. in: Hillel D, ed. Encyclopedia of soils in the Environment, London: Elsevier, 3:295-303, (2004).
  • [30] Fakhimi A. and Alavi Gharahbagh E., “Discrete element analysis of the effect of pore size and pore distribution on the mechanical behavior of rock”, Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 48(1):77-85, (2011).
  • [31] Ritter H.L. and Drake L.C., “Pore-size distribution in porous materials: pressure porosimeter and determinations of complete macropore-size distribution”, Ind Eng Chem Anal Ed, 17:782, (1945).
  • [32] Pickell J.J., Swanson B.F. and Hickman W.B., “Application of air mercury and oil-air capillary pressure data in the study of pore structure and fluid distribution”, Soc Petrol Eng, J, 237:55-61, (1966).
  • [33] Klavetter E.A. and Peters R.R., “An evaluation of the use of mercury porosimetry in calculating hydrologic properties of tuffs from Yucca Mountain, Nevada”, SAND86-0286, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, (1987).
  • [34] Vogt G.T., “Porosity, pore-size distribution and pore surface area of Apache Leap Tuff near Superior, Arizona using mercury intrusion”, Unpublished master's thesis, Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson, 130 p. (1988).
  • [35] Nwaubani S.O., Mulheron M., Tilly G.P. and Schwamborn B., “Pore-structure and water transport properties of surface-treated building stones”, Mater Struct, 33:198-206, (2000).
  • [36] Roels S., Elsen J., Carmeliet J. and Hens H., “Characterisation of pore structure by combining mercury porosimetry and micrography”, Mater Struct, 34(2):76-82, (2001).
  • [37] Schoelkopf J., Gane P.A.C., Ridgway C.J. and Matthews G.P., “Practical observation of deviation from Lucas-Washburn scaling in porous media”, Colloid Surface Physicochem Eng Aspect, 206:445-454, (2002).
  • [38] Yang C.C. and Chiang C.T., “On the relationship between pore structure and charge passed from RCPT in mineral-free cement-based materials”, Mater Chem Phys, 93(1):202-207, (2005).
  • [39] Šperl J. and Trčková J., “Permeability and porosity of rocks and their relationship based on laboratory testing”, Acta Geodyn Geomater, 5(149):41-47, (2008).
  • [40] Angeli M., Benavente D., Bigas J.P., Menéndez B., Hébert R. and David C., “Modification of the porous network by salt crystallization in experimentally weathered sedimentary stones”, Mater Struct, 41(6):1091–1108, (2008).
  • [41] García-Del-Cura M.A., Benavente D., Martínez-Martínez J. and Cueto N., “Sedimentary structures and physical properties in travertine and carbonate tufa building stone”, Constr Build Mater, 28:456-467, (2012).
  • [42] Vacchiano C.D., Incarnato L., Scarfato P., Acierno D., “Conservation of tuff-stone with polymeric resins”, Constr Build Mater, 22(5):855-865, (2008).
  • [43] Anselmetti F.S., Luthi S. and Eberli G.P., “Quantitative characterization of carbonate pore systems by digital image analysis”, AAPG Bulletin, 82(10):1815–1836, (1991).
  • [44] Abell A.B., Willis K.L. and Lange D.A., “Mercury Intrusion porosimetry and image analysis of cement-based materials”, J Colloid Interf Sci, 211:39-44, (1999).
  • [45] Atzeni C., Sanna U. and Spanu N., “Some mechanisms of microstructure weakening in high-porous calcareous stones”, Mater Struct, 39:525–531, (2006).
  • [46] Lu S., Landis E.N. and Keane D.T., (2006) “X-ray microtomographic studies of pore structure and permeability in Portland cement concrete”, Mater Struct, 39:611–620,
  • [47] Loucks R.G., Reed R.M., Ruppel S.C. and Jarvie D.M., “Morphology, genesis and distribution of nanometer-scale pores in siliceous mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett shale”, J Sediment Res, 79:848-861, (2009).
  • [48] De La Fuente S., Cuadros J., Fiore S. and Linares J., “Electron microscopy study of volcanic tuff alteration to illite-smectite under hydrothermal conditions”, Clays Clay Miner, 48:339–50, (2000).
  • [49] Liu C., Shi B., Zhou J. and Tang C., “Quantification and characterization of microporosity by image processing, geometric measurement and statistical methods: application on SEM images of clay materials”, Appl Clay Sci, 54(1):97-106, (2011).
  • [50] Giesche H., “Mercury porosimetry: A general (Practical) overview”, Part Syst Char, 23:1-11, (2006).
  • [51] Klobes P., Meyer K., Munro R.G., “Porosity and specific surface area measurements for solid materials”, NIST Recommended Practice Guided, Special Publication, 960-17, (2006).
  • [52] Sing K.S.W., Everett D.H., Haul R.A.W., Moscou L., Pierotti R.A. and Rouquerol Jiemieniewska T., “Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity”, Pure Appl Chem, 57(4):603-619, (1985).
  • [53] Ergül A., “Investigation of the effect on physico-mechanic characteristics of the water content dependent upon porosity in the tuffs used as a building stone in Afyonkarahisar”, Master of Science Thesis, Afyon Kocatepe University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science, Mining Engineering Department, 117p. (Unpublished). (2009).
  • [54] Webb P.A. and Orr C., “Analytical methods in fine particle technology”, Micromeritics Instrument Corporation, Norcross, 303 p. (1997).

Pore Characterization of Volcanic Tuffs Used as Building Stone in Afyonkarahisar (Turkey)

Year 2018, , 101 - 112, 31.03.2018
https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.385929

Abstract

The tuffs have been used as a
building material for hundreds of years. The physical and mechanical properties
of tuffs are affected by the amount of pore and its geometry. The pore
characteristics of the building natural stone of Seydiler and Ayazini
(Afyonkarahisar-Turkey) tuffs were investigated in this article. For
determination of the mineralogical and petrographical properties of the tuff; a
polarizing optical microscope, X-ray diffractometry and scanning electron
microscope (SEM) were used. Tuffs are composed of a mineral assemblage of
various crystals including quartz, feldspar; mafic mineral is biotite and rock
particles with glass cement. SEM images show the presence of numerous voids in
tuffs. The mean value of effective porosity of the Ayazini and Seydiler tuffs
was 37.3% and 36.0%. Mercury porosimetry was used to determine the pore size
distribution. Ayazini tuffs have pore sizes ranging from about 200.000 to 10 nm
and Seydiler tuffs ranging from about 7.000 to 10 nm.  

References

  • [1] Yasar E., Tolgay A. and Teymen A., “Industrial usage of Nevsehir-Kayseri (Turkey) tuff stone”, World Appl Sci J, 7(3):271-284, (2009).
  • [2] Francalanci L., Innocenti F., Manetti P. and Savaşçın M.Y., “Neogene alkaline volcanism of the Afyon – Isparta area, Turkey: petrogenesis and geodynamic implications”, Miner Petrol, 70:285-312, (2000).
  • [3] Yıldırım D. and Altunkaynak Ş., Geochemistry of Neogene-Quaternary alkaline volcanism in western Anatolia, Turkey and implications for the Aegean mantle, Int Geol Rev, 52:579-607, (2010).
  • [4] Besang C., Eckhardt F.J., Harre W., Kreuzer H. and Muller P. “Radiometricshe altersbestimmungen an Neogenen eruptivgesteinen der Turkei”, Geol Jb B, 25:3-36, (1977)
  • [5] Keller J. and Villari L., “Rhyolitic ignimbrites in the region of Afyon (Central Anatolia)”, Bull Volcan, 36:342-358, (1972).
  • [6] Metin S., Genç Ş. and Bulut V., “The geology of Afyon”, MTA Report Nu: 8103, (not Published) (in Turkish), (1987).
  • [7] Kavas T. and Çelik M.Y., “Usability of the Ayazini (Afyon) tuffs as trass material for cement production”, Madencilik, 40(2-3):39-46. (in Turkish), (2001).
  • [8] Kuşçu M. and Yıldız A., “Usability of the Ayazini (Afyon) tuffs as building stone”, Turkey III. Marble Symposium Afyon, 85-98, (in Turkish), (2001).
  • [9] Demir İ., Başpınar M.S. and Görhan G., “Mechanical properties of the natural construction stone of Ayazini Tuffs-Afyonkarahisar”, MERSEM’2006 Turkey V. Marble and Natural Stone Symposium, 31-38. (in Turkish), (2006).
  • [10] Tuğrul A., “The effect of weathering on pore geometry and compressive strength of selected rock types from Turkey”, Eng Geol, 75:215-227, (2004).
  • [11] Torok A., Forgo L.Z., Vogt T., Lobens S., Siegesmund S. and Weiss, T. “The influence of lithology and pore-size distribution on the durability of acid volcanic tuffs, Hungary”, Spec Publ Geol Soc Lond, 271:251-260, (2007).
  • [12] Topal T. and Doyuran V. “Analyses of deterioration of the Cappadocian tuff, Turkey”, Environ Geol, 34(1):5-20, (1998).
  • [13] Topal T. and Sözmen B. “Deterioration mechanisms of tuffs in Midas Monument”, Eng Geol, 68:201-223, (2003).
  • [14] Chen T.C., Yeung M.R. and Mori N., “Effect of water saturation on deterioration of welded tuff due to freeze–thaw action”, Cold Reg Sci Technol, 38:127–136, (2004).
  • [15] Steindlberger E., “Volcanic tuffs from Hesse (Germany) and their weathering behavior”, Environ Geol, 46:378-390, (2004).
  • [16] Erguler Z.A., “Field-based experimental determination of the weathering rates of the Cappadocian tuffs”, Eng Geol, 105:186-199, (2009).
  • [17] Yavuz A.B., “Durability assessment of the Alaçatı tuff (Izmir) in western Turkey”, Environ Earth Sci, 67:1909-1925, (2012).
  • [18] Topal T. and Doyuran V., “Engineering geological properties and durability assessment of the Cappadocian tuff”, Eng Geol, Vol.47(1-2):175-187, (1997).
  • [19. Chigira M., Nakamoto M. and Nakata E., “Weathering mechanisms and their effects on the landsliding of ignimbrite subject to vapor-phase crystallization in the Shirakawa pyroclastic flow, Northern Japan”, Eng Geol, 66:111-125, (2002).
  • [20] Entwisle D.C., Hobbs P.R.N., Jones L.D., Gunn D. and Raines M.G., “The relationships between effective porosity, uniaxial compressive strength and sonic velocity of intact Borrowdale volcanic group core samples from Sellafield”, Geotech Geol Eng, 23:793-809, (2005).
  • [21] Emir E., Konuk A. and Daloğlu G., “Strength enhancement of Eskisehir tuff ashlars in Turkey”, Constr Build Mater, 25(7):3014-3019, (2011).
  • [22] Pola A., Crosta G.B., Fusi N., Barberini V., Norini G. and Pola Villasenor A., “Influence of alteration on physical properties of volcanic rocks”, Tectonophysics, 566–567:67-86, (2012).
  • [23] Palchik V., “Influence of porosity and elastic modulus on uniaxial compressive strength insoft brittle porous sandstones”, Rock Mech Rock Eng, 32(4):303–309, (1999).
  • [24] Vásárhelyi B., “Influence of the water saturation on the strength of volcanic tuffs”, ISRM International Symposium - EUROCK 2002, November 25 - 27, 2002; Madeira, Portugal, (2002).
  • [25] Palchik V. and Hatzor Y.H., “The influence of porosity on tensile and compressive strength of porous chalk”, Rock Mech Rock Eng, 37(4):331–341, (2004).
  • [26] Kahraman S., Gunaydin O. and Fener M., “The effect of porosity on the relation between uniaxial compressive strength and point load index”, Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 42(4):584-589, (2005).
  • [27] Vasarhelyi B. and Van P., “Influence of Water Content on the Strength of Rock”, Eng Geol, 84:70–74, (2006).
  • [28] Ju Y., Yang Y.M., Song Z.D. and Xu WJ., “A statistical model for porous structure of rocks”, Sci China Ser E, 51:11:2040-2058, (2008).
  • [29] Nimmo J.R., “Porosity and pore size distribution”. in: Hillel D, ed. Encyclopedia of soils in the Environment, London: Elsevier, 3:295-303, (2004).
  • [30] Fakhimi A. and Alavi Gharahbagh E., “Discrete element analysis of the effect of pore size and pore distribution on the mechanical behavior of rock”, Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 48(1):77-85, (2011).
  • [31] Ritter H.L. and Drake L.C., “Pore-size distribution in porous materials: pressure porosimeter and determinations of complete macropore-size distribution”, Ind Eng Chem Anal Ed, 17:782, (1945).
  • [32] Pickell J.J., Swanson B.F. and Hickman W.B., “Application of air mercury and oil-air capillary pressure data in the study of pore structure and fluid distribution”, Soc Petrol Eng, J, 237:55-61, (1966).
  • [33] Klavetter E.A. and Peters R.R., “An evaluation of the use of mercury porosimetry in calculating hydrologic properties of tuffs from Yucca Mountain, Nevada”, SAND86-0286, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, (1987).
  • [34] Vogt G.T., “Porosity, pore-size distribution and pore surface area of Apache Leap Tuff near Superior, Arizona using mercury intrusion”, Unpublished master's thesis, Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson, 130 p. (1988).
  • [35] Nwaubani S.O., Mulheron M., Tilly G.P. and Schwamborn B., “Pore-structure and water transport properties of surface-treated building stones”, Mater Struct, 33:198-206, (2000).
  • [36] Roels S., Elsen J., Carmeliet J. and Hens H., “Characterisation of pore structure by combining mercury porosimetry and micrography”, Mater Struct, 34(2):76-82, (2001).
  • [37] Schoelkopf J., Gane P.A.C., Ridgway C.J. and Matthews G.P., “Practical observation of deviation from Lucas-Washburn scaling in porous media”, Colloid Surface Physicochem Eng Aspect, 206:445-454, (2002).
  • [38] Yang C.C. and Chiang C.T., “On the relationship between pore structure and charge passed from RCPT in mineral-free cement-based materials”, Mater Chem Phys, 93(1):202-207, (2005).
  • [39] Šperl J. and Trčková J., “Permeability and porosity of rocks and their relationship based on laboratory testing”, Acta Geodyn Geomater, 5(149):41-47, (2008).
  • [40] Angeli M., Benavente D., Bigas J.P., Menéndez B., Hébert R. and David C., “Modification of the porous network by salt crystallization in experimentally weathered sedimentary stones”, Mater Struct, 41(6):1091–1108, (2008).
  • [41] García-Del-Cura M.A., Benavente D., Martínez-Martínez J. and Cueto N., “Sedimentary structures and physical properties in travertine and carbonate tufa building stone”, Constr Build Mater, 28:456-467, (2012).
  • [42] Vacchiano C.D., Incarnato L., Scarfato P., Acierno D., “Conservation of tuff-stone with polymeric resins”, Constr Build Mater, 22(5):855-865, (2008).
  • [43] Anselmetti F.S., Luthi S. and Eberli G.P., “Quantitative characterization of carbonate pore systems by digital image analysis”, AAPG Bulletin, 82(10):1815–1836, (1991).
  • [44] Abell A.B., Willis K.L. and Lange D.A., “Mercury Intrusion porosimetry and image analysis of cement-based materials”, J Colloid Interf Sci, 211:39-44, (1999).
  • [45] Atzeni C., Sanna U. and Spanu N., “Some mechanisms of microstructure weakening in high-porous calcareous stones”, Mater Struct, 39:525–531, (2006).
  • [46] Lu S., Landis E.N. and Keane D.T., (2006) “X-ray microtomographic studies of pore structure and permeability in Portland cement concrete”, Mater Struct, 39:611–620,
  • [47] Loucks R.G., Reed R.M., Ruppel S.C. and Jarvie D.M., “Morphology, genesis and distribution of nanometer-scale pores in siliceous mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett shale”, J Sediment Res, 79:848-861, (2009).
  • [48] De La Fuente S., Cuadros J., Fiore S. and Linares J., “Electron microscopy study of volcanic tuff alteration to illite-smectite under hydrothermal conditions”, Clays Clay Miner, 48:339–50, (2000).
  • [49] Liu C., Shi B., Zhou J. and Tang C., “Quantification and characterization of microporosity by image processing, geometric measurement and statistical methods: application on SEM images of clay materials”, Appl Clay Sci, 54(1):97-106, (2011).
  • [50] Giesche H., “Mercury porosimetry: A general (Practical) overview”, Part Syst Char, 23:1-11, (2006).
  • [51] Klobes P., Meyer K., Munro R.G., “Porosity and specific surface area measurements for solid materials”, NIST Recommended Practice Guided, Special Publication, 960-17, (2006).
  • [52] Sing K.S.W., Everett D.H., Haul R.A.W., Moscou L., Pierotti R.A. and Rouquerol Jiemieniewska T., “Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity”, Pure Appl Chem, 57(4):603-619, (1985).
  • [53] Ergül A., “Investigation of the effect on physico-mechanic characteristics of the water content dependent upon porosity in the tuffs used as a building stone in Afyonkarahisar”, Master of Science Thesis, Afyon Kocatepe University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science, Mining Engineering Department, 117p. (Unpublished). (2009).
  • [54] Webb P.A. and Orr C., “Analytical methods in fine particle technology”, Micromeritics Instrument Corporation, Norcross, 303 p. (1997).
There are 54 citations in total.

Details

Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Mustafa Yavuz Çelik

Ayşe Ergül This is me

Publication Date March 31, 2018
Submission Date January 8, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2018

Cite

APA Çelik, M. Y., & Ergül, A. (2018). Pore Characterization of Volcanic Tuffs Used as Building Stone in Afyonkarahisar (Turkey). Politeknik Dergisi, 21(1), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.385929
AMA Çelik MY, Ergül A. Pore Characterization of Volcanic Tuffs Used as Building Stone in Afyonkarahisar (Turkey). Politeknik Dergisi. March 2018;21(1):101-112. doi:10.2339/politeknik.385929
Chicago Çelik, Mustafa Yavuz, and Ayşe Ergül. “Pore Characterization of Volcanic Tuffs Used As Building Stone in Afyonkarahisar (Turkey)”. Politeknik Dergisi 21, no. 1 (March 2018): 101-12. https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.385929.
EndNote Çelik MY, Ergül A (March 1, 2018) Pore Characterization of Volcanic Tuffs Used as Building Stone in Afyonkarahisar (Turkey). Politeknik Dergisi 21 1 101–112.
IEEE M. Y. Çelik and A. Ergül, “Pore Characterization of Volcanic Tuffs Used as Building Stone in Afyonkarahisar (Turkey)”, Politeknik Dergisi, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 101–112, 2018, doi: 10.2339/politeknik.385929.
ISNAD Çelik, Mustafa Yavuz - Ergül, Ayşe. “Pore Characterization of Volcanic Tuffs Used As Building Stone in Afyonkarahisar (Turkey)”. Politeknik Dergisi 21/1 (March 2018), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.385929.
JAMA Çelik MY, Ergül A. Pore Characterization of Volcanic Tuffs Used as Building Stone in Afyonkarahisar (Turkey). Politeknik Dergisi. 2018;21:101–112.
MLA Çelik, Mustafa Yavuz and Ayşe Ergül. “Pore Characterization of Volcanic Tuffs Used As Building Stone in Afyonkarahisar (Turkey)”. Politeknik Dergisi, vol. 21, no. 1, 2018, pp. 101-12, doi:10.2339/politeknik.385929.
Vancouver Çelik MY, Ergül A. Pore Characterization of Volcanic Tuffs Used as Building Stone in Afyonkarahisar (Turkey). Politeknik Dergisi. 2018;21(1):101-12.
 
TARANDIĞIMIZ DİZİNLER (ABSTRACTING / INDEXING)
181341319013191 13189 13187 13188 18016 

download Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-AynıLisanslaPaylaş 4.0 Uluslararası ile lisanslanmıştır.