Abstract
In recent years, hybrid working systems have emerged as a transformative development in the structure of modern work. However, most existing research has primarily examined the economic advantages of hybrid work for organizations often overlooking its broader societal impacts, particularly those concerning women’s employment. The broader implications of hybrid work across different cultural and social contexts also remain insufficiently explored. This gap has recently been highlighted by Shore et al. (2025) Accordingly, this research aimed to explore how hybrid work affects the well-being, work-life balance, and organizational commitment of female workers within the context of Türkiye. A structured survey which consists of five sections: demographic
questions; “Hybrid Working Evaluation Form” developed by Yosunkaya (2023); “Organizational Commitment Scale” developed by Allen & Meyer (1990); “Employee Well-being Scale” developed by Pradhan & Hati (2022) and “Work-Life Balance Scale” developed by Apaydın (2011) designed. Hofstede’s (2025) country map was used to evaluate findings in the cultural context. 384 females participated to this research who are working in banking industry. They were chosen based on purposive sampling. Findings demonstrated that hybrid work environment positively affecting well-being however, negatively affecting work-life balance. This study further reveals that while well-being is positively influencing; work-life balance is negatively influencing organizational commitment. This underscores the importance of strategy and culture-based hybrid work policies to not only promote well-being but also prevent work-life imbalances.
References
- Allen, N.J. & Meyer, J.P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1): 1-18.
Abstract
References
- Allen, N.J. & Meyer, J.P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1): 1-18.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Strategy, Management and Organisational Behaviour (Other) |
| Journal Section | 2025 5(SI-IXASC2025) |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | August 31, 2025 |
| Submission Date | May 6, 2025 |
| Acceptance Date | July 24, 2025 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2025 Volume: 5 Issue: Special Issue (SI) IXASC 2025 |
Dear Author(s),
Requests or personal needs that may undermine the transparency, fairness, and adherence to scientific ethical standards of the publication process, or that may create the perception of pressure on the editorial board or reviewers, should not be included in the “notes to the editor” section or sent via email to the editorial team. We thank you for your understanding and sensitivity on this matter.
In addition, as part of the manuscript submission process, it is required to complete the Artificial Intelligence Use Declaration and upload it to the journal system along with the Copyright Transfer Form. These documents are essential to ensure transparency and maintain ethical standards throughout the editorial process.
You can access the relevant forms via the links at the top of the page as well as in the Documents section. Please ensure that the forms are filled out completely and accurately to avoid delays in the review process.