ALMANYA VE KIRGIZİSTAN BANKACILIK SEKTÖRLERİNDE TAKİPTEKİ KREDİ ORANLARI BELİRLEYİCİLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRMALI ANALİZİ

Abstract

Bu çalışmada makro stres testi ile ilgili detaylı bir literatür taraması yapılmış ve 1999ç1-2020ç3 döneminde Alman ve Kırgız bankacılık sektöründe takipteki kredi oranlarının makroekonomik belirleyicileri tespit edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Ampirik model bulguları sonucunda Alman bankacılık sektöründe endüstriyel üretim, emek maliyeti ve petrol fiyatı enflasyonu temerrüt olasılığını azaltıcı etki yaparken, ekonomik büyüme, hükümet tahvili faiz oranı ve kriz kukla değişkeninin ise temerrüt olasılığını artırıcı etki yaptığı tespit edilmiştir. Kırgız bankacılık sektöründe ise döviz kurları, kredi faiz oranı, kredi büyümesi ile net işçi dövizleri temerrüt olasılığını azaltırken, ekonomik büyüme, enflasyon oranı ile ticaret haddi temerrütleri azalttığı gösterilmiştir.

Keywords

• takipteki kredi oranı
• Almanya ve Kırgızistan bankacılık sektörü
• ekonometrik model sonuçları

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NON PERFORMING LOAN DETERMINANTS IN GERMAN AND KYRGYZ BANKING SECTORS

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to make a comprehensive literature review and determine the macroeconomic factors of non-performing loans in German and Kyrgyz banking sectors in 1999Q1-2020Q3. The empirical model results show that while industrial production, labor cost and oil price inflation have diminishing effects, economic growth, treasury bond rate and crisis dummy variable have increasing effects on the probability of default in the German banking sector. Furthermore, whereas exchange rates, loan interest rate, credit growth and net remittances have decreasing effects, economic growth, inflation rate and trade balance have rising effects on the probability of default in Kyrgyz banking sector.

Keywords

• non-performing loans
• Germany and Kyrgyzstan banking sectors
• econometric model results

СРАВНИТЕЛЬНЫЙ АНАЛИЗ ОПРЕДЕЛЯЮЩИХ ФАКТОРОВ ПРОСРОЧЕННЫХ КРЕДИТОВ В БАНКОВСКОМ СЕКТОРЕ ГЕРМАНИИ И КЫРГЫЗСТАНА

Abstract

Целью данного исследования является всеобъемный обзор литературы и определение макроэкономических факторов просроченных кредитов в банковском секторе Германии и Кыргызстана за 1999 кв1-2020 кв3 период времени. Результаты эмпирической модели показывают, когда промышленное производство, затраты на рабочую силу и инфляция цен на нефть имеют понижающие эффекты, экономический рост, ставка казначейских облигаций и кризисная фиктивная переменная оказывают увеличивающее влияние на ставку дефолта в банковском секторе Германии. Более того, валютные курсы, процентная ставка по кредитам, рост кредитования и чистые денежные переводы оказывают понижающие эффекты, тогда как экономический рост, инфляция и торговый баланс имеют увеличивающее влияние на ставку дефолта в кыргызском банковском секторе.

Keywords

• просроченный кредит
• банковский сектор Германии и Кыргызстана
• результаты эконометрической модели

References

1. Cıhák, M. Stress Testing of Banking Systems // Czech Journal of Economics and Finance. – 2005. - No.55 – P. 418-440.
2. Naimy, V. Y. Stress Tests and VaR Analysis in the Process of Risk Management // Journal of Business and Financial Affairs. – 2012. – No.1(3). - DOI: 10.4172/2167-0234.1000e114
3. Alexander, C. and Sheedy, E. Model-Based Stress Tests: Linking Stress Tests to VaR for Market Risk // Macquarie University Applied Finance Centre. – 2008.
4. Akkaya, G. C., Tükenmez N.M., Kutay N. & Kabakçı A. Pazar Risk Modeli: Bir Riske Maruz Değer ve Stres Testi Uygulaması // Ege Akademik BakışDergisi. – 2008. - No.8. – P. 813-821.
5. Lopez, J. A. Stress Tests: Useful Complements to Financial Risk Models // Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Economic Letter. – 2005.
6. Foglia, A. Stress Testing Credit Risk: A Survey of Authoririties' Approaché // International Journal of Central Banking. – 2009.
7. Van den End, J. W., Hoeberichts, M. & Tabba M. Modelling Scenario Analysis and Macro Stress-Testing // De Nederlandsche Bank Working Paper. – 2006. - No.119.
8. NBKR. NBKR bülteni [Elektronik kaynak]. - 2021. - https://www.nbkr.kg/index1.jsp?item=137&lang=ENG

9. Saint Louis Merkez Bankası internet sitesi adresi [Elektronik kaynak]. - https://fred.stlouisfed.org/
10. Wilson, T. C. Portfolio Credit Risk //FRBNY Economic Policy Review. – 1998. - No.4(3). – P. 71-82. 10., 19. Wilson, T. C. Portfolio Credit Risk I // Risk Magazine. – 1997a. – No.10(9). – P. 111-117. 10., 19. Wilson, T. C. Portfolio Credit Risk II // Risk Magazine. - 1997b - No.10(10) – P. 56-61.
11. Pesola. The Role of Macroeconomic Shocks in Banking Crises // Bank of Finland Discussion Paper. – 2001.
12. Froyland, E. & Larsen, K. How Vulnerable are Financial Institutions to Macroeconomic Changes? An Analysis Based on Stress Testing // Norges Bank Economic Bulletin, Norges Bank, Oslo, 2002. – No. LXXIII (3).
13. Hoggarth, G. & Whitley, J. Assessing the Strength of UK Banks through Macroeconomic Stress Tests // Financial Stability Review. 2003. – No.14. – P. 91-103
14. Pesola, J. Banking Fragility and Distress: An Econometric Study of Macroeconomic Determinants // Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers, Bank of Finland, Helsinki, Finland. – 2005.
15. Beşe, E. Finansal sistem stres testi uygulamalari ve Türkiye örneği: uzmanlık yeterlilik tezi… TCMB Bankacılık ve Finansal Kuruluslar Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara. – 2007.
16. Jakubik, P. & Schmieder, C. Stress Testing Credit Risk: Comparison of the Czech Republic and Germany // Financial Stability Institute, BIS, Basel, Switzerland. – 2008.
17. Avouyi-Dovi, S., Bardos, M., Jardet, C., Kendaoui, L. & Moquet, J. Macro Stress Testing with a Macroeconomic Credit Risk Model: Application to the French Manufacturing Sector // Banque de France Working Papers, Paris, France. – 2009. – No.238.
18. Blank, S. & Dovern, J. (2010). What Macroeconomic Shocks Affect the German Banking System? // Journal of Financial Economic Policy. – 2010. – No.2(2). – P. 126 – 148.