Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2023, Volume: 10 Issue: 2, 69 - 80, 30.06.2023
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2023.1737

Abstract

References

  • Akbari, M., Foroudi, P., Fashami, R. Z., Mahavarpour, N., Khodayari, M., (2022). Let us talk about something: The evolution of e-WOM from the past to the future. Journal of Business Research 149, 663-689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.061
  • Aleixo, A.M., Leal, S., Azeiteiro, U.M., (2021). Higher education students’ perceptions of sustainable development in Portugal. Journal of Cleaner Production 327, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129429
  • AlQahtany, A., (2020). People’s perceptions of sustainable housing in developing countries: the case of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Housıng, Care and Support, 23(3/4), 93-109.
  • Anastasiei, B., Dospinescu, N., (2019). Electronic word-of-mouth for online retailers: predictors of volume and valence. Sustainability, 11(3), 1-18.
  • Arslan, A., Haapanen, L., Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., Tarba, S.Y., Alon, I., (2021). Climate change, consumer lifestyles and legitimation strategies of sustainability-oriented firms. European Management Journal, 39(6), 720-730.
  • Bezençon, V., Etemad-Sajadi, R., (2015). The effect of a sustainable label portfolio on consumer perception of ethicality and retail patronage. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 43(4/5), 314-328.
  • Brandão, A., Miranda, C.C., (2022). Does Sustainable Consumption Behaviour Influence Luxury Services Purchase Intention? Sustainability, 14(13), 1-28.
  • Caglar, A.E., Yavuz, E., (2023). The role of environmental protection expenditures and renewable energy consumption in the context of ecological challenges: Insights from the European Union with the novel panel econometric approach. Journal of Environmental Management 331, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117317
  • Catenazzo, G., Epalle, A., Fragniere, E., Tuberosa, J., (2010). Testing the impact of sustainable development policies in Canton Geneva. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 21(6), 845-861.
  • Coulmont, M., Berthelot, S., Gagné, V., (2022). Sustainability performance indicator trends: a Canadian industry-based analysis. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 7(2), 1-17.
  • Duarte, P., Silva, S. C., Ferreira, M. B., (2018). How convenient is it? Delivering online shopping convenience to enhance customer satisfaction and encourage e-WOM. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 44, 161-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.06.007
  • Escario, J.J., Rodriguez-Sanchez, C., Casaló, LV., (2020). The influence of environmental attitudes and perceived effectiveness on recycling, reducing, and reusing packaging materials in Spain. Waste Management 113, 251-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.05.043
  • Ha, H.Y., Akamavi, R.K., Kitchen, P.J., Janda, S., (2014). Exploring key antecedents of purchase intentions within different services. Journal of Services Marketing, 28(7), 595–606.
  • Helm, S.V., Pollitt, A., Barnett, M.A., Curran, M.A., Craig, Z.R., (2018). Differentiating environmental concern in the context of psychological adaption to climate change. Global Environmental Change 48, 158-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.012
  • Herrmann, C., Rhein, S., Strater, K.F., (2022). Consumers’ sustainability-related perception of and willingness-to-pay for food packaging alternatives. Resources, Conservation & Recycling 181, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106219
  • Hopewell, J., Dvorak, R., Kosior, E., (2009). Plastics Recycling: Challenges and Opportunities. Royal Society, 364(1526), 2115-2126.
  • Hussain, S., Guangju, W., Jafar, R. M. S., Ilyas, Z., Mustafa, G., Jianzhou, Y., (2018). Consumers' online information adoption behavior: Motives and antecedents of electronic word of mouth communications. Computers in Human Behavior 80, 22-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.019
  • Jung, H. J., Choi, Y. J., Oh, K. W., (2020). Influencing factors of Chinese consumers’ purchase ıntention to sustainable apparel products: exploring consumer “attitude–behavioral ıntention” gap. Sustainability, 12(5), 1-14.
  • Kayıkçı, P., Armağan, K., Dal, N.E., (2019). Sürdürülebilir pazarlama: kavramsal bir çalışma. Journal of Bucak Faculty of Business, 2(1), 77-93.
  • Khalil, D., Ramzy, O., Mostafa, R., (2013). Perception towards sustainable development concept: Egyptian students’ perspective. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 4(3), 307-327.
  • Kim, Y., Oh, K. W., (2020). Effects of perceived sustainability level of sportswear product on purchase ıntention: exploring the roles of perceived skepticism and perceived brand reputation. Sustainability, 12(20), 1-16.
  • Kong, H. M., Witmaier, A., Ko, E., (2021). Sustainability and social media communication: How consumers respond to marketing efforts of luxury and non-luxury fashion brands. Journal of Business Research 131, 640-651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.021
  • Kwok, L., Mao, Z. E., Huang, Y. K., (2019). Consumers’ electronic word-of-mouth behavioral intentions on Facebook. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 19(3), 296-307.
  • Lee, K. Y., Choi, H., (2019). Predictors of electronic word-of-mouth behavior on social networking sites in the United States and Korea: Cultural and social relationship variables. Computers in Human Behavior 94, 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.025
  • Lestari, E., Septifani, R., Nisak, K., (2021). Green awareness and green purchase intention: The moderating role of corporate image, International Conference on Green Agro-industry and Bioeconomy, IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 924, 1-8. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/924/1/012051
  • Lim, W. M., Ahmed, P. K., Ali, M. Y., (2022). Giving electronic word of mouth (eWOM) as a prepurchase behavior: The case of online group buying. Journal of Business Research 146, 582-604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.093
  • Nath, V., Agrawal, R., (2022). Barriers to consumer adoption of sustainable products – an empirical analysis. Social Responsibility Journal. DOI: 10.1108/SRJ-12-2020-0495
  • Nauges, C., Wheeler, S.A., (2017). The complex relationship between households' climate change concerns and their water and energy mitigation behaviour. Ecological Economics 141, 87-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.05.026
  • Nguyen, N.H., Dao, T. K., Duong, T. T., Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, V. K., Dao, T. L., (2023). Role of consumer ethnocentrism on purchase intention toward foreign products: Evidence from data of Vietnamese consumers with Chinese products. Journal Pre-Proof, 9(2), 1-25.
  • Ottenbacher, M.C., Kuechle, G., Harrington, R.J., Kim, W.H., (2019). QSR customer sustainable behaviors and brand practice perceptions on willingness to pay a Premium. International Hospitality Review, 33(2), 106-125.
  • Panuju, A., Ambarwati, D., Susila, M., (2019). Implications of automotive product sustainability on young customers’ purchase intention in developing countries: an experimental approach. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 857, 1-10.
  • Queiroz, F. C. B. P., Lima, N. C., Silva, C. L., Queiroz, J. V., Souza, G. H. S., (2021). Purchase ıntentions for Brazilian recycled PET, products—circular economy opportunities. Recycling, 6(75), 1-18.
  • Rakib, M. R. H. K., Pramanik, S. A. K., Amran, M. A., Islam, M.N., Sarker, M. O. F., (2022). Factors affecting young customers’ smartphone purchase intention during Covid-19 pandemic. Heliyon 8(9), 1-11.
  • Saari, U.A., Damberg, S., Frombling, L., Ringle, C.M., (2021). Sustainable consumption behavior of Europeans: The influence of environmental knowledge and risk perception on environmental concern and behavioral intention. Ecological Economics, 189, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107155 .
  • Schoubroeck, S.V., Chacon, L., Reynolds, A.M., Lavoine, N., Hakovirta, M., Gonzalez, R., Van Passel, S., Venditti, R.A., (2023). Environmental sustainability perception toward obvious recovered waste content in paper-based packaging: An online and in-person survey best-worst scaling experiment. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 188, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106682
  • Scott, K.A., Weaver, S.T., (2018). The ıntersection of sustainable consumption and anticonsumption: repurposing to extend product life spans. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 37(2), 291-305.
  • Shankar, A., Jebarajakirthy, C., Ashaduzzaman, M., (2020). How do electronic word of mouth practices contribute to mobile banking adoption?. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 52, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101920
  • Shu, M., Wu, F., (2014). Effects of electronic word-of-mouth on consumers' purchase decision in catering industry. Akadémiai Kiadó, 64(2), 199-211.
  • Siqueira Jr, J.R., Pena, N. G., ter Horst, E., Molina, G. (2019). Spreading the word: how customer experience in a traditional retail setting ınfluences consumer traditional and electronic word-of-mouth ıntention. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 37, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100870
  • Steinhorst, J., Beyerl, K., (2021). First reduce and reuse, then recycle! Enabling consumers to tackle the plastic crisis – Qualitative expert interviews in Germany. Journal of Cleaner Production 313, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127782
  • Sun, Y., Gonzalez-Jimenez, H., Wang, S., (2021). Examining the relationships between e-WOM, consumer ethnocentrism and brand equity. Journal of Business Research 130, 564-573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.040
  • Wijekoon, R., Sabri, M. F., (2021). Determinants that ınfluence green product purchase ıntention and behavior: a literature review and guiding framework. Sustainability, 13(11), 1-40.
  • Yeğin, T., Ikram, M., (2022). Analysis of consumers’ electric vehicle purchase ıntentions: an expansion of the theory of planned behavior. Sustainability, 14(19), 1-27.
  • Yükselen, C., (2017). Pazarlama Araştırmaları. Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara, ISBN: 978-975-8326-14-7.
  • Yükselen, C. (2020). Pazarlamanın Yeni Paradigması- Sürdürülebilirlik. Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara, ISBN: 978-605-254-282-8

EFFECT OF SUSTAINABILITY PERCEPTION ON CONSUMER PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR

Year 2023, Volume: 10 Issue: 2, 69 - 80, 30.06.2023
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2023.1737

Abstract

Purpose- The aim of the study is to determine how sustainability perception affects electronic word-of-mouth communication and purchase intention. The perception of sustainability consists of waste utilisation and minimisation, climate change concerns, contributing to environmental protection and recycling. Consumer behaviour is addressed with the dimensions of electronic word-of-mouth communication and purchase intention.
Methodology- The data were collected from consumers who use white goods by online survey method and SPSS statistical programme was used to test the relationships. The population of the study consists of consumers who use white goods. Considering that it is not practically possible to reach the universe, sampling was used. Since it is not foreseen to make a generalisation about the population, convenience sampling method, one of the non-random sampling methods, was used. Accordingly, the participants of the study consisted of 517 people.
Findings- In the study, sustainability perception positively affects electronic word-of-mouth communication and purchase intention. Moreover, sustainability perception components together positively affect electronic word-of-mouth communication and purchase intention.
Conclusion- In recent years, negative impacts on natural ecosystems have increased the importance of the concept of sustainability. Consumers have an important role in ensuring sustainability. Consumers' increasing awareness of sustainability and parallel to this, increasing concerns affect their purchasing behaviour. Perceptions of sustainability strongly influence consumer purchase intentions, which in turn encourage positive online word-of-mouth marketing more effectively than traditional marketing tools.

References

  • Akbari, M., Foroudi, P., Fashami, R. Z., Mahavarpour, N., Khodayari, M., (2022). Let us talk about something: The evolution of e-WOM from the past to the future. Journal of Business Research 149, 663-689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.061
  • Aleixo, A.M., Leal, S., Azeiteiro, U.M., (2021). Higher education students’ perceptions of sustainable development in Portugal. Journal of Cleaner Production 327, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129429
  • AlQahtany, A., (2020). People’s perceptions of sustainable housing in developing countries: the case of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Housıng, Care and Support, 23(3/4), 93-109.
  • Anastasiei, B., Dospinescu, N., (2019). Electronic word-of-mouth for online retailers: predictors of volume and valence. Sustainability, 11(3), 1-18.
  • Arslan, A., Haapanen, L., Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., Tarba, S.Y., Alon, I., (2021). Climate change, consumer lifestyles and legitimation strategies of sustainability-oriented firms. European Management Journal, 39(6), 720-730.
  • Bezençon, V., Etemad-Sajadi, R., (2015). The effect of a sustainable label portfolio on consumer perception of ethicality and retail patronage. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 43(4/5), 314-328.
  • Brandão, A., Miranda, C.C., (2022). Does Sustainable Consumption Behaviour Influence Luxury Services Purchase Intention? Sustainability, 14(13), 1-28.
  • Caglar, A.E., Yavuz, E., (2023). The role of environmental protection expenditures and renewable energy consumption in the context of ecological challenges: Insights from the European Union with the novel panel econometric approach. Journal of Environmental Management 331, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117317
  • Catenazzo, G., Epalle, A., Fragniere, E., Tuberosa, J., (2010). Testing the impact of sustainable development policies in Canton Geneva. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 21(6), 845-861.
  • Coulmont, M., Berthelot, S., Gagné, V., (2022). Sustainability performance indicator trends: a Canadian industry-based analysis. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 7(2), 1-17.
  • Duarte, P., Silva, S. C., Ferreira, M. B., (2018). How convenient is it? Delivering online shopping convenience to enhance customer satisfaction and encourage e-WOM. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 44, 161-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.06.007
  • Escario, J.J., Rodriguez-Sanchez, C., Casaló, LV., (2020). The influence of environmental attitudes and perceived effectiveness on recycling, reducing, and reusing packaging materials in Spain. Waste Management 113, 251-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.05.043
  • Ha, H.Y., Akamavi, R.K., Kitchen, P.J., Janda, S., (2014). Exploring key antecedents of purchase intentions within different services. Journal of Services Marketing, 28(7), 595–606.
  • Helm, S.V., Pollitt, A., Barnett, M.A., Curran, M.A., Craig, Z.R., (2018). Differentiating environmental concern in the context of psychological adaption to climate change. Global Environmental Change 48, 158-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.012
  • Herrmann, C., Rhein, S., Strater, K.F., (2022). Consumers’ sustainability-related perception of and willingness-to-pay for food packaging alternatives. Resources, Conservation & Recycling 181, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106219
  • Hopewell, J., Dvorak, R., Kosior, E., (2009). Plastics Recycling: Challenges and Opportunities. Royal Society, 364(1526), 2115-2126.
  • Hussain, S., Guangju, W., Jafar, R. M. S., Ilyas, Z., Mustafa, G., Jianzhou, Y., (2018). Consumers' online information adoption behavior: Motives and antecedents of electronic word of mouth communications. Computers in Human Behavior 80, 22-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.019
  • Jung, H. J., Choi, Y. J., Oh, K. W., (2020). Influencing factors of Chinese consumers’ purchase ıntention to sustainable apparel products: exploring consumer “attitude–behavioral ıntention” gap. Sustainability, 12(5), 1-14.
  • Kayıkçı, P., Armağan, K., Dal, N.E., (2019). Sürdürülebilir pazarlama: kavramsal bir çalışma. Journal of Bucak Faculty of Business, 2(1), 77-93.
  • Khalil, D., Ramzy, O., Mostafa, R., (2013). Perception towards sustainable development concept: Egyptian students’ perspective. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 4(3), 307-327.
  • Kim, Y., Oh, K. W., (2020). Effects of perceived sustainability level of sportswear product on purchase ıntention: exploring the roles of perceived skepticism and perceived brand reputation. Sustainability, 12(20), 1-16.
  • Kong, H. M., Witmaier, A., Ko, E., (2021). Sustainability and social media communication: How consumers respond to marketing efforts of luxury and non-luxury fashion brands. Journal of Business Research 131, 640-651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.021
  • Kwok, L., Mao, Z. E., Huang, Y. K., (2019). Consumers’ electronic word-of-mouth behavioral intentions on Facebook. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 19(3), 296-307.
  • Lee, K. Y., Choi, H., (2019). Predictors of electronic word-of-mouth behavior on social networking sites in the United States and Korea: Cultural and social relationship variables. Computers in Human Behavior 94, 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.025
  • Lestari, E., Septifani, R., Nisak, K., (2021). Green awareness and green purchase intention: The moderating role of corporate image, International Conference on Green Agro-industry and Bioeconomy, IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 924, 1-8. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/924/1/012051
  • Lim, W. M., Ahmed, P. K., Ali, M. Y., (2022). Giving electronic word of mouth (eWOM) as a prepurchase behavior: The case of online group buying. Journal of Business Research 146, 582-604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.093
  • Nath, V., Agrawal, R., (2022). Barriers to consumer adoption of sustainable products – an empirical analysis. Social Responsibility Journal. DOI: 10.1108/SRJ-12-2020-0495
  • Nauges, C., Wheeler, S.A., (2017). The complex relationship between households' climate change concerns and their water and energy mitigation behaviour. Ecological Economics 141, 87-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.05.026
  • Nguyen, N.H., Dao, T. K., Duong, T. T., Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, V. K., Dao, T. L., (2023). Role of consumer ethnocentrism on purchase intention toward foreign products: Evidence from data of Vietnamese consumers with Chinese products. Journal Pre-Proof, 9(2), 1-25.
  • Ottenbacher, M.C., Kuechle, G., Harrington, R.J., Kim, W.H., (2019). QSR customer sustainable behaviors and brand practice perceptions on willingness to pay a Premium. International Hospitality Review, 33(2), 106-125.
  • Panuju, A., Ambarwati, D., Susila, M., (2019). Implications of automotive product sustainability on young customers’ purchase intention in developing countries: an experimental approach. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 857, 1-10.
  • Queiroz, F. C. B. P., Lima, N. C., Silva, C. L., Queiroz, J. V., Souza, G. H. S., (2021). Purchase ıntentions for Brazilian recycled PET, products—circular economy opportunities. Recycling, 6(75), 1-18.
  • Rakib, M. R. H. K., Pramanik, S. A. K., Amran, M. A., Islam, M.N., Sarker, M. O. F., (2022). Factors affecting young customers’ smartphone purchase intention during Covid-19 pandemic. Heliyon 8(9), 1-11.
  • Saari, U.A., Damberg, S., Frombling, L., Ringle, C.M., (2021). Sustainable consumption behavior of Europeans: The influence of environmental knowledge and risk perception on environmental concern and behavioral intention. Ecological Economics, 189, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107155 .
  • Schoubroeck, S.V., Chacon, L., Reynolds, A.M., Lavoine, N., Hakovirta, M., Gonzalez, R., Van Passel, S., Venditti, R.A., (2023). Environmental sustainability perception toward obvious recovered waste content in paper-based packaging: An online and in-person survey best-worst scaling experiment. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 188, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106682
  • Scott, K.A., Weaver, S.T., (2018). The ıntersection of sustainable consumption and anticonsumption: repurposing to extend product life spans. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 37(2), 291-305.
  • Shankar, A., Jebarajakirthy, C., Ashaduzzaman, M., (2020). How do electronic word of mouth practices contribute to mobile banking adoption?. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 52, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101920
  • Shu, M., Wu, F., (2014). Effects of electronic word-of-mouth on consumers' purchase decision in catering industry. Akadémiai Kiadó, 64(2), 199-211.
  • Siqueira Jr, J.R., Pena, N. G., ter Horst, E., Molina, G. (2019). Spreading the word: how customer experience in a traditional retail setting ınfluences consumer traditional and electronic word-of-mouth ıntention. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 37, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100870
  • Steinhorst, J., Beyerl, K., (2021). First reduce and reuse, then recycle! Enabling consumers to tackle the plastic crisis – Qualitative expert interviews in Germany. Journal of Cleaner Production 313, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127782
  • Sun, Y., Gonzalez-Jimenez, H., Wang, S., (2021). Examining the relationships between e-WOM, consumer ethnocentrism and brand equity. Journal of Business Research 130, 564-573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.040
  • Wijekoon, R., Sabri, M. F., (2021). Determinants that ınfluence green product purchase ıntention and behavior: a literature review and guiding framework. Sustainability, 13(11), 1-40.
  • Yeğin, T., Ikram, M., (2022). Analysis of consumers’ electric vehicle purchase ıntentions: an expansion of the theory of planned behavior. Sustainability, 14(19), 1-27.
  • Yükselen, C., (2017). Pazarlama Araştırmaları. Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara, ISBN: 978-975-8326-14-7.
  • Yükselen, C. (2020). Pazarlamanın Yeni Paradigması- Sürdürülebilirlik. Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara, ISBN: 978-605-254-282-8
There are 45 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Business Administration
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Tugba Uzunkaya Satır 0000-0002-3728-3388

Publication Date June 30, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023 Volume: 10 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Satır, T. U. (2023). EFFECT OF SUSTAINABILITY PERCEPTION ON CONSUMER PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR. Research Journal of Business and Management, 10(2), 69-80. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2023.1737
AMA Satır TU. EFFECT OF SUSTAINABILITY PERCEPTION ON CONSUMER PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR. RJBM. June 2023;10(2):69-80. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2023.1737
Chicago Satır, Tugba Uzunkaya. “EFFECT OF SUSTAINABILITY PERCEPTION ON CONSUMER PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR”. Research Journal of Business and Management 10, no. 2 (June 2023): 69-80. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2023.1737.
EndNote Satır TU (June 1, 2023) EFFECT OF SUSTAINABILITY PERCEPTION ON CONSUMER PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR. Research Journal of Business and Management 10 2 69–80.
IEEE T. U. Satır, “EFFECT OF SUSTAINABILITY PERCEPTION ON CONSUMER PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR”, RJBM, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 69–80, 2023, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2023.1737.
ISNAD Satır, Tugba Uzunkaya. “EFFECT OF SUSTAINABILITY PERCEPTION ON CONSUMER PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR”. Research Journal of Business and Management 10/2 (June 2023), 69-80. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2023.1737.
JAMA Satır TU. EFFECT OF SUSTAINABILITY PERCEPTION ON CONSUMER PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR. RJBM. 2023;10:69–80.
MLA Satır, Tugba Uzunkaya. “EFFECT OF SUSTAINABILITY PERCEPTION ON CONSUMER PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR”. Research Journal of Business and Management, vol. 10, no. 2, 2023, pp. 69-80, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2023.1737.
Vancouver Satır TU. EFFECT OF SUSTAINABILITY PERCEPTION ON CONSUMER PURCHASING BEHAVIOUR. RJBM. 2023;10(2):69-80.

Research Journal of Business and Management (RJBM) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. RJBM aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in all related areas of business, management and organizations. The editor in chief of RJBM invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. RJBM publishes academic research studies only. RJBM charges no submission or publication fee.

Ethics Policy - RJBM applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). RJBM is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).

Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.