EN
TR
A Conceptual Evaluation of the Relationship Between Organizational Culture and Institutional Belonging
Abstract
The sustainability of institutions cannot be explained solely by their material resources, technological capacity, formal structures, or managerial processes; rather, it is also closely related to how employees perceive the institution, the values through which the institution is shaped, and the sense of meaning it offers to its members. In this context, organizational culture functions as a fundamental structure that influences employees’ behavioral patterns, communication styles, decision-making processes, perceptions of justice, and attitudes toward the institution, while organizational belonging refers to employees’ perception of themselves as meaningful members of the organization and their emotional, cognitive, and psychological attachment to institutional goals and values. A strong, consistent, fair, participatory, and inclusive organizational culture may strengthen employees’ sense of belonging by creating trust, value alignment, recognition, shared purpose, and meaningful participation. Conversely, cultural structures perceived as ambiguous, exclusionary, unfair, inconsistent, or detached from daily organizational realities may weaken employees’ attachment to the institution and lead to emotional distance, organizational silence, reduced motivation, and limited voluntary contribution. This study conceptually examines the relationship between organizational culture and organizational belonging by discussing the role of institutional values, managerial practices, communication patterns, justice perceptions, employee participation, and the consistency between discourse and practice in shaping employees’ sense of belonging. The study argues that organizational belonging should not be considered merely as an individual attitude or a short-term motivational outcome, but as a multidimensional organizational phenomenon shaped by the cultural climate experienced by employees in everyday institutional life. Therefore, institutions seeking to strengthen employee belonging should focus not only on individual motivation tools, but also on developing a culture based on justice, trust, participation, transparency, recognition, and shared meaning.
Keywords
References
- Acar, A. (2013). Farklı örgüt kültürü tipleri ve liderlik tarzları ile örgütsel bağlılık arasındaki ilişki: Lojistik işletmelerinde bir araştırma. 5, 5–31.
- Akyüz, İ., Saraç, U., & Ersen, N. (2019). Örgütsel davranış boyutları ile örgüt kültürü arasındaki ilişki: Ahşap panel levha sektörü örneği. 21, 793–802.
- Altaş, S. S. (2021). Sağlık çalışanlarının örgütsel özdeşleşme, örgütsel bağlılık, örgütsel güven ve örgütsel destek algıları arasındaki ilişkiler. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(1), 875–891.
- Asatiani, A., Hämäläinen, J., Penttinen, E., & Rossi, M. (2020). Constructing continuity across the organisational culture boundary in a highly virtual work environment. Information Systems Journal, 31, 62–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12293
- Atouba, Y. C., Carlson, E. J., & Lammers, J. (2019). Directives and dialogue: Examining the relationship between participative organizational communication practices and organizational identification among IT workers. International Journal of Business Communication, 56, 530–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488416672430
- Bar-Hayim, A., & Berman, G. S. (1992). The dimensions of organizational commitment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 379–387. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130406
- Barnhill, C., Smith, N., & Oja, B. (2018). Organizational culture. In Organizational behavior in sport management. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483329635.n8
- Bayter, M. (2019). Importance of establishment of corporate culture in libraries in the development of information services. Journal of Human Sciences. https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v16i3.5771
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Finance and Investment (Other)
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Publication Date
July 3, 2026
Submission Date
May 18, 2026
Acceptance Date
June 23, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 8 Number: 1
APA
Şüküroğlu, V. K. (2026). A Conceptual Evaluation of the Relationship Between Organizational Culture and Institutional Belonging. Quantrade Journal of Complex Systems in Social Sciences, 8(1), 107-130. https://doi.org/10.64739/quantrade.1954451
AMA
1.Şüküroğlu VK. A Conceptual Evaluation of the Relationship Between Organizational Culture and Institutional Belonging. Quantrade. 2026;8(1):107-130. doi:10.64739/quantrade.1954451
Chicago
Şüküroğlu, Veysel Karani. 2026. “A Conceptual Evaluation of the Relationship Between Organizational Culture and Institutional Belonging”. Quantrade Journal of Complex Systems in Social Sciences 8 (1): 107-30. https://doi.org/10.64739/quantrade.1954451.
EndNote
Şüküroğlu VK (July 1, 2026) A Conceptual Evaluation of the Relationship Between Organizational Culture and Institutional Belonging. Quantrade Journal of Complex Systems in Social Sciences 8 1 107–130.
IEEE
[1]V. K. Şüküroğlu, “A Conceptual Evaluation of the Relationship Between Organizational Culture and Institutional Belonging”, Quantrade, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 107–130, July 2026, doi: 10.64739/quantrade.1954451.
ISNAD
Şüküroğlu, Veysel Karani. “A Conceptual Evaluation of the Relationship Between Organizational Culture and Institutional Belonging”. Quantrade Journal of Complex Systems in Social Sciences 8/1 (July 1, 2026): 107-130. https://doi.org/10.64739/quantrade.1954451.
JAMA
1.Şüküroğlu VK. A Conceptual Evaluation of the Relationship Between Organizational Culture and Institutional Belonging. Quantrade. 2026;8:107–130.
MLA
Şüküroğlu, Veysel Karani. “A Conceptual Evaluation of the Relationship Between Organizational Culture and Institutional Belonging”. Quantrade Journal of Complex Systems in Social Sciences, vol. 8, no. 1, July 2026, pp. 107-30, doi:10.64739/quantrade.1954451.
Vancouver
1.Veysel Karani Şüküroğlu. A Conceptual Evaluation of the Relationship Between Organizational Culture and Institutional Belonging. Quantrade. 2026 Jul. 1;8(1):107-30. doi:10.64739/quantrade.1954451