Assessment of Energy Performance of Buildings Constructed in Different Regions of Turkey According to European Specification

Year 2018, , 581 - 586, 01.09.2018

Gökhan Durmuş , Sadık Önal

https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.450411

Abstract

In this study, the complex of buildings built in Turkey's eastern and western regions (Kırklareli- Pehlivanköy, and Gaziantep-Oğuzeli) energy performance levels was investigated according to European specification. To determine these levels were used Building Energy Performance (BEP) program. It is a software that has been in force the protection of the environment and limitation of greenhouse gas emissions regarding primary energy and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions of buildings, according to "Energy Performance Regulations at Buildings" of the Ministry of Environment and Urban Plannings since 2010. Building geometry, heating, lighting, ventilation, mechanical and technical values project data is entered into the program. It has been identified what the amount of energy required by the building through the program, daylighting needs for areas where the effectiveness of energy utilization daylight time from light and carbon emissions is. After all, under EU norms, evaluation of energy certification of buildings built in different regions of all energy, fuel costs, climate and regional differences revealed that changes were explained. A result, energy data of Gaziantep reception center which was built in Turkey's southeastern is lower than 8% energy data of Kırklareli reception center which was made in Turkey's region of Thrace. However, when looking at the results obtained carbon emissions, lighting, ventilation and hot water systems has been shown to occur in the near value for the two centers. It has been observed that there are differences in heating and cooling systems.

Keywords

Energy performance of buildings, building energy performance program (bep- tr). quantity of net energy building, energy identity certificate

References

• [1] Doukas H, Nychtis C, Psarras J. “Assessing energy-saving measures in buildings through an intelligent decision support model”, Building and Environment, 44: 290-298, (2009).
• [2] Bordass B, Cohen R, Standeven M, Leaman A. “Assessing building performance in use 3: energy performance of the Probe buildings”, Building Research & Information, 29: 114-12, (2001).
• [3] Wang S, Yan C, Xiao F. Quantitative energy performance assessment methods for existing buildings, Energy and Buildings, 55: 873-888, (2012).
• [4] Dascalaki EG, Droutsa KG, Balaras CA, Kontoyiannidis S. “Building typologies as a tool for assessing the energy performance of residential buildings – A case study for the Hellenic building stock”, Energy and Buildings, 43: 3400-3409, (2011).
• [5] Menezes AC, Cripps A, Bouchlaghem D, Buswell R. “Predicted vs. actual energy performance of non-domestic buildings: Using post-occupancy evaluation data to reduce the performance gap”, Applied Energy, 97: 355-364. (2012).
• [6] Deng S-M, Burnett J. “A study of energy performance of hotel buildings in Hong Kong”, Energy and Buildings, 31: 7-12, (2000). [7] Tsikaloudaki K, Theodosiou T, Laskos K, Bikas D. “Assessing cooling energy performance of windows for residential buildings in the Mediterranean zone”, Energy Conversion and Management, 64: 335-343, (2012).
• [8] Olesen BW. “The philosophy behind EN15251: Indoor environmental criteria for design and calculation of energy performance of buildings”, Energy and Buildings, 39: 740-749, (2007).
• [9] Poel B, van Cruchten G, Balaras CA., “Energy performance assessment of existing dwellings”, Energy and Buildings, 39: 393-403, (2007).
• [10] Ingrao C, Lo Giudice A, Bacenetti J, Tricase C, Dotelli G, Fiala M, et al. “Energy and environmental assessment of industrial hemp for building applications: A review”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 51: 29-42, (2015)
• [11] Pfafferott J, Herkel S, Wambsganß M. “Design, monitoring and evaluation of a low energy office building with passive cooling by night ventilation”, Energy and Buildings, 36: 455-465, (2004).
• [12] Atmaca M. KE, Yılmaz Z. A., “Building Energy Performance Calculation Method (BEP-TR) and Hotel Performance Evaluation of Buildings”. X National Installation Engineering Congress, 811-826, (2011).
• [13] Santamouris M, Argiriou A., “Renewable energies and energy conservation technologies for buildings in southern Europe”, International Journal of Solar Energy, 15: 69-79, (1994).
• [14] Ramesh T, Prakash R, Shukla K. “Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview”, Energy and Buildings, 42: 1592-600, (2010).
• [15] Eskin N. “Annual Energy Needs Analysis of Non-Residential Buildings”. İTÜ, İstanbul, 1-6, (2011).
• [16] Aykal D, Gümüş B, Özbudak Y., “Scope of Application of Renewable and Efficient Energy Use in Buildings Sustainability”, V Symposium on Renewable Energy Sources, Diyarbakır, 78-84, (2009).
• [17] Ding G, Forsythe PJ. “Sustainable construction: life cycle energy analysis of construction on sloping sites for residential buildings”, Construction Management and Economics, 31: 254-265, (2013).
• [18] European Commission, EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Directive 2002/91 EC-Official Journal L 001. Brussels, (2002).
• [19] European Commission, European Commission Directorate general for energy and transport. European Energy and Transport Trends to 2030. Brussels, (2003).
• [20]http://www.sisecamduzcam.com/sites/catalogs/tr/Documents/gunes-kolektor-camlari-dokumanlari/gunes-enerjisi-camlari-brosuru.pdf
• [21] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri= celex%3A32002L0091. Access date: 04.06.2018.
• [22] Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, “Building Energy Performance Calculation Method Utility User's Guide”. Ankara, 1-64.
• [23] Turkish National Police. Department of Foreigners Borders and Asylum. Project The Information Note and Project Treatment. Ankara, (2010).