Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

THE IMPACT OF ENTREPRENEURIAL LEADERSHIP ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE: MEDIATING ROLE OF CREATIVITY AND MODERATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT IN KAYSERI SMES

Year 2025, Volume: 12 Issue: 1, 1 - 14, 30.07.2025

Abstract

Purpose- In today's competitive and global economy, firms must prioritize creativity and entrepreneurial spirit, which are further fueled by globalization and technological advancements. Creativity and entrepreneurial action drive innovation, offer new perspectives, and uncover untapped business opportunities. Therefore, it is crucial for managers and employees to identify and eliminate detrimental practices within the workplace. This study aims to highlight the importance of leaders fostering a supportive and positive work environment to enhance creativity and, consequently, employee performance. The research also highlights the necessity of fostering an innovative and entrepreneurial culture as more crucial because businesses deal with ongoing changes in the market and technology advancements. Leaders that actively support innovation and risk-taking can motivate staff to make more significant contributions to the expansion of the business. Businesses can further improve employee performance and innovation by funding training initiatives, providing chances for skill development, and fostering an atmosphere that values ideas. This will ensure long-term sustainability and competitiveness.
Methodology- The study focused on employees of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) within Kayseri's Organized Industrial Zone. Data was collected through a survey technique, and hypotheses were tested using regression analysis to explore the relationships between variables.
Findings- The results indicate that entrepreneurial leadership behavior positively influences both employee creativity and performance. Employee creativity, in turn, significantly impacts performance. Additionally, creativity mediates the relationship between entrepreneurial leadership and employee performance, while perceived organizational support moderates the link between entrepreneurial leadership and creativity.
Conclusion- To boost employee performance, leaders must adopt entrepreneurial behaviors, cultivate a creative work environment, and provide integrated support for employees

References

  • Addy, W. A., Ajayi-Nifise, A. O., Bello, B. G., Tula, S. T., Odeyemi, O., & Falaiye, T. (2024). Entrepreneurial leadership in high-tech industries: A review of key traits and success strategies. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 18(2), 286-296.
  • Allen, D. G., Shore, L. M., & Griffeth, R. W. (2003). The role of perceived organizational support and supportive human resource practices in the turnover process. Journal of management, 29(1), 99-118.
  • Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in organizational behavior, 10(1), 123-167.
  • Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative science quarterly, 50(3), 367–403.
  • Armeli, S., Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Lynch, P. (1998). Perceived organizational support and police performance: the moderating influence of socioemotional needs. Journal of applied psychology, 83(2), 288.
  • Armstrong, M. (2009). Armstrong’s handbook of management and leadership a guide to managing for results. Kogan.
  • Aykan, E. (2007). Örgütlerde insan kaynakları uygulamaları ile algılanan örgütsel destek arasındaki ilişkilerin belirlenmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(1), 123-137.
  • Bekmezci, M., Saygın, M., & Orçanlı, K. (2021). Girişimci liderlik ölçeği’nin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması ve girişimci liderliğin bireysel performansa etkisi. Savunma Bilimleri Dergisi, (39), 249-274.
  • Bingöl, D. (1997). Personel Yönetimi, 3. Baskı, Beta Yayınları.
  • Byrne, Z. S., & Hochwarter, W. A. (2008). Perceived organizational support and performance: Relationships across levels of organizational cynicism. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(1), s. 54-72.
  • Cai, W., Lysova, E. I., Khapova, S. N., & Bossink, B. A. (2019). Does entrepreneurial leadership foster creativity among employees and teams? The mediating role of creative efficacy beliefs. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(2), 203-217.
  • Chaniago, H., & Efawati, Y. (2024). Individual Innovative Behavior Model: The Role of Entrepreneurial Leadership in Uncertain Times. Calitatea, 25(202), 180-190.
  • Chen, M. H. (2007). Entrepreneurial leadership and new ventures: Creativity in entrepreneurial teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(3), 239-249.
  • Chen, J. ve Chen, I. S. (2012). Creative-Oriented Personality, Creativity İmprovement, and Innovation Level Enhancement. Quality and Quantity, 26, 1625-1645.
  • Cheung, M. F., & Wong, C.-S. (2011). Transformational leadership, leader support, and employee creativity. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 32(7), 656-672.
  • Cunningham, J. B., & Lischeron, J. (1991). Defining entrepreneurship. Journal of small business management, 29(1), 45-61.
  • Dewett, T. (2007). Linking intrinsic motivation, risk taking, and employee creativity in an R&D environment. R&D Management, 37(3), 197-208.
  • Egan, A., Maguire, R., Christophers, L., & Rooney, B. (2017). Developing creativity in higher education for 21st century learners: A protocol for a scoping review. International Journal of educational research, 82, 21-27.
  • Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of applied psychology, 75(1), 51.
  • Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied psychology, 71(3), 500.
  • Eisenberger, R., & Stinglhamber, F. (2011). Perceived organizational support: Fostering enthusiastic and productive employees. American Psychological Association.
  • Fernald, L. W., Solomon, G. T., & Tarabishy, A. (2005). A new paradigm: Entrepreneurial leadership. Southern business review, 30(2), 1-10.
  • Goel, R. K., & Nelson, M. A. (2021). How do firms use innovations to hedge against economic and political uncertainty? Evidence from a large sample of nations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46(2), 407-430.
  • Green, A. E., Beaty, R. E., Kenett, Y. N., & Kaufman, J. C. (2024). The process definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 36(3), 544-572.
  • Gupta, V., MacMillan, I. C., & Surie, G. (2004). Entrepreneurial leadership: developing and measuring a cross-cultural construct. Journal of business venturing, 19(2), 241-260.
  • Hirst, G., Knippenberg, V. D., & Zhou, J. (2009). A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Academy of Management journal, 52(2), 280-293.
  • Hon, A. H. (2012). Shaping environments conductive to creativity: The role of intrinsic motivation. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 53(1), 53-64.
  • Jung, D. I. (2001). Transformational and transactional leadership and their effects on creativity in groups. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2), 185-195.
  • Kanter, R., (1985). Supporting innovation and venture development in established companies. Journal of business venturing, 1(1), 47-60.
  • Kara, E., Kırpık, G., Kaya, A., (2021). The mediating role of organizational identification in the effect of perceived organizational support on employee performance. Sosyoekonomi, 29(49), 47-64.
  • Kesen, M. (2014). İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi Uygulamaları ve Örgüt Kültürünün Çalışan Performansı Üzerine Etkileri. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Gebze Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kocaeli.
  • Kim, T. Y., Hon, A. H., & Lee, D. R. (2010). Proactive personality and employee creativity: The effects of job creativity requirement and supervisor support for creativity. Creativity research journal, 22(1), 37-45.
  • Kuratko, D. F., Ireland, R. D., & Hornsby, J. S. (2001). Improving firm performance through entrepreneurial actions: Acordia's corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Academy of Management Perspectives, 15(4), 60-71.
  • Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., & Adis, C. S. (2017). Perceived organizational support: A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of management, 43(6), 1854-1884.
  • Lestari, S., Watini, S., & Rose, D. E. (2024). Impact of self-efficacy and work discipline on employee performance in sociopreneur initiatives. Aptisi Transactions on Technopreneurship (ATT), 6(2), 270-284.
  • Lin, Q., & Yi, L. (2021). The multilevel effectiveness of entrepreneurial leadership: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management & Organization, 1-19.
  • Lynch, P. D., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (1999). Perceived organizational support: Inferior versus superior performance by wary employees. Journal of applied psychology, 84(4), 467.
  • Mehmood, M. S., Jian, Z., Akram, U., & Tariq, A. (2021). Entrepreneurial leadership: The key to develop creativity in organizations. Leadership & Organization Development Journal.
  • Mert, E., & Bayrak Kök, S. (2017). An examination of the relationship between ındividual creativity and perceived organizational support levels of employees.
  • Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The leadership quarterly, 13(6), 705-750.
  • Munthe, R. A., Pratikto, H., & Restuningdiah, N. (2024). The Impact of Entrepreneurial Leadership, Business Environment, Digital Literacy, and Religiosity on Msme Performance: The Mediating Role of Innovative Behavior in Pekanbaru. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(8), 139-149.
  • Neves, P., & Eisenberger, R. (2012). Management communication and employee performance: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Human performance, 25(5), 452-464.
  • Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of management journal, 39(3), 607-634.
  • Peterson, J. (2020). Entrepreneurial leadership: The art of launching new ventures, inspiring others, and running stuff, HarperCollins Leadership.
  • Reiter-Palmon, R., & Illies, J. J. (2004). Leadership and creativity: Understanding leadership from a creative problem-solving perspective. The leadership quarterly, 15(1), 55-77.
  • Renko, M., El Tarabishy, A., Carsrud, A. L., & Brännback, M. (2015). Understanding and measuring entrepreneurial leadership style. Journal of small business Management, 53(1), 54-74.
  • Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. Journal of applied psychology, 87(4), 698.
  • Riana, I. G., Aristana, I. N., Rihayana, I. G., Wiagustini, N. L. P., & Abbas, E. W. (2020). High-performance work system in moderating entrepreneurial leadership, employee creativity and knowledge sharing. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 21.
  • Rothmann, S., & Coetzer, E. P. (2003). The big five personality dimensions and job performance. SA Journal of industrial psychology, 29(1), 68-74.
  • Sani, A., Ekowati, V. M., Wekke, I. S., & Idris, I. (2018). Respective contribution of entrepreneurial leadership through organizational citizenship behaviour in creating employee's performance. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 24(4), 1-11.
  • Sathe, V. (1989). Fostering entrepreneurship in the large, diversified firm. Organizational Dynamics, 18(1), 20-32.
  • Schumpeter, J. A. (2008). The theory of economic development
  • Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The leadership quarterly, 15(1), 33-53.
  • Suswati, E. (2020). Entrepreneurial leadership: Midwife competence and performance. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 24(1), 1-9.
  • Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of management review, 18(2), 293-321.
  • Ximenes, M., Supartha, W. G., Manuati Dewi, I. G. A., & Sintaasih, D. K. (2019). Entrepreneurial leadership moderating high performance work system and employee creativity on employee performance. Cogent Business & Management, 6(1), 1697512.
  • Yıldız, O., Dağdeviren, M. & Çetinyokuş, T. (2008). İşgören performansının değerlendirilmesi için bir karar destek sistemi ve uygulaması. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(1), 239-248.
  • Zan, F., Leong, Y. C., Ismail, N. A., Chu, M., Saif, A. N. M., & Islam, K. A. (2024). Knowledge sharing and innovation performance: The mediating role of open innovation. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 43(3), 32-45.
  • Zhang, L., Bu, Q., & Wee, S. (2016). Effect of perceived organizational support on employee creativity: Moderating role of job stressors. International Journal of Stress Management, 23(4), 400.
  • Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2003). Awakening employee creativity: The role of leader emotional intelligence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4), 545-568.
There are 60 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Labor Economics, Microeconomics (Other), Business Administration
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Mehmet Turgut 0000-0002-5534-1393

Ebru Aykan 0000-0003-3537-5235

Fatma Hümeyra Haskebabçı 0000-0002-9223-292X

Publication Date July 30, 2025
Submission Date January 9, 2025
Acceptance Date June 5, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 12 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Turgut, M., Aykan, E., & Haskebabçı, F. H. (2025). THE IMPACT OF ENTREPRENEURIAL LEADERSHIP ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE: MEDIATING ROLE OF CREATIVITY AND MODERATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT IN KAYSERI SMES. Research Journal of Business and Management, 12(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.1970
AMA Turgut M, Aykan E, Haskebabçı FH. THE IMPACT OF ENTREPRENEURIAL LEADERSHIP ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE: MEDIATING ROLE OF CREATIVITY AND MODERATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT IN KAYSERI SMES. RJBM. July 2025;12(1):1-14. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.1970
Chicago Turgut, Mehmet, Ebru Aykan, and Fatma Hümeyra Haskebabçı. “THE IMPACT OF ENTREPRENEURIAL LEADERSHIP ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE: MEDIATING ROLE OF CREATIVITY AND MODERATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT IN KAYSERI SMES”. Research Journal of Business and Management 12, no. 1 (July 2025): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.1970.
EndNote Turgut M, Aykan E, Haskebabçı FH (July 1, 2025) THE IMPACT OF ENTREPRENEURIAL LEADERSHIP ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE: MEDIATING ROLE OF CREATIVITY AND MODERATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT IN KAYSERI SMES. Research Journal of Business and Management 12 1 1–14.
IEEE M. Turgut, E. Aykan, and F. H. Haskebabçı, “THE IMPACT OF ENTREPRENEURIAL LEADERSHIP ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE: MEDIATING ROLE OF CREATIVITY AND MODERATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT IN KAYSERI SMES”, RJBM, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2025, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.1970.
ISNAD Turgut, Mehmet et al. “THE IMPACT OF ENTREPRENEURIAL LEADERSHIP ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE: MEDIATING ROLE OF CREATIVITY AND MODERATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT IN KAYSERI SMES”. Research Journal of Business and Management 12/1 (July2025), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.1970.
JAMA Turgut M, Aykan E, Haskebabçı FH. THE IMPACT OF ENTREPRENEURIAL LEADERSHIP ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE: MEDIATING ROLE OF CREATIVITY AND MODERATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT IN KAYSERI SMES. RJBM. 2025;12:1–14.
MLA Turgut, Mehmet et al. “THE IMPACT OF ENTREPRENEURIAL LEADERSHIP ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE: MEDIATING ROLE OF CREATIVITY AND MODERATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT IN KAYSERI SMES”. Research Journal of Business and Management, vol. 12, no. 1, 2025, pp. 1-14, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2025.1970.
Vancouver Turgut M, Aykan E, Haskebabçı FH. THE IMPACT OF ENTREPRENEURIAL LEADERSHIP ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE: MEDIATING ROLE OF CREATIVITY AND MODERATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL SUPPORT IN KAYSERI SMES. RJBM. 2025;12(1):1-14.

Research Journal of Business and Management (RJBM) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, semi-annually and open-access online journal. The journal publishes 2 issues a year. The issuing months are June and December. The publication language of the Journal is English. RJBM aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in all related areas of business, management and organizations. The editor in chief of RJBM invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. RJBM publishes academic research studies only. RJBM charges no submission or publication fee.

Ethics Policy - RJBM applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). RJBM is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract).

Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.