Opinions of Individuals Exposed to Earthquake Regarding Their Psychological Inflexibility

Abstract

This is a qualitative study conducted to evaluate the thoughts of individuals who were exposed to the earthquake that took place on 06.02.2023, centered in Kahramanmaraş, regarding their psychological rigidity. A phenomenological approach was adopted in the study. 14 participants were included in the study. Data were collected by audio recording with a semi-structured interview form. Content analysis technique was used to analyze the data. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that individuals exposed to the earthquake avoided the emotions of joy, happiness, love, sadness, anger and fear. It was determined that thoughts are suppressed and thoughts about the loss of family members are avoided. However, there are also participants who do not have avoidant thoughts or behaviors. Individuals exposed to earthquake reported situations such as fear of loss, nightmares, anxiety, hopelessness, rumination, powerlessness, failure, fear of punishment, burnout, embarrassment, claustrophobia, crying spells, eating problems, increase in alcohol/cigarette use, sleep problems, social isolation, excessive cleaning, staying away from entertainment, and disruption of social relations. In this study, after the trauma experienced, some individuals stated that they became aware of the value of life, created new options, had positive changes in social relations, and change in the perception of self. Considering the results, it is evaluated that practices aimed at increasing psychological flexibility will reduce the negative effects of traumatic experiences and increase psychological resilience in individuals.

Keywords

• Individual exposed to earthquake
• Psychological inflexibility
• Psychological flexibility

References

1. Acierno, R.,Ruggiero, K. J., Kilpatrick, D. G., Resnick, H. S. & Galea, S. (2006). Risk andprotectivefactorsforpsychopathologyamongolderversusyoungeradultsafterthe 2004 Florida hurricanes. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14 (12), 1051–1059. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JGP.0000221327.97904.b0
2. AFAD [Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency], 2024. Afet. https://www.afad.gov.tr/aciklamali-afet-yonetimi-terimleri-sozlugu sitesinden erişilmiştir.
3. Aker, A. T. (2006). 1999 Marmara earthquakes a review on epidemiologic findings and community mental health policies. Turk PsikiyatriDergisi, 17(3), 204.
4. Baltacı, A. (2018). Nitel araştırmalarda örnekleme yöntemleri ve örnek hacmi sorunsalı üzerine kavramsal bir inceleme. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(1), 231-274.
5. Brewin, C. R., Andrews, B., & Valentine, J. D. (2000).Meta-analysis of risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder in trauma-exposed adults. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 68(5), 748. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.68.5.748
6. Bryan, C. J., Ray Sannerud, B., & Heron, E. A. (2015).Psychological flexibility as a dimension of resilience for posttraumatic stress, depression, and risk for suicidal ideation among Air Force personnel. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 4(4), 263-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2015.10.002
7. Caia, G., Ventimiglia, F., & Maass, A. (2010). Container vs. dacha: The psychological effects of temporary housing characteristics on earthquake survivors. Journal of environmental psychology, 30(1), 60-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.005
8. Cankardaş, S., & Sofuoğlu, Z. (2019). Deprem ya da yangin deneyimlemis kisilerde travma sonrasi stres bozuklugu belirtileri ve belirtilerin yordayicilari. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 30(3).

9. Chou, F. H. C., Wu, H. C., Chou, P., Su, C. Y., Tsai, K. Y., Chao, S. S., ... & Ou‐Yang, W. C. (2007). Epidemiologic psychiatric studies on post‐disaster impact among Chi‐Chi earthquake survivors in Yu‐Chi, Taiwan. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 61(4), 370-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1819.2007.01688.x
10. Cofini, V.,Carbonelli, A., Cecilia, M. R., Binkin, N., & diOrio, F. (2015). Post traumaticstressdisorderandcoping in a sample of adultsurvivors of theItalianearthquake. Psychiatryresearch, 229(1-2), 353-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2015.06.041
11. Creswell, J. W. (2021). A concise introduction to mixed methods research.SAGE publications.
12. Çınarlı, İ. (2023). Afetdönemindeiletişimnasılolmalı. FikirTuru. Erişim T, 12.
13. Dawson, D. L.,& Golijani Moghaddam, N. (2020). COVID-19: Psychological flexibility, coping, mental health, and well being in the UK during the pandemic. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.07.010
14. Duman, N. (2019).Travma sonrası büyümevegelişim. Uluslararası Afro-AvrasyaAraştırmalarıDergisi, 4(7), 178-184.
15. Edemen, M.,Okkay, M., Tugrul, R., Kurt, M. Ş., Bircan, O., Yoldaş, H., ... & Aslan, A. (2023). Deprem nedir? Nasıl oluşur? Türkiye’de oluşmuş depremler ve etkileri nelerdir? Depremlere karşı alınabilecek tedbirler hususunda öneriler. International Journal Of SocıalHumanıtıesScıencesResearch, 10(93), 719-734. https://doi.org/10.26450/jshsr.3584
16. Fernández, R. S.,Crivelli, L., Guimet, N. M., Allegri, R. F., & Pedreira, M. E. (2020). Psychologi- cal distressassociatedwith COVID-19 quarantine: Latentprofileanalysis, outcomepredictionandmediationanalysis. Journal of AffectiveDisorders, 277, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020. 07.133
17. Fonseca, S., Trindade, I. A., Mendes, A. L., & Ferreira, C. (2020).The buffer role of psychological flexibility against the impact of major life events on depression symptoms. Clinical Psychologist, 24(1), 82-90.https://doi.org/10.1111/cp.12194
18. Francis, A. W., Dawson, D. L., & Golijani Moghaddam, N. (2016). The development and validation of the Comprehensive assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy processes (CompACT). Journal of contextual behavioral science, 5(3), 134-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2016.05.003
19. Friedman, M. J. (2015). Posttraumatic and acute stress disorders.Springer.
20. Giorgi, A. (1997). Thetheory, practice, andevaluation of thephenomenologicalmethod as a qualitativeresearch. Procedure. Journal of Phemomenological Psychology, 28(2), 235-260. https://doi.org/10.1163/156916297X00103
21. Gök, B. A., &Karaaziz, M. (2023). Kabulvekararlılıkterapisinindepresyondaelealınması: Vakasunumu. Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 6(4), 445–461. https://doi.org/10.26677/TR1010.2023.1212
22. Harada, N., Shigemura, J., Tanichi, M., Kawaida, K., Takahashi, S., &Yasukata, F. (2015). Mental health and psychological impacts from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake Disaster: a systematic literature review. Disaster and military medicine, 1, 1-12.
23. Harris, R. (2019). ACT’I kolay öğrenmek (H. T. Karatepe & K. F. Yavuz, Çev.Edt.).LiteraYayıncılık.
24. Hayes, S. C., Levin, M. E., Plumb-Vilardaga, J., Villatte, J. L., & Pistorello, J. (2013). Acceptance and commitment therapy and contextual behavioral science: Examining the progress of a distinctive model of behavioral and cognitive therapy. Behavior Therapy, 44(2), 180-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2009.08.002
25. Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006
26. Hayes, S. C., Pistorello, J., & Levin, M. E. (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy as a unified model of behavior change. The Counseling Psychologist, 40(7), 976-1002. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000012460836
27. Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., Gifford, E. V., Follette, V. M., &Strosahl, K. (1996). Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders: A functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 64(6), 1152.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.64.6.1152
28. Hayes, S.C., & Smith, S. (2021). Zihninden çık hayatına gir (Ş. İlkay & K. F. Yavuz, Çev. Edt.). Litera Yayıncılık.
29. Işıklı, S.,& Tüzün, Z. (2017). Afetlerin akut dönem psikolojik etkilerine yönelik psikososya lmüdahale yaklaşımları. Türkiye Klinikleri , 2, 180-188.https://www.turkiyeklinikleri.com/article/en-afetlerin-akutdonem-psikolojik-etkilerine-yonelik-psikososyal-mudahaleyaklasimlari-80106.html
30. Karanci, A. N., & Rüstemli, A. (1995).Psychological consequences of the 1992 Erzincan (Türkiye) earthquake. Disasters, 19(1), 8-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.1995.tb00328.x
31. Kashdan, T. B., & Rottenberg, J. (2010). Psychologicalflexibility as a fundamentalaspect of health. Clinicalpsychologyreview, 30(7), 865-878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.001
32. Kula, N. (2006). İstenmedik ve beklenmedik olaylarla karşılaşan bireylere yönelik moral ve manevî desteğin önemi (Deprem ve bedensel engellilik örneği). Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma Dergisi, 6(3), 73-94.
33. Landi, G., Pakenham, K. I., Boccolini, G., Grandi, S., &Tossani, E. (2020). Health anxiety and mental health outcome during COVID-19 lockdown in Italy: the mediating and moderating roles of psychological flexibility. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 2195. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02195
34. Matsubara, C., Murakami, H., Imai, K., Mizoue, T., Akashi, H., Miyoshi, C., &Nakasa, T. (2014).Prevalence and risk factors for depressive reaction among resident survivors after the tsunami following the Great East Japan Earthquake, March 11, 2011. PloS one, 9(10).https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109240
35. Marshall, C., &Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research.Sage publications.
36. McCracken, L. M.,Badinlou, F., Buhrman, M., & Brocki, K. C. (2021). The role of psychological flexibility in thecontext of COVID-19: Associations with depression, anxiety, andinsomnia. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 19, 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.11.003
37. Mendolia, M., & Baker, G. A. (2008). Attentional mechanisms associated with repressive distancing. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(3), 546-563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.08.004
38. Montazeri, A., Baradaran, H., Omidvari, S., Azin, S. A., Ebadi, M., Garmaroudi, G., ...& Shariati, M. (2005). Psychological distress among Bam earthquake survivors in Iran: a population-based study. BMC public health, 5, 1-6. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1471-244X-14-126
39. Nakaya, N., Nakamura, T., Tsuchiya, N., Narita, A., Tsuji, I., Hozawa, A., & Tomita, H. (2016).Prospect of future housing and risk of psychological distress at 1 year after an earthquake disaster. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 70(4), 182-189. https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.12377
40. Niitsu, T., Takaoka, K., Uemura, S., Kono, A., Saito, A., Kawakami, N., ...& Shimizu, E. (2014). The psychological impact of a dual-disaster caused by earthquakes and radioactive contamination in Ichinoseki after the Great East Japan Earthquake. BMC research notes, 7, 1-7. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1756-0500-7-307
41. Özçetin, A., Maraş, A., Ataoğlu, A., &İçmeli, C. (2008).Deprem sonucu gelişen travma sonrası stress bozukluğu ile kişilik bozuklukları arasında ilişki. Duzce Medical Journal, 10(2), 8-18. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/793215
42. Özçetin, Y. S. Ü., &Hiçdurmaz, D. (2017).Kanser deneyiminde travma sonrası büyüme ve psikolojik sağlamlık. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 9(4), 388-397.https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=697143
43. Rubin, G. J., & Wessely, S. (2020). The psychological effects of quarantining a city. Bmj, 368. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m313
44. Sheldon, K. M.,&Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goalstriving, needsatisfaction, andlongitudinalwell-being: the self-concordance model. Journal of personalityandsocialpsychology, 76(3), 482-497. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.3.482
45. Sönmez, M. B. (2022). Depremin psikolojik etkileri, psikolojik destek ve korkuyla baş etme. TOTBİD Dergisi, 21(3), 337-343. https://doi.org/10.5578/totbid.dergisi.2022.46
46. Strosahl, K. D., Robinson, P. J., & Gustavsson, T. (2012). Brief interventions for radical change: Principles and practice of focused acceptance and commitment therapy. New Harbinger Publications.
47. Strosahl, K., Robinson, A. P., & Gustavsson, T. (2019). Radikal değişimler için kısa müdahaleler. Litera Yayıncılık.
48. Şeker, B. D., & Akman, E. (2014). Van Depremi sonrası duygusal, bilişsel ve davranışsal tepkiler: Polis örneklemi incelemesi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(27), 215-231. https://doi.org/10.21550/sosbilder.269510
49. Taymur, İ., Sargin, A. E., Özdel, K., Türkçapar, H. M., Çalışgan, L., Zamki, E., &Demirel, B. (2014).Endüstriyel Bir Patlama Sonrasında Akut Stres Bozukluğu ve Travma Sonrası Stres Bozukluğu Gelişiminde Olası Risk Faktörleri. Archives of Neuropsychiatry/Noropsikiatri Arsivi, 51(1). https://doi.org/10.4274/npa.y6510
50. Tekindal, M., & Arsu, Ş. U. (2020).Nitel araştırma yöntemi olarak fenomenolojik yaklaşımın kapsamı ve sürecine yönelik bir derleme. Ufkun Ötesi Bilim Dergisi, 20(1), 153-172. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/uobild/issue/58856/813813
51. Tural, Ü.,Coşkun, B., Önder, E., Çorapçioǧlu, A., Yildiz, M., Kesepara, C., ... &Aybar, G. (2004). Psychological consequences of the 1999 earthquake in Turkey. Journal of Traumatic Stress: Official Publication of TheInternational Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, 17(6), 451-459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10960-004-5793-9
52. Yavuz, K. F. (2015). Kabul ve kararlılık terapisi (ACT): Genel bir bakış. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Psychiatry Special Topics, 8(2), 21-27.
53. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.