Profile Empathy Quality and Prosocial Intension of Counselor Candidates

Year 2020, Volume: 1 Issue: 1, 11 - 18, 15.06.2020

Muwakhidah Muwakhidah Nur Hıdayah

Abstract

This study aims to explore the quality of empathy and prosocial intentions of counselor candidates and see the effect of empathy quality on the prosocial intensity of counselor candidates. The study uses descriptive survey type. The research sample of 260 counselor candidates of 11 Guidance and Counseling Study Programs in Indonesia. The research sample was selected using purposive sampling technique. Data collection using a questionnaire that is the empathy quality scale (EQS) and prosocial intention scale (PIS) in the form of a five-level scale. Data analysis techniques used descriptive statistics and regression analysis (ANAREG) and analysis of variance (ANOVA). The results showed the empathy quality of students in the good category, they showed better scores in Personal Distress factors, Perspective Taking factors, Fantasy factors, and Emphatic Concerns. But it shows a lower prosocial intention score. The results also showed that there was no correlation between empathic quality and prosocial intentions of students

Keywords

emphatic quality, prosocial intention, Counselor candidate

Supporting Institution

Beasiswa Unggulan Dosen Indonesia (BUDI) Kementerian Riset, Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi (Kemristekdikti) dan Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan (LPDP)

Thanks

Beasiswa Unggulan Dosen Indonesia (BUDI) Kementerian Riset, Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi (Kemristekdikti) dan Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan (LPDP)

References

• Azwar, S. (2003). Arrangement of Psychology Scale. Student Library.
• Gayati, T., Amalia, S., Maimunah, S. (2018). The Effectiveness of Empathy Care Training to Improve Empathy in Nursing Students. Journal of Psychological Intervention, 10(1), 43–56.
• Hall, C. S. & Lindzey, G. (1978). Theories of Personality. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
• Heppner, P.P., Wampold, B.E., & Kivlighan, D. . (2008). Research design in counseling (3rd Edition) (3rd Editio). Thomson & Brooks/Cole.
• Hojat, M. R., Mangione, S., Nasca, T. J. & Gonnella, J. S. (2005). Empathy Scores in Medical School and Ratings of Empathic Behavior in Residency Training 3 Years Later. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145(6), 663–672.
• Manstead, A. S. R., Hewstone, M., Editors, A., Fiske, S. T., Hogg, M. A., & Reis, H. T. (1996). The Blackwell encyclopedia of social psychology. Choice Reviews Online, 33(05), 33-2457-33–2457. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.33-2457
• McLeod, J. (2001). Qualitative Research in Counselling and Psychotherapy. Sage Publications.
• Miller, P. A & Eisenberg, N. (1997). The Relation Of Empathy To Prosocial And Related Behaviors. Journal Psychological, 101(1), 91–119.
• Miville, M. L., Carlozzi, A. F., Gushue, G. V., Schara, S. L. & Ueda, M. (2006). Mental Health Counselor Qualities for a Diverse Clientele: Linking Empathy, Universal-Diverse Orientation, and Emotional Intelligence. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 28(2), 151–165.
• Miville et al. (2006). Mental Health Counselor Qualities for a Diverse Clientele: Linking Empathy, Universal-Diverse Orientation, and Emotional Intelligence. Ournal of Mental Health Counseling:, 28(2), 151-165. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17744/mehc.28.2.6khc06t87c2fr7y3
• Myers, S. C. (2001). Capital Structure. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2), 81–102.
• Ratnasari, Shinantya & Suleeman, J. (2017). The Difference of Women and Male Emotion Regulations at University. Journal of Social Psychology, 15(1), 35–46.
• Robinson, E. H. M. & Curry, J. R. (2006). Promoting Altruism in the Classroom. Childhood Education, 82(2), 68–73.
• Shechtman, Z. (2003). Cognitive and Affective Empathy in Aggressive Behavior; Implications for Counseling. International Journal for the Advancement of Counseling, 24(4), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023316712331