Abstract
This study aims to examine the relationship between conflict resolution styles and serenity. The sample comprises 434 adults in marital or romantic relationships. Data were collected using the Conflict Resolution Styles Inventory and the Serenity Scale. The variables of age, relationship duration, and frequency of conflict were analyzed through one-way ANOVA. A t-test was used to analyze the relationship between gender and the variables of conflict resolution and serenity. According to the test results, there was no significant difference between gender and scales scores. The analyses revealed a significant positive relationship between conflict resolution styles and serenity. It was concluded that age is related to both conflict resolution and serenity; frequency of conflict is related only to serenity; and relationship duration is related only to conflict resolution styles. According to the results of the ANOVA test, it was determined that the scores obtained from the serenity scale and the conflict resolution styles scale showed significant differences across age groups. Furthermore, it was found that the scores derived from the serenity scale differed significantly based on the frequency of conflict. Additionally, it was concluded that the scores obtained from the conflict resolution styles scale exhibited a significant difference in relation to the duration of the relationship
References
- Alkın, S., & Öksüz, Y. (2023). The Development of the Turkish Serenity Scale: A Validation Study. International Journal of Progressive Education, 19(4).
- Alkın, S. (2024). Genç yetişkinlerin huzur ve özanlayış düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkide aile uyumu ve gelecek vizyonlarının aracı rolü [The mediating role of family harmony and future visions in the relationship between young adults' peace and self-compassion levels] (Doctoral dissertation, Ondokuz Mayıs Univercity, Samsun, Türkiye).
- Aydın, S. (2023). Duygusal emeğin tükenmişlik, depresif belirtiler ve çatışma çözme stilleriyle ilişkisi: bu ilişkilerde tükenme duyarlığının düzenleyici rolü [The relationship of emotional labor to burnout, depressed individuals, and conflict styles: the local role of collapse susceptibility in these developments] (Master’ thesis, Hacettepe Univercity, Ankara, Türkiye).
- Bacanlı, H. (2016, Temmuz). Nasıl huzurlu olunur? Benlik açısından huzur modeli [How to be peaceful? A model of peace from the perspective of the self] International Spiritual Guidance Congress, İstanbul, Türkiye.
- Batık, M. V., & Kalkan, M. (2017). Evlilikte algılanan sorun çözme becerileri ve evlilik doyumu. [Perceived problem-solving skills and marital satisfaction in marriage.] İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi [Journal of Human and Social Sciences Research], 6(5), 2630-2646.
- Canel, A. N. (2012). Evlilik ve aile hayatı. [Marriage and family life]. İstanbul, Türkiye: Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı.
- Çetinkaya, B. (2017).Kişilerarası İlişkilerde Çatışma ve Çatışma Çözme[Conflict and Conflict Resolution in Interpersonal Relationships]. In A. Kaya (Eds.), Kişilerarası ilişkiler ve etkili iletişimde kendini açma içinde [Self-disclosure in interpersonal relationships and effective communication](pp. 136-155).Ankara,Türkiye: Pegem Akademi.
- Ceylan, İ. (2013). Ergenlerin benlik saygısı ve duygusal özyeterlik düzeylerinin incelenmesi [An investigation of self-esteem and emotional self-efficacy levels in adolescents] (Master’s thesis, Dokuz Eylül University, Türkiye, İzmir)
- Çelik, O. B. (2020). Üniversite öğrencilerinin huzur düzeylerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi, [Investigation of peace levels of university students in terms of various variables]. Uluslararası Güncel Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi [International Journal of Current Educational Research] 6(1), 233-242.
- Çıtışlı Turgut, M. K. (2018). Evlilik çatışması ve evlilik doyumu arasındaki ilişkide affetmenin aracı rolü [The mediating role of forgiveness in the relationship between marital conflict and marital satisfaction] (Master’s thesis, Hasan Kalyoncu Univercity, Gaziantep, Türkiye).
- D'agostino, R. B., Belanger, A., & D'Agostino Jr, R. B. (1990). A suggestion for using powerful and informative tests of normality. The American Statistician, 44(4), 316-321.
- Demir, İ. (2017). Benlik, kimlik ve kişilik. H. Ergin & A. Köseoğlu (Ed.), Gelişim psikolojisi içinde (s.181-206). Nobel Akademi Yayıncılık
- Demirci, İ. (2017). Huzurlu ve mutlu yaşamın değerler ve karakter güçleri bağlamında karma bir araştırmayla incelenmesi [A mixed study examining peaceful and happy life in the context of values and character strengths] (Doctoral dissertation, Marmara Univercity, İstanbul, Türkiye).
- Demirci, İ., Ekşi, H., Dinçer, D., & Kardaş, S. (2017). Beş boyutlu iyi oluş modeli: PERMA Ölçeği Türkçe Formunun geçerlik ve güvenirliği [Five-dimensional well-being model: validity and reliability of the Turkish form of the PERMA scale]. The Journal of Happiness & Well-Being, 5(1), 60-77.
- Demirci, İ., & Ekşi, H. (2017). Huzur ölçeği’nin geliştirilmesi ve psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesi [Development of the peace scale and examination of its psychometric properties]. Değerler Eğitimi Dergisi [Journal of Values Education], 15(33), 39-60.
- Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542.
- Erdoğan, Ö. (2021). Evli çiftlerin çatışma çözüm stili tercihlerinde köken ailelerinin rolü [The role of families of origin in married couples' conflict resolution style preferences] Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi [Dokuz Eylül University Social Sciences Institute Journal], 23(3), 1099-1122.
- Erkılınç, M. M. (2020). Aile içi iletişim kalıpları, benlik kavramı ve evlilik uyumu arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi[Examining the relationship between family communication patterns, self-concept, and marital adjustment] (Master's thesis, Işık Üniversitesi, İstanbul Türkiye).
- Fincham, F. D. (2003). Marital conflict: Correlates, structure, and context. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(1), 23-27.
- Genç, E.S. (2024). Romantik ilişki doyumu ve rasyonel olmayan ilişki inançları arasındaki ilişkide ikili ilişkilerde çatışma çözme tepkilerinin aracı rolü [The mediating role of conflict resolution reactions in dyadic relationships in the relationship between romantic relationship satisfaction and irrational relationship beliefs](Master’ thesis, İstanbul Beykent Univercity, İstanbul Türkiye).
- Hanzal, A., & Segrin, C. (2009). The role of conflict resolution styles in mediating the relationship between enduring vulnerabilities and marital quality. Journal of Family Communication, 9(3), 150-169.
- Karasar, N. (2020). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi kavramlar ilkeler ve teknikler [Scientific research methodology concepts principles and techniques]. Ankara, Türkiye: Nobel Akademi Yayıncılık
- Kartal, S. (2020). Evli bireylerde çatışma çözme becerileri, evlilik doyumu ve cinsel yaşam doyumu arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi [Examining the relationships between conflict resolution skills, marital satisfaction and sexual life satisfaction in married individuals](Master’s thesis, İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim Univercity, İstanbul, Türkiye).
- Kublay, D., & Oktan, V. (2015). Evlilik uyumu: Değer tercihleri ve öznel mutluluk açısından incelenmesi [Marital adjustment: Examining value preferences and subjective happiness]. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 5(44), 25-35.
- Lalaşahin, G. (2023). Evli bireylerde yaşanan çatışma durumları, çatışma çözme stilleri, algılanan ilişki kalitesi ve psikolojik iyi oluş arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Examining the relationship between conflict situations, conflict resolution styles, perceived relationship quality and psychological well-being in married individuals] (Master’s thesis, Aydın Adnan Menderes Univercity, Aydın, Türkiye).
- Minaz, M. (2023). Çocukluk çağı travmaları ve romantik ilişki doyumu arasındaki ilişkide çatışma çözme stillerinin ve ilişkilerle ilgili bilişsel çarpıtmaların aracı rolünün incelenmesi [Examining the mediating role of conflict resolution styles and relationship-related cognitive distortions in the relationship between childhood trauma and romantic relationship satisfaction](Master’ thesis, Maltepe Univercity, İstanbul, Türkiye).
- Öner Koruklu, N. (2017). Kişilerarası ilişkilerde çatışma ve çatışma çözme [Conflict and Conflict Resolution in Interpersonal Relationships] In A. Kaya (Eds.), Kişilerarası ilişkilerde çatışma ve çatışma çözme içinde[Conflict and conflict resolution in interpersonal relationships.] (s. 210-233). Ankara, Türkiye: Pegem Akademi.
- Öz, T., & Tatar, A. (2020). Evlilik doyumu ile depresyon, mutluluk ve psikolojik iyi oluş arası ilişkide evlilik süresinin aracı rolü [The mediating role of marriage duration in the relationship between marital satisfaction and depression, happiness, and psychological well-being], Humanistic Perspective, 2(1), 18-31.
- Özdemir, N. K., Tatlı, C. E., Özbay, Y., Akbaş, U., Sümer, Z. H., Kayabol, N. B. A., ... & Durmuş, E. E. (2023). Development of marital conflict areas ındex and the conflict styles ınventory: Reliability and validity studies. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 15(Supplement 1), 74-86.
- Özdemir-kemahlı, P. (2020). Ailelerin üzerinde durduğu fay hattı: aile huzuru, nitel bir araştırma[The fault line that families stand on: family peace, a qualitative research] Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi [Marmara University Atatürk Faculty of Education Journal of Educational Sciences], 51(51), 18-49.
- Ünal, Ö., & Akgün, S. (2022). Evlilikte çatışma çözme stillerinin evlilik uyumu ve doyumu ile ilişkisi[The relationship between marital conflict resolution styles and marital harmony and satisfaction]. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar [Current Approaches in Psychiatry], 14(3), 322-330.
- Rusdi, A., Nurasha, K. P., Rachmawati, M. A., Yang, L., Wangnan, P., & Andriansyah, Y. (2022). Models of helping, happiness, and spiritual serenity among Indonesian and Chinese students. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 5(2), 83-89.
- Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 57(6), 1069.
- Saraç, A., Hamamcı, Z., & Güçray, S. (2015). Üniversite öğrencilerinin romantik ilişki doyumunu yordaması [Predicting romantic relationship satisfaction among university students]. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 5(43), 69-81.
- Sharf, R.S. (2017). Psikoterapi ve psikolojik danışma kuramları kavramlar ve örnek olaylar [Psychotherapy and counseling theories, concepts and case studies] (N. Voltan Acar, Trans;2017 ed.). Nobel Akademi Yayıncılık (Original work published 1996).
- Şengül Öner, D. (2013). Evli bireylerin evlilik çatışması, çatışma çözüm stilleri ve evlilik uyumlarının incelenmesi [Examining marital conflict, conflict resolution styles, and marital adjustment of married individuals] (Master’s thesis, Dokuz Eylül Univercity, İzmir, Türkiye).
- Soylu, Y., & Kağnıcı, D. Y. (2015). Evlilik uyumunun empatik eğilim, iletişim ve çatışma çözme stillerine göre yordanması[Predicting marital harmony based on empathic tendencies, communication, and conflict resolution styles.]. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 5(43), 44-54.
- Taşköprü, M. (2013). Evlilik doyumu ile problem çözme becerileri, stresle başa çıkma ve evlilik süresi arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Examining the relationship between marital satisfaction and problem-solving skills, coping with stress, and marriage duration] (Master’s thesis, İstanbul Bilim Univercity, İstanbul, Türkiye).
- Tözün, M. (2010). Benlik saygısı[Self-esteem], Actual Medicine, 18(7), 52-57.
- Türk Dil Kurumu. (2024, Haziran). Huzur. İçinde Güncel Türkçe sözlük. Erişim tarihi: Mayıs 22, 2024. https://sozluk.gov.tr/
- Türk Dil Kurumu. (2024, Haziran). Mutluluk. İçinde Güncel Türkçe sözlük. Erişim tarihi: Mayıs 22, 2024. https://sozluk.gov.tr/
- Uzun, M., & Avcı, R. (2021). Algılanan evlilik çatışması, ebeveynin akılcı olmayan inançları, kaygıları ve çocukların otomatik düşünceleri, problem çözme becerileri ile çocukların kaygı ve saldırganlıkları arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi [Examining the relationships between perceived marital conflict, parents' irrational beliefs, anxiety, and children's automatic thoughts, problem-solving skills, and children's anxiety and aggression]. Eğitim ve Bilim [Education and Science], 46(208).
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Psychological Counseling and Guidance (Other) |
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Submission Date | November 22, 2025 |
| Acceptance Date | December 21, 2025 |
| Early Pub Date | December 30, 2025 |
| Publication Date | December 30, 2025 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2025 Volume: 9 Issue: 2 |
Aim & Scope
The aim of REP is to be a focal point for international and interdisciplinary original scientific studies in the fields of education, and psychology and to produce qualified discussions. Therefore, it is expected that the studies to be held in the journal have both statistical significance and original discussions which illuminate topics of education sciences. Studies in the REP should fill a gap in the literature of education and psychology and provide a basis for new research.
REP publishes research that employs quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods and has a strong theoretical framework, and has the potential to impact educational practices. The process of selecting articles for publication prioritizes essential factors such as originality in terms of topic and methodology, educational relevance of the content, and clarity of presenting the information. The journal provides valuable information to a wide range of professionals in the field of education, including school counselors, psychologists, teachers, educational policymakers, administrators, and scholars.
The scope of REP includes the following main topics:
• Educational Psychology
• Educational Management
• Early Childhood Education
• Special Education
• Foreign Language Education
• Social Sciences Education
• Medical & Health Education
• Science Education
• Curriculum and Instruction
• Assessment and Evaluation in Education
• Psychological Counseling and Guidance
• Mathematics Education
• Fine Arts Education
• Sport and Education
• Education and Training in Higher Education
• Emerging and Best Practices
• Design and Technologies
• Education History
• Sociology Education
• Systems and Technologies in Education
• Philosophies of Education and Educational Approaches
• Portals and Virtual Learning Practices and Cases in Education
• Psychology Education
• E-learning Technologies
• Developmental Psychology
Author Guidelines
Formatting and Content Requirements for Manuscripts
Basic Citation Formats Reference Examples
It is obligatory for the publication association that the articles (Article Template) to be sent to Research on Education and Psychology (REP) have the following format characteristics.
Ethical Principles and Publication Policy
EDITORIAL POLICIES
The publication process at REP is the basis of the improvement and dissemination of information objectively and respectfully. Therefore, the procedures in this process improves the quality of the studies. Peer-reviewed studies are the ones that support and materialize the scientific method. At this point, it is of utmost importance that all parties included in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publisher, reviewers and editors) comply with the standards of ethical considerations. There is no submission fee for publishing in REP. Currently, there are no Author Processing Charges (APCs) required.
Peer Review Policy
REP operates a strictly blind peer review process in which the reviewer’s name is withheld from the author and, the author’s name from the reviewer. The reviewer may at their own discretion opt to reveal their name to the author in their review but our standard policy practice is for both identities to remain concealed. Should an article/manuscript be considered suitable for review, it is reviewed by two reviewers.
Editorial Procedure
All articles are initially reviewed by the Editor. Secondly, the statistical and technical quality of the articles is checked by experts. Only those articles that meet the standards of the journal, and fit within its aims and scope, will be sent to reviewers. Authors of articles can expect a decision normally within three working days as to whether or not their article will be sent to the reviewers or instead be rejected at this stage. Should the decision be to ‘desk reject’ it at this stage, authors can be assured of a supportive response that offers feedback that is constructive and helpful in nature. REP recognizes that authors are keen to get a decision as soon as possible, and reviewers are asked to return their decisions to the Editor within four weeks so that the decision can be sent to authors within that timeframe. At that stage, authors get one of the four standard decisions, that is, ‘accept, as is’, ‘conditional accept, but minor changes are required’, ‘conditional accept, but major changes are required’, or ‘reject’. Finally, the language of accepted articles is checked.
Authorship
All parties who have made a substantive contribution to the article should be listed as authors. Principal authorship, authorship order, and other publication credits should be based on the relative scientific or professional contributions of the individuals involved, regardless of their status. A student is usually listed as principal author on any multiple-authored publication that substantially derives from the student’s dissertation or thesis.
Acknowledgements
All contributors who do not meet the criteria for authorship should be listed in an acknowledgements section. Examples of those who might be acknowledged include a person who provided purely technical help, or a department chair who provided only general support.
Funding
REP requires all authors to acknowledge their funding in a consistent fashion under a separate heading.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
Editors, acknowledging that there may be conflicting interests between reviewers and other editors, guarantee that the publication process of the manuscripts will be completed in an independent and unbiased manner
Protection of Research Participants
All investigators should ensure that the planning conductand reporting of human research are in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration as revised in 2013 (www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinkiethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-humansubjects/). All authors should seek approval to conduct research from an independent local, regional, or national review body (e.g., ethics committee, institutional review board). If doubt exists whether the research was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration, the authors must explain the rationale for their approach and demonstrate that the local, regional, or national review body explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the study. Approval by a responsible review body does not preclude editors from forming their own judgment whether the conduct of the research was appropriate. Informed consent should be obtained if there is any doubt that anonymity can be maintained. For example, masking the eye region in photographs of patients is inadequate protection of anonymity. If identifying characteristics are de-identified, authors should provide assurance, and editors should so note, that such changes do not distort scientific meaning. The requirement for informed consent should be included in the journal’s instructions for authors. When informed consent has been obtained, it should be indicated in the published article.
Plagiarism
REP take issues of copyright infringement, plagiarism or other breaches of best practice in publication very seriously. We seek to protect the rights of our authors and we always investigate claims of plagiarism or misuse of published articles. Equally, we seek to protect the reputation of the journal against malpractice.
PUBLISHING POLICIES
In the scope of REP publishing ethics, all stakeholders are expected to carry out the following ethical responsibilities. The following ethical duties and responsibilities have been set up as open access, taking into account guidelines and policies published by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). REP is committed to upholding the integrity of the academic record. We encourage authors to refer to the Committee on Publication Ethics’ International Standardsfor Authors..
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
* Authors should present their results honestly and without fabrication, falsification or inappropriate data manipulation.
* Authors should adhere to publication requirements that submitted work is original, is not plagiarised, and has not been published elsewhere.
* Authors should strive to describe their methods clearly and unambiguously so that their findings can be confirmed by others.
* Authors should take collective responsibility for submitted and published work.
* The authorship of research publications should accurately reflect individuals’ contributions to the work and its reporting.
* Authors bear the responsibility to inform the editor of the journal or publisher if they happen to notice a mistake in their study which is in early release or publication process and to cooperate with the editors during the correction or withdrawal process.
* During the review process of their manuscripts, author(s) may be asked to supply raw data. In such a case, author(s) should be ready to submit such data and information to the editorial and scientific boards.
* Author responsibilities given in a study (e.g.: adding an author, reordering of author names) whose review process has begun cannot be changed.
* Funding sources and relevant conflicts of interest should be disclosed.
* Appropriate approval, licensing or registration should be obtained before the research begins and details should be provided in the report (e.g. Institutional Review Board, Research Ethics Committee approval, national licensing authorities for the use of animals).
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
* Reviewers should be objective and conduct the reviews with privacy.
* Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based only on scientific content, without regard to ethnic origin, gender, sexual orientation, citizenship, religious belief, or political philosophy of the authors.
* Reviewers should only accept the studies related to their field.
* Reviewers dispose the manuscripts they have reviewed in accordance with the principle of confidentiality after the review process. Reviewers can use the final versions of the manuscripts they have reviewed only after publication.
* The review should aim to be constructive and polite and should not include offensive language.
* The submissions accepted for review should be processed within the specified timing and in compliance with the ethical principles.
* In the case of conflict of interests, the submission should be rejected and the editor-in-chief should be notified.
* The identity of the authors should be reached and the submissions of the authors whose identities are revealed should be rejected.
* No information related to the rejected submissions should be shared or made public.
Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
* All editors ensure the editorial independence. They should only evaluate manuscripts for their scientific content without regard to ethnic origin, gender, sexual orientation, citizenship, religious belief, political philosophy of the authors, or personal influences from association staff or volunteer leaders.
* Editors must provide a fair double-blind peer review of the submitted articles for publication. They should ensure that all the information related to submitted manuscripts is kept confidential before publishing.
* Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication. They should publish errata pages or make corrections when needed.
* The editors should ensure the progress within the specified timing of the process.
* The editors should ensure that the processes are realized within the ethical principles.
Unethical Behaviour
Should you encounter any unethical act or content in REP apart from the ethical responsibilities listed above, please notify the journal by e-mail at editor.journalrep@gmail.com
ETHICS COMMITTEE APPROVAL
"Ethical committee approval document" is requested for the articles uploaded in February 2020. The following sample statement should be added to the end of the article (chapter before the references) to be uploaded to the journal:
"I declare that the research was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. There is no conflict of interest in the research. The study approved by Social and Humanities Research and Publication Ethics Committee of Necmettin Erbakan University. The authors received no financial support for the authorship, research, and/or publication of this article."
Plagiarism Policy
In accordance with its publishing policies, REP oblige each study that has undergone the "Blind Review Process" to be detected for plagiarism to protect the integrity of the study. Therefore, all manusicripts are detected for plagiarism.
The plagiarism detection is done by iThenticate software. Plagiarism ratio (excluding references) is at most 10%. Studies exceeding this ratio is rejected by the editors.
Copyright Policy
The manuscripts submitted to REP for publication should be original studies that were not published before or not submitted to anywhere else for publication.
Authors who submit their studies to REP should acknowledge that they have to transfer the copyright of their studies to journal REP. The editorial board of the journal is authorized to publish the study.
Those authors who will submit their studies to REP have to fill in the "Copyright Agreement Form". Wet signature is required. The signed form should be scanned and uploaded to the system via file upload option.
Price Policy
There is no submission fee for publishing in REP. Currently, there are no Author Processing Charges (APCs) required.
Indexes
Citation Indexes
Other Indexes
Journal Boards
Editor-in-Chief
Editor
Abdulkadir Haktanir, Ph.D., is an associate professor and doctoral program coordinator in the Department of Counselor Education at Kean University. Dr. Haktanir has clinical experience in school settings and mental health settings. He worked as a full-time school counselor in a K-12 school in Turkey and as a counselor and coordinator at Necmettin Erbakan University’s Eregli counseling center. He has national and international experience teaching in school counseling and core counseling courses in counselor education programs. Dr. Haktanir is an active scholar with 25+ peer-reviewed publications in esteemed journals, two book editorships, and five book chapter contributions. He directly contributed to the Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Association’s latest code of ethics and is recognized as an author. In recognition of his scholarly contributions, he received four awards: Exemplary Research and Practice Award- Doctoral Level (2017), an award presented by the Association for Assessment and Research in Counseling- a division of the American Counseling Association; and the Most Impactful Scholar in Social Sciences, presented by Necmettin Erbakan University (2020, 2022, and 2023). Currently, he is an associate editor for Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development journal. Dr. Haktanir’s current research interests include DBT, adolescent mental health, trauma, and suicide risk assessment and prevention in school settings.
All the articles published in REP are licensed with "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License"