Review
Year 2018,
Volume: 1 Issue: 2, 385 - 388, 30.07.2018
Abstract
Peace is an interdisciplinary subject matter. Peace is
mostly studied and addressed in the fields such as international relations,
political sciences, psychology, sociology and educational sciences. It is
essential to present psychological foundations of peace besides psychological
theories of peace since peace occupies such a broad field. The aim of the
current study is to introduce the historical development and psychological
approaches to peace. Review approach was adopted in this study as it is based
on literature review. In the end of the study, the researcher addressed
psychological approaches to peace and the places of these approaches in the
literature in the course of history. The current study is thought to redound to
the literature in the way that it will raise awareness about peace and peace
psychology.
Keywords
References
- Christie, D. J., Tint, B. S., Wagner, R. V. and Winter, D. D. (2008). Peace psychology for a peaceful world. American Psychologist, 63(6), 540-552.
- Galtung, J. (1967). Theories of peace, a synthetic approach to peace thinking. Oslo: International Peace Research Institute.
- Graf, W., Kramer, G. and Nicolescou, A. (2006). Conflict transformation through dialogue: From Lederach’s rediscovery of the Freire method to Galtung’s “Transcend” approach. Journal Für Entwicklungspolitik, 22(3), 55-83.
- Özkeçeci-Taner, B. (2002). The myth of democratic peace: theoretical and empirical shortcomings of the “Democratic Peace Theory”. Alternatives, Turkish Journal of International Relations, 1(3), 40-48.
- Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65-85.
- Spillmann, K. R. and Kollars, N. D. (2010). Herbert Kelman’s contribution to the methodology of practical conflict resolution. Peace and Conflict, 16, 349-360.
- Vezzali, L. and Stathi, S. (2017). The present and the future of the contact hypothesis, and the need for integrating research fields. In A. E. R. Bos (Ed.), Intergroup contact theory (pp. 1-7). London: Routledge Taylor and Francis.
- Vinayak, S. and Sharma, A. (2016). Peace psychology in today’s era. Santosh University Journal of Health Sciences, 2(1), 33-38.
- Weber, A. (2006). Feminist Peace and Conflict Theory. Routledge Encylopaedia on Peace and Conflict Theory.
Year 2018,
Volume: 1 Issue: 2, 385 - 388, 30.07.2018
Abstract
Barış, disiplinler arası bir çalışma konusudur. Barış; uluslararası ilişkiler, siyaset bilimi, psikoloji, sosyoloji ve eğitim bilimleri gibi alanlarda ağırlıklı olarak çalışılmaktadır. Bu denli geniş bir çalışma alanı olan barış konusunun psikolojik temellerinin ve barışa yönelik psikolojik kuramların ortaya konulması gerekmektedir. Mevcut çalışmanın amacı, barış psikolojisinin tarihsel gelişimini ve barışa yönelik psikolojik yaklaşımları ortaya koymaktır. Bu çalışma, literatür taramasına dayalı olarak yürütülen bir derleme çalışmasıdır. Çalışma sonucunda barış psikolojisi kapsamında ortaya konulan kuramlar ele alınmış ve tarihsel gelişim içinde bu kuramların literatürdeki yerleri ortaya konulmuştur. Çalışmanın, en çok ihtiyaç duyulan zamanda Türkiye’de barış ve barış psikolojisi ile ilgili farkındalığın artırılmasına katkı sağlayacağı beklenmektedir.
Keywords
References
- Christie, D. J., Tint, B. S., Wagner, R. V. and Winter, D. D. (2008). Peace psychology for a peaceful world. American Psychologist, 63(6), 540-552.
- Galtung, J. (1967). Theories of peace, a synthetic approach to peace thinking. Oslo: International Peace Research Institute.
- Graf, W., Kramer, G. and Nicolescou, A. (2006). Conflict transformation through dialogue: From Lederach’s rediscovery of the Freire method to Galtung’s “Transcend” approach. Journal Für Entwicklungspolitik, 22(3), 55-83.
- Özkeçeci-Taner, B. (2002). The myth of democratic peace: theoretical and empirical shortcomings of the “Democratic Peace Theory”. Alternatives, Turkish Journal of International Relations, 1(3), 40-48.
- Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65-85.
- Spillmann, K. R. and Kollars, N. D. (2010). Herbert Kelman’s contribution to the methodology of practical conflict resolution. Peace and Conflict, 16, 349-360.
- Vezzali, L. and Stathi, S. (2017). The present and the future of the contact hypothesis, and the need for integrating research fields. In A. E. R. Bos (Ed.), Intergroup contact theory (pp. 1-7). London: Routledge Taylor and Francis.
- Vinayak, S. and Sharma, A. (2016). Peace psychology in today’s era. Santosh University Journal of Health Sciences, 2(1), 33-38.
- Weber, A. (2006). Feminist Peace and Conflict Theory. Routledge Encylopaedia on Peace and Conflict Theory.
There are 9 citations in total.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | July 30, 2018 |
| Submission Date | July 4, 2018 |
| Acceptance Date | July 12, 2018 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2018 Volume: 1 Issue: 2 |
