Maddi ve Sosyal Yoksunluğun Belirleyicilerinde Bölgesel Farklılıklar: İstanbul ve Ankara Örnekleri

Year 2025, Volume: 8 Issue: 4, 538 - 556, 25.10.2025

İsmail Çakmak

https://doi.org/10.33723/rs.1762394

Abstract

Bu çalışma, Türkiye’nin en büyük iki şehri olan İstanbul ve Ankara’daki maddi ve sosyal yoksunlukta etkili faktörleri analiz etmeyi hedeflemektedir. Bu bağlamda çalışma, TÜİK 2022 gelir ve yaşam koşulları araştırması hane mikro veri setini kullanmış ve veriler logit yöntemi ile analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmanın bulguları, maddi ve sosyal yoksunlukta etkili bölgesel farklılıkların olabileceğini göstermiştir. Yapılan analizler, Ankara’da ev sahipliğine kıyasla kiracı olmanın maddi yoksunluk yaşama olasılığını arttırdığını göstermektedir. Çalışmanın sonuçları, İstanbul’da konut harcamalarının yoksunlukla doğrudan ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişkisi olmadığını buna karşın Ankara’da konut için yapılan harcamalar arttıkça yoksunluk yaşama olasılığının azaldığını göstermektedir. Söz konusu bölgesel farklılıkların yanında çalışmanın sonuçları İstanbul ve Ankara özelinde benzer örüntü sergileyen faktörlerin de olduğunu göstermiştir. Buna göre kredi, kredi kartı ya da faturalarını zamanında ödeyemeyenlerin diğerlerine kıyasla maddi ve sosyal yoksunluk yaşama olasılıkları artmakta iken yüksek hane gelirinin ise yoksunluğu azalttığı tespit edilmiştir. Çalışmada her iki ilde de, maddi ve sosyal yoksunlukta benzeyen ve farklılaşan mekanizmaların ortaya konulmuş olması, maddi ve sosyal yoksunlukla mücadeledeki politikalarda ihtiyaç eksenli politikaların belirlenmesine faydalı olacaktır.

Keywords

Maddi ve Sosyal Yoksunluk , Gelir ve Yaşam Koşulları , Logit Model

Ethical Statement

Etik kurul raporuna gerek yoktur

REGIONAL DIFFERENCES IN THE DETERMINANTS OF MATERIAL AND SOCIAL DEPRIVATION: THE CASES OF ISTANBUL AND ANKARA

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the factors influencing material and social deprivation in Istanbul and Ankara, the two largest cities in Turkey. In this context, the study utilizes the 2022 Income and Living Conditions Survey (ILCS) household microdata provided by TURKSTAT, and the data were analyzed using the logit method. The findings reveal that there may be region-specific differences in the factors contributing to material and social deprivation. The analyses indicate that, in Ankara, being a tenant—compared to being a homeowner—increases the likelihood of experiencing material deprivation. The results also show that, while housing expenditures in Istanbul do not have a direct and statistically significant relationship with deprivation, in Ankara, higher spending on housing is associated with a lower probability of deprivation. In addition to these regional disparities, the study also identifies factors that exhibit similar patterns in both cities. Specifically, individuals who are unable to pay their loans, credit card debts, or utility bills on time are more likely to experience material and social deprivation, whereas higher household income is found to reduce the likelihood of deprivation. By revealing both common and differing mechanisms of material and social deprivation in Istanbul and Ankara, the study contributes to the development of need-based policies in the fight against deprivation.

Keywords

Material and Social Deprivation , Income and Living Conditions , Logit Model

Ethical Statement

There is no need for an ethics committee report

References

• Arundel, R. & Ronald, R. (2021). The false promise of homeownership: Homeowner societies in an era of declining access and rising inequality. Urban Studies, 58(6), 1120-1140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019895227 Atkinson, A. B. (1998). Social exclusion, poverty and unemployment. Exclusion, employment and opportunity, 4.
• Atkinson, A. B.; Cantillon, B., Marlier, E. & Nolan, B. (2002). Social Indicators: The EU and Social Inclusion. Oxford University Press.
• Baker, E.; Lester, L. H., Bentley, R. & Beer, A. (2016). Poor housing quality: Prevalence and health effects. Journal of prevention & intervention in the community, 44(4), 219-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/10852352.2016.1197714
• Burchardt, T.; Le Grand, J. & Piachaud, J. (2002). Degrees of exclusion: Developing a dynamic, multidimensional. J. Hills, J. Le Grand, & D. Pichaud, Understanding social exclusion, 30-43.
• Cohen Raviv, O. & Lewin-Epstein, N. (2021). Homeownership regimes and class inequality among young adults. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 62(5), 404-434. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207152211070817
• Dewilde, C. (2018). Explaining the declined affordability of housing for low-income private renters across Western Europe. Urban Studies, 55(12), 2618-2639. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017729077
• Elsinga, M. & Hoekstra, J. (2005). Homeownership and housing satisfaction. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 20(4), 401–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-005-9023-4
• Eurofound (2022). Access to essential services for people on low incomes: Energy, public transport and digital communications, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
• Evans, G. W.; Wells, N. M. & Moch, A. (2003). Housing and mental health: A review of the evidence and a methodological and conceptual critique. Journal of Social Issues, 59(3), 475-500. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00074
• Haffner, M. & Boumeester, H. (2010). The affordability of housing in the Netherlands: An increasing income gap between renting and owning? Housing Studies, 25(6), 799–820. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2010.511472
• Ivaldi, E. (2016). Material and social deprivation in Italy: An analysis on a regional basis. Eastern European Business and Economics Journal, 2(3), 248-268.
• Ivaldi, E. & Ciacci, A. (2025). Social Deprivation. In Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online (eds N. Balakrishnan, T. Colton, B. Everitt, W. Piegorsch, F. Ruggeri and J.L. Teugels). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat08105
• Kapar, R. (2023). Türkiye’de çalışanların yoksulluğu, yoksunluğu ve sosyal dışlanmaları. REFLEKTİF Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(2), 279-308. https://doi.org/10.47613/reflektif.2023.106.
• Kearns, A. & Whitley, E. (2019). Associations of internet access with social integration, wellbeing and physical activity among adults in deprived communities: Evidence from a household survey. BMC Public Health, 19(1), 860. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7199-x.
• Krieger, J. & Higgins, D. L. (2002). Housing and health: Time again for public health action. American Journal of Public Health, 92(5), 758-768. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.92.5.758
• Levitas, R. (2005). The inclusive society?: social exclusion and New Labour. Springer.
• Marvi, H.; Memon, R. M., Soomro, R., Memon, I. A. & Kumar, A. (2025). Neighborhood Connectivity and Social Sustainability: A Study of Hyderabad's Residential Areas. World (2673-4060), 6(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/world6020042
• McCabe, B. J. (2012). Homeownership and social trust in neighbors. City & Community, 11(4), 389-408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6040.2012.01416.x
• Muianga, E. A. D.; Kowaltowski, D. C., da Silva, V. G., de Carvalho Moreira, D., Granja, A. D., Oliva, C. A. & da Silva, R. F. (2021). Critical analysis of housing condition impacts on residents' well-being and social costs. Gestão & Tecnologia de Projetos, 16(4), 33-66. https://doi.org/10.11606/gtp.v16i4.178511
• Nolan, B. & Whelan, C. T. (2011). Poverty and deprivation in Europe. Oxford University Press.
• Sen, A. (1992). Inequality Reexamined. Harvard University Press.
• Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom Oxford University Press Shaw TM & Heard. The Politics of Africa: Dependence and Development.
• Silver, H. (1994). Social exclusion and social solidarity: Three paradigms. International Labour Review, 133(5-6), 531-578.
• Stone, M. E. (2006). What is housing affordability? The case for the residual income approach. Housing Policy Debate, 17(1), 151–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2006.9521564
• Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom: a survey of household resources and standards of living. Univ of California Press.
• Turgut, T. & Çakmak, İ. (2025). Türkiye’de Çalışanlardaki Maddi Yoksunluğunun Çok Boyutlu Analizi. Ekonomi Politika ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(1), 389-411. https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.1616780
• Uğur, M. S. (2023). Türkiye için gelir yoksulluğu ve maddi yoksunluğun belirleyicileri: Çok durumlu probit modeli. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(1), 224-240. https://doi.org/10.25287/ohuiibf.1177542
• Ünver, Ş. & Alkan, Ö. (2020). Türkiye’de bireylerin maddi yoksunluk durumlarini etkileyen faktörlerin modellenmesi. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(2), 1334-1370. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i2.1457
• Wacquant, L. (2008). Urban Outcasts: A Comparative Sociology of Advanced Marginality. Polity Press.