The correlation between self-efficacy and academic dishonesty among the students

Year 2022, Volume: 3 Issue: 3, 95 - 100, 30.09.2022

Fina Mufarrihah

Abstract

Academic dishonesty often occurs in the academic world. Self-efficacy is one of the variables that affect academic dishonesty. The purpose of this study is to ascertain whether academic dishonesty among students attending Islamic high schools is correlated with self-efficacy. The method applied in this research is correlational. The subjects of this research consist of 265 students. The research instrument applies Academic Dishonesty Scale and the Academic Self-Efficacy Scale. The data analysis technique uses the spearman rank correlation technique. According to the study's findings, there is a substantial inverse relationship between students at Islamic high schools' self-efficacy and academic dishonesty (r = -0.451; p 0.05). This study suggests that in order to decrease academic dishonesty, teachers should boost their students' self-efficacy.

Keywords

self-efficacy, academic dishonesty, high school student

Supporting Institution

Madrasah Aliyah Miftahul Qulub Pamekasan, Indonesia dan Faculty Psychology Universitas Negeri Malang Indonesia

Project Number

2

Thanks

Madrasah Aliyah Miftahul Qulub Pamekasan, Indonesia dan Faculty Psychology Universitas Negeri Malang Indonesia

References

• Abushafia, A. H., Roslan, N. S., Yusof, D. M., & Nor, M. Z. M., (2018). Snapshot of Academic Dishonesty Among Malaysian Nursing Students: A single university experience. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 13(4), 370-376. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2018.04.003.
• Alwisol. (2005). Psikologi Kepribadian (Personality psychology). Malang: UMM Press.
• Anderman, E.M., & Murdock, T.B., (2007). Psychology of Academic Cheating. America: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372541-7.X5000-1
• Aulia, F. (2015). Faktor-faktor yang terkait dengan kecurangan akademik pada mahasiswa (Factors associated with academic cheating in students). Jurnal RAP, 6 (1). 23-32.
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self Efficacy The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
• Bashir, H. & Bala, R. (2018). Development and validation of academic dishonesty scale (ads): presenting a multidimensional scale. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2). 57-74. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1125a.
• Elias, R. Z. (2009). The impact of antiintellectualism attitudes and academic self-efficacy on business students’ perceptions of cheating. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(2),199-209. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-008-9843-8
• Finn, K. V., & Frone, M. R. (2004). Academic Performance and Cheating: Moderating Role of School Identification and Self-Efficacy. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(3), 115–121. doi:10.3200/joer.97.3.115-121
• Gafoor, A.K. & Ashraf, M.P. (2016). Academic Self-Efficacy Scale-2006. Calicut: Department of Education, University of Calicut. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3930.2640
• Kusrieni, D. (2014). Hubungan Efikasi Diri dengan Perilaku Mencontek (The relationship between self-efficacy and cheating behavior). Psikopedagogia, 3(2). 100 - 111.
• Lin, C-H.S, & Wen, L-Y.M. (2007). Academic dishonesty in higher education-a nationwide study in taiwan. High Educ. 54,85–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9047-z.
• Marsden, H., Carroll, M., & Neill, J.T. (2005). Who cheats at university? A self-report study of dishonest academic behaviours in a sample of Australian university students. Australian Journal of Psychology, 57(1), 1-10
• Meng, C.L., Othman, J., D’Silva, J.L, & Omar, Z. (2014). Ethical decision making in acadeic dishonesty with application of modified theory of planned behavior: A Review. International Education Studies, 7(3), 126-139
• Ogilvie, J., & Stewart, A. (2010). The integration of rational choice and self-efficacy theories: a situational analysis of student misconduct. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 43(1), 130–155. doi:10.1375/acri.43.1.130
• Ozmercan, E.E. (2015). Determining the Tendencies of Academic Dishonesty and Senses of Self-efficacy with Discriminant Analysis. The Anthropologist, 20(1-2): 353-359. DOI: 10.1080/09720073.2015.11891739.
• Rocher, A. R. du. (2018). Active learning strategies and academic self-efficacy relate to both attentional control and attitudes towards plagiarism. Active Learning in Higher Education, 21(3), 203–216. DOI:10.1177/1469787418765515
• Republik Indonesia. 2003. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta.
• Whitley, B.E., Jr., & Keith-Spiegel, P. (2002). Academic Dishobesty: An educator’s Guide. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.