Abaqus İle Zemin-Yapi Etkileşimi Üzerine Bir Simülasyon: Deprem ve Zemin Tabaka Özelliklerinin Betonarme Bina Davranışına Etkisi

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 2, 749 - 757, 27.03.2024

Mohammed Yadgar Ahmed İnan Keskin

https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.1059138

Cited By: 1

Öz

Bu makalede, Abaqus/СAЕ kullanılarak çok tabakalı bir temel zemin üzerine inşa edilmiş yapıya zemin özelliklerinin ve depremlerin etkisi incelenmiştir. Tekil temeller, depreme eğilimli bölgelerdeki binaları desteklemek için geleneksel olarak gerekli olan en yaygın temel türlerinden biridir. Çoğu araştırmacı, deprem türü ve zemin tabakasının özelliklerinden dolayı deprem sırasında binanın tepkisini etkileyebilen temel ve zemin arasındaki dinamik etkileşim üzerinde çalışmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, çok farklı zemin özelliklerine sahip iki tabakalı zeminlerde inşa edilen betonarme bir binaya dört farklı deprem uygulanmış ve Abaqus yazılımı kullanılarak zemin-yapı etkileşimi üzerine tartışma yapılmıştır. Analizde 4 farklı model (yumuşak-sert, sert-yumuşak) ile katmanlı bir zemin simüle edilmiştir. Analizlerde farklı zemin katmanlarının (yumuşak ve sert) etkisi, binanın yer değiştirmesi ve depremin frekans içeriği incelenmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlar, dinamik zemin-yapı etkileşiminde deprem özellikleri, zemin özellikleri ve temel tipinin birlikte dikkate alınmasının oldukça önemli olduğunu göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Abaqus/СAЕ, zemin-yapı etkileşimi, sonlu elemanlar modeli, temel, zemin

A simulation on soil structure interaction with ABAQUS; effect on the behavior of a concrete building of soil layers and earthquake properties

Öz

In this article, the effect of soil properties and earthquakes on a structure built in a multi-layer foundation soil is studied using Abaqus/СAЕ. Single foundations are one of the most common types of foundations traditionally required to support buildings in earthquake-prone regions. Most researchers work on the dynamic interaction between the foundation and the soil, which can affect the response of the building during earthquakes due to the type of earthquake and the properties of the soil layer. In this paper, four different earthquakes were applied to a reinforced concrete building constructed in two-layer soils with very different soil properties, and a discussion on soil-structure interaction was opened using Abaqus software. In the analysis, a layered soil is simulated with 4 different models (soft-hard, hard-soft). Through these analyses, the influence of the different soil layers (soft and hard), the building displacement and the frequency content of the earthquake were studied. According to the result of the analysis, it is important to consider the earthquake characteristics, the soil properties, and the type of foundation in the dynamic soil-structure interaction.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Abaqus/СAЕ, soil-structure interaction, finite element model, foundation, soil

Kaynakça

• [1] Çetinkaya M.Y., Çelebi̇ E, Kirtel O., "Yapı-Temel-Zemin Sismik Etkileşim Probleminin Adapazarı Bölgesi İçin Empedans Fonksiyonları Yardımıyla Analizi", Politeknik Dergisi, 20(2):325–32, (2017).
• [2] Romo M.P. and Seed H.B., "Analytical Modeling of Dynamic Soil Response in Mexico Earthquake of September 19th 1985", Proceedings of International Conference on the 1985 Mexico Earthquake, Mexico City, 19-21 September 1986, 148-162, (1986).
• [3] Seed H.B.,"Influence of Local Soil Conditions on Ground Motions and Building Damage during Earthquakes", The 8th Nabor Carillo Lecture, Presented at the Mexican Society for Soil Mechanics 13th National Meeting, Mazatlan, 8-10 September 1986, (1986).
• [4] Ohsaki, Y., "Effects of Local Soil Conditions upon Earthquake Damage", Seventh International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, México City, 3-32, (1969).
• [5] Ghosh B., Madabhushi S.P., "Effects of localised soil inhomogeneity in modyfying seismic soil structure interaction effects", 16th ASCE Eng. Mech. Conf. (EM 2003), p. 7–18, (2003).
• [6] Rahgozar M.A., "Seismic soil-structure interaction analysis of structural base shear amplification", M. Eng. Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, Carleton University, (1993).
• [7] Gazetas G., "Seismic design of foundation and soil-structure interaction", First Eur. Conf. Earthq. Eng. Seismol., Geneva, Switzerland:. Keynote Address K7, (2006)
• [8] Kolekova Y., Schmid G. and Stojanovski K., "Soil-structure interaction under seismic excitation", Slovak Journal of Civil Engineering 4:18–21, (2007).
• [9] Matinmanesh H. and Saleh Asheghabadi M., "Seismic Analysis on Soil-Structure Interaction of Buildings over Sandy Soil", Procedia Engineering, 14:1737–1743, (2011).
• [10] Gürel M. A., İzol R. Arda Büyüktaşkın H. A. and Pekgökgöz R. K., “Dikdörtgen ve daire kesitli yığma narin kolonların burkulma yüklerinin karşılaştırılması” Politeknik Dergisi, 24(1): 131-142, (2021).
• [11] Kosedag E., Ekici R., “Free vibration analysis of foam-core sandwich stractures”, Politeknik Dergisi, 24(1): 69-74, (2021).
• [12] Chu D., Truman K.Z., "Effects of Pile Foundation Configurations in Seismic Soil-Pile-Structure Interaction", 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, Paper No. 1551, (2004).
• [13] Nielsen AH., "Towards a complete framework for seismic analysis in Abaqus", Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering and Computational Mechanics 167(1):3–12, (2014)
• [14] Abaqus. Abaqus Standard user’s Manual, Vol. I-III, Version 6.8. Pawtucket n.d, (2008).
• [15] Sáez E, Lopez-Caballero F. and Modaressi-Farahmand-Razavi A., "Inelastic dynamic soil-structure interaction effects on moment-resisting frame buildings", Engineering Structures, 51:166–77, (2013).
• [16] Van Nguyen Q., Fatahi B. and Hokmabadi A.S., "The effects of foundation size on the seismic performance of buildings considering the soil-foundation-structure interaction", Structural Engineering and Mechanics 58(6):1045–75, (2016).
• [17] Fares R., Santisi d′Avila M.P. and Deschamps A., "Soil-structure interaction analysis using a 1DT-3C wave propagation model", Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 120:200–13, (2019).
• [18] Rayhani M.H.T. and El Naggar H., "Physical and Numerical Modeling of Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction. "Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics Congress IV"; p. 1–11, (2008).
• [19] Veletsos A.S. and Meek JW., "Dynamic behaviour of building-foundation systems", Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics 3(2):121–38, (1974).
• [20] Bielak J., "Dynamic behaviour of structures with embedded foundations", Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics 3(3):259–274, (1974).
• [21] Nielsen AH., "Towards a complete framework for seismic analysis in Abaqus", Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Engineering and Computational Mechanics 167(1):3–12, (2015)
• [22] Kerr A.D., "Elastic and viscoelastic foundation models", Journal of Applied Mechanics, Transactions ASME 31(13):491–498, (1964).
• [23] Wolf J.P., "Spring-dashpot-mass models for foundation vibrations", Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics 26(9):931–49, (1997).
• [24] Tabatabaiefar H.R. and Fatahi B., "Idealisation of soil-structure system to determine inelastic seismic response of mid-rise building frames", Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 66:339–51, (2014).
• [25] Fu J., Yu Z., Wang S. and Yang J., "Numerical analysis of framed building response to tunnelling induced ground movements", Engineering Structures, 158:43–66, (2018).
• [26] Tabatabaiefar H.R. and Massumi A. A., "Simplified method to determine seismic responses of reinforced concrete moment resisting building frames under influence of soil-structure interaction", Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 30:1259–67, (2010).
• [27] Worku A., "Calibrated Analytical Formulas for Foundation Model Parameters", International Journal of Geomechanics., 13(4):340–7, (2013).
• [28] Darbre G.R. and Wolf JP., "Criterion of stability and implementation issues of hybrid frequency-time-domain procedure for non-linear dynamic analysis", Earthquake Engineering Structural Dynamics, 16(4):569–81, (1988).