Irak İşgalinin Meşruiyeti ve Bundan Kaynaklanan Uluslararası Sorumluluk

Öz

Irak’ın işgali, hem hukuki hem de siyasi alanlarda çeşitli tepkilere yol açmıştır; zira işgal yasağı, özellikle 1945 yılında kabul edilen Birleşmiş Milletler Antlaşması’yla birlikte, uluslararası hukukta açıkça belirtilmiştir. Antlaşma’nın 2. maddesinin 3. fıkrası, Üye Devletler arasında ortaya çıkan anlaşmazlıkların barışçıl yollarla çözülmesini zorunlu kılarken, 2. maddenin 4. fıkrası ise Üye Devletlerin başka bir devletin toprak bütünlüğüne ya da siyasi bağımsızlığına karşı güç kullanmalarını veya tehditte bulunmalarını ya da Birleşmiş Milletler’in amaçlarıyla bağdaşmayan herhangi bir şekilde davranmalarını açıkça yasaklamaktadır. 2003 yılında ABD öncülüğündeki uluslararası koalisyon güçleri Irak’ı işgal etmiştir. Bu askeri müdahaleyi meşrulaştırmak adına, Amerikan yönetimi "önleyici savaş doktrini"ni benimsemiştir. Bu makale, Irak işgalinin uluslararası kamu hukuku çerçevesinde meşruiyetini incelemeyi ve işgalin hukuka aykırı olarak değerlendirilmesi durumunda koalisyon ülkelerinin uluslararası sorumluluklarını ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma, Irak’ın işgaline zemin hazırlayan siyasi, ekonomik ve toplumsal koşulları açıklığa kavuşturmayı hedeflemekte; bu amaçla, hukuki metinler ve raporlar üzerinden yürütülen analitik bir yöntem kullanılarak mantıklı sonuçlara ulaşılmaktadır. Nihai olarak bu çalışma, Irak’ın işgaline dair meşruiyet tartışmalarına ve buna bağlı uluslararası sorumluluklara ilişkin kapsamlı ve ayrıntılı bir bakış açısı sunmayı hedeflemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Irak’ın İşgalı
• Uluslararası Meşruiyet
• Uluslararası Sorumluluk

The Legitimacy of the Occupation of Iraq and the International Responsibility Resultion from It

Abstract

The occupation of Iraq raises many responses in legal and political domains, as the prohibition of occupation is explicitly Stated in international law, particularly with the adoption of the United Nations Charter in 1945. Article 2(3) of the Charter mandates the peaceful resolution of disputes among Member States, while Article 2(4) forbids Member States from threatening or employing force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State, or by any means that contravene the objectives of the United Nations. The U.S-led international coalition invaded Iraq in 2003. To justify this action, the American administration embraced the doctrine of preventive war. This article seeks to examine the legitimacy of the occupation of Iraq in accordance with public international law and to delineate the responsibilities of the coalition countries should the occupation be deemed illegal The study will elucidate the political, economic, and social conditions that precipitated the invasion of Iraq, employing an analytical methodology through the examination of legal texts and reports to derive logical conclusions. Ultimately, the study will contribute provide a comprehensive and detailed understanding of the occupation of Iraq, its legitimacy, and the international responsibility resulting from it.

Keywords

• Iraq Occupation
• International Legitimacy
• International Responsibility

References

1. Abdullah, H. (Dirctor). (2022, April 16). hat message did Osama bin Laden send to Iraqi intelligence when Iraq asked him to cooperate? [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=beraRDR7FW4.
2. Aflaq, M. (1978). On the Path of Baath. Baghdad: Office of Culture and Information.
3. Akipek, İ. (1955). Devletlerarası Hukuk Bakımından Meşru Müdafaanın Mahiyeti Ve Benzeri Müesseselerden Farkı. Ankara: Ankara son havadi matbaası, 1955.
4. alah, S. A., & Abd Aun, A. (2022, August 29). Genocide crimes under the Baathist regime (1968–2003): Causes and consequences [Conference paper]. Peacebuilding and Genocide Prevention Conference. University of Human Development. https://doi.org/10.21928/uhdicpgp/34
5. Al-Alawi, H. (1990). Shiism and the nation-state in Iraq. Baghdad: Dar Al-Thaqafa.
6. Al-Ani, T. (2020). It aimed to kill Saddam Hussein and destroy Iraq's capabilities. Learn about the American operation Desert Fox. https://www.aljazeera.net/news/2020/12/16/%D9%87%D8%AF%D9%81%D8%AA-%D9%84%D9%82%D8%AA%D9%84-%D8%B5%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%85-%D9%88%D8%AA%D8%AF%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D9%82%D8%AF%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%82.
7. Al-Atiyya, I. (2015). Public international law. Beirut: Dar Al-Sanhouri.
8. Al-Bayati, R. Y. M. (2018). Iraqi-Saudi relations: Challenges and opportunities after 2003. Political Horizons, 2(4), 8–30.

9. Al-Emami, A. (2004, July). The Turkmen and the indictment of the criminal Saddam. https://elaph.com/Web/Archive/1089127264750143000.htm.
10. Alnasrawi, A. (1986). Economic consequences of the Iraq‐Iran war. Third World Quarterly, 8(3), 869–895. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436598608419929.
11. Al-Obaidi, S. (2015). Presdential banquet; Untold events of the 1979 Al-Khald Hall massacre. Lebanon: Difaf publishing.
12. Alpay, A. H. (2020). 2003 Irak İşgali’nin Felsefesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(2), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.33537/sobild.2020.11.2.1.
13. Al-Qatrani, S. T. H. (2025). The Tammuz Reactor and Operation Opera 1981. Arabian Gulf Journal, 53(1), 221–246.
14. Al-Rubaie, K. F. (2019). International responsibility in public international law. Baghdad: The legal library.
15. Amnesty International. (2023, March 18). Iraq: twenty years on, still no justice for war crimes by US-led coalition. Amnesty International. https://www.amnesty.org.uk/press-releases/iraq-twenty-years-still-no-justice-war-crimes-us-led-coalition.
16. Arkin, W. (1999). The Difference Was in the Details. https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/iraq/analysis.htm.
17. Batatu, Hanna (1992). The Communist Party. The Arab Research Foundation ( Afef Al-Razaz, Trans). Basic Book (Orginial Book Published 1978)
18. Beetham, D. (2016). Legitimacy. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415249126-S034-1.
19. Ben Yahi, A., Al-Siddiq, B., Bashar, & Rachid. (2024). Provisions of international responsibility for internationally wrongful acts. The Academic Journal for Legal and Political Research, 8(2), 77–102.
20. Besson, S. (2017). International Responsibility: An Introduction. International Responsibilty. Essays in Law, History and Philosophy, Travaux de l’Ecole Doctorale CUS 2016, 3–13.
21. Bundy, M. (1990). Nuclear Weapons and the Gulf. Foreign Aff., 70, 83.
22. CNN. (2004, June 18). Cheney blasts media on al Qaeda-Iraq link. CNN Politics. https://edition.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/06/18/cheney.iraq.al.qaeda/.
23. Crawford, J. (2013). State responsibility: The general part. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139033060
24. Crossette, B. (1995, December 1). Iraq Sanctions Kill Children, U.N. Reports. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/1995/12/01/world/iraq-sanctions-kill-children-un-reports.html.
25. Damrosh, L. F., & Oxman, B. H. (2003). Agora: Future Implications of the Iraq Conflict Editors' Introduction. Am. Jl. Int'l. Law, 97, 553.
26. Department Of State. The Office of Electronic Information, B. of P. A. (2002). Iraq: A Population Silenced.
27. Department Of State. The Office of Electronic Information, Bureau of Public Affairs. Retrieved January 18, 2025, from https://2001-2009.state.gov/g/drl/rls/15996.htm.
28. Department Of State. The Office of Electronic Information, B. of P. A. (2004, November 5). Secretary Powell at the UN: Iraq’s Failure to Disarm. Department Of State. The Office of Electronic Information, Bureau of Public Affairs. https://2001-2009.state.gov/p/nea/disarm/.
29. Devlin, J. F. (1991). The Baath Party: Rise and Metamorphosis. The American Historical Review. 96(5). https://www.jstor.org/stable/2165277
30. DeYoung, K., & Ryan, M. (2021, October 18). Iraq War role was a stain on Powell’s record—One he openly said he regretted. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/colin-powell-iraq-war/2021/10/18/179d66bc-3023-11ec-a880-a9d8c009a0b1_story.html.
31. Dodge, T. (2003). Inventing Iraq the Failure of Nation Building and a History Denied. New York: Columbia University Press.
32. Doge, T. (2003). Inventing Iraq The Failure of Nation Building and a History Denied . Columbia University Press.
33. Douple, E. B., Mabuchi, K., Cullings, H. M., Preston, D. L., Kodama, K., Shimizu, Y., … Shore, R. E. (2011). Long-term radiation‑related health effects in a unique human population: Lessons learned from the atomic bomb survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 5(Suppl 1), S122–S133. https://doi.org/10.1001/dmp.2011.21
34. Erkiner, H. H. (2008). Devletin haksız fiilden kaynaklanan milletlerarası sorumluluğu (Doktora Tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü..
35. Fidan, Ö. (2004). 11 Eylül`ün ABD dış politikasına etkisi: Irak işgali (Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Sakarya Üniversitesi).
36. Fowler, M. W. (2015). A Brief Survey of Democracy Promotion in US Foreign Policy. Democracy and Security, 11(3), 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/17419166.2015.1045974.
37. Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War (Geneva Convention IV), Aug. 12, 1949.
38. George W. Bush White House Archives. (2002, September 12). A Decade of Deception and Defiance. https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/09/20020912.html.
39. George W. Bush. (2002, October 7). President Bush Outlines Iraqi Threat. The White House (Archived). https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/10/20021007-8.html.
40. Gökçe, O. (2024). Önleyici meşru müdafaa doktrini çerçevesinde ABD’nin Irak’a müdahalesinin uluslararası hukuka uygunluğu yüksek lisans tezi). Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
41. Graham-Brown, S. (2000). Sanctioning Iraq: A failed policy. Middle East Report, 215, 8–35.
42. Hague Convention (IV) Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land, Oct. 18, 1907, Annex to the Hague Convention.
43. Hancılar, Ö. (2004). Uluslararası Hukukta Meşru Müdafaa Hakkı (Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Ankara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
44. Hasan, M. (2003). Irak’ın gizlenen gerçeği: Türkmenler. In Ü. Özdağ, S. Laçiner, & S. Erkmen (Eds.), Irak krizi: [2002–2003] (pp. 58–75). Avrasya Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi (ASAM).
45. Hassani, Z. (2021). Countermeasures in public international law. Cairo: Al-Merkaz Al-Arabi.
46. Hesnel, H.M. (Ed). (2008). The legitimate use of military force: the just war tradition and the customary law of armed conflict. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
47. Human Rights Watch. (1993). Genocide in Iraq: The Anfal campaign aginst the Kurds. https://www.hrw.org/reports/1993/iraqanfal/.
48. Hürriyet, (2012, September 1). 29 yıl saklanan sır ortaya çıktı, https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/29-yil-saklanan-sir-ortaya-cikti-21357336.
49. IICI. (2024). Supplement to the International Protocol on the Documentation and Investigation of Sexual Violence in Conflict: Iraq Guidelines. Institute for Intertnational Criminal Investigations. https://iici.global/.
50. Intelligence and Security Committee. (2003). Iraqi weapons of mass destruction – intelligence and assessments. The Stationery Office. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7d31d3e5274a2e510d90b3/intelligence_assessments.pdfThe Rt. Hon, Ann Taylor, & MP. (2003). Iraqi weapons of mass destruction—Intelligence and assessments (Cm. 5972; p. 13,14,15). Government of the United Kingdom. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/iraqi-weapons-of-mass-destruction-intelligence-and-assessments--2.
51. International Court of Justice. (1949). Advisory opinion on reparation for injuries suffered in the service of the United Nations. I.C.J. Reports 1949, 174. https://www.icj-cij.org/case/4.
52. International Court of Justice. (1986). Case concerning military and paramilitary activities in and aginst Nicaragua Nicaragua v. United States of America), Judgment of 27 June 1986. https://www.icj-cij.org/case/70/judgments.\
53. International Court of Justice. (2012). Colombia v. Nicaragua: Judgment of 19 November 2012. I.C.J. Reports 2012, p. 624. https://www.icj-cij.org/case/124.
54. International Criminal Court. (2016). Al-Mahdi case. International Criminal Court. https://www.icc-cpi.int/cases.
55. International Law Commission. (2001). Draft articles on responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts, with commentaries. United Nations. https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_6_2001.pdf
56. Iraq, Revolutionary Command Council. (1980). Decision No. 666 of 1980.
57. Jassim, F.D. (2019). Public international law. Amman: Dar Amjad.
58. Jubja, H. A. (2023). The repercussions of the Israeli attack on the Iraqi Tammuz reactor in 1982. Adab Al-Kufa, 1(57).
59. Judgment of the Dujail Trial at the Iraqi High Tribunal. (n.d.). Retrieved January 18, 2025, from https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/a2fdfa/
60. Karadağ, U. (2016). Bi̇rleşmi̇ş Mi̇lletler Antlaşmasi’na Göre Meşru Müdafaa Hakki. İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(2), 171–186.
61. Kavak, M. H. (2021). Uluslararası Sorumluluk Hukukunda Tazminatın Belirlenmesi ve Hesaplanması (Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Marmara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
62. Kaya, İ., & Acer, Y. (2003). Silahlı Çatışmalar Hukuku ve Irak Savaşı: İhlallerle ve Olası Yargılamalara İlişkin Değerlendirmeler. Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(3-4 (CUMHURİYETİMİZE 80. YIL ARMAĞANI), 115-135.
63. Kazak, C. (2024). Pan-Arabist Suriye Baas Partisinin; “Tek Bir Arap Devleti” Mottosu ve Birleşik Arap Cumhuriyeti Girişiminin Başarısızlığı. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 80, 237–248.
64. Kohut, A. (2002). Americans Favor Force in Iraq, Somalia, Sudan, and. Washington: Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2002/01/22/americans-favor-force-in-iraq-somalia-sudan-and/.
65. Kramer, R. C., & Michalowski, R. J. (2005). War, aggression and state crime: A criminological analysis of the invasion and occupation of Iraq. British Journal of Criminology, 45(4), 446–469.
66. Kurubaş, E. (2003). Irak Kürt hareketi: İç çekişme – dış destek – ayaklanma. In Ü. Özdağ, S. Laçiner, & S. Erkmen (Eds.), Irak krizi: [2002–2003] (pp. 21–44). Avrasya Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi (ASAM).
67. League of Nations. (1919). Covenant of the League of Nations. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/leagcov.asp#art1.
68. Lieber, F. (1863). General Orders No. 100: Instructions for the Government of Armies of the United States in the Field. U.S. War Department.
69. Maftei, J. (2015). Reflections on the international responsibility of states for wrongful acts. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Relationes Internationales, 8(1), 37–55. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=475419
70. Matthew R. Hover. (2012). The occupation of Iraq: A military perspective on lessons learned. International Review of the Red Cross, 94(885). 339-346.
71. Mona Kazem Ijeel. (2022). The Policy of King Faisal I and Its Impact on the Independence of Iraq until 1932. Journal of Education College Wasit University, 2(47), 791–806.
72. Mulligan, S. P. (2006). The Uses of Legitimacy in International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 34(2), 349–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298060340021801.
73. Nahi, S. (2023). The story of the Irqi nuclear project: Significant efforts wasted by political gambles. https://www.independentarabia.com/node/434736/%D8%AA%D8%AD%D9%82%D9%8A%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%AA%D9%88%D9%85%D8%B7%D9%88%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%AA/%D9%82%D8%B5%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B4%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%B9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%86%D9%88%D9%88%D9%8A-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%82%D9%8A-%D8%AC%D9%87%D9%88%D8%AF-%D9%83%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%B1%D8%A9-%D8%A3%D8%B6%D8%A7%D8%B9%D8%AA%D9%87%D8%A7-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%BA%D8%A7%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%B3%D9%8A%D8%A9.
74. Naji, A. M. A. (2002). The Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party within the Structure of Iraqi Society. Alukah Network
75. National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States. (2004). The 9/11 Commission report: Final report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the Unted states.W.W. Norton & Company. https://9-11commission.gov/report/.
76. National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States. (2004, July 22). The 9/11 commission report: Final report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States. U.S. Government Printing Office.
77. News, A. B. C. (2008, Novmber 29). Bush: “I Did Not Compromise My Principles.” ABC News. Retrieved January 21, 2025, from https://abcnews.go.com/WN/Politics/story?id=6354012&page=1.
78. Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. (1997). Chemical Weapons Convention. https://www.opcw.org/chemical-weapons-convention.
79. Orhan, O. (2003). Orta Doğu’nun Duşman Kardeşleri: Suriye ve Irak. In Ü. Özdağ, S. Laçiner, & S. Erkmen (Eds.), Irak krizi: [2002–2003] (pp. 111–124). Avrasya Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi (ASAM).
80. Parry, T., & Townsley, S. (2024, June 12). They survived a chemical weapons massacre, but Halabja’s victims still suffer its poisonous legacy. The Telegraph. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/terror-and-security/halabja-chemical-attack-survivors-iraq-war-crime-atrocity/.
81. Pirim, C. Z. (2013). AGGRAVATED RESPONSIBILITY OF STATES IN INTERNATIONAL LAW: A THEORETICAL ASSESSMENT. Milletlerarası Hukuk Ve Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk Bülteni, 32(2), 147-182.
82. Rakipoğlu, M. (2017). Revisiting the saudi position during the Iran-Iraq war through the lens of balance of threat theory. Ortadoğu Etütleri, 9(1), 118–134.
83. Ramadan, E. (2023, March). It began with an American gift and ended with an Israeli strike: The full story of the Iraqi nuclear project. https://www.aljazeera.net/midan/reality/politics/2023/3/24/%D8%A8%D8%AF%D8%A3-%D8%A8%D9%87%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%A3%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%B1%D9%83%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%AA%D9%87%D9%89-%D8%A8%D8%B6%D8%B1%D8%A8%D8%A9.
84. Reichberg, G. M. (2007). Preventive war in classical just war theory. Journal of the History of International Law, 9(1), 5-34.
85. Reliefweb. (1999, Novmber 1). Living under sanctions in Iraq: The Oil-For-Food Program and The Intellectual Embargo. https://reliefweb.int/report/iraq/living-under-sanctions-iraq-oil-food-program-and-intellectual-embargo.
86. Richelson, J. (Ed.). (2004, February 11). Iraq and weapons of mass destruction (National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 80). National Security Archive. https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB80/#reading.
87. Sanbir, S. (2023, March). Twenty years on. Iraq bears the scare of the US-led invasion. https://www.hrw.org/ar/news/2023/03/20/twenty-years-iraq-bears-scars-us-led-invasion.
88. Sapiro, M. (2003). Iraq: The shifting sands of preemptive self-defense. American Journal of International Law, 97(3), 599–607.
89. Saygı, T. (2017). Irak Kralı Faysal’ın Atatürk’ü Ziyareti Ve Oluşturduğu Yankılar. Yalova Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(15), 211–223.
90. Şen, A. (2003). Irak’ta savaş ve propaganda. In Ü. Özdağ, S. Laçiner, & S. Erkmen (Eds.), Irak krizi: [2002–2003] (pp. 111–124). Avrasya Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi (ASAM).
91. Serbest, M. B. (2016). Bağdat Paktı’nın Kuruluş Süreci ve Gelişiminde Türkiye’nin Rolü. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(3), 401-424.
92. Sheikha, H.A.A. (2004). Responsibility and Punishment for war crimes: An applied study on war crimes in Bosina and Herzegovina. Alexandria: Dar Al-Jamia Al-Jadida.
93. TBMM, T. (2012). Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi Tutanak Dergisi, Cilt 29, 1’ inci Birleşim, https://www5.tbmm.gov.tr/develop/owa/tutanak_dergisi_pdfler.birlesimler?v_meclis=1&v_donem=d24&v_yasama_yili=3&v_cilt=
94. The Guardian, (2002, September 24). Full text of Tony Blair's statement to parliament on Iraq, https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2002/sep/24/foreignpolicy.houseofcommons.
95. The Guardian, (2003, March 18). Full text: Bush's speech, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/mar/18/usa.iraq.
96. The Guardian, (2016, July 6). Tony Blair: “I express more sorrow, regret and apology than you can ever believe.”, https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/jul/06/tony-blair-deliberately-exaggerated-threat-from-iraq-chilcot-report-war-inquiry.
97. Tomak, Ö., & Ataç, K. K. (2023). Dış Politikada İstihbaratın Önemi ve Etkileri: ABD ve 2003 Irak Savaşı Örneği. İstihbarat Çalışmaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 150–177.
98. U.S. Department of State. (2003). Country reports on human rights practices for 2002. https://www.refworld.org/reference/annualreport/usdos/2003/en/31369.
99. United Nations General Assembly. (1970). Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/202170?v=pdf.
100. United Nations General Assembly. (1974). Definition of Aggression (Resolution 3314 (XXIX)). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/218218
101. United Nations General Assembly. (1974, December 14). Definition of aggression (A/RES/3314(XXIX)). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/218450
102. United Nations General Assembly. (2013). Resolution 68/32: Review of development in the field of nuclear disarmament. https://docs.un.org/A/RES/68/32.
103. United Nations Security Council (1991). Resolution 687 (1991): Establishment of the Special Commission to oversee the elimination of Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction. https://docs.un.org/S/RES/687(1991).
104. United Nations Security Council. (1990). Resolution 661 (1990) Concering the situation between Iraq and Kuwait. https://docs.un.org/S/RES/661(1990).
105. United Nations Security Council. (1991). Resolution 715 (1991): Establishment of an ongoing moitoring and verification system in Iraq. https://docs.un.org/S/RES/715(1991).
106. United Nations Security Council. (1994). Resolution 949 (1994): Demanding that Iraq nt use its military forces to threaten its neighbors and cooperate with UNSCOM. https://docs.un.org/S/RES/949(1994).
107. United Nations Security Council. (1996). Resolution 1051 (1996): Establishment of a mechanism to monitor Iraq’s imports and prevent proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. https://docs.un.org/S/RES/1051(1996).
108. United Nations Security Council. (1999). Resolution 1284 (1999): Estsablishment of the United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC). https://docs.un.org/S/RES/1284(1999).
109. United Nations Security Council. (2002). Resolution 1441 (2002): Iraq’s non-complians with disarmament obligations and final opportunity to comply. https://docs.un.org/S/RES/1441(2002).
110. United Nations. (1945). Charter of the United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter.
111. United Nations. (1966). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights.
112. United Nations. (1970). Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. https://disarmament.unoda.org/wmd/nuclear/npt/.
113. United Nations. (1975). The Biological Weapons Convention. https://disarmament.unoda.org/biological-weapons/.
114. United Nations. (1992). Report on the situation of human rights in Iraq / prepared by Max van der Stoel, Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights, in accordance with Commission resolution 1991/74. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/225895?v=pdf.
115. UNSCEAR. (n.d.). Chernobyl. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Retrieved July 29, 2025, from https://www.unscear.org/unscear/en/areas-of-work/chernobyl.html
116. William M. Arkin. (1999, January). The Difference Was in the Details. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/iraq/analysis.htm.
117. Yacoub, S. F. (2024). The justifications and pretexts promoted by the United States for the occupation of Iraq. Journal of the Iraqia University, 67(2), 574-583. https://www.iasj.net/iasj/issue/2776
118. Zalaan Nimah, Jaafar, M.k., & Abd Ali, H, K. (2017). International humanitarian law. Baghdad: Al-Sisban Library.
119. Zwanenburg, M. (2004). Existentialism in Iraq: Security Council Resolution 1483 and the law of occupation. International Review of the Red Cross, 86(856), 745–769.