International Perspectives on the Micropolitics of the Superintendency

Abstract

The rise of globalization compelled national governments to examine how they would adapt widespread social, economic, and political changes to advance their nation’s future wellbeing. Most recognized the pivotal role of education in facilitating adaptation to changes unfolding in society and expressed concern about the quality of their education systems and student academic performance. During the last three decades, nations engaged in what is generally regarded as one of the most intense and protracted attempts at educational reform in recent history. National educational reform initiatives initiated in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden) and in the United States of America. In many instances, shifts in national education policy altered how school districts were organized, managed, and governed which in turn reconfigured superintendents’ roles. An examination of findings from recent nationwide studies on superintendents suggests that decentralization and devolution of decision-making authority to municipal governments, local schools, and parents may have heightened the importance their micropolitical roles in the provision of education.

Keywords

• Superintendent, Micropolitics, Decentralization, Change, Education reform

International Perspectives on the Micropolitics of the Superintendency

Abstract

References

1. Achilles, C. M., & Lintz, M. N. (1983, November). Public confidence in public education: A growing concern in the 80’s. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Nashville, TN.
2. Aho, E., Pitkänen, K., & Sahlberg, P. (2006). Policy development and reform principles of basic and secondary education in Finland since 1968. Washington, DC: World Bank.
3. Aro, T. (2007). Maassamuuton suuri linja 1880-luvulta lähtien: Savotta-Suomesta Rannikko-Suomeen [The main line of mass migration from the 1880s: From Logging Site Finland to Coast Finland. Kuntapuntari 2/2007]. Statistics Finland. Retrieved from http://www.stat.fi/artikkelit/2007/art_2007-07-13_001.html
4. Ball, S. J. (1987). The micro-politics of the school: Towards a theory of school organization. New York, NY: Methuen.
5. Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham, United Kingdom: Open University Press.
6. Balogun, J. (2003). From blaming the middle to harnessing its potential. British Journal of Management, 14, 69-83.
7. Basic Education Act. (1998/628). Retrieved from http://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/1998/en19980628.pdf
8. Björk, L. (1993). Effective schools-effective superintendents: The emerging instructional leadership role. Journal of school leadership, 3(3), 246-259.

9. Björk, L. G. (2000). Introduction: Women in the superintendency—Advances in research and theory. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(1), 5-17.
10. Björk, L, G., & Blase, J. (2009). The micropolitics of school district decentralization. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(3), 196-208.
11. Björk, L, G., & Browne-Ferrigno, T. (2012). Introduction to special issue: International perspectives on school-parent relations. Journal of School Public Relations, 33(1), 4-7.
12. Björk, L, G., & Browne-Ferrigno, T. (2014). Introduction: International perspectives on educational reform and superintendent leadership. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(4), 357-361.
13. Björk, L, G., Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Kowalski, T. J. (2014). The superintendent and education reform in the United States of America. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(4), 444-465.
14. Björk, L. G., & Gurley, D. K. (2005). Superintendent as educational statesman and political strategist. In L. G. Björk & T. Kowalski (Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice, and development (pp.163-185). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
15. Björk, L, G., Johansson, O., & Bredeson, P. (2014). International comparison of the influence of educational reform on superintendent leadership. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(4), 466-473.
16. Björk, L. G., Kowalski, T. J., & Young, M. D. (2005). National reports and implications for professional preparation and development. In L. G. Björk & T. J. Kowalski (Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice and development (pp. 45-70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
17. Björk, L., & Lindle, J. C. (2001). Superintendents and interest groups. Educational Policy, 15(1), 76-91.
18. Blase, J. (1998). The micropolitics of education change. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of education change (pp. 544-557). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
19. Blase, J., & Blase, J. (2000). The micropolitics of instructional leadership: A call for research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(1), 6-44.
20. Blase, J. & Björk, L. (2009). The micropolitics of educational change and reform: Cracking open the black box. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international handbook of education change (Part 1, pp. 237-258). New York, NY: Springer.
21. Bovbjerg, K. M. (2009). Arbejdsmiljøets nye paradigmer - transformation i organisationer og arbejdsmiljø. København, Denmarks: DPU-AU.
22. Boyd, W. L. (1991). Forward. In J. Blase (Ed.), The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict, and cooperation (pp. vii-ix). Newbery Park, CA: Sage.
23. Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Glass, T. E. (2005). Superintendent as organizational manager. In L. G. Björk & T. J. Kowalski (Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice and development (pp.137-161). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
24. Busher, H. (2006). Understanding educational leadership: People, power and culture. Maidenhead, United Kingdom: Open University Press.
25. Callahan, R. E. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency: A study of the social forces that have shaped the administration of public schools. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26. Callahan, R. E. (1966). The superintendent of schools: A historical analysis. Unpublished manuscript, Graduate Institute of Education, Washington University, St. Louis, MO. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 104 410)
27. Cibulka, J. G. (2001). The changing role of interest groups in education: Nationalization and the new politics of education productivity. Educational Policy, 15(1), 12-40.
28. Consolidation Act No. 170 of 2. June 2006, Ministry of Education (Act on Folkeskole 2006).
29. Consolidation Act on Folkeskolen 1993, no 870. (21/10/2003).
30. Cuban, L. (1976a). Urban school chiefs under fire. Chicago, IL: University Chicago Press.
31. Cuban, L. (1976b). The urban school superintendent: A century and a half of change. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
32. Culbertson, J. A. (1981). Antecedents of the theory movement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 17(1), 25-47.
33. DiPaolo, M. F., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2005). Bridging or buffering? Journal of Educational Administration, 43(1), 60-71.
34. Education Act SFS 1958:1100
35. Education Act SFS 2010:800. Den nya skollagen. Stockholm, Sweden: Norstedts Juridik.
36. Enteman, W. F. (1993). Managerialism: The emergence of a new ideology. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
37. Floyd, S. W., & Wooldridge, B. (1997). Middle management's strategic influence and organizational performance. The Journal of Management Studies, 34(3), 465-485.
38. Fusarelli, B. C., & Fusarelli, L. D. (2005). Reconceptualizing the superintendency: Superintendents as social scientists and social activists. In L. G. Björk & T. J. Kowalski (Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice, and development (pp. 187-206). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
39. Glass, T. E., Björk, L. G., & Brunner, C. C. (2000). The study of the American superintendency 2000: A look at the superintendent in the new millennium. Arlington, VA.: American Association of School Administrators.
40. Goldring, E., & Greenfield, W. (2002). Understanding the evolving concept of leadership in education: Roles, expectations, and dilemmas. In J. Murphy (Ed.), The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century (pp. 1-19). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
41. Gould, R. V., & Fernandez, R. M. (1989). Structure of mediation: A formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Sociological Methodology, 19, 89-126.
42. Guzley, R. M. (1992). Organizational climate and communication climate: Predictors of commitment to the organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 5(4), 379-402.
43. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
44. Holmgren, M., Johansson, O., Nihlfors, E. & Skott, P. (2012). Local school government in Sweden: Boards, parents, and democracy. Journal of School Public Relations, 33(1), 8-28.
45. Hood, C. (1991, Spring). A public management for all seasons. Public Administration, 69, 3-19.
46. Howlett, P. (1993). The politics of school leaders, past and future. Education Digest, 58(9), 18-21.
47. Isosomppi, L. (1996). Johtaja vai juoksupoika. Suomalaisen yleissivistävän koulun johtamiskulttuurin ja sen determinanttien tarkastelua [Leader or errand boy: Examination on leadership culture and its determinants in Finnish general education school]. Tampere, Finland: Acta Universitatis Tamperensis ser A vol. 514 [University of Tampere Publication Series A].
48. Johansson, O., & Nihlfors, E. (2014). The Swedish superintendent in the policy stream. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(4), 362-382.
49. Johansson, O., Moos, L., Nihlfors, E., Paulsen, J. M., & Risku, M. (2011). The Nordic superintendents’ leadership roles: Cross national comparisons. In J. McBeath, & T. Townsend (Eds.), International handbook on leadership for learning (pp. 695-725). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
50. Kanervio, P. & Risku, M. (2009). Tutkimus kuntien yleissivistävän koulutuksen opetustoimen johtamisen tilasta ja muutoksista Suomessa [A study on educational leadership in general education in Finnish municipalities]. Opetusministeriön julkaisuja 2009: 16.
51. Kirst, M. W., & Wirt, F. M. (2009). The political dynamics of American education (4th ed.). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
52. Kjærnsli, M., Lie, S., Olsen, R., & Turmo, A. (2004). Rett spor eller ville veier? Norske elevers prestasjoner i matematikk, naturfag og lesing i PISA 2003 [On or off track? Norwegian pupils' achievements in mathematics, science and literacy in PISA 2003]. Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press.
53. Kochan, F. K., Jackson, B. L., & Duke, D. L. (1999). A thousand voices from the firing line: A study of educational leaders, their jobs, their preparation and the problems they face. Columbia, MO: University Council for Educational Administration.
54. Kowalski, T. J. (1995). Keepers of the flame: Contemporary urban superintendents. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
55. Kowalski, T. J. (1999). The school superintendent: Theory, practice, and cases. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill, Prentice Hall.
56. Kowalski, T. J. (2001). The future of local school governance: Implications for board members and superintendents. In C. C. Brunner & L. G. Björk (Eds.), The new superintendency (pp. 183-201). Oxford, UK: JAI Press.
57. Kowalski, T. J. (2003). Superintendent shortage: The wrong problem and the wrong solutions. Journal of School Leadership, 13(3), 288-303.
58. Kowalski, T. J. (2005). Evolution of the school district superintendent position. In L. G. Björk & T. Kowalski (Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice, and development (pp. 1-18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
59. Kowalski, T. J. (2006). The school superintendent: Theory, practice and cases (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60. Kowalski, T. J., & Björk, L. G. (2005). Role expectations of district superintendents: Implications for deregulating preparation and licensing. Journal of Thought, 40(2), 73-96.
61. Kowalski, T. J., & Keedy, J. L. (2005). Preparing superintendents to be effective communicators. In L. G. Björk & T. J. Kowalski (Eds.), School district superintendents: Role expectations, professional preparation, development and licensing (pp. 207-226). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
62. Kowalski, T. J., McCord, R. S., Petersen, G. J., Young, I. P., & Ellerson, N. M. (2011). The American school superintendent: 2010 decennial study. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
63. Kristofferson, M. (2007). The paradox of parental influence in Danish schools: A Swedish perspective. International Journal about Parents in Education, 10(0), 24-131.
64. Kristofferson, M. (2008). Lokala styrelser med föräldramajoritet i grundskolan. Umeå, Sweden: Umeå Universitet.
65. Kuikka, M. (1992). Suomalaisen koulutuksen vaiheet [Phases of Finnish education]. Helsinki, Finland: Otava.
66. Laswell, H. (1936/2011). Politics: Who get what, when and how. Whitefish, MT: Literacy Licensing.
67. Laitila, T. (1999). Siirtoja koulutuksen ohjauskentällä Suomen yleissivistävän koulutuksen ohjaus 1980- ja 1990-luvuilla [Shifts in the control domain of education: Control of Finnish general education system in the 1980s and 1990s] (University of Turku Publications C146). Turku, Finland: University of Turku.
68. Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
69. Local Finland. (2013). Kaupunkien ja kuntien lukumäärä [Number of towns and municipalities in Finland]. Retrieved from http://www.kunnat.net/fi/tietopankit/tilastot/aluejaot/kuntien-lukumaara/Sivut/default.aspx
70. Luthans, F. (1981). Organizational behavior (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
71. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.
72. Mawhinney, H. B. (1999). Reappraisal: The problems and prospects of studying the mircopolitics of leadership in reforming schools. School Leadership & Management, 19(2), 159-170.
73. Melby, E. O. (1955). Administering community education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
74. Ministry of Education. (2007). Suomalaisen koulutuksen kehitystarina tilastoina [Development story of Finnish education as statistics]. Retrieved from http://www.minedu.fi/etusivu/arkisto/2007/2211/koulutus_90.html
75. Mintzberg, H. (1993). Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall.
76. Møller, J., Prøitz, T. S., & Aasen, P. (2009). Kunnskapsløftet—tung bør å bære? [The knowledge promotion—a heavy burden to carry? ] Oslo, Norway: NIFU-STEP.
77. Moos, L. (2014). Educational governance in Denmark. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(4), 424-443.
78. National Board of Education. (2013). Education. Retrieved from http://www.oph.fi/english/education
79. Niemelä, M. (2008). Julkisen sektorin reformin pitkä kaari Valtava-uudistuksesta Paras-hankkeeseen [The long reform of public sector from Valtava-reform to PARAS-project]. Helsinki, Finland: Kela, Publications of Finnish Federation for Social Affairs and Health, 102.
80. Nihlfors, E. (2003). Scholchefen i skolans styrning og ledning [The superintendent in governance and leadership of the school]. Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala University, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis (Uppsala Studies in Education, 102).
81. Nihlfors, E., Johansson, O., Moos, L., Paulsen, J. M., & Risku, M. (2013). The Nordic superintendents´ leadership roles: Cross-national comparison. In L. Moos (Ed.), Transnational influences on values and practices in Nordic educational leadership: Is there a Nordic model? Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
82. Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development. (2010). PISA 2009 at a Glance. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/31/28/46660259.pdf
83. Pappas, J., M. , Flaherty, K., & Wooldridge, P. (2003). Achieving strategic consensus in the hospital setting: A middle management perspective. Hospital Topics, 81(1), 15-22.
84. Paulsen, J. M. (2008). Managing adaptive learning in the middle (Doctoral dissertation). Department of Leadership and Organizational Management, BI Norwegian School of Managements, Oslo, Norway.
85. Paulsen, J. M. (2012). Parental involvement in Norwegian schools. Journal of School Public Relations, 33(1), 29-47.
86. Paulsen, J. M. (2014). Norwegian superintendents as mediators of change initiatives. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(4), 407-423.
87. Peltonen, T. (2002). Pienten koulujen esiopetuksen kehittaminen—entisajan alakoulusta esikouluun [Development of pre-school in small school—from old-time schools to pre-school]. Oulu, Finland: University of Oulu.
88. Pihlajanniemi, T. (2006). Kuntarakenne muutoksessa [Muncipal structure in change]. Research Publications of Foundation for Municipal Development, 53.
89. Risku, M. (2011). Superintendency in the historical development of education in Finland. In J. Beckmann (Ed.), Effective schools in effective systems: Proceedings of the 6th Annual ISER Conference South Africa 2010 (pp. 182-210). Pretoria, South Africa: Department of Education Management, University of Pretoria with the International Symposium of Educational Reform.
90. Risku, M., Kanerviao, P., & Björk, L. G. (2014). Finnish superintendents: Leading in a changing education policy context. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(4), 383-406.
91. Ryynänen, A. (2004). Kuntien ja alueiden itsehallinto–kehittämisvaihtoehdot.
92. Helsinki, Finland: Edita.
93. Sahlberg, P. (2010). Educational change in Finland. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change (pp. 323-348). New York, NY: Springer.
94. Salmela, A. (1946). Kansakoululautakunta:Lainsäädäntö selityksineen [Folk school board: Legislation with explanations]. Helsinki, Finland: Otava.
95. Sarjala, J. (1982). Suomalainen koulutuspolitiikka [Finnish education policy]. Porvoo, Finland: WSOY.
96. Sarjala, J. (2008). Järki hyvä herätetty Koulu politiikan pyörteissä [Sense good awoken. School in the turmoil of politics]. Helsinki, Finland: Kirjapaja.
97. Souri, L. (2009). Rehtorin oikeudellinen asema–selvitys 2009. [Principal’s juridical position – Report 2009]. Helsinki, Finland: Association of Finnish Principals.
98. Statistics Finland. (2007). Koulutus Suomessa: yhä enemmän ja yhä useammalle [Education in Finland: More education for more people]. Retrieved from http://www.stat.fi/tup/suomi90/marraskuu.html
99. Statistics Finland. (2013). Population at end of 2012. Retrieved from http://tilastokeskus.fi/tup/suoluk/suoluk_vaesto_en.html
100. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
101. Trombetta, J. J., & Rogers, D. P. (1988). Communication climate, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment: The effects of information adequacy communication openness, and decision participation. Management Communication Quarterly, 1(4), 494-514.
102. Tushman, M. L., & Katz, R. (1980). External communication and project performance: An investigation into the role of gatekeepers. Management Science, 26(11), 1071-1085.
103. Tushman, M. L., & Scanlan, T. J. (1981). Characteristcs and external orientation of boundary spanning individuals. Academy of Management Journal, 24(1), 83-98.
104. Välijärvi, J. (2006, March). The Finnish success in learning achievements—the PISA Study. Paper presented at HEAD Fifth International Stakeholder Seminar, Oslo, Norway.
105. Välijärvi, J., Linnakylä, P., Kupari, P., & Arffman, I. (2002). The Finnish success in PISA—and some reasons behind it. Jyväskylä, Finland: OECD-PISA. Retrieved from http://ktl.jyu.fi/arkisto/verkkojulkaisuja/publication1.pdf
106. Varjo, J. (2007). Kilpailukykyvaltion koululainsäädännön rakentuminen. Suomen eduskunta ja 1990-luvun koulutuspoliittinen käänne. Helsingin yliopisto. Kasvatustieteen laitoksen tutkimuksia 209 [Drafting education legislation for the competitive state: The Parliament of Finland and the 1990s change in education policy]. Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki, Department of Education, Research Reports 209.
107. Willower, D. J. (1991). Micropolitics and the sociology of school organizations. Education and Urban Society, 23(4), 442-454.