The Use of Orlando’s Interaction Theory in Nursing Care Practice: Celiac Disease

Year 2019, Volume: 7 Issue: Ek - IRUPEC 2019 Kongresi Tam Metin Bildirileri, 259 - 263, 10.12.2019

Dilek Şayık , Ayfer Açıkgöz , Deniz Yiğit

Abstract

Nursing is a profession that aims to provide care practices for individuals in a good and bad state of health. Therefore, the use of nursing theories and models in nursing care practices has key importance. The nurse-patient relationship maintains therapeutically through the care practices that base on nursing theories and models and integrative care can be provided to the patient. One of the theories that enable the given situation is Orlando’s Interaction Theory which creates an empathetic relationship between nurses and patients. The objective of this study is to provide an example of nursing care provided to a child diagnosed with Celiac Disease based on Orlando’s Interaction Theory.
Method: The study was designed in the form of a case report and the study data was collected using interviews conducted with the patient and observations.
Findings: As a result of the interviews, it was determined that the patient experienced difficulties in complying with the diet, felt restricted by the family members and overcoming stressful situations. Nursing interventions were planned by evaluating the verbal and non-verbal behaviors of the patient. The study findings showed that the patient exhibited more positive behaviors when his/her needs were met and the family also contributed to the management of the illness and the self-management skills of the patient were improved.
Result: Orlando’s Interaction Theory can be used for managing the illness of children who suffer from chronic illnesses. Our suggestion is to increase the proper and effective use of Orlando’s Interaction Theory in the provision of care to patients with chronic illnesses.

Keywords

Nurse, Orlando, Interaction Theory

References

• KAYNAKLAR 1. Bekem Soylu Ö, Ecevit ÖÇ. Çölyak hastalığı tanısı ile izlenen olguların klinik değerlendirmesi. İzmir Dr. Behçet Uz Çocuk Hast. Derg 2013; 3(1): 38-43. doi:10.5222/buchd.2013.038 2. Kondolot M, Demirçeken F, Ertan Ü. Vaka ile Türk çocuklarında çölyak hastalığı. Türkiye Çocuk Hast Derg 2009;3(1):10-7. 3. Fuchs V, Kurppa K, Huhtala H et al. Delayed celiac disease diagnosis predisposes to reduced quality of life and incremental use of health care services and medicines: A prospective nation wide study. United European Gastroenterology J 2018; 6(4): 567-575. Doı: 10.1177/2050640617751253. 4. Singh P, Arora A, Strand TA et al. Global prevalence of celiac disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2018; 16(6): 823-836. 5. Comba A, Eren NB, Demir E. Prevalence of celiac disease among school-age children in Çorum, Turkey. The Turkish J Gastroenterology 2018; 29(5): 595. 6. Sağlık Bakanlığı. Çölyak hastalığı görülme sıklığı ve illere dağılımı. Erişim tarihi: 21.11.2018. https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/tr/metabolizma-ve-colyak/ 7. Yanar Ö, Durmaz Ö, Gökçay G. Atipik başlangıçlı çölyak hastalığı. Çocuk Derg 2013;13(3):126-30. Doi:10.5222/j.child.2013.126 8. Uenishi TH, Gandolfi L, Almeida LM et al. Screening for celiac disease in 1st degree relatives: a 10-year follow-up study. BMC Gastroenterology. 2014; 14(1): 36. Doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-14-36. 9. Guandalini S, Discepolo V. Celiac Disease. In: Guandalini S, Dhawan A, Branski D, editors. Text book of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. 1st ed. Switzerland: Springer. 2016. p:453-70. 10. Emiroğlu HH, Emiroğlu M, Akbulut H, Eryılmaz A, Bayram RO, Yüksel A, Ağır MA. Clinical characteristics in children with celiac disease: a single center results. J Contemp Med 2017; 7(4): 1-7. oı: 10.16899/gopctd.358797. 11. Potter MD, Brienesse SC, Walker MM, Boyle A, Talley NJ. Effect of the gluten-free diet on cardiovascular risk factors in patients with coeliac disease: A systematic review. J gastroenterology and hepatology 2018; 33(4):781-91. Doi.org/10.1111/jgh.14039. 12. Serin Y, Akbulut G. Çölyak hastalığı ve glutensiz diyet tedavisine güncel yaklaşım. Turkiye Klin J of Health Scien 2017; 2(3): 192-200. Doı: 10.5336/healthsci.2016-53640. 13. Demirağ SA. Kronik hastalıklar ve yaşam kalitesi. Sağlıklı Yaşam Tarzı Derg 2009;1(1): 58-65. 14. Haskett T. Chronic illness management: Changing the system. Home Health Care Management Prac 2006;18(6):492-94. Doi.org/10.1177/1084822306289988. 15. Kudubeş AA, Bektaş M. Çocukluk dönemi kronik hastalıklarında kullanılan model ve teoriler. Dokuz Eylül Üniv Hem Fak Elek Derg 2015;8(1):39-44. 16. Uslu N, Bayat M, Variyenli N, Arıcan F, Hatipoğlu N. Orlando’nun etkileşim teorisinin uygulamada kullanımına bir örnek: Tip 1 diyabetes mellitus. Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniv Hem e-Derg. 2016;3(1):64-70. 17. Velioğlu P. Hemşirelikte Kavram ve Kuramlar. İstanbul: Alaş Ofset; 1999:351-65. 18. Fawcett J. Orlando’s Theory of the Deliberative Nursing Process. ed. Contemporary Nursing Knowledge Analysis and Evaluation of Nursing Models and Theories. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company. 2005:506-27. 19. Sheldon LK, Ellington L. Application of a model of social information processing to nursing theory: how nurses respond to patients. J Adv Nurs 2008;64(4):388-98. 20. Schmieding N. Orlando's nursing process theory in nursing practice. Nursing theory: Utilization & application St. Louis: Mosby 2002: 315-37. 21. Faust C. A practice application in an extended care facility. J Gerontological Nurs 2002;28(7):14-8. 22. Parker LM. Twentieth-Century Nursing Wieden bach, Henderson, and Orlando’s Theories and Their Applications. Gesse T, Dombro M, Gordon SC, Rittman MR, ed. Nursing Theories and Nursing Practice. Philadelhia: F. A. Davis Company; 2005:73-7. 23. Tomey AM, Alligood MR. Ida Jean Orlando. Schumacher, Fisher S, Tomey AM, Mills DI, Sauter MK. Nursing Theorists and Their Work. Boston: Mosby YearBook; 1998: 351-63. 24. Vandemark LM. Awareness of self & expanding consciousness: Using nursing theories to prepare nurse-therapists. Mental Health Nurs 2006; 27(6):605-15. 25. Abdoli S, Safavi SS. Nursing students’ immediate responses to distressed clients based on Orlando’s theory. Iranian J Nurs and Midwifery Res 2010;15(4):178-84. 26. Uslu N, Bayat M, Variyenli N et al. Orlando’nun etkileşim teorisinin uygulamada kullanımına bir Örnek: Tip 1 Diyabetes Mellitus. Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniv Hem E-Derg 2016; 3(1). 27. Can S, Yıldırım Usta Y, Can Çiçek S. Orlando’nun hemşirelik süreci teorisi’nin uygulamada kullanımına bir örnek: olgu sunumu. Diyabet, Obezite ve Hipertansiyonda Hemş Form Derg 2019, 11(1).