ICSID Sözleşmesi ile oluşturulan Merkezin amacı, Sözleşmenin 1. Maddesi kapsamında yatırım uyuşmazlıklarının arabuluculuk ve tahkim yollarıyla çözümünü kolaylaştırmaktır. Bu çalışmada, Merkezin söz konusu amacı doğrultusunda Devletler ve Diğer Devletlerin Vatandaşları Arasındaki Yatırım Uyuşmazlıklarının Çözümlenmesi Hakkında Sözleşme (ICSID) uyarınca, yatırım uyuşmazlıklarının “ICSID Arabuluculuk Kuralları” ışığında çözümü ayrıntılı olarak ele alınmıştır. ICSID Arabuluculuk Kurallarında öngörülen arabuluculuk prosedürü de dahil olmak üzere, yatırım uyuşmazlıklarının dostane bir yöntem olarak arabuluculuk yoluyla çözümü bu çalışmanın esasını oluşturmaktadır. Arabuluculuk, bir yatırım uyuşmazlığının söz konusu olduğu hallerde, çoğunlukla tercih edilen tahkim yargılamasına alternatif bir çözüm yöntemi olarak karşımıza çıkar. Arabuluculuk, uzlaşı sağlanması adına birçok yönü itibariyle tahkim yargılamasının dezavantajlı özelliklerini daha esnek bir sürecin takip edilmesiyle giderebilen aynı zamanda, uzlaşı sağlanmasında tahkim yargılaması kadar etkili olabilecek bir yöntemdir. Arabuluculuk süreci sonunda verilen “arabuluculuk raporunun” bağlayıcılığı, yöntemin tercihinde rol oynayan en önemli faktörlerden biridir. Arabuluculuk, salt olarak sonucunda tavsiye niteliğinde bir karar ile herhangi bir bağlayıcılıktan söz edilmeksizin uzlaşı sağlanan bir süreç olarak görülmemelidir. Çalışmamızda, arabuluculuk sürecinin niteliği, tahkim yargılaması sonucunda verilen kararların aksine arabulucu raporlarının bağlayıcı etkisi bulunmadığını ve yatırım uyuşmazlıklarına konu olan büyük çaplı projelerde zaman kaybı olmaktan ileriye gidemeyeceğini savunan görüşler de dikkate alınarak incelenmiştir.
Abramson H, Mediation Representation: Advocating in a Problem-Solving Process, (3rd edn, Wolters Kluwer, 2013).
Berger KP, Private Dispute Resolution in International Business, Negotiation, Mediation, Arbitration, (Cilt 2, Gözden Geçirilmiş 3rd edn, Wolters Kluwer Law& Business 2015).
Bishop D, Enforcement of Arbitral Awards Against Sovereigns, JuricNet LLC (2009).
Black E, “History of the ICSID Convention: Documents Concerning the Origin and the Formulation of the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Others” (1968) 2(1).
Blankley K, “Keeping a Secret from Yourself? Confidentiality when the Same Neutral Serves both as Mediator and Arbitrator in the Same Case” (2011) 63(2)
Baylor Law Review. Bret AJ, “Reshaping the Investor-State Dispute Settlement System: Journeys for the 21st Century” (2015) TDM.
Brett JM / Shapiro DL, “Comparing Three Processes Underlying Judgements of Procedural Justice: A Field Study of Mediation and Arbitration, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology” (1993) 65(6) 1167,1177.
Bush RB, “Efficiency and Protection or Empowerment and Recognition?: The Mediator’s Role and Ethical Standards in Mediation” (1989) 41 University of Florida Law Review 253,286.
Coe J, “Toward a Complementary Use of Conciliation in Investor-State Disputes- A Preliminary Sketch” University of California, (2007) 12(7)
Davis 8,44. Connerty A, Manual od International Dispute Resolution, Commonwealth Secretariat (2006).
De Jonk, VBED, “The new swiss-german treaty of arbitration and conciliation” <https://archive. org/stream/jstor-20659950/20659950_djvu.tx> Çevrimiçi 30 Kasım 2018.
Demir Gökyayla C/ Süral C, “4875 Sayılı Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlar Kanunu ve Getirdiği Yenilikler” (2004) 6(2) Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 131,168.
Deutsch R, “An ICSID Tribunal Denies Jurisdiction for Failure to Satisfy BIT’s “Cooling-Off” Period; Further Evidence of a Sea Change in Investor-State Arbitration or a Meaningless Ripple?” (2010) (33) Hous. J.Int’I L. 589,594.
Dinç M, “ICSID Tahkim Sistemi ve ICSID Hakem Kararlarının Tanınması, Tenfizi ve İcrası” (2016) 11(120) Terazi Hukuk Dergisi 83,96.
Dost S, Yabancı Yatırım Uyuşmazlıkları ve ICSID Tahkimi (Asil Yayın 2006).
Egemen Demir I, Uluslararası Tahkim Hukukunda Şemsiye Klozlar, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Özel Hukuk Anabilim Dalı, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, (2007).
Erkan M, Milletlerarası Tahkimde Yetki Sorunları, (Yetkin Yayınları 2013).
Fabri HR; “The Relationship between Negotiations and Third-Party Dispute Settlement at the WTO, with an Emphasis on the EC-Bananas Dispute”, Laurence Boisson de Chazournes, Marcelo Kohen and Jorge Vinuales (eds), Diplomatic and Judicial Means of Dispute Settlement (Martinus Niljhoff Publishers 2013).
Franck S, “Using Investor-State Mediation Rules to Promote Conflict Management: An Introductory Guide” (2014) 29(1) ICSID Review- Foreign Investment Law Journal 66,89.
Garesh A, “Cooling Off Period (Investment Arbitration)”, Max Planck Institute Luxemburg of International Law and Dispute Resolution (2017).
Gill L, “The Nature of Arbitration: The Blurred Line Between Mediatory and Judicial Arbitration Proceedings” (1988-1999) 39(2) Case Western Reserve Law Review 545,555.
Giray FK, Milletlerarası Yatırım Tahkiminde Kamulaştırmadan Doğan Tazminat ve Tazminatın Hesaplanmasında Kullanılan Yöntemler (2nd edn, Beta 2013).
Golann D, “Mediating Legal Disputes: Effective Strategies for Neutrals and Advocates”, ABA Section of Dispute Resolution (2009).
Greenberg S/ Kee C/ Weeramanthry R, International Commercial Arbitration: An Asia Pacific Perspective (Cambridge University Press 2011).
Hanaway M, Co-Mediation: Using a Psychological, Paired Approach to Resolving Conflict, Corporate Harmony (2012).
Hollander Blumoff R/ Tyler T, “Procedural Justice and the Rule of Law: Fostering Legitimacy in Alternative Dispute Resolution” (2011) (1) Journal of Dispute Resolution 1,18.
Henderson S, “Promissory Estoppel and Traditional Contract Doctrine” (1969) 78(3) Yale Law Journal 343,387.
Imhoos C, “The Enactment of the French Decree No. 2012-66 of January 20, 2012 Related to the Amicable Settlement of Disputes: Some Progress in ADR in France?” (Kluwer Mediation Blog) <http://mediationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2012/02/07/the-enactment-of-the-frenchdecree-no-2012-66-of-january-20-2012-related-to-the-amicable-settlement-of-disputes-someprogress-in-adr-in-france/> Çevrimiçi 01 Aralık 2018.
Kalicki J/ Bret AJ, “Reshaping the Investor-State Dispute Settlement System: Journeys for the 21st Century” (2015) TDM.
Khalifa F, “Mediation Use in ISDS” (2014) (1) Transnational Dispute Management.
Koopmans S, “Diplomatic Dispute Settlement: The Use of Inter-State Conciliation” (2008) TMC Asser Press.
Landry S, “Med-Arb: Mediation with a Bite and an Effective ADR Model” (1996) (63) Defense Counsel Journal 263,266.
Merrils JG; International Dispute Settlement (5th edn, Cambridge University Press 2012).
Nitschke F, “The ICSID Conciliation Rules in Practice” <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=3257031> Çevrimiçi 30 Kasım 2018
Onwuamaegbu U, “The Role of ADR in Investor-State Dsipute Settlement: The ICSID Experience” (2005) 22(2) News from ICSID 12,14.
Orrego Vicuna F, “Arbitration in a New International Dispute Resolution System” (2001) 18(2) News from ICSID 1,20.
Özbek MS, “Arabuluculuk ile Tahkim Yöntemlerinin Kesişme Bölgesi: Arabuluculuk-Tahkim” (2017) 43(1) Yargıtay Dergisi 15,106.
Özmumcu S, Uzak Doğu’da Arabuluculuk Anlayışı ile Türk Hukuk Sisteminde Arabuluculuk Kurumuna Genel Bir Bakış (On İki Levha Yayıncılık 2013)
Özmumcu S, “Karşılaştırmalı Hukuk ve Türk Hukuku Açısından Zorunlu Arabuluculuk Sistemine Genel Bir Bakış” (2016) LXXIV(2) İÜHFD 807,847.
Öztekin Gelgel G, “5 Ekim 1980 Tarihli Uluslararası Çocuk Kaçırma ve Hukuki Yönlerine İlişkin Lahey Sözleşmesi Çerçevesinde Arabuluculuk Uygulaması” 37(2) MHB 611,640.
Parra A, “The Development of the Regulations and Rules of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes” (2007) 22(1) ICSID Review- Foreign Investment Law Journal 55,68.
Polasek M, “The Consultation Period Requirement In Investment Treaties As a Matter of Jurisdiction, Admissibility or Procedure” (2006) 23(1) News From ICSID.
Polat M, Milletlerarası Usul Hukukunda Arabuluculuk (Yetkin Yayınları 2010).
Pürselim HS, “Yabancılık İçeren Arabuluculuk Usulü ve Bağlayıcılığı Hakkında Düşünceler” (2014) 20(2) MÜHF-HAD 3,21.
Rayfuse R, ICSID Reports: Reports Decided under the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States, (Cambridge University Press 1994).
Reif L, “Conciliation As a Mechanism for the Resolution of International Economic and Business Disputes” (1990) 14(3) Fordham International Law Journal 578,638.
Salacause J, “Is There a Better Way? Alternative Methods of Treaty- Based Investor State Dispute Resolution” (2007) 31(1) Fordham International Law Journal 138,185.
Schnably S/ Nurick L, “The First ICSID Conciliation: Tesoro Petroleum Corporation v Trinidad and Tobago” (1986) 1 ICSID Review- Foreign Investment Law Journal 340,353.
Schreuer C, “The ICSID Convention: on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States” (Cambridge University Press 2001).
Schreuer C / Malintopp, L/ Reinisch A/ Sinclair A, The ICSID Convention: A Commentary, (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press 2013).
Sim C, “ICSID Amendmends in 2017: Exploring Early Mediation or Conciliation” <https://icsid. worldbank.org/en/amendmends/Documents/6.%20Christine%20Sim.pdf> Erişim Tarihi 1 Aralık 2018.
Sornarajah M, “A Law for Need or A Law for Greed?: Restoring the Lost Law in the International Law of Foreign Investment” I(2006) 6(4) International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 329,357.
Stevens M, “Arbitration and Investment Disputes: Are We Heading in the Right Direction?” (2002) 19(1) News from ICSID 1,12.
Sussman E, “Developing an Effective Med-Arb/Arb-Med Process” (2009) 2(1) New York Dispute Resolution Lawyer 71,74.
Şanlı C; “Uluslararası Ticari Akitlerin Hazırlanması ve Uyuşmazlıkların Çözüm Yolları” (6th edn, Beta 2016).
Tanrıver S, Hukuki Uyuşmazlıklar Bağlamında Alternatif Uyuşmazlık Çözüm Yolları ve Özellikle Arabuluculuk, Makalelerim-II 2006-2010 (Adalet Yayınevi 2011).
Tarman ZD, “Tarafsız Bir Üçüncü Kişi Uyuşmazlıkta Hem Hakem Hem de Arabulucu Olabilir mi?” (2010) (2010/86) Legal Hukuk Dergisi 463,471.
Telford ME, “Med-Arb: A Viable Dispute Resolution Alternative” Queens University IRC Press, Current Issues Series 1,17.
Troya JJ, “Cooling-off Periods in Investment Treaty Arbitration: An Opportunity to Negotiate or a Mere Formality? Views from a Negotiation Perspective”, Harvard Law School Master of Laws Class (2014).
Ubilava A/ Nottage L, “ICSID’s New Mediation Rules: A Small but Positive Step Forward” <https://icsid.worldbank.org/en/Documents/Ubilava_Notage_10.17.2018.pdf> Erişim Tarihi 1 Aralık 2018.
Welser I, “Alternative Dispute Resolution- A Wide Choice of Varities” (2016) 3 İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi (Prof. Dr. İlhan Ulusan’a Armağan) 757,774.
Welsh N, “Making Deals in Court-Connected Mediation: What’s Justice Got to Do with It?” (2001) 79(3) Wash ULQ 788,858.
The purpose of the Center established by the ICSID Convention, is to facilitate the settlement of investment disputes through conciliation and arbitration mechanisms under Article 1 of the Convention. Related with the mentioned purpose, in this article, the resolution of investment disputes has been analyzed in the light of “ICSID Conciliation Rules” of the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (ICSID). Including the conciliation procedure prescribed in ICSID Conciliation Rules, the corner stone of this article constituted under the conciliation process as an amicable settlement method. Conciliation, where an investment dispute is involved, is often an alternative solution to the arbitral proceedings. As of many aspects, conciliation can be as effective as an arbitration in order to achieve a consensus via eliminating the disadvantageous features of arbitral proceedings thanks to its more flexible structure. Whether the binding feature of the “conciliator report” at the end of the process is one of the most important factors in the choice of this method. Conciliation should not be seen as an advisory process merely. Within the framework of this article, the characteristics of conciliation process has been examined considering the opposite opinions that advocate the a nonfunctionality and nonbinding effect of conciliation.
Abramson H, Mediation Representation: Advocating in a Problem-Solving Process, (3rd edn, Wolters Kluwer, 2013).
Berger KP, Private Dispute Resolution in International Business, Negotiation, Mediation, Arbitration, (Cilt 2, Gözden Geçirilmiş 3rd edn, Wolters Kluwer Law& Business 2015).
Bishop D, Enforcement of Arbitral Awards Against Sovereigns, JuricNet LLC (2009).
Black E, “History of the ICSID Convention: Documents Concerning the Origin and the Formulation of the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Others” (1968) 2(1).
Blankley K, “Keeping a Secret from Yourself? Confidentiality when the Same Neutral Serves both as Mediator and Arbitrator in the Same Case” (2011) 63(2)
Baylor Law Review. Bret AJ, “Reshaping the Investor-State Dispute Settlement System: Journeys for the 21st Century” (2015) TDM.
Brett JM / Shapiro DL, “Comparing Three Processes Underlying Judgements of Procedural Justice: A Field Study of Mediation and Arbitration, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology” (1993) 65(6) 1167,1177.
Bush RB, “Efficiency and Protection or Empowerment and Recognition?: The Mediator’s Role and Ethical Standards in Mediation” (1989) 41 University of Florida Law Review 253,286.
Coe J, “Toward a Complementary Use of Conciliation in Investor-State Disputes- A Preliminary Sketch” University of California, (2007) 12(7)
Davis 8,44. Connerty A, Manual od International Dispute Resolution, Commonwealth Secretariat (2006).
De Jonk, VBED, “The new swiss-german treaty of arbitration and conciliation” <https://archive. org/stream/jstor-20659950/20659950_djvu.tx> Çevrimiçi 30 Kasım 2018.
Demir Gökyayla C/ Süral C, “4875 Sayılı Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlar Kanunu ve Getirdiği Yenilikler” (2004) 6(2) Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 131,168.
Deutsch R, “An ICSID Tribunal Denies Jurisdiction for Failure to Satisfy BIT’s “Cooling-Off” Period; Further Evidence of a Sea Change in Investor-State Arbitration or a Meaningless Ripple?” (2010) (33) Hous. J.Int’I L. 589,594.
Dinç M, “ICSID Tahkim Sistemi ve ICSID Hakem Kararlarının Tanınması, Tenfizi ve İcrası” (2016) 11(120) Terazi Hukuk Dergisi 83,96.
Dost S, Yabancı Yatırım Uyuşmazlıkları ve ICSID Tahkimi (Asil Yayın 2006).
Egemen Demir I, Uluslararası Tahkim Hukukunda Şemsiye Klozlar, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Özel Hukuk Anabilim Dalı, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, (2007).
Erkan M, Milletlerarası Tahkimde Yetki Sorunları, (Yetkin Yayınları 2013).
Fabri HR; “The Relationship between Negotiations and Third-Party Dispute Settlement at the WTO, with an Emphasis on the EC-Bananas Dispute”, Laurence Boisson de Chazournes, Marcelo Kohen and Jorge Vinuales (eds), Diplomatic and Judicial Means of Dispute Settlement (Martinus Niljhoff Publishers 2013).
Franck S, “Using Investor-State Mediation Rules to Promote Conflict Management: An Introductory Guide” (2014) 29(1) ICSID Review- Foreign Investment Law Journal 66,89.
Garesh A, “Cooling Off Period (Investment Arbitration)”, Max Planck Institute Luxemburg of International Law and Dispute Resolution (2017).
Gill L, “The Nature of Arbitration: The Blurred Line Between Mediatory and Judicial Arbitration Proceedings” (1988-1999) 39(2) Case Western Reserve Law Review 545,555.
Giray FK, Milletlerarası Yatırım Tahkiminde Kamulaştırmadan Doğan Tazminat ve Tazminatın Hesaplanmasında Kullanılan Yöntemler (2nd edn, Beta 2013).
Golann D, “Mediating Legal Disputes: Effective Strategies for Neutrals and Advocates”, ABA Section of Dispute Resolution (2009).
Greenberg S/ Kee C/ Weeramanthry R, International Commercial Arbitration: An Asia Pacific Perspective (Cambridge University Press 2011).
Hanaway M, Co-Mediation: Using a Psychological, Paired Approach to Resolving Conflict, Corporate Harmony (2012).
Hollander Blumoff R/ Tyler T, “Procedural Justice and the Rule of Law: Fostering Legitimacy in Alternative Dispute Resolution” (2011) (1) Journal of Dispute Resolution 1,18.
Henderson S, “Promissory Estoppel and Traditional Contract Doctrine” (1969) 78(3) Yale Law Journal 343,387.
Imhoos C, “The Enactment of the French Decree No. 2012-66 of January 20, 2012 Related to the Amicable Settlement of Disputes: Some Progress in ADR in France?” (Kluwer Mediation Blog) <http://mediationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2012/02/07/the-enactment-of-the-frenchdecree-no-2012-66-of-january-20-2012-related-to-the-amicable-settlement-of-disputes-someprogress-in-adr-in-france/> Çevrimiçi 01 Aralık 2018.
Kalicki J/ Bret AJ, “Reshaping the Investor-State Dispute Settlement System: Journeys for the 21st Century” (2015) TDM.
Khalifa F, “Mediation Use in ISDS” (2014) (1) Transnational Dispute Management.
Koopmans S, “Diplomatic Dispute Settlement: The Use of Inter-State Conciliation” (2008) TMC Asser Press.
Landry S, “Med-Arb: Mediation with a Bite and an Effective ADR Model” (1996) (63) Defense Counsel Journal 263,266.
Merrils JG; International Dispute Settlement (5th edn, Cambridge University Press 2012).
Nitschke F, “The ICSID Conciliation Rules in Practice” <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=3257031> Çevrimiçi 30 Kasım 2018
Onwuamaegbu U, “The Role of ADR in Investor-State Dsipute Settlement: The ICSID Experience” (2005) 22(2) News from ICSID 12,14.
Orrego Vicuna F, “Arbitration in a New International Dispute Resolution System” (2001) 18(2) News from ICSID 1,20.
Özbek MS, “Arabuluculuk ile Tahkim Yöntemlerinin Kesişme Bölgesi: Arabuluculuk-Tahkim” (2017) 43(1) Yargıtay Dergisi 15,106.
Özmumcu S, Uzak Doğu’da Arabuluculuk Anlayışı ile Türk Hukuk Sisteminde Arabuluculuk Kurumuna Genel Bir Bakış (On İki Levha Yayıncılık 2013)
Özmumcu S, “Karşılaştırmalı Hukuk ve Türk Hukuku Açısından Zorunlu Arabuluculuk Sistemine Genel Bir Bakış” (2016) LXXIV(2) İÜHFD 807,847.
Öztekin Gelgel G, “5 Ekim 1980 Tarihli Uluslararası Çocuk Kaçırma ve Hukuki Yönlerine İlişkin Lahey Sözleşmesi Çerçevesinde Arabuluculuk Uygulaması” 37(2) MHB 611,640.
Parra A, “The Development of the Regulations and Rules of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes” (2007) 22(1) ICSID Review- Foreign Investment Law Journal 55,68.
Polasek M, “The Consultation Period Requirement In Investment Treaties As a Matter of Jurisdiction, Admissibility or Procedure” (2006) 23(1) News From ICSID.
Polat M, Milletlerarası Usul Hukukunda Arabuluculuk (Yetkin Yayınları 2010).
Pürselim HS, “Yabancılık İçeren Arabuluculuk Usulü ve Bağlayıcılığı Hakkında Düşünceler” (2014) 20(2) MÜHF-HAD 3,21.
Rayfuse R, ICSID Reports: Reports Decided under the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States, (Cambridge University Press 1994).
Reif L, “Conciliation As a Mechanism for the Resolution of International Economic and Business Disputes” (1990) 14(3) Fordham International Law Journal 578,638.
Salacause J, “Is There a Better Way? Alternative Methods of Treaty- Based Investor State Dispute Resolution” (2007) 31(1) Fordham International Law Journal 138,185.
Schnably S/ Nurick L, “The First ICSID Conciliation: Tesoro Petroleum Corporation v Trinidad and Tobago” (1986) 1 ICSID Review- Foreign Investment Law Journal 340,353.
Schreuer C, “The ICSID Convention: on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States” (Cambridge University Press 2001).
Schreuer C / Malintopp, L/ Reinisch A/ Sinclair A, The ICSID Convention: A Commentary, (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press 2013).
Sim C, “ICSID Amendmends in 2017: Exploring Early Mediation or Conciliation” <https://icsid. worldbank.org/en/amendmends/Documents/6.%20Christine%20Sim.pdf> Erişim Tarihi 1 Aralık 2018.
Sornarajah M, “A Law for Need or A Law for Greed?: Restoring the Lost Law in the International Law of Foreign Investment” I(2006) 6(4) International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 329,357.
Stevens M, “Arbitration and Investment Disputes: Are We Heading in the Right Direction?” (2002) 19(1) News from ICSID 1,12.
Sussman E, “Developing an Effective Med-Arb/Arb-Med Process” (2009) 2(1) New York Dispute Resolution Lawyer 71,74.
Şanlı C; “Uluslararası Ticari Akitlerin Hazırlanması ve Uyuşmazlıkların Çözüm Yolları” (6th edn, Beta 2016).
Tanrıver S, Hukuki Uyuşmazlıklar Bağlamında Alternatif Uyuşmazlık Çözüm Yolları ve Özellikle Arabuluculuk, Makalelerim-II 2006-2010 (Adalet Yayınevi 2011).
Tarman ZD, “Tarafsız Bir Üçüncü Kişi Uyuşmazlıkta Hem Hakem Hem de Arabulucu Olabilir mi?” (2010) (2010/86) Legal Hukuk Dergisi 463,471.
Telford ME, “Med-Arb: A Viable Dispute Resolution Alternative” Queens University IRC Press, Current Issues Series 1,17.
Troya JJ, “Cooling-off Periods in Investment Treaty Arbitration: An Opportunity to Negotiate or a Mere Formality? Views from a Negotiation Perspective”, Harvard Law School Master of Laws Class (2014).
Ubilava A/ Nottage L, “ICSID’s New Mediation Rules: A Small but Positive Step Forward” <https://icsid.worldbank.org/en/Documents/Ubilava_Notage_10.17.2018.pdf> Erişim Tarihi 1 Aralık 2018.
Welser I, “Alternative Dispute Resolution- A Wide Choice of Varities” (2016) 3 İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi (Prof. Dr. İlhan Ulusan’a Armağan) 757,774.
Welsh N, “Making Deals in Court-Connected Mediation: What’s Justice Got to Do with It?” (2001) 79(3) Wash ULQ 788,858.
Baytaroğlu, D. (2019). Yatırım Uyuşmazlıklarının ICSID Arabuluculuk Kurallarına İstinaden Çözümü. Public and Private International Law Bulletin, 39(2), 357-392. https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2019.39.2.0004
AMA
Baytaroğlu D. Yatırım Uyuşmazlıklarının ICSID Arabuluculuk Kurallarına İstinaden Çözümü. PPIL. December 2019;39(2):357-392. doi:10.26650/ppil.2019.39.2.0004
Chicago
Baytaroğlu, Dilara. “Yatırım Uyuşmazlıklarının ICSID Arabuluculuk Kurallarına İstinaden Çözümü”. Public and Private International Law Bulletin 39, no. 2 (December 2019): 357-92. https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2019.39.2.0004.
EndNote
Baytaroğlu D (December 1, 2019) Yatırım Uyuşmazlıklarının ICSID Arabuluculuk Kurallarına İstinaden Çözümü. Public and Private International Law Bulletin 39 2 357–392.
IEEE
D. Baytaroğlu, “Yatırım Uyuşmazlıklarının ICSID Arabuluculuk Kurallarına İstinaden Çözümü”, PPIL, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 357–392, 2019, doi: 10.26650/ppil.2019.39.2.0004.
ISNAD
Baytaroğlu, Dilara. “Yatırım Uyuşmazlıklarının ICSID Arabuluculuk Kurallarına İstinaden Çözümü”. Public and Private International Law Bulletin 39/2 (December 2019), 357-392. https://doi.org/10.26650/ppil.2019.39.2.0004.
Baytaroğlu, Dilara. “Yatırım Uyuşmazlıklarının ICSID Arabuluculuk Kurallarına İstinaden Çözümü”. Public and Private International Law Bulletin, vol. 39, no. 2, 2019, pp. 357-92, doi:10.26650/ppil.2019.39.2.0004.