Cultivating Geographical Thinking: A Framework for Student-Led Research on Food Waste

Year 2017, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 80 - 93, 30.04.2017

Caitlin Fınlayson Meredith Gregory Clara Ludtke Christian Meolı Michael Ryan

Abstract

Research has consistently demonstrated the wide-ranging benefits of student-led research, from
increased student engagement to higher retention and graduation rates. Despite these calls to increase
research opportunities for students, however, the availability of practical, easy-to-implement research
frameworks in disciplinary-specific settings remains limited. For geographers, in particular, student-led
research provides an opportunity for students to engage in the craft of geography, learning how to solve
spatial problems in a real-world context. This paper presents a practical guide to working with students
to develop and analyze a case study on food preferences and food waste. The subject of food waste
provides an accessible framework for analyzing a range of geographic issues, from culture to
globalization to industry. Specifically, this paper builds on the methodology utilized by a team of
undergraduate researchers who examined the issue of food waste using both quantitative and
qualitative techniques and adapts this project so it could be used in a variety of classroom settings.
Student-led research can and should be expanded in geography, offering students a deeper
understanding of spatial problem solving and a better understanding of geography as a discipline. 

Keywords

undergraduate research, pedagogy, case study, food waste, agriculture

References

• Alkon, A. H., & McCullen, C. G. (2011). Whiteness and farmers markets: Performances, perpetuations… contestations?. Antipode, 43(4), 937-959.
• Brown, A. (2001). Counting farmers markets. Geographical Review, 91(4), 655-674.
• Cole, K., McNees, M., Kinney, K., Fisher, K., Krieger, J. W. (2013). Increasing access to farmers markets for beneficiaries of nutrition assistance: evaluation of the Farmers Market Access Project. Preventing Chronic Disease, 10: 130121.
• Craney, C., McKay, T., Mazzeo, A., Morris, J., Prigodich, C., & De Groot, R. (2011). Crossdiscipline perceptions of the undergraduate research experience. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(1), 92-113.
• Deaton, C. C., & Cook, M. (2012). Using role-play and case study to promote student research on environmental science. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas, 49(3), 71-76.
• Fuller, I., Rawlinson, S., & Bevan, R. (2000). Evaluation of student learning experiences in physical geography fieldwork: Paddling or pedagogy?. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 24(2), 199-215.
• Gersten, R., & Dimino, J. (2001). The realities of translating research into classroom practice. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16(2), 120-130.
• Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S., & Toulmin, C. (2010). Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science, 327(5967), 812-818.
• Gregerman, S. R., Lerner, J. S., von Hippel, W., Jonides, J., & Nagda, B. A. (1998). Undergraduate student-faculty research partnerships affect student retention. The Review of Higher Education, 22(1), 55-72.
• Haigh, M., & Gold, J. R. (1993). The problems with fieldwork: a group‐based approach toward integrating fieldwork into the undergraduate geography curriculum. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 17(1), 21-32.
• Hathaway, R. S., Nagda, B. A., & Gregerman, S. R. (2002). The relationship of undergraduate research participation to graduate and professional education pursuit: an empirical study. Journal of College Student Development, 43(5), 614.
• Hay, I. (2016). Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography. Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press.
• Healey, M. (2005a). Linking research and teaching: exploring disciplinary spaces and the role of inquiry-based learning. Reshaping the university: new relationships between research, scholarship and teaching, 67-78.
• Healey, M. (2005b). Linking research and teaching to benefit student learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29(2), 183-201.
• Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62-66. Ishiyama, J. (2002). Does early participation in undergraduate research benefit social science and humanities students?. College Student Journal, 36(3), 381-387.
• Kenny, R. W., Alberts, B., Booth, W. C., Glaser, M., Glassick, C. E., Ikenberry, S. O., & Jamieson, K. H. (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America's research universities. State University of New York at Stony Brook.
• Larsen, K., & Gilliland, J. (2009). A farmers’ market in a food desert: Evaluating impacts on the price and availability of healthy food. Health & Place, 15(4), 1158-1162.
• Linn, M. C., Palmer, E., Baranger, A., Gerard, E., & Stone, E. (2015). Undergraduate research experiences: impacts and opportunities. Science, 347(6222), 1261757.
• Marr, C. W., & Gast, K. L. (1991). Reactions by Consumers in a Farmers' Market to Prices for Seedless Watermelon and Ratings of Eating Quality. HortTechnology, 1(1), 105-106.
• Matsui, J., Liu, R., & Kane, C. M. (2003). Evaluating a science diversity program at UC Berkeley: more questions than answers. Cell Biology Education, 2(2), 117-121.
• NSF Advisory Committee. (1996). Shaping the future: new expectations for undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Arlington: National Science Foundation Directorate for Education and Human Resources.
• Pollan, M. (2006). The omnivore’s dilemma: A natural history of four meals. New York: The Penguin Press.
• Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of engineering education, 93(3), 223-231.
• Russell, S. H., Hancock, M. P., & McCullough, J. (2007). Benefits of undergraduate research experiences. Science(Washington), 316(5824), 548-549.
• Secor, A. (2010). Social surveys, interviews, and focus groups. In B. Gomez & J. P. Jones III (Eds.), Research methods in geography (194-205). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, Ltd.
• Simm, D. J., & David, C. A. (2002). Effective teaching of research design in physical geography: a case study. Journal of Geography in Higher education, 26(2), 169-180.
• Sommer, R., Wing, M., & Aitkens, S. (1980). Price savings to consumers at farmers' markets. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 14(2), 452-462.
• Spronken-Smith, R., & Harland, T. (2009). Learning to teach with problem-based learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(2), 138-153.
• Visser, S., & Jones III, J. P. (2010). Measurement and interpretation. In B. Gomez & J. P. Jones III (Eds.), Research methods in geography (41-59). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, Ltd.
• Walkington, H., & Jenkins, A. (2008). Embedding undergraduate research publication in the student learning experience. Brookes eJournal of Learning and Teaching, 2(3), 2.
• Walkington, H., Griffin, A. L., Keys-Mathews, L., Metoyer, S. K., Miller, W. E., Baker, R., & France, D. (2011). Embedding research-based learning early in the undergraduate geography curriculum. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 35(3), 315-330.
• Zydney, A. L., Bennett, J. S., Shahid, A., & Bauer, K. (2002). Faculty perspectives regarding the undergraduate research experience in science and engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(3), 291-297.