Bu çalışmanın amacı örgütsel adalet algısı ile psikolojik sözleşme ihlali algısı arasındaki ilişkiyi, aracı bir model içerisinde inceleyerek etik liderliğin bu ilişkide nasıl bir rol oynadığını ortaya koymaktır. Bu çalışmada geçmişteki çalışmalardan farklı olarak, örgütsel adalet ve psikolojik sözleşme ihlali arasındaki ilişkide etik liderlik davranışının aracılık etkisine odaklanılarak hem ilgili literatüre katkı sağlanmaya hem de örgütsel ortamda yöneticilere kolaylık sağlayacak bulgulara ulaşılmaya çalışılmıştır. Türkiye’deki Kalkınma Ajanslarında çalışanların örgütsel adalet algılarının psikolojik sözleşme ihlalini nasıl etkilediği ve etik liderliğin bu etkideki aracılık rolünü ortaya koymak amacıyla yapılan ampirik araştırmanın çalışma evrenini, Türkiye’nin değişik bölgelerinde bulunan 23 kalkınma ajansında çalışanlar oluşturmaktadır. Psikolojik sözleşme ihlali ile örgütsel adalet arasında negatif ve anlamlı bir ilişki tespit edilmiş ve etik liderliğin bu ilişkide aracılık etkisi belirlenmiştir. 1. GİRİŞ
The aim of this paper is to examine the relationship between organizational justice and psychological contract breach within the scope of a moderator model and to exhibit the role of ethical leadership in this relationship. This study distinctively focuses on the impact of ethical leadership attitude in the relationship between organizational justice and psychological contract breach. In this context, this study aims to make a contribution to the existing literature and obtain favorable results that facilitates the executives in an organizational environment. Particularly, the objective of the empirical research is to exhibit how the organizational justice perceptions of employees working in Turkish Development Agencies effect the pyschological contract and the role of ethical leadership in this relationship. The universe of the corresponding research comprises the 23 Development Agencies staff working in the different geographical regions of Turkey. The results reveal that there is a statistically significant negative relationship between psychological contract breach and organizational justice and ethical leadership has a mediating effect on this relationship
Journal Section | Articles |
---|---|
Authors | |
Publication Date | June 1, 2014 |
Published in Issue | Year 2014 Volume: 1 Issue: 2 |
Research Journal of Business and Management (RJBM) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. RJBM aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in all related areas of business, management and organizations. The editor in chief of RJBM invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. RJBM publishes academic research studies only. RJBM charges no submission or publication fee.
Ethics Policy - RJBM applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). RJBM is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).
Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.