A Comparative Glance At Teaching Practice of Mother Tongue Teacher Candidates in Türkiye and United Kingdom

Abstract

This research aimed to determine how prospective secondary school language teachers conduct their teaching practicum in the United Kingdom and Türkiye. The study was designed using a multiple-case holistic design. Accordingly, data for the research were collected through document analysis and interviews. Data related to the teaching practicum in the Turkish Language Teaching program at Kırşehir Ahi Evran University Faculty of Education in Türkiye were obtained through document analysis. Data regarding the teaching practicum in the Postgraduate Certificate in Education program for secondary English teaching at the University of Reading Faculty of Education in the United Kingdom were obtained through document analysis and interviews with faculty members at the institution. It is evident that while the instructional content of teaching practicums in both nations exhibits substantial similarities, a notable disparity emerges with regard to the temporal extent of the practicum experience afforded to prospective secondary school language educators. As a result, the process of teaching practicums for secondary school language teacher candidates differs between Türkiye and the UK in terms of practicum hours, school diversity, and assessment methods.

Keywords

• Native language teaching
• Teaching practice
• Teacher training

References

1. Akdemir, H. (2021). Almanya’da Sınıf Öğretmeni Adayları İçin Yürütülen Öğretmenlik Uygulaması Programının İncelenmesi [Examination of the Teacher Training Practice Program for Primary School Teacher Candidates in Germany]. Phd Thesis, Çukurova University Social Sciences Institute, Çukurova.
2. Aykaç, N. Kabaran, H. Bilgin, H. (2014). Türkiye ve bazı Avrupa Birliği ülkelerinde öğretmen yetiştirme uygulamaları (Almanya Finlandiya, Fransa, İngiltere, Türkiye örneği) [Comparative Analysis Of The Teacher Training Programs In Turkey And Some European Countries (Germany, Finland, France, England And Turkey Samples)]. Turkish Studies - International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, Volume 9/3, p. 279-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.6484
3. Aytaç, A., & Er, K. O. (2018). Türkiye’de ve Finlandiya’da Hizmet Öncesi Sınıf Öğretmeni Yetiştirme Programlarındaki Öğretmenlik Uygulamalarının Karşılaştırılması [A Comparison of Teaching Practices in Pre-service Classroom Teacher Training Programs in Turkey and Finland]. Journal of Education, Theory and Practical Research, 4 (2) , 10-19 . https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ekuad/issue/38280/442712
4. Babayiğit, Ö . (2019). Dünya’da ve Türkiye’de Anadili Eğitiminde Güncel Yönelimlerin Öğretim Üyelerinin Görüşleri Doğrultusunda Değerlendirilmesi [Analysis of Current Trends in Mother Tongue Education in the World and Turkey in Terms of Academicians]. Journal of Social Sciences of Mus Alpaslan University, 7 (2) , 181-190 . https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.459985
5. Başkale, H. (2016). Nitel Araştırmalarda Geçerlik, Güvenirlik ve Örneklem Büyüklüğünün Belirlenmesi [Determination of Validity, Reliability and Sample Size in Qualitative Studies].. E-Journal od Dokuz Eylül University Nursing Faculty, 9(1), 23-28. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/deuhfed/issue/46796/586804
6. Beeth, M.E., & Adadan, E. (2006). The influences of university-based coursework on field experience. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(2), 103-120.
7. Bolat, Y. (2006). Türkiye, Almanya, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri, Avustralya, Fransa, İngiltere ve Japonya’da Mesleki ve Teknik Eğitime Öğretmen Yetiştirme [Teacher Training for Vocational and Technical Education In Turkey, Germany, Us, Australia, France, UK, and Japan]. Journal of Educational Research, 2(3), 39-72. https://doi.org/10.29065/usakead.256379
8. Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.

9. Cabaroglu, N., & Roberts, J. (2000). Development in student teachers' pre-existing beliefs during a 1-year PGCE programme. System, 28(3), 387-402.
10. Çakmakcı, C. C. (2017). Türkçe Eğitimi Bölümlerine Kabul Koşullarının Avrupa Birliğinin Önde Gelen Ülkelerindeki Ana Dili Öğretmeni Yetiştirme Programları İle Karşılaştırılması [A Comparison of Entry Requrements for Turkish Education Departments with Native Language Teacher Training Programmes in Leading European Union Countries]. Journal of World of Turks, 9(2), 39-59.
11. Çakmakçı, C. C., & Demir, N. (2021). "Okul Deneyimi" ve" Öğretmenlik Uygulaması" Dersleri Açısından Türkiye ve Finlandiya'da Ana Dili Öğretmeni Yetiştirme Süreci [Mother Tongue Teacher Training Process in Turkey and Finland in Terms of "School Experience" and "Teaching Practice" Courses]. Journal of Mother Tongue Education, 9(4), 1169-1187. https://doi.org/10.16916/aded.946460
12. Çam Tosun, F. (2019). Öğretmenlik Uygulamasının Süre Açısından İncelenmesi ve Bir Çözüm Önerisi [Analysis of Teaching Practicum in Terms of Duration and Suggestion of a Solution]. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES) , 52 (3) , 837-868 . https://doi.org/10.30964/auebfd.539374
13. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). How teacher education matters. Journal of teacher education, 51(3), 166-173.
14. Department for Education. (2021). Teachers’ Standards Guidance for school leaders, school staff and governing bodies. Access on the date: 01.03.2021. Access adress: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/teachers-standards#full-publication-update-history
15. Department for Education. (2023). Qualified teacher status (QTS): qualify to teach in England. Accessed on the date: 12.02.2023. Access adress: https://www.gov.uk/education/qualified-teacher-status-qts )
16. Grix, J. (2001). Demystifying postgraduate research. University of Birmingham University Press.
17. Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2012). The distribution of teacher quality and implications for policy. Journal of Annual Review of Economics, 4, 131-157.
18. Kaptan, S. (2000). Bilimsel araştırma ve istatistik teknikleri [Scientific Research and Statistical Techniques]. Tekışık Publishing.
19. Kunzman, R. (2002). Pre-service education for experienced teachers: What STEP teaches those who have already taught. Issues in Teacher Education, 11 (1), 99-112.
20. Kavcar, C. (2002). Cumhuriyet Döneminde Dal Öğretmeni Yetiştirme [Teacher Training for Subject-Specific Education during the Republican Era]. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES) , 35 (1) , 1-14 . DOI: 10.1501/Egifak_0000000058.
21. Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi. (2018). Öğretmenlik Uygulaması Dersi Uygulama Kılavuzu [Practice Teaching Course Implementation Guide]. Access on the date: 09. 04.2023. Access adress: https://ef.ahievran.edu.tr/uploads/6811/KL-007_Egitim_Fakultesi_Ogretmenlik_Uygulamasi_Dersi_Kilavuzu.pdf
22. Köse, E., & Caner, H. N. (2022). 2015-2020 yılları arasında öğretmenlik uygulaması dersi üzerine Türkiye’de yapılan çalışmalara ilişkin içerik analizi [Content Analyses of Studies Published Between the Years 2005 and 2020 on Teaching Practice in Turkey]. Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 23(1), 1221-1267. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kefad/issue/69091/927275
23. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
24. MNE. (1998). Öğretmen adaylarının Milli Eğitim Bakanlığına bağlı eğitim öğretim kurumlarında yapacakları öğretmenlik uygulamasına ilişkin yönerge [Guidelines for the Teaching Practice of Teacher Candidates in Educational Institutions Affiliated with the Ministry of National Education]. Access on the date: 10.05.2019. Access Adress: http://mevzuat.meb.gov.tr/dosyalar/263.pdf
25. MNE. (2018). Uygulama Öğrencilerinin Milli Eğitim Bakanlığına Bağlı Eğitim Öğretim Kurumlarında Yapacakları Öğretmenlik Uygulamasına İlişkin Yönerge [Directive on Trainee teachers' Teaching Practice in Educational Institutions Affiliated with the Ministry of National Education]. Access on the date: 09. 04.2023. Access adress: https://oygm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2018_06/25172143_YYnerge.pdf
26. MNE. (2021). Öğretmenlik Uygulaması Yönergesi [Teaching Practice Directive]. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Tebliğler Dergisi. 1049-1064. Access on the date: 12.03.2023. Access adress: https://oygm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2021_10/03181211_OYGYRETMENLIYK_UYGULAMASI_YOYNERGE_2021_EYLUYL_EK.pdf
27. Poulou, M. (2007). Student-teachers’ concerns about teaching practice. European Journal of Teacher Education, 30 (1), 91-110.
28. OECD. (2003). Programme for International Student Assessment (2000 Results). Access on the date: 05.05.2023 Access adress: http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/33690591.pdf
29. OECD. (2004). Programme for International Student Assessment (2003 Results). Access on the date: 05.05.2023. Access adress: http://www.oecd.org/education/school/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/34002216.pdf
30. OECD. (2007). Programme for International Student Assessment (2006 Resılts). Access on the date: 05.05.2023 Access adress: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/39725224.pdf
31. OECD. (2010). Programme for International Student Assessment (2009 Results). Access on the date: 05.05.2023 Access adress: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/46619703.pdf
32. OECD. (2014). Programme for International Student Assessment (2012 Results). Access on the date: 05.05.2023 Access adress: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf
33. OECD. (2016). Programme for International Student Assessment (2015 Results). Access on the date: 05.05.2023 Access adress: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf
34. Oğuzkan, F. (1983). Orta Dereceli Okul Öğretmenlerinin Yetiştirilmesi - Cumhuriyet Döneminde Eğitim [Training of Secondary school Teachers - Education in the Republican Era]. MEB Devlet Kitapları Publishing.
35. Orhan, A. & Kuyumcu Vardar, A. (2019). Foreign Language Teacher Education in Finland and Turkey: A Comparative Glance at Teaching Practice. [Finlandiya ve Türkiye’de Yabancı Dil Öğretmeni Yetiştirme: Öğretmenlik Uygulamasına Karşılaştırmalı Bir Bakış[ . Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 19 (1), 309-330 . https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2019..-418264
36. Parmaksız, R. Ş., Kısakürek, M. A. (2013). Türkiye ve Bazı AB Ülkelerinde Öğretmenlere Yönelik Hizmetiçi Eğitim Programlarının Temel Öğeler ve Kalite Kontrolü/Güvencesi Açısından Karşılaştırılması [A Comparison of Essential Elements of Service Training Program for Teachers and Quality Control / Assurance in Turkey and Some European Countries]. Karaelmas Journal of Educational Sciences, (1), 112-129.
37. Sağlam, M., Kürüm, D. (2005). Türkiye ve Avrupa Birliği Ülkelerinde Öğretmen Eğitiminde Yapısal Düzenlemeler ve Öğretmen Adaylarının Seçimi [Structural Reforms in Teacher Education in Turkey and European Union Countries, and Selection of Teacher Candidates]. National Education Journal, 33(167). https://dhgm.meb.gov.tr/yayimlar/dergiler/Milli_Egitim_Dergisi/167/index3-kurum.htm
38. Seifried, J. (2012). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs at commercial schools: an empirical study in Germany. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 21(5), 489– 514. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2012.661606.
39. Sözer, M. A. & Karakaş, H. (2018). Öğretmen Yetiştirme Programlarında Yer Alan Öğretmenlik Uygulamalarına Karşılaştırmalı Bir Bakış: Türkiye ve OECD Ülkeleri Örneği [Comparison of Professional Practice Studies In The Teacher Training Systems of The Successfull Countries According to The Pisa Results with Our Country]. In 2nd International Turkic World Congress on Educational and Social Sciences, 721-744, Türk Eğitim Sen Genel Merkezi Press.
40. Şahin, V. (2017). İngiltere’de Öğretmen Standartları ve Coğrafya Eğitimi [Teacher Standarts and Geography Education in England]. The Journal of Kesit Academy, 3 (10), 273-286. ISSN: 2149 – 9225.
41. University of Reading. PGCE Secondary English. Access on the date:15. 05.2023. Access address: https://www.reading.ac.uk/ready-to-study/study/2023/education-pg/pgce-secondary-education-english.
42. Uygun, S. , Ergen, G. & Öztürk, İ. H. (2011). Türkiye, Almanya ve Fransa'da Öğretmen Eğitimi Programlarında Uygulama Eğitiminin Karşılaştırılması [A Comparison between Practical Training Programs in Teacher Education in Turkey, Germany and France]. Elementary Education Online , 10 (2) , 389-405. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ilkonline/issue/8592/106809
43. Wiseman, A. (2013). Policy Responses to PISA in Comparative Perspective. In Meyer, H. D. & Benayot, A. (Eds), PISA, Power, and Policy: The Emergence of Global Educational Governance, 303–322. Oxford: Symposium Books.
44. Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative Research Methods in Social Sciences]. Seçkin Publishing.
45. Yin, R.K. (2014). Case study methods: design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Pbc.
46. Yurdakal, İ. H. (2018). Türkiye ve İngiltere Temel Eğitim İlkokuma-Yazma Uygulamalarının Karşılaştırılması [Comparison of Basic Education Reading and Writing Applications in Turkey and Britain.]. Journal of World of Turks/Zeitschrift für die Welt der Türken, 10(2), 137-165.
47. CHE (Council of Higher Education). (1998). Fakülte-Okul birliği YÖK-Dünya Bankası Milli Eğitimi Geliştirme Projesi Hizmet Öncesi Öğretmen Eğitimi [Faculty-School Collaboration CHE-World Bank National Education Development Project In-Service Teacher Training]. Ankara.
48. CHE. (2018). Turkish Language Teaching Undergraduate Program [Türkçe Öğretmenliği Lisans Programı]. Access on the date: 20.04.2023.Access adress: https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/Kurumsal/egitim_ogretim_dairesi/Yeni-Ogretmen-Yetistirme-Lisans-Programlari/Turkce_Ogretmenligi_Lisans_Programi.pdf