EN
Teachers’ Views on the Achievement Level of the Learning Outcomes in the New 2017-2018 Grade 5 Social Studies Curriculum
Abstract
Technological and social changes necessitate changes in education programs as well. Thus, with the changes and improvements made in education programs over time, new curricula were introduced to replace the existing ones. The most recent reform made in the education programs in Turkiye was in the year 2017, during which the social studies curriculum was also renewed. To what extent learning outcomes are achieved in a curriculum can be best assessed by the teachers who are the implementers of the curriculum. Curriculum studies in the literature are mostly focused on the teacher, students, expert opinions and comparative studies. The aim of the present study was to determine the extent to which the learning outcomes in the new 2017 grade 5 social studies curriculum were achieved based on teachers’ views. Descriptive research methods, namely the survey, and mixed qualitative-quantitative research models were utilized. The data collection tool used in the present research study was developed by the researcher: "Questionnaire on Teachers’ Views Regarding the Achievement Levels of the New 2017-2018 Grade 5 Social Studies Course Learning Outcomes". This questionnaire consists of three parts and includes open-ended questions. The data of the study were obtained from 60 grade 5 social studies teachers out of the 99 social studies teachers working in 49 official secondary schools in the city center of Tokat. Frequency (f), percentage (%), standard deviation (ss), t-test, Oneway ANOVA, and the Shcheffe test were used in the analysis of the data obtained.
Keywords
References
- Badem, Tan, S. (2012). İlköğretim 7. sınıf sosyal bilgiler programının ekonomi ve sosyal hayat ünitesindeki kazanımların gerçekleşme düzeyine ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri (Elazığ ili örneği)[Teacher’s views on the level of realization of the achievements in the economic and social life unit of the primary education 7th grade social studies program (Elazig province example)]. Yüksek lisans tezi [Master’s thesis], Fırat Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İlköğretim Anabilim Dalı, Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretmenliği Bilim Dalı, Elazığ.
- Başol, G. (2015). Eğitimde ölçme değerlendirme [Measurement and evaluation in education]. Pegem Academy.
- Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2008). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Manual of data analysis for social sciences]. Pegem Academy.
- Çalışkan, H. ve Yiğittir, S. (2011). Sosyal Bilgilerde ölçme değerlendirme [Measurement and in evaluation social studies]. Pegem Academy.
- Çelikkaya, T. ve Kürümlüoğlu, M. (2018). Yenilenen sosyal bilgiler dersi öğretim programına yönelik öğretmen görüşleri [Teachers’ views on the renewet social studies curriculum ]. Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(11), 104-120. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/goputeb/issue/39821/430128
- Daşçıoğlu, K. ve Şimşek, S. (2014). Sosyal bilgiler eğitiminin müfredatı [Curriculum of social studies education]. S. İnan, (Editör). Öğretmen ve öğretmen adayları için sosyal bilgiler eğitimine giriş kavramlar, yaklaşımlar, etkinlikler içinde. (s.23-35). Anı Yayıncılık
- Erden, M. (2004) Öğretmenlik mesleğine giriş [Introduction to the teaching profession]. Alkım Yayınları.
- Gelen, İ. (2007). Bilimsel araştırmalarda veri toplama araçları [Data collection tools in scientific research]. D. Ekiz, (Editör). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemler içinde (s. 126-159). Lisans Yayıncılık.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Studies on Education
Journal Section
Research Article
Early Pub Date
June 30, 2023
Publication Date
June 30, 2023
Submission Date
April 11, 2023
Acceptance Date
June 1, 2023
Published in Issue
Year 2023 Volume: 7 Number: 1
APA
Karataş, M., & Çalıkan, Ö. (2023). Teachers’ Views on the Achievement Level of the Learning Outcomes in the New 2017-2018 Grade 5 Social Studies Curriculum. Research on Education and Psychology, 7(1), 51-71. https://doi.org/10.54535/rep.1280901
AMA
1.Karataş M, Çalıkan Ö. Teachers’ Views on the Achievement Level of the Learning Outcomes in the New 2017-2018 Grade 5 Social Studies Curriculum. Research on Education and Psychology. 2023;7(1):51-71. doi:10.54535/rep.1280901
Chicago
Karataş, Mehmet, and Önder Çalıkan. 2023. “Teachers’ Views on the Achievement Level of the Learning Outcomes in the New 2017-2018 Grade 5 Social Studies Curriculum”. Research on Education and Psychology 7 (1): 51-71. https://doi.org/10.54535/rep.1280901.
EndNote
Karataş M, Çalıkan Ö (June 1, 2023) Teachers’ Views on the Achievement Level of the Learning Outcomes in the New 2017-2018 Grade 5 Social Studies Curriculum. Research on Education and Psychology 7 1 51–71.
IEEE
[1]M. Karataş and Ö. Çalıkan, “Teachers’ Views on the Achievement Level of the Learning Outcomes in the New 2017-2018 Grade 5 Social Studies Curriculum”, Research on Education and Psychology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 51–71, June 2023, doi: 10.54535/rep.1280901.
ISNAD
Karataş, Mehmet - Çalıkan, Önder. “Teachers’ Views on the Achievement Level of the Learning Outcomes in the New 2017-2018 Grade 5 Social Studies Curriculum”. Research on Education and Psychology 7/1 (June 1, 2023): 51-71. https://doi.org/10.54535/rep.1280901.
JAMA
1.Karataş M, Çalıkan Ö. Teachers’ Views on the Achievement Level of the Learning Outcomes in the New 2017-2018 Grade 5 Social Studies Curriculum. Research on Education and Psychology. 2023;7:51–71.
MLA
Karataş, Mehmet, and Önder Çalıkan. “Teachers’ Views on the Achievement Level of the Learning Outcomes in the New 2017-2018 Grade 5 Social Studies Curriculum”. Research on Education and Psychology, vol. 7, no. 1, June 2023, pp. 51-71, doi:10.54535/rep.1280901.
Vancouver
1.Mehmet Karataş, Önder Çalıkan. Teachers’ Views on the Achievement Level of the Learning Outcomes in the New 2017-2018 Grade 5 Social Studies Curriculum. Research on Education and Psychology. 2023 Jun. 1;7(1):51-7. doi:10.54535/rep.1280901
Cited By
Comparative Analysis of Kyrgyzstan and Türkiye’s Secondary Geography Curriculums
Research on Education and Psychology
https://doi.org/10.54535/rep.1401366