Year 2021, Volume 24 , Issue 2, Pages 529 - 537 2021-06-01

Dimensional Accuracy Analysis of Samples Printed in Delta and Cartesian Kinematic Three Dimensional Printers
Dimensional Accuracy Analysis of Samples Printed in Delta and Cartesian Kinematic Three Dimensional Printers

Erkan İNCEKAR [1] , Hüseyin KAYGISIZ [2] , Sebahattin BABUR [3]


The motion mechanisms of manufacturing and robotic systems are developed in different structures, mainly in cartesian and delta structures having series or parallel movement abilities according to the capacity and construction structure of the system. Different systems are used according to the criteria such as bearing load capacity, sensitivity or cost of the system. In this study, the performances of machines installed in the delta and cartesian kinematic structures, which are mostly used in the kinematic systems of three - dimensional printers, were analyzed. In this context, in two different machines with these two construction structures, the same boundary conditions and 4 pieces of calibration parts especially in manufacturing features were printed. 23 different elements that constituted the calibration part were measured, tabulated, statistically analyzed, and the acceptable measuremental tolerance ranges of the elements were determined and the accuracy values of the machines were compared. As a result of this study, according to T test results, 15 of the 23 measurements on the Cartesian system based three-dimensional printers were obtained as acceptable in terms of tolerance range as well as 9 of the 23 different measurements were obtained as acceptable on Delta system. Consequently, operation accuracy of the Cartesian system based three-dimensional printers were higher than the Delta system under the same working conditions and manufacturing parameters.
The motion mechanisms of manufacturing and robotic systems are developed in different structures, mainly in cartesian and delta structures having series or parallel movement abilities according to the capacity and construction structure of the system. Different systems are used according to the criteria such as bearing load capacity, sensitivity or cost of the system. In this study, the performances of machines installed in the delta and cartesian kinematic structures, which are mostly used in the kinematic systems of three - dimensional printers, were analyzed. In this context, in two different machines with these two construction structures, the same boundary conditions and 4 pieces of calibration parts especially in manufacturing features were printed. 23 different elements that constituted the calibration part were measured, tabulated, statistically analyzed, and the acceptable measuremental tolerance ranges of the elements were determined and the accuracy values of the machines were compared. As a result of this study, according to T test results, 15 of the 23 measurements on the Cartesian system based three-dimensional printers were obtained as acceptable in terms of tolerance range as well as 9 of the 23 different measurements were obtained as acceptable on Delta system. Consequently, operation accuracy of the Cartesian system based three-dimensional printers were higher than the Delta system under the same working conditions and manufacturing parameters.
  • [1] Hull, Charles W. “Apparatus for production of three- dimensional objects by stereolithography” U.S. Patents No. 4: 75,330, 11 Mar. (1986).
  • [2] S. Li, R. Zhang, F. Lin, R. Wu, Q. Lu, Z. Xiong, and X. Wang Y. Yan. “Rapid Prototyping and Manufacturing Technology: Principle, Representative Technics, Applications, and Development Trends”. Tsinghua Science & Technology,14: 1-12, (2009).
  • [3] Kruth, J. P., Levy, G., Klocke, F., Childs, T.H.C., “Consolidation phenomena in laser and powder-bed based layered manufacturing.” CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 56(2): 730–759, (2007).
  • [4] Galantucci, L. M., Lavecchia, F., Percoco, G., “Study of Compression Properties of Topologically Optimized FDM Made Structured Parts.” CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 57(1): 243–246, (2008).
  • [5] Hopkinson, N., Majewskia, C. E., Zarringhalamb, H., “Quantifying the Degree of Particle Melt in Selective Laser Sintering.” CIRP Annals, 58(1): 197–200, (2009).
  • [6] Armillotta, A.,” Assessment of Surface Quality on Textured FDM Prototypes.” Rapid Prototyping Journal, 12(1): 35–41, (2006).
  • [7] Galantucci, L.M., Lavecchia, F., Percoco, G., “Quantitative analysis of a chemical treatment to reduce roughness of parts fabricated using fused deposition modelling.” CIRP Annals -Manufacturing Technology, 59(1): 247-251, (2010).
  • [8] Galantucci, L.M., Lavecchia, F., “Direct digital manufacturing of ABS parts: An experimental study on effectiveness of proprietary software for shrinkage compensation.” International Journal of Digital Content Technology and its Applications, 19(6): 546-555, (2012).
  • [9] Galantucci, L.M., Lavecchia, F. Percoco, G., “Experimental Study Aiming to Enhance the Surface Finish of Fused Deposition Modeled Parts.” CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 58(1): 189-192, (2009).
  • [10] Wohler, T., “Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing State of the Industry Annual Worldwide Progress Report.” Wohler associates, Colorado, USA, (2011).
  • [11] Pearce, J. M., Morris Blair, C., Laciak, K. J., Andrews, R., Nosrat, A. Zelenika-Zovko, I., “3-D Printing of Open Source Appropriate Technologies for Self-Directed Sustainable Development”, Journal of sustainable development, 3(4): 17-29, (2010).
  • [12] Wohlers T., Wohlers report : “3D printing and additive manufacturing state of the industry annual worldwide progress report”, Fort Collins, Wohlers Associates, (2016).
  • [13] Sudin M.N., Shamsudin S.A. and Abdullah M.A. “Effect of Part Features on Dimensional Accuracy of FDM Model” ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 8067-8072, (2016).
  • [14] Bakar N. S. A., Alkahari M. R. and Boejang H. “Analysis on Fused Deposition Modeling Performance”, Journal of Zhejiang University-Science A, 11(12): 972-977, (2010).
  • [15] Dyrbuś G. “Investigation on quality of Rapid Prototyping FDM method”, 14th International Research. In Expert Conference. Trends in the Development of Machinery and Associated Technology, 11-18 September, Mediterranean Cruise, (2010).
  • [16] Dixit N.K., Srivastava R. and Narain R., “Comparison of Two Different Rapid Prototyping System Based on Dimensional Performance Using Grey Relational Grade Method.” Procedia Technology, 25: 908-915, (2016).
  • [17] L.M. Galantucci, I. Bodi, J. Kacani, F. Lavecchia., “Analysis of Dimensional Performance for 3D Open-source Printer Based on Fused Deposition Modeling Technique”, Procedia CIRP. 28: 82-87, (2015).
  • [18] Habeeb H.A., Alkahari M.R., Ramli F.R., Hasan R. and Maidin S., “Strength and porosity of additively manufactured PLA using a low cost 3D printing”., Proceedings of Mechanical Engineering Research Day, 69-70, (2016).
  • [19] Nazan M. A., Ramli F. R., Alkahari M. R., Sudin M. N. and Abdullah M. A., “Process parameter optimization of 3D printer using Response Surface Method”, ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 12(7): 2291-2296, (2017).
  • [20] Nazan M. A., Ramli F. R., Alkahari M. R., Sudin M. N. and Abdullah M. A., “An investigation on applying different types of adhesive to reduce warping deformation in open source 3D printer”, Proceedings of Mechanical Engineering Research Day, 155-157, (2017).
  • [21] Nazan, M. A., Ramli, F. R., Alkahari, M. R., Tokoroyama, T., and Umehara, N. “Polymer adhesion investigation on fused deposition modelling machine”, In Proceedings of SAKURA Symposium on Mechanical Science and Engineering, 6-7, (2017).
  • [22] Majid, S.N.A., Alkahari, M.R., Ramli, F.R., Fai, T.C., Sudin, M.N., “Influence of integrated pressing during Fused Filament Fabrication on tensile strength and porosity”, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2: 185-197, (2017).
  • [23] Ramli F.R. and Nazan M.A., “Layer adhesion study of plant bio-adhesive to reduce curling effect in 3D printer”, In Proceedings of SAKURA Symposium on Mechanical Science and Engineering, 1-2, (2017).
  • [24] Kaygısız, H, Çetinkaya, K. "CNC Freze Eğitim Seti Tasarımı ve Uygulaması". Uluslararası Teknolojik Bilimler Dergisi 2(3): 53-71, (2010).
Primary Language en
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Orcid: 0000-0002-8919-298X
Author: Erkan İNCEKAR (Primary Author)
Institution: ISTANBUL GEDIK UNIVERSITY
Country: Turkey


Author: Hüseyin KAYGISIZ
Institution: ISTANBUL GEDIK UNIVERSITY, GEDİK VOCATIONAL SCHOOL
Country: Turkey


Author: Sebahattin BABUR
Institution: TURKISH - GERMAN UNIVERSITY
Country: Turkey


Supporting Institution Istanbul Gedik University
Thanks We would like to thank Istanbul Gedik University BAP Coordinator for supporting us in this study.
Dates

Application Date : June 26, 2019
Publication Date : June 1, 2021

Bibtex @research article { politeknik582410, journal = {Politeknik Dergisi}, issn = {}, eissn = {2147-9429}, address = {Gazi Üniversitesi Teknoloji Fakültesi 06500 Teknikokullar - ANKARA}, publisher = {Gazi University}, year = {2021}, volume = {24}, pages = {529 - 537}, doi = {10.2339/politeknik.582410}, title = {Dimensional Accuracy Analysis of Samples Printed in Delta and Cartesian Kinematic Three Dimensional Printers}, key = {cite}, author = {İncekar, Erkan and Kaygısız, Hüseyin and Babur, Sebahattin} }
APA İncekar, E , Kaygısız, H , Babur, S . (2021). Dimensional Accuracy Analysis of Samples Printed in Delta and Cartesian Kinematic Three Dimensional Printers . Politeknik Dergisi , 24 (2) , 529-537 . DOI: 10.2339/politeknik.582410
MLA İncekar, E , Kaygısız, H , Babur, S . "Dimensional Accuracy Analysis of Samples Printed in Delta and Cartesian Kinematic Three Dimensional Printers" . Politeknik Dergisi 24 (2021 ): 529-537 <https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/politeknik/issue/61515/582410>
Chicago İncekar, E , Kaygısız, H , Babur, S . "Dimensional Accuracy Analysis of Samples Printed in Delta and Cartesian Kinematic Three Dimensional Printers". Politeknik Dergisi 24 (2021 ): 529-537
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Dimensional Accuracy Analysis of Samples Printed in Delta and Cartesian Kinematic Three Dimensional Printers AU - Erkan İncekar , Hüseyin Kaygısız , Sebahattin Babur Y1 - 2021 PY - 2021 N1 - doi: 10.2339/politeknik.582410 DO - 10.2339/politeknik.582410 T2 - Politeknik Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 529 EP - 537 VL - 24 IS - 2 SN - -2147-9429 M3 - doi: 10.2339/politeknik.582410 UR - https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.582410 Y2 - 2020 ER -
EndNote %0 Politeknik Dergisi Dimensional Accuracy Analysis of Samples Printed in Delta and Cartesian Kinematic Three Dimensional Printers %A Erkan İncekar , Hüseyin Kaygısız , Sebahattin Babur %T Dimensional Accuracy Analysis of Samples Printed in Delta and Cartesian Kinematic Three Dimensional Printers %D 2021 %J Politeknik Dergisi %P -2147-9429 %V 24 %N 2 %R doi: 10.2339/politeknik.582410 %U 10.2339/politeknik.582410
ISNAD İncekar, Erkan , Kaygısız, Hüseyin , Babur, Sebahattin . "Dimensional Accuracy Analysis of Samples Printed in Delta and Cartesian Kinematic Three Dimensional Printers". Politeknik Dergisi 24 / 2 (June 2021): 529-537 . https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.582410
AMA İncekar E , Kaygısız H , Babur S . Dimensional Accuracy Analysis of Samples Printed in Delta and Cartesian Kinematic Three Dimensional Printers. Politeknik Dergisi. 2021; 24(2): 529-537.
Vancouver İncekar E , Kaygısız H , Babur S . Dimensional Accuracy Analysis of Samples Printed in Delta and Cartesian Kinematic Three Dimensional Printers. Politeknik Dergisi. 2021; 24(2): 529-537.
IEEE E. İncekar , H. Kaygısız and S. Babur , "Dimensional Accuracy Analysis of Samples Printed in Delta and Cartesian Kinematic Three Dimensional Printers", Politeknik Dergisi, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 529-537, Jun. 2021, doi:10.2339/politeknik.582410