ADAPTATION OF THE E-LEARNING SERVICE QUALITY SCALE TO TURKISH: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY

Year 2022, Volume: 15 Issue: 3, 681 - 712, 30.09.2022

Selçuk Efe Küçükkambak Bahman Huseynlı Melek Süler

Abstract

The spread of higher education institutions, the differentiation of students’ demands and expectations, the increasing importance of education on the internet, and the increasingly diversified education and training techniques grew the integration of technology with teaching and have led to the creation of various innovative education methods. E-learning, which has become a necessity, has become a part of today’s academic world, especially in the face of current conditions. It has a critical role in issues such as measuring the service quality of educational institutions, regarding competition and determining the evaluations of the individuals using the service about the system, gaining competitive advantage, and creating satisfaction. This study aims to demonstrate the validity and reliability of the “E-Learning Service Quality Scale” developed by Pham et al. (2019a) by adapting it to Turkish. It is expected that the findings of this study will contribute to the literature regarding providing an up-to-date scale to measure the e-learning service quality of higher education institutions.

Keywords

E-learning, e-learning service quality, scale adaptation

E-ÖĞRENME HİZMET KALİTESİ ÖLÇEĞİNİN TÜRKÇEYE UYARLANMASI: GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI

Abstract

Yükseköğretim kurumlarının yaygınlaşması, öğrencilerin istek ve beklentilerinin farklılaşması, internet ortamında eğitimin öneminin artması, eğitim ve öğretim tekniklerinin giderek çeşitlenmesi teknolojinin öğretimle bütünleşmesini artırmış ve çeşitli yenilikçi eğitim yöntemlerinin ortaya çıkmasına neden olmuştur. Bir zorunluluk haline gelen e-öğrenme, özellikle bugünün koşullarında akademik dünyanın ayrılmaz bir parçası haline gelmiştir. Eğitim kurumlarının hizmet kalitesinin rekabet açısından ölçülmesi ve hizmeti kullanan bireylerin sistemle ilgili değerlendirmelerinin belirlenmesi, rekabet avantajı elde edilmesi ve memnuniyet yaratılması gibi konularda kritik bir role sahiptir. Bu çalışma, Pham ve arkadaşları (2019a) tarafından geliştirilen “E-Öğrenme Hizmet Kalitesi” ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanarak geçerlik ve güvenirliğini ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu çalışmadan elde edilecek bulguların, yükseköğretim kurumlarının e-öğrenme hizmet kalitesini ölçmek için güncel bir ölçme aracı sağlaması açısından literatüre katkı sağlaması beklenmektedir.

Keywords

e-öğrenme, e-öğrenme hizmet kalitesi, ölçek uyarlama

References

• Abdullah, F. (2005). HEdPERF versus SERVPERF: The quest for ideal measuring instrument of service quality in higher education sector. Quality Assurance in Education, 13(4), 305-328. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880510626584
• Abdullah, F. (2006). The development of HEdPERF: A new measuring instrument of service quality for the higher education sector. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(6), 569-581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2005.00480.x
• Al-dweeri Rami Mohammad, Obeidat, Z. M., Al-dwiry Mohammad Ahmad, Alshurideh, M. T., & Alhorani, A. M. (2017). The impact of e-service quality and e-loyalty on online shopping: Moderating effect of e-satisfaction and e-trust. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 9(2), 92-103. http://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v9n2p92
• Amer, T. S., Al Musawi, A. S., & Muhammad, A. A. N. (2022). Higher Education Students' Perceptions of E-Learning Quality. History, 9(2), 71-78. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v9i2.3910
• Arbaugh, J. B. (2005). Is There an Optimal Design for On-Line MBA Courses? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 135-149. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2005.17268561
• Baker, T. L. (1994). Doing social research (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill Inc.
• Bauer, H. H., Falk, T., & Hammerschmidt, M. (2006). eTransQual: A transaction process-based approach for capturing service quality in online shopping. Journal of Business Research, 59(7), 866-875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.01.021
• Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186-3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
• Bhuasiri, W., Xaymoungkhoun, O., Zo, H., Rho, J. J., & Ciganek, P. A. (2012). Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Computers & Education, 58(2), 843-855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.010
• Blythe, J. (2005). Essentials of marketing (3rd ed.). Pearson.
• Borsa, J. C., Damásio, B. F., & Bandeira, D. R. (2012). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of psychological instruments: Some considerations. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 22, 423-432.
• Butt, B. Z., & Ur Rehman, K. (2010). A study examining the students satisfaction in higher education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5446-5450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.888
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2005). Anket geliştirme. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(2), 133-151.
• Çerri, S. (2012). Assessing the quality of higher education services using a modified SERVQUAL scale. Annales Universitatis Apulensis-Series Oeconomica, 14(2), 664-679. https://doi.org/10.29302/oeconomica.2012.14.2.32
• Collier, J. E., & Bienstock, C. C. (2006). Measuring service quality in e-retailing. Journal of service research, 8(3), 260-275. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670505278867
• Crosby, L. A., Evans, K. R., & Cowles, D. (1990). Relationship quality in services selling: An interpersonal influence perspective. Journal of Marketing, 54(3), 68-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400306
• Cuthbert, P. F. (1996). Managing service quality in HE: is SERVQUAL the answer? Part 1. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 6(2), 11-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604529610109701
• De Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M., & Kleijnen, M. (2001). Customer adoption of e‐service: An experimental study. International journal of service industry management. 12(2), 184-207. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230110387542
• DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of management information systems, 19(4), 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
• Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2012). Factor analysis, Oxford University Press.
• Fassnacht, M., & Koese, I. (2006). Quality of electronic services: conceptualizing and testing a hierarchical model. Journal of service research, 9(1), 19-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670506289531
• Fazlollahtabar, H., & Muhammadzadeh, A. (2012). A knowledge-based user interface to optimize curriculum utility in an e-learning system. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), 8(3), 34-53. https://doi.org/10.4018/jeis.2012070103
• Finn, A. (2011). Investigating the non-linear effects of e-service quality dimensions on customer satisfaction. Journal of Retailing and Consumer services, 18(1), 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2010.09.002
• Frazer, M. (1994). Quality in higher education: An international perspective. In D. Green (Ed.), What is quality in higher education (1st ed., pp. 107-117). SRHE and Open University Press.
• Geçkil, T., & Tikici, M. (2015). Örgütsel demokrasi ölçeği geliştirme çalışması. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 48(4), 41-78.
• George, D., & Mallery, P. (2018). IBM SPSS Statistics 25 step by step: A simple guide and reference. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351033909
• Gupta, P., & Kaushik, N. (2018). Dimensions of service quality in higher education–critical review (students’ perspective). International Journal of Educational Management. 32(4),580-605. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2017-0056
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed). Springer.
• Hajpoor, S., Mirshekari, F., & Rahdar, M. (2022). Evaluate the Quality of E-Learning Services and its Impact on Service Recipients (Case Study: University of Sistan and Baluchestan). Journal of Management and Sustainable Development Studies, 2(1), 133-145. https://doi.org/10.30495/msds.2022.1963074.1065
• Hambleton, R. K., & Patsula, L. (1999). Increasing the validity of adapted tests: Myths to be avoided and guidelines for improving test adaptation practices. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 1(1), 1-16.
• Han, S., & Baek, S. (2004). Antecedents and consequences of service quality in online banking: An application of the SERVQUAL instrument. Advances in Consumer Research. Association for Consumer Research (U.S.), 31, 208-214.
• Haryaka, U., Agus, F., & Kridalaksana, A. H. (2017). User satisfaction model for e-learning using smartphone. Procedia computer science, 116, 373-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.10.070
• Higher Education Institution. (2020). -YÖK üniversitelerimizdeki uzaktan öğretimin bir aylik fotoğrafini çekti – YÖK’ten üniversitelerdeki uzaktan eğitime yönelik değerlendirme –YÖK’ten, salgin sürecinde üniversitelerdeki uzaktan eğitimin bir aylik durum tespiti. Retrieved December 18, 2021, from https://www.yok.gov.tr/Sayfalar/Haberler/2020/uzaktan-egitime-yonelik-degerlendirme.aspx
• Hughey, D., Chawla, S., & Khan, Z. (2003). Measuring the quality of university computer labs using SERVQUAL: A longitudinal study. The Quality Management Journal, 10(3), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2003.11919071
• Huseynli, B., Engizek, N., & Kurtuluş, S. (2018). Tüketicilerin fiyat taktiklerinin ikna kabiliyeti ile ilgili bilinç düzeyi ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması. Yildiz Social Science Review, 4(1), 65-78.
• Ibrahim, E. E., Joseph, M., & Ibeh, K. I. (2006). Customers' perception of electronic service delivery in the UK retail banking sector. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 24(7), 475-493. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320610712094
• Ibrahim, M. Z., Rahman, M. N., & Yasin, R. M. (2012). Assessing students perceptions of service quality in technical educational and vocational training (TEVT) institution in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56, 272-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.655
• Jayawardhena, C. (2004). Measurement of service quality in internet banking: The development of an instrument. Journal of Marketing Management, 20(1-4), 185-207. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725704773041177
• Jiang, J. J., Klein, G., & Crampton, S. M. (2000). A note on SERVQUAL reliability and validity in information system service quality measurement. Decision Sciences, 31(3), 725-744. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2000.tb00940.x
• Joseph, M., & Joseph, B. (1997). Service quality in education: A student perspective. Quality assurance in education, 5(1), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684889710156549
• Jun, M., & Cai, S. (2001). The key determinants of internet banking service quality: A content analysis. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 19(7), 276-291. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320110409825
• Juran, J. M. (1992). Juran on planning for quality. The Free Press. Juran Institute Inc. USA.
• Kara, A., & DeShields, O. W. (2004). Business student satisfaction, intentions and retention in higher education: An empirical investigation. Marketing Educator Quarterly, 3(1), 1-25.
• Kartha, C. P. (2006). Learning business statistics vs. traditional. Business Review, 5, 27-33.
• Khodayari, F., & Khodayari, B. (2011). Service quality in higher education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research in Business, 1(9), 38-46.
• Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2016). Principles of marketing (16th ed.). Pearson.
• Kotler, P., Armstrong, G., Harris, L. C., & Piercy, N. (2013). Principles of marketing (6th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
• Lagrosen, S., Seyyed‐Hashemi, R., & Leitner, M. (2004). Examination of the dimensions of quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 12(2), 61-69. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880410536431
• Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575.
• Lee, G. G., & Lin, H. F. (2005). Customer perceptions of e-service quality in online shopping. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 33(2), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590550510581485
• Lee, J.-W. (2010). Online support service quality, online learning acceptance, and student satisfaction. Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 227-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.08.002
• Lee, M. K., Cheung, C. M., & Chen, Z. (2005). Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information & management, 42(8), 1095-1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.10.007
• Li, H., & Masters, J. (2009). E-Learning and knowledge management in the early years: Where are we and where should we go. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 1(4), 245-250. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2009.01.017
• Li, H., Liu, Y., & Suomi, R. (2009). Measurement of e-service quality: An empirical study in online travel service. European Conferance of Information Systems (ECIS), Proceedings. 191.
• Li, R. Y., & Kaye, M. (1998). Understanding overseas students’ concerns and problems. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 20(1), 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080980200105
• Loiacono, E., Watson, R.T., and Goodhue, D.L (2002). WEBQUAL: a Measure of Website Quality. In AMA Winter Conference, Austin, TX.
• Mahapatra, S. S., & Khan, M. S. (2007). A framework for analysing quality in education settings. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(2), 205-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790601118606
• Martínez-Argüelles, M. J., Callejo, M. B., & Farrero, J. M. C. (2013). Dimensions of perceived service quality in higher education virtual learning environments. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 10(1), 268-285. http://dx.doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v10i1.1411
• Naveed, Q. N., Alam, M. M., Qahmash, A. I., & Quadri, K. M. (2021). Exploring the determinants of service quality of cloud e-learning system for active system usage. Applied Sciences, 11(9), 4176. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11094176
• Nikolić, V., Kaljevic, J., Jović, S., Petković, D., Milovančević, M., Dimitrov, L., & Dachkinov, P. (2018). Survey of quality models of e-learning systems. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 511, 324-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.07.058
• O’Neill, M., Wright, C., & Fitz, F. (2001). Quality evaluation in on‐line service environments: An application of the importance‐performance measurement technique. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal. 11(6), 402-417. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006519
• Oliver, R., & Herrington, J. (2001). Teaching and learning online: A beginner's guide to e-learning and e-teaching in higher education. Mount Lawley, Australia: Centre for Research in Information Technology and Communications, Edith Cowan University.
• Ozkan, S., & Koseler, R. (2009). Multi-dimensional students’ evaluation of e-learning systems in the higher education context: An empirical investigation. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1285-1296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.011
• Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298504900403
• Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.
• Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1994). Reassessment of expectations as a comparison in measuring service quality: Implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 58( l), 1 11 - 124. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800109
• Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Malhotra, A. (2005). E-S-Qual: A multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality. Journal of Service Research, 7(3), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670504271156
• Parasuraman, A., Ziethaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1991). Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Retailing, 67,420-450.
• Peltier, J.W., Schibrowsky, J.A., Drago, W., (2007). The interdependence of the factors influencing the perceived quality of the online learning experience: a causal model. Journal of Marketing Education. 29 (2), 140-153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475307302016
• Perreault Jr, W. D., Cannon, J. P., & McCarthy, E. J. (2015). Essentials of marketing: a marketing strategy planning approach, 15th ed., McGrawHill,USA.
• Pham, L., Kim, K., Walker, B., DeNardin, T., & Le, H. (2019a). Development and validation of an instrument to measure student perceived e-learning service quality. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), 15(2), 15-42. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-3877-0.ch034
• Pham, L., Limbu, Y. B., Bui, T. K., Nguyen, H. T., & Pham, H. T. (2019b). Does e-learning service quality influence e-learning student satisfaction and loyalty? Evidence from Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0136-3
• Pham, L., Williamson, S., & Berry, R. (2018). Student perceptions of e-learning service quality, e-satisfaction, and e-loyalty. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), 14(3), 19-40. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEIS.2018070102
• Polit, D.F., Beck, C.T. & Hungler, B.P. (2001), Essentials of Nursing Research: Methods, Appraisal and Utilization. 5th Ed., Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
• Purwati, A. A., Pratiwi, N. J., Hamzah, M. L., & Nyoto, N. (2022). The Effect Of Service Quality And Academic Information Systems Quality On Student’s Satisfaction. International Journal of Economics Development Research (IJEDR), 3(1), 51-70. https://doi.org/10.37385/ijedr.v3i1.400
• Rubio, D. M., Berg-Weger, M., Tebb, S. S., Lee, E. S., & Rauch, S. (2003). Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Social work research, 27(2), 94-104. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/27.2.94
• Satuti, J. R., Sunaryanto, S., & Nuris, D. M. R. (2020). Does student satisfaction mediate the correlation between e-learning service quality, academic engagement and academic achievement? JABE (Journal Of Accountıng And Busıness Educatıon), 5(1), 38-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.26675/jabe.v5i1.12699
• Şeker, H., & Gençdoğan, B. (2014). Psikolojide ve eğitimde ölçme aracı geliştirme (2. Basım) Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
• Shahzad, A., Hassan, R., Aremu, A. Y., Hussain, A., & Lodhi, R. N. (2021). Effects of COVID-19 in E-learning on higher education institution students: the group comparison between male and female. Quality & quantity, 55(3), 805-826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01028-z
• Sousa, V. D., & Rojjanasrirat, W. (2011). Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross‐cultural health care research: a clear and user‐friendly guideline. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 17(2), 268-274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x
• Srikanthan, G., & Dalrymple, J. (2003). Developing alternative perspectives for quality in higher education. International Journal of Educational Management. 17(3), 126-136. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540310467804
• Stodnick, M., & Rogers, P. (2008). Using SERVQUAL to measure the quality of the classroom experience. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 6(1), 115-133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2007.00162.x
• Sultan, P., & Wong, H. Y. (2010). Service quality in higher education–a review and research agenda. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences. 2(2), 259-272. https://doi.org/10.1108/17566691011057393
• Sultan, P., & Wong, H. Y. (2011). Service quality in a higher education context: antecedents and dimensions. International Review of Business Research Papers, 7(2), 11-20. https://acquire.cqu.edu.au/articles/conference_contribution/Service_quality_in_a_higher_education_context_antecedents_and_dimensions/13455953
• Swaid, S. I., & Wigand, R. T. (2009). Measuring the quality of e-service: Scale development and initial validation. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 10(1), 13-28. http://www.jecr.org/sites/default/files/10_1_p02.pdf
• Tan, K. C., & Kek, S. W. (2004). Service quality in higher education using an enhanced SERVQUAL approach. Quality in higher education, 10(1), 17-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/1353832242000195032
• Taylor, P. S. (2007). Can clickers cure crowded classes? Maclean’s, 120(26-27), 73.
• Telford, R., & Masson, R. (2005). The congruence of quality values in higher education. Quality assurance in education. 13 (2), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880510594364
• Tsai, C., Shen, P., & Chiang, Y. (2013). The application of mobile technology in e-learning and online education environments: A review of publications in SSCI-indexed journals from 2003 to 2012. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, 9(4), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijeis.2013100106
• Uppal, M. A., Ali, S., & Gulliver, S. R. (2018). Factors determining e‐learning service quality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 412-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12552
• Van Teijlingen, E. R., & Hundley, V. (2001). The importance of pilot studies. Social Research Update, 35. https://aura.abdn.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/2164/157/SRU35%20pilot%20studies.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
• Wagner, N., Hassanein, K. & Head, M. (2008). Who is responsible for E-learning in Higher Education? A Stakeholders’ Analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 11 (3), 26-36. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.607.4358&rep=rep1&type=pdf
• Wang, S. Y., Wang, Y. H., & Shee, Y. D. (2007). Measuring e-learning systems success in an organizational context: Scale development and validation. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1792–1808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.10.006
• Wisloski, J. (2011). Online Education Study: As Enrollment Rises, Institutions See Online Education as a ‘Critical Part’ of Growth, Online Education Information. Retrieved from http://www.geteducated.com/online-education-facts-and-statistics/latest-onlinelearning-news-and-research/461-online-education-study-increasing-enrollment. Date of Access: 18.09.2021.
• Wolfinbarger, M. F., & Gilly, M. C. (2002). ETailQ: Dimensionalization, measuring and predicting Etail quality. Journal of Retailing, 79(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(03)00034-4
• Yang, Z., Cai, S., Zhou, Z., & Zhou, N. (2005). Development and validation of an instrument to measure user perceived service quality of information presenting web portals. Information & management, 42(4), 575-589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.03.001
• Yang, Z., Jun, M., & Peterson, R. T. (2004). Measuring customer perceived online serevice quality: Scale development and managerial implications. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(11), 1149–1174. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570410563278
• Yilmaz, R. (2017). Exploring the role of e-learning readiness on student satisfaction and motivation in flipped classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 70(C), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.085
• Yoo, B., Donthu, N., (2001). Developing a scale to measure the perceived quality of an internet shopping site (SITEQUAL). Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce 2(1), 31–45. https://sites.hofstra.edu/boonghee-yoo/wp-content/uploads/sites/32/2019/08/2001_QJEC_SITEQUAL.pdf
• Yurdugül, H. (2005). Ölçek geliştirme çalışmalarında kapsam geçerliği için kapsam geçerlik indekslerinin kullanılması. XIV. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi, (ss.771-774), 28-30 Eylül 2005, Denizli, Türkiye. https://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/~yurdugul/3/indir/PamukkaleBildiri.pdf
• Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Malhotra, A. (2002). Service quality delivery through web sites: a critical review of extant knowledge. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 30(4), 362-375. https://doi.org/10.1177/009207002236911