Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Uluslararası Ticari Tahkimde Taraf Vekillerine Uygulanan Etik Kurallar ve Uygulamada Karşılaşılan Sorunlar

Year 2019, Volume: 39 Issue: 1, 275 - 294, 26.06.2019

Abstract

Uluslararası ticari tahkimde taraflar kimi
zaman birden çok baroya bağlı bulunan, kimi zaman herhangi bir baroya bağlı
bulunmayan veya hukuk eğitimi görmemiş bir veya birden çok vekil tarafından
temsil edilmekte, tahkim yargılaması çoğunlukla taraf vekillerinin ikisinin de
bağlı bulunmadığı tahkim yerlerinde cereyan etmektedir. Uluslararası tahkimin
niteliği itibarıyla oluşan bu çeşitlilik taraf vekillerine birden çok ve bazı
durumlarda çelişen etik kuralların uygulanmasına sebep olmakta, bu belirsizlik taraf
vekillerine hangi etik kuralların uygulanacağı, etik kuralların ihlali halinde
yaptırımın hangi otorite tarafından sağlanacağı, hakem kurullarının taraf
vekillerini cezalandırma yetkileri bulunup bulunmadığı hususlarında birçok
soruyu da beraberinde getirmektedir. Bu çalışmada uluslararası ticari tahkimde
taraf vekillerine uygulanan mevcut kurallar incelenecek, bu kuralların içeriği
ve uygulamada karşılaşılan zorluklar değerlendirilecek ve son olarak mevcut
düzenlemelerdeki eksiklikler ile yaptırım sorunu tartışılacaktır.

References

  • Balkar B S, Milletlerarası Ticari Tahkimde Hakemlerin Bağımsızlık Yükümlülüğü, (Onikilevha Yayınları, 2016).
  • Bishop R D, Stevens M, ‘Safeguarding the Fair Conduct of Proceedings – Report’, ICCA Congress Series, Kluwer Law International, (2013).
  • Born B G, International Commercial Arbitration, 2nd, (2014) Kluwer Law International.
  • Dasser F, Gauthey F, “La bonne foi dans l’arbitrage” (2015) ASA Bulletin, Kluwer Law International.
  • Dasser F, ‘Equality of Arms in International Arbitration: Do Rules and Guidelines Level the Playing Field and Properly Regulate Conduct? – Can They? Will They? Should They? The Example of the IBA Guidelines on Party Representation’ (2017) ICCA Congress Series, Kluwer Law International.
  • Halprin A P, ‘Resisting Guerrilla Tactics in International Arbitration’, The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management (2019) 85, Thomson Reuters, England.
  • Heitzmann P, ‘Confidentiality and Privileges in Cross-border Legal Practice: the Need for Global Standards?’ (2008) ASA Bulletin, 205.
  • Henry M, ‘Ethique et arbitrage, ou la solitude du coureur de fond’, Revue de l’Arbitrage, (2016) 2016 (3), 734, 748.
  • Hodges P, “International Arbitration: Time to Draw the Line?” (2015) Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration.
  • Marzolini P, ‘Counsel Ethics in International Arbitration: Is There Any Need for Regulation?’ (2017) S 2, Indian Journal of Arbitration Law.
  • Nessi S, ‘Creation of a Global Arbitration Ethics Council: the Swiss Arbitration Association declares that time has not yet come’ <http://arbitrationblog.practicallaw.com/creation-of-aglobal-arbitration-ethics-council-the-swiss-arbitration-association-declares-that-time-has-notyet-come/> Erişim Tarihi: 04.12.2018.
  • Osmanoğlu B, ‘Third-Party Funding in International Commercial Arbitration and Arbitrator Conflict of Interest’ (2015) S 3, 32 Kluwer Law International, Journal of International Arbitration. Reisman W M, ‘Nullity and Revision: The Review and Enforcement of International Judgements and Awards’ (1971) Yale University Press.
  • Rogers A C, ‘Fit and Function in Legal Ethics: Developing a Code of Conduct for International Arbitration’, <https://elibrary.law.psu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1238&context=fac_ works> Erişim Tarihi: 04.12.2018.
  • Wessel J, McAllister G, ‘Towards a Workable Approach to Ethical Regulation in International Arbitration’ (2015) 10(2) Canadian International Lawyer.
  • Zharikov A, ‘Conflicts and Ethics in International Arbitration’ (2019) The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management, 85, Thomson Reuters, England.

Ethical Rules Applicable to Party Representatives in International Commercial Arbitration and Difficulties Encountered in Practice

Year 2019, Volume: 39 Issue: 1, 275 - 294, 26.06.2019

Abstract

Parties in international commercial arbitration are represented either by one or more party representatives registered with multiple bars or not registered with a bar at all or by a layperson. The seat of arbitration is usually where neither party’s representative is licensed. This diversity arising out of the very nature of international arbitration gives rise to the application of multiple ethical rules to party’s representatives and brings up the question of which ethical rules shall be applicable to parties’ representatives, who shall be the competent authority in case of breach and whether the arbitral tribunals have legitimate power to sanction the parties’ representatives. In this article, we first examine existing ethical rules regulating the conduct of party representatives in international arbitration. Then we explain the content and difficulties encountered in the application of the said rules. Finally, we discuss the gaps of the current regulations and the enforcement issue. 

References

  • Balkar B S, Milletlerarası Ticari Tahkimde Hakemlerin Bağımsızlık Yükümlülüğü, (Onikilevha Yayınları, 2016).
  • Bishop R D, Stevens M, ‘Safeguarding the Fair Conduct of Proceedings – Report’, ICCA Congress Series, Kluwer Law International, (2013).
  • Born B G, International Commercial Arbitration, 2nd, (2014) Kluwer Law International.
  • Dasser F, Gauthey F, “La bonne foi dans l’arbitrage” (2015) ASA Bulletin, Kluwer Law International.
  • Dasser F, ‘Equality of Arms in International Arbitration: Do Rules and Guidelines Level the Playing Field and Properly Regulate Conduct? – Can They? Will They? Should They? The Example of the IBA Guidelines on Party Representation’ (2017) ICCA Congress Series, Kluwer Law International.
  • Halprin A P, ‘Resisting Guerrilla Tactics in International Arbitration’, The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management (2019) 85, Thomson Reuters, England.
  • Heitzmann P, ‘Confidentiality and Privileges in Cross-border Legal Practice: the Need for Global Standards?’ (2008) ASA Bulletin, 205.
  • Henry M, ‘Ethique et arbitrage, ou la solitude du coureur de fond’, Revue de l’Arbitrage, (2016) 2016 (3), 734, 748.
  • Hodges P, “International Arbitration: Time to Draw the Line?” (2015) Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration.
  • Marzolini P, ‘Counsel Ethics in International Arbitration: Is There Any Need for Regulation?’ (2017) S 2, Indian Journal of Arbitration Law.
  • Nessi S, ‘Creation of a Global Arbitration Ethics Council: the Swiss Arbitration Association declares that time has not yet come’ <http://arbitrationblog.practicallaw.com/creation-of-aglobal-arbitration-ethics-council-the-swiss-arbitration-association-declares-that-time-has-notyet-come/> Erişim Tarihi: 04.12.2018.
  • Osmanoğlu B, ‘Third-Party Funding in International Commercial Arbitration and Arbitrator Conflict of Interest’ (2015) S 3, 32 Kluwer Law International, Journal of International Arbitration. Reisman W M, ‘Nullity and Revision: The Review and Enforcement of International Judgements and Awards’ (1971) Yale University Press.
  • Rogers A C, ‘Fit and Function in Legal Ethics: Developing a Code of Conduct for International Arbitration’, <https://elibrary.law.psu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1238&context=fac_ works> Erişim Tarihi: 04.12.2018.
  • Wessel J, McAllister G, ‘Towards a Workable Approach to Ethical Regulation in International Arbitration’ (2015) 10(2) Canadian International Lawyer.
  • Zharikov A, ‘Conflicts and Ethics in International Arbitration’ (2019) The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management, 85, Thomson Reuters, England.
There are 15 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Burcu Osmanoğlu This is me 0000-0003-0591-6141

Publication Date June 26, 2019
Submission Date April 5, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 39 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Osmanoğlu, B. (2019). Uluslararası Ticari Tahkimde Taraf Vekillerine Uygulanan Etik Kurallar ve Uygulamada Karşılaşılan Sorunlar. Public and Private International Law Bulletin, 39(1), 275-294.
AMA Osmanoğlu B. Uluslararası Ticari Tahkimde Taraf Vekillerine Uygulanan Etik Kurallar ve Uygulamada Karşılaşılan Sorunlar. PPIL. June 2019;39(1):275-294.
Chicago Osmanoğlu, Burcu. “Uluslararası Ticari Tahkimde Taraf Vekillerine Uygulanan Etik Kurallar Ve Uygulamada Karşılaşılan Sorunlar”. Public and Private International Law Bulletin 39, no. 1 (June 2019): 275-94.
EndNote Osmanoğlu B (June 1, 2019) Uluslararası Ticari Tahkimde Taraf Vekillerine Uygulanan Etik Kurallar ve Uygulamada Karşılaşılan Sorunlar. Public and Private International Law Bulletin 39 1 275–294.
IEEE B. Osmanoğlu, “Uluslararası Ticari Tahkimde Taraf Vekillerine Uygulanan Etik Kurallar ve Uygulamada Karşılaşılan Sorunlar”, PPIL, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 275–294, 2019.
ISNAD Osmanoğlu, Burcu. “Uluslararası Ticari Tahkimde Taraf Vekillerine Uygulanan Etik Kurallar Ve Uygulamada Karşılaşılan Sorunlar”. Public and Private International Law Bulletin 39/1 (June 2019), 275-294.
JAMA Osmanoğlu B. Uluslararası Ticari Tahkimde Taraf Vekillerine Uygulanan Etik Kurallar ve Uygulamada Karşılaşılan Sorunlar. PPIL. 2019;39:275–294.
MLA Osmanoğlu, Burcu. “Uluslararası Ticari Tahkimde Taraf Vekillerine Uygulanan Etik Kurallar Ve Uygulamada Karşılaşılan Sorunlar”. Public and Private International Law Bulletin, vol. 39, no. 1, 2019, pp. 275-94.
Vancouver Osmanoğlu B. Uluslararası Ticari Tahkimde Taraf Vekillerine Uygulanan Etik Kurallar ve Uygulamada Karşılaşılan Sorunlar. PPIL. 2019;39(1):275-94.