Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2017, Volume: 4 Issue: 3, 410 - 416, 30.09.2017
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.718

Abstract

References

  • Akyurt N. 2013, “Hastane Yönetimi” , Nobel Tıp Kitapevleri, 1. Baskı, pp. 453-460.
  • Çakır A. , 2007 , “Hasta Güvenlığ̇ ı ̇Kültürü ile Kalıṫ e Yönetıṁ Sıṡ temı ̇Arasindaki İlış̇ kıṅ ıṅ Analıż ı ̇Tezi”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi.
  • Domittner B., 2013,”Quality Management”. Yazgan M., 2009, “Sağlık İşletmelerinde, Hizmet Kalitesinin Sağlık Hizmeti Sunan ve Sağlık Hizmeti Alan Taraflarca Değerlendirilmesi Tezi”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi.
  • Rad A., 2005, “A Survey of total quality management in IRAN”, Leadersh Heal Serv [Internet] ,18(3):5–7. www.emeraldsight.com/13660756.htm
  • Sosyal Güvenlik Kurumu , 2013, “Sosyal Güvenlik Kurumu Sağlık Uygulama Tebliği”.
  • Taşçı D., Eroğlu E., Çabuk S., Duman G, Ağlargöz O. Erdemir E. , 2013, “KALİTE YÖNETİM SİSTEMLERİ”, Anadolu Üniversitesi, pp 20
  • Uluslararası Hasta Hizmetleri Derneği, 2016, “JCI Akredite Hastaneleri” [Internet]. [cited 2016 Nov 2]. http://www.visitturkeyforhealthcare.com/19-jci-akredite-hastaneleri.html
  • Budak M, 2014, “Akreditasyon Ders Notları”, Okan Üniversitesi
  • Weinmar C, Daniel M. ,2013, “Neuer Standard im Gesundheitswesen”. Praxis (Bern 1994) [Internet]., 36–7. http://www.bzbonline.de/jan13/36_37.pdf
  • Sens B. , 2013, ”DIN EN 15224:2012 – eine neue Zertifizierungsnorm für Qualitätsmanagement- systeme in Gesundheitseinrichtungen : DIN EN 15224:2012 – a new certification standard for Quality Management Systems in healthcare facilities” , Clinotel 11.
  • TS EN 15224 TÜRK STANDARDI ,2013
  • Sağlık Bakanlığı, 2012, “SKS Işığında Sağlıkta Kalite”, 1. Baskı, Pozitif Matbaa.
  • Tutuncu O. , “Evaluating the Effects of Quality Assurance: A Comparative analysis between ISO 9001 certified and Non - certified Hospitals in Turkey” .
  • EU, 2013, “Comparative analysis of training needs and specific trends in healthcare quality assurance in. Life Long Learn Progr.”, 1–44.
  • Pasachen U. , 2013, “Die DIN EN 15224:2012 - der neue Stamdard für QM - Systeme in Organisation der Gesundheits- versogung und die Konformitatsbewertung” Clinotel [Internet] 12:1–13. http://www.clinotel-journal.de/article-id-012.html Engel N., 2013, “DIN EN 15224 – Vorsicht ist angebracht!” Praxis.
  • Øvretveit J. A , 1997, “Comparison of hospital quality programmes: lessons for other services”, Int J Serv Ind Manag, Vol;8(3):220–35.
  • Øvretveit J, Serouri A Al., 2006, “Hospital quality management system in a low income Arabic country: an evaluation”, Int J Health Care Qual Assur 19(6):516–32.
  • Øvretveit J. ,2003 , “What are the best strategies for ensuring quality in hospitals ?”, Health Evidence Network. Paccioni A, Sicotte C, Champagne F. , 2008 , “Accreditation: A cultural control strategy. Int J Health Care Qual Assur” 21(2):146 http://www.scopus.com/
  • Sack C, Scherag A, Lütkes P, Günther W, Jöckel KH, Holtmann G. ,2011, “Is there an association between hospital accreditation and patient satisfaction with hospital care? A survey of 37 000 patients treated by 73 hospitals.”, Int J Qual Heal Care, 23(3):278–83.
  • Serkan T.,2015, “Standart Belge ile Farklılaşma mümkün mü ? Akreditasyon Söylem Analizi.”, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sos Bilim Dergi 27(Bahar).

TS EN 15224 HEALTHCARE SERVICE - THE COMPARISON OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO OTHER QUALITY SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE

Year 2017, Volume: 4 Issue: 3, 410 - 416, 30.09.2017
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.718

Abstract

Purpose- The aim of
the work is to find out, which quality system application could be appropriate
for different kind of health service providers by also introducing the new
quality management system ISO 15224 . 

Methodology-
The
study has been done by comparing ISO 15224 Health Service
Management System with ISO 9001-2008 quality management system, SKS and JCI
accreditation systems by clause by clause. The summary of the findings are
given as a table in the article. Findings-
The most important difference between ISO Standards, and SKS and JCI comes
up in product realization clause. ISO Standards define realization of a health
service offering in general. At the stage of realizing a service offering, by
emphasizing the critical points, a progress is made on the basis of ISO
standards. Especially clinical risk assessment and patient safety should be
ignored.





Conclusion- As a result,
for large hospitals intending to expand in global markets, having an
accreditation and having that certification internationally should make these
institutions more competitive in global health sector. At the other hand, for
health institutions intending to compete on a national scale only, preferring
ISO 15224 Standard, considering the examples in the literature, would be more
appropriate.    

References

  • Akyurt N. 2013, “Hastane Yönetimi” , Nobel Tıp Kitapevleri, 1. Baskı, pp. 453-460.
  • Çakır A. , 2007 , “Hasta Güvenlığ̇ ı ̇Kültürü ile Kalıṫ e Yönetıṁ Sıṡ temı ̇Arasindaki İlış̇ kıṅ ıṅ Analıż ı ̇Tezi”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi.
  • Domittner B., 2013,”Quality Management”. Yazgan M., 2009, “Sağlık İşletmelerinde, Hizmet Kalitesinin Sağlık Hizmeti Sunan ve Sağlık Hizmeti Alan Taraflarca Değerlendirilmesi Tezi”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi.
  • Rad A., 2005, “A Survey of total quality management in IRAN”, Leadersh Heal Serv [Internet] ,18(3):5–7. www.emeraldsight.com/13660756.htm
  • Sosyal Güvenlik Kurumu , 2013, “Sosyal Güvenlik Kurumu Sağlık Uygulama Tebliği”.
  • Taşçı D., Eroğlu E., Çabuk S., Duman G, Ağlargöz O. Erdemir E. , 2013, “KALİTE YÖNETİM SİSTEMLERİ”, Anadolu Üniversitesi, pp 20
  • Uluslararası Hasta Hizmetleri Derneği, 2016, “JCI Akredite Hastaneleri” [Internet]. [cited 2016 Nov 2]. http://www.visitturkeyforhealthcare.com/19-jci-akredite-hastaneleri.html
  • Budak M, 2014, “Akreditasyon Ders Notları”, Okan Üniversitesi
  • Weinmar C, Daniel M. ,2013, “Neuer Standard im Gesundheitswesen”. Praxis (Bern 1994) [Internet]., 36–7. http://www.bzbonline.de/jan13/36_37.pdf
  • Sens B. , 2013, ”DIN EN 15224:2012 – eine neue Zertifizierungsnorm für Qualitätsmanagement- systeme in Gesundheitseinrichtungen : DIN EN 15224:2012 – a new certification standard for Quality Management Systems in healthcare facilities” , Clinotel 11.
  • TS EN 15224 TÜRK STANDARDI ,2013
  • Sağlık Bakanlığı, 2012, “SKS Işığında Sağlıkta Kalite”, 1. Baskı, Pozitif Matbaa.
  • Tutuncu O. , “Evaluating the Effects of Quality Assurance: A Comparative analysis between ISO 9001 certified and Non - certified Hospitals in Turkey” .
  • EU, 2013, “Comparative analysis of training needs and specific trends in healthcare quality assurance in. Life Long Learn Progr.”, 1–44.
  • Pasachen U. , 2013, “Die DIN EN 15224:2012 - der neue Stamdard für QM - Systeme in Organisation der Gesundheits- versogung und die Konformitatsbewertung” Clinotel [Internet] 12:1–13. http://www.clinotel-journal.de/article-id-012.html Engel N., 2013, “DIN EN 15224 – Vorsicht ist angebracht!” Praxis.
  • Øvretveit J. A , 1997, “Comparison of hospital quality programmes: lessons for other services”, Int J Serv Ind Manag, Vol;8(3):220–35.
  • Øvretveit J, Serouri A Al., 2006, “Hospital quality management system in a low income Arabic country: an evaluation”, Int J Health Care Qual Assur 19(6):516–32.
  • Øvretveit J. ,2003 , “What are the best strategies for ensuring quality in hospitals ?”, Health Evidence Network. Paccioni A, Sicotte C, Champagne F. , 2008 , “Accreditation: A cultural control strategy. Int J Health Care Qual Assur” 21(2):146 http://www.scopus.com/
  • Sack C, Scherag A, Lütkes P, Günther W, Jöckel KH, Holtmann G. ,2011, “Is there an association between hospital accreditation and patient satisfaction with hospital care? A survey of 37 000 patients treated by 73 hospitals.”, Int J Qual Heal Care, 23(3):278–83.
  • Serkan T.,2015, “Standart Belge ile Farklılaşma mümkün mü ? Akreditasyon Söylem Analizi.”, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sos Bilim Dergi 27(Bahar).
There are 20 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Selden Coskun This is me

Yildirim Gulhan

Publication Date September 30, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 4 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Coskun, S., & Gulhan, Y. (2017). TS EN 15224 HEALTHCARE SERVICE - THE COMPARISON OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO OTHER QUALITY SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE. Research Journal of Business and Management, 4(3), 410-416. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.718
AMA Coskun S, Gulhan Y. TS EN 15224 HEALTHCARE SERVICE - THE COMPARISON OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO OTHER QUALITY SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE. RJBM. September 2017;4(3):410-416. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.718
Chicago Coskun, Selden, and Yildirim Gulhan. “TS EN 15224 HEALTHCARE SERVICE - THE COMPARISON OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO OTHER QUALITY SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE”. Research Journal of Business and Management 4, no. 3 (September 2017): 410-16. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.718.
EndNote Coskun S, Gulhan Y (September 1, 2017) TS EN 15224 HEALTHCARE SERVICE - THE COMPARISON OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO OTHER QUALITY SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE. Research Journal of Business and Management 4 3 410–416.
IEEE S. Coskun and Y. Gulhan, “TS EN 15224 HEALTHCARE SERVICE - THE COMPARISON OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO OTHER QUALITY SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE”, RJBM, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 410–416, 2017, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.718.
ISNAD Coskun, Selden - Gulhan, Yildirim. “TS EN 15224 HEALTHCARE SERVICE - THE COMPARISON OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO OTHER QUALITY SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE”. Research Journal of Business and Management 4/3 (September 2017), 410-416. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.718.
JAMA Coskun S, Gulhan Y. TS EN 15224 HEALTHCARE SERVICE - THE COMPARISON OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO OTHER QUALITY SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE. RJBM. 2017;4:410–416.
MLA Coskun, Selden and Yildirim Gulhan. “TS EN 15224 HEALTHCARE SERVICE - THE COMPARISON OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO OTHER QUALITY SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE”. Research Journal of Business and Management, vol. 4, no. 3, 2017, pp. 410-6, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.718.
Vancouver Coskun S, Gulhan Y. TS EN 15224 HEALTHCARE SERVICE - THE COMPARISON OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO OTHER QUALITY SYSTEMS IN HEALTHCARE. RJBM. 2017;4(3):410-6.

Research Journal of Business and Management (RJBM) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. RJBM aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in all related areas of business, management and organizations. The editor in chief of RJBM invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. RJBM publishes academic research studies only. RJBM charges no submission or publication fee.

Ethics Policy - RJBM applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). RJBM is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).

Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.