LPI Based Comparison of Turkey And Mexican Logistics Sector

Year 2019, , 1061 - 1067, 01.12.2019

Kürşat Yıldız , Çağlar Tabak

https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.479410

Cited By: 3

Abstract

Transportation costs are the main
parameters directly affecting the country's economy. This parameter is not only
increasing day by day due to unsustainable fossil fuels, but also brings heavy
burdens to economies. In case of Turkey, logistic strategies had to be
considered inevitably. For this purpose, along general comparison made by
taking the data of logistic performance index (LPI) issued biennially by World
Bank into consideration, Mexico included in the same category in said index has
been taken as the sample and then the logistic sector has been analyzed and
compared. As a result, it was shown that Mexico and Turkey had poor transport
infrastructure, lack of legislation, lack of independent logistics management
and lack of independent port authority. In addition to them, it has been seen
that the railway infrastructure should be less developed than behind the road
infrastructure and the ports should be strengthened with highway-rail
connections. Geostrategically, both countries have a similar structure but also
have lack of data on the logistics sector. It has been asserted that regions
for combined transport in both countries should be identified and logistics
areas should be established. 

Keywords

Logistics performance index, transport, competition, performance criteria

References

• [1] Voortman, C., “Global logistics management”, Lansdowne: Juta and Company Ltd., 8-10, (2004).
• [2] Kumar, V., Reinartz, W., “Customer relationship management: concept, strategy, and tools”, Berlin: Springer, (2012).
• [3] Tabak, Ç., “Choosing location, integratıon with types of transport and modeling of logistics activity areas in Turkey”, Ph. D. Thesis, Gazi university graduate school of natural and applied sciences, Ankara, Turkey, pp.50-52, (2017).
• [4] Mentzer, J. T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J. S., Min, S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D. and Zacharia, Z. G., “Defining supply chain management”, Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 1-25, (2001).
• [5] Atmaca, E., Vardar, S., Akbabaöz, S., Vural, A., Uruş, G., “Ankara İlinde Ürün Dağıtımı Yapan Bir Beyaz Eşya Yetkili Servisinin Araç Rotalama Problemine Çözüm Yaklaşımı”, Politeknik Dergisi, 18(2), 99-105, (2015).
• [6] Tabak, Ç., Yıldız, K., “Türkiye’de lojistiğin kurumsal yapılanması”, presented at congress named 11. Ulaştırma Kongresi, İstanbul, (2015).
• [7] LPI “World Bank International”, https://lpi.worldbank.org/international/global/2016, (2016),
• [8] Ojala L. and Celebi D., “Dilay Celebi Logistics Performance Index and Drivers of Logistics Performance” Turku School of Economics, Finland and Istanbul Technical University, Turkey; Presented at International Transport Forum at the OECD, Mexican Institute of Transportation Sanfandila, Queretaro, (2015, March).
• [9] Cebeci, D., “Lojistik Performans Endeks Ölçütleri”, presented at the seminars named Ulaştırma – Lojistik Ağları Ve Planlama 21. Yüzyıl İçin Planlama, Ankara, (2015, May).
• [10] Tabak, Ç., Yıldız K., “Turkey’s logistics impact compared to the Netherland, Germany and Belgium”, United States: Logistics Systems and Management, (2017).
• [11] GDP 2017, Internet: Trading Economics Mexico –11–21, URL: http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftradingeconomics.com%2Fmexico%2Fgdp&date=2017-11-21 Last access date: 21.11.21017.
• [12] Hausman, L., “The impact of logistics performance on trade”, Production and Operations Management, 22(2), 236-252, (2013).
• [13] Cedillo G., “Supply Chain Performance Measurement in Latin America”, Prepared for the Roundtable on Logistics Development Strategies and their Performance Measurements, Queretaro, Mexico, (2015, March).
• [14] Kirillova A. “Development of the international transport corridors in the transport system of the Russian Federation”, pp: 11-20, (2017).
• [15] International Transport Forum., Logistics strategy and performance measurement: Mexico’s national observatory for transport and logistics, URL: http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.itfoecd.org%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fdocs%2F15cspa_mexicologistics.pdf&date=2018-02-14, Last access date: 14.12.2017, (2015, March).
• [16] Instituto Mexicano del Transporte, Manual estadístico del sector transporte, SCT, URL:http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fimt.mx%2Farchivos%2FPublicaciones%2FManual%2Fmn2013.pdf&date=2018-02-14, Last access date: 14.12.2017, (2013).
• [17] ITF/OECD Research Roundtable, Logistics development strategies and their performance measurement, Querétaro, URL: http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.itf-oecd.org%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fdocs%2Flogistics-strategy-performance-management.pdf&date=2018-02-14, Last access date: 14.12.2017, (2015, March).
• [18] Mexican Ministry of Transport, Transportation Sector Statistics Data Preparation Report, URL:http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gob.mx%2Fsct%2Farchivo%2Fdocumentos&date=2017-11-21 Last access date: 11.20.2017. 196
• [19] Statistics and Reports http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ubak.gov.tr%2F+&date=2017-11-20, Last access date: 20.11.2017.