TR
EN
A Comparison of Majalla's Kitab al-Buyu‘ and the French Civil Code
Abstract
This article will first examine the views preferred by the Majalla Commission to the main fatwā in order for Kitab al-Buyu to be regulated with the provisions in accordance with the needs of the century. Then the sales theory of the French Civil Code will be mentioned. The concept of goods, conditions, rights of option, sales of rights, wholesales and production orders will be our focus. Then, the minutes documenting the Majalla amendments of the law-making commissions will be examined from a comparative perspective. Thus, we will come to a conclusion on whether the amended articles match up with the French Civil Code. During the enactment of Majalla, the intellectual movement defending the quotation of the French Civil Code was not successful. However, we can say that the French Civil Code's theory of sale found a suitable door to influence Majalla, even the Islamic Law of Obligations, through amendments, since the Ottoman jurists of the period largely adopted the Western conception of French civil law, especially the principle of freedom of contract and liability.
Keywords
References
- “ʿAdliye Vekāleti Celīlesinin Emir ve Talimātıyla Teşekkül Edip 3 Mayıs 339 Tarihinde İlk Celsesini Akdeden (Kānun-i Medenī ʿUkūd ve Vācibāt) Komisyonunun Tarih-i Mezkūrdan İtibaren 30 Haziran 339 Tarihine Kadar Sebkeden Mesāisini Mübeyyin Rapordur”. Cerīde-i ʿAdliye Annex 13-14-15 (1339), 3-15.
- “Iḥḍār-ı Qawānīn Komisyonları”. Cerīde-i ʿAdliye 149 (Ağustos 1332), 65-68.
- “Mecelle Encumani’nin Kitābu’l-Buyūʿa Ait Tetkīkātı”. Dār al-Funūn Hukūk Fakultesi Mecmūʿası 11 (1341), 82-89, 161-178.
- “Kavānīn Lāyiḥalarını İḥḍāra Meʾmūr Komisyonların Usūl-i Mesāisine, Makām-ı Nezāretle Münāsebetine ve Rüʾesāʾ ve ʿĀzāsına İʿtā Edilecek Mebāliğe Dāir Tālimātnāmedir”. Cerīde-i ʿAdliye 149 (Ağustos 1332), 67-68.
- Kod Sivil Yani Fransa Kānūn-i Medenīsi Yahut Hukūk-i ʿAdliye Kānūnnāmesi. ter. Nuzret Hilmi. İstanbul: Dikran Karabtiyan Maṭbaʿası, 1303.
- “Mecelle Hakkinda”. Sabīl al-Rashād 23/577 (20 Teşrinisani 1329/20 Rebiülahir 1342), 77-78.
- “Mecelle Taʿdīlāt Komisyonu Tarafından Kitābu’l-Buyūʿ Tadilatına Dair Tanzīm Edilen Rapor”. Cerīde-i ʿAdliye 25 (1340), 894-902.
- “Vacibat Komisyonu Zabıtnamesi: Vacibat Komisyonu İkinci İctima”. Dār al-Funūn Hukūk Fakultesi Mecmūʿası 15 (1343).
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Religion, Society and Culture Studies
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Publication Date
April 20, 2023
Submission Date
March 5, 2023
Acceptance Date
April 4, 2023
Published in Issue
Year 2023 Number: 23
APA
Yaşar Bilicioğlu, İ. (2023). A Comparison of Majalla’s Kitab al-Buyu‘ and the French Civil Code. Rize İlahiyat Dergisi, 23, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.32950/rid.1260548
AMA
1.Yaşar Bilicioğlu İ. A Comparison of Majalla’s Kitab al-Buyu‘ and the French Civil Code. Rize İlahiyat Dergisi. 2023;(23):1-18. doi:10.32950/rid.1260548
Chicago
Yaşar Bilicioğlu, İlknur. 2023. “A Comparison of Majalla’s Kitab Al-Buyu‘ and the French Civil Code”. Rize İlahiyat Dergisi, nos. 23: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.32950/rid.1260548.
EndNote
Yaşar Bilicioğlu İ (April 1, 2023) A Comparison of Majalla’s Kitab al-Buyu‘ and the French Civil Code. Rize İlahiyat Dergisi 23 1–18.
IEEE
[1]İ. Yaşar Bilicioğlu, “A Comparison of Majalla’s Kitab al-Buyu‘ and the French Civil Code”, Rize İlahiyat Dergisi, no. 23, pp. 1–18, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.32950/rid.1260548.
ISNAD
Yaşar Bilicioğlu, İlknur. “A Comparison of Majalla’s Kitab Al-Buyu‘ and the French Civil Code”. Rize İlahiyat Dergisi. 23 (April 1, 2023): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.32950/rid.1260548.
JAMA
1.Yaşar Bilicioğlu İ. A Comparison of Majalla’s Kitab al-Buyu‘ and the French Civil Code. Rize İlahiyat Dergisi. 2023;:1–18.
MLA
Yaşar Bilicioğlu, İlknur. “A Comparison of Majalla’s Kitab Al-Buyu‘ and the French Civil Code”. Rize İlahiyat Dergisi, no. 23, Apr. 2023, pp. 1-18, doi:10.32950/rid.1260548.
Vancouver
1.İlknur Yaşar Bilicioğlu. A Comparison of Majalla’s Kitab al-Buyu‘ and the French Civil Code. Rize İlahiyat Dergisi. 2023 Apr. 1;(23):1-18. doi:10.32950/rid.1260548