Dil öğrenme stratejilerinin geliştirilmesi: çevrimiçi eğitim öncesinde ve sırasında öğrenci uygulamaları

Öz

Bu makale, İstanbul’da bulunan Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesinde yer alan Fransız Dili ve Eğitimi Bölümündeki 52 öğrencinin katılımıyla gerçekleştirilmiş nicel tipi bir anketin sonuçlarını ele almaktadır. Bu çalışma, Lisans ve Yüksek Lisans öğrencilerinin çevrimiçi eğitimden önceki ve çevrimiçi eğitim sırasındaki dil öğrenim stratejilerini incelemektedir. Eğitimdeki durum değişikliğiyle beklenmedik bir şekilde karşı karşıya kalan öğrenciler, bir gecede hiç aşina olmadıkları bir çevrimiçi çalışma yöntemini takip etmek zorunda kaldılar. Yalnızca stratejik, teknik, teknolojik, organizasyonel, mekânsal değil, aynı zamanda psikolojik ve sosyolojik olarak ilişkisel düzeylerde de uyarlamaların derhal yapılması gerekti. Bu araştırma, öğrencilerin dil öğrenme stratejilerini dört ana eksene göre ön plana çıkarmaktadır: birinci eksen bilişsel stratejilere dayanmaktadır, ikinci eksen üstbilişsel stratejileri vurgulamaktadır, üçüncü eksen duygusal stratejiler üzerinedir, dördüncü ve son eksen ise kaynak yönetimi üzerinedir. Amaç, çevrimiçi eğitim boyunca öğrenci çalışma uygulamalarının öğrenim açısından gelişimini kavramak ve bu yeni eğitim şekline uyum sağlamak amacıyla öğrencilerin bizzat kendileri tarafından geliştirilen yeni stratejileri anlamaktır. Alışık oldukları dil öğrenme stratejilerine bağlı mı kaldılar? Yoksa yeni dil öğrenim stratejileri mi geliştirdiler? Çevrimiçi eğitim sürecinde öğrencilerin çalışmaya öncekiyle aynı dil öğrenim stratejileri ile devam edip etmediklerini ve öğrenme stratejilerini gerektiği gibi yeniden ayarlayıp ayarlamadıklarını, değiştirip değiştirmediklerini veya geliştirip geliştirmediklerini anlamaya çalıştık.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çevrimiçi eğitim
• öğrenme stratejilerinin geliştirilmesi
• dil öğrenim stratejileri
• öğrenci uygulamaları
• Fransız dili

Development of language learning strategies: student practices before and during online education

Abstract

This article presents the results of a quantitative survey carried out with the participation of 52 students in the Department of French Language Teaching at Atatürk Faculty of Education of Marmara University in Istanbul. This study questions the language learning strategies of bachelors and master degree students before and during online education. Unexpectedly confronted with a change of situation in education, the students found themselves overnight having to follow an online way of studying to which they were unfamiliar with over the night. Not only strategic, technical, technological, organizational and spatial but also psychological and sociological adaptation were immediately necessary. This study highlights the language learning strategies of students based on four main axes: the first one is based on cognitive strategies, the second one emphasizes metacognitive strategies, the third one is on effective strategies and the fourth and the last one is on resource management strategies. The aim is to understand the development of student learning practices during online education, and to understand the new strategies put in place by the students themselves in order to adapt to this new way of teaching. Have they stuck to their familiar language learning strategies or have they developed new language learning strategies? We tried to understand whether the students continued studying using the same language learning strategies as before during online education or not, and whether they readjusted, modified, developed their learning strategies as needed.

Keywords

• Online education
• development of learning strategies
• language learning strategies
• student practices
• French language

References

1. Aboagye, E., Yawson, J. A. & Appiah, K. N. (2020). COVID-19 and E-Learning: the Challenges of Students in Tertiary. Institutions. Social Education Research. 1-8.
2. Bégin, C. (2003). Enseigner des stratégies d’apprentissage à l’université : application d’un modèle et analyse des changements consécutifs à leur enseignement. Thèse de doctorat inédite. Université de Sherbrooke : Faculté des Sciences de l’Éducation.
3. Bégin, C. (2008). Les stratégies d’apprentissage : un cadre de référence simplifié. Revue des Sciences de l’Éducation, 34(1), 47-67.
4. Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Hawthorn, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.
5. Boulet, A., Savoie-Zajc, L. & Chevrier, J. (1996). Les stratégies d’apprentissage à l’université. Sainte-Foy : Presses de l’Université du Québec.
6. Broekkamp, H. & Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. (2007). Students’ Adaptation of Study Strategies When Preparing for Classroom Tests. Educational Psychology Review. 19(401).
7. Cartier, S. (1997). Lire pour apprendre : description des stratégies utilisées par des étudiants en médecine dans un curriculum d’apprentissage par problèmes. Thèse de doctorat inédite. Montréal : Université de Montréal.
8. Coman, C., Țîru, L. G., Meseșan-Schmitz, L., Stanciu, C. & Bularca, M. C. (2020). Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education during the Coronavirus Pandemic: Students’ Perspective. Sustainability, 12(24).

9. Dhawan, Sh. (2020). Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 49(1), 5-22.
10. Dulude, F. (2001). Signet : français 2ème cycle (guide pédagogique). Saint-Laurent, Québec : Éditions du Renouveau pédagogique.
11. Ertek, B. (2020). Le concept de « pédagogie universitaire » selon les étudiants de Licence en Didactique du Français Langue Étrangère. The Journal of International Lingual Social and Educational Sciences, 6(1), 49-65.
12. Fayol, M. & Monteil, J. M. (1994). Stratégies d’apprentissage et apprentissage des stratégies. Revue française de pédagogie, 106, 91-110.
13. Flippo, R. F. & Caverly, D. C. (1991). Teaching Reading & Study Strategies at the College Level. Newark, Denver: International Reading Association.
14. Frenay, M., Noël, B., Parmentier, P. & Romainville, M. (1998). L’étudiant-apprenant. Grilles de lecture pour l’enseignant universitaire. Bruxelles, Belgique : De Boeck.
15. Hattie, J., Biggs, J. & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 99-136.
16. Hensler, H. (1992). Élaboration d’une conception de l’enseignement et de la formation des enseignants dans le domaine des stratégies d’apprentissage. Thèse de doctorat inédite. Montréal : Université de Montréal.
17. Hrimech, M. (2000). Les stratégies d’apprentissage en contexte d’autoformation. In : Foucher, R. & Hrimech, M. (dir.) : L’autoformation dans l’enseignement supérieur : apports européens et nord-américains pour l’an 2000. 99-111. Montréal, Québec : Éditions Nouvelles.
18. Jonnaert, P. (2002). Compétences et socioconstructivisme : un cadre théorique. Bruxelles, Belgique : De Boeck.
19. Lavasani, M. G., Mirhosseini, F. S., Hejazi, E., & Davoodi, M. (2011). The effect of self-regulation learning strategies training on the academic motivation and self-efficacy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 627-632.
20. Lord, F. (2003). Cyclades : transdisciplinaire, 3ème cycle (guide pédagogique). Mont-Royal, Québec: Modulo.
21. Mishra, L., Gupta, T. & Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1.
22. Naiman, N., Frohlich, M., Stern, H., & Todesco, A. (1978). The good language learner. Research in Education Series, 7. Toronto: The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
23. O’Malley, J. M. & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Ouellet, Y. (1997). Un cadre de référence en enseignement stratégique. Vie pédagogique, 104, 4-11.
25. Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House/Harper & Row.
26. Pask, G. (1988). Learning Strategies, Teaching Strategies, and Conceptual or Learning Style. In: Schmeck, R. R. (Ed.), Learning Strategies and Learning Styles, 4, New York: Plenum Press.
27. Pelletier, M. L. & Demers, M. (1994). Recherche qualitative, recherche quantitative : expressions injustifiées. Revue des Sciences de l’Éducation, 20(4), 757-771.
28. Peters, M. & Viola, S. (2003). Stratégies et compétences : intervenir pour mieux agir. Montréal, Québec : Éditions Hurtubise.
29. Roces Montero, C. & Sierra-Arizmendiarrieta, B. (2017). The effectiveness of a learning strategies program for university students. Psicothema, 29(4), 527-532.
30. Romainville, M. (1993). Savoir parler de ses méthodes : métacognition et performance à l’université. Bruxelles, Belgique : De Boeck.
31. Rovers, S. F. E., Stalmeijer R. E., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Savelberg, H. H. C. M. & de Bruin, A. B. H. (2018). How and Why Do Students Use Learning Strategies? A Mixed Methods Study on Learning Strategies and Desirable Difficulties With Effective Strategy Users. Frontiers in psychology, 9.
32. Rubin, J. (1987). Learner Strategies: Theoretical Assumptions, Research History and Typology. In: Wenden, A. L. & Rubin, J. (Eds.), Learner Strategies in Language Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 15-30.
33. Saint-Pierre, L. (1991). Effets de l’enseignement de stratégies cognitives et métacognitives sur les méthodes de travail des élèves faibles en mathématiques au collégial. Essai de maîtrise, Faculté d’éducation, Université de Sherbrooke.
34. Shi, H. (2017). Learning Strategies and Classification in Education. Institute for Learning Styles Journal, 1, 24-36.
35. Schmeck, R. R. (1988). An Introduction to Strategies and Styles of Learning. In: Schmeck, R. R. (dir.). Learning Strategies and Learning Styles, 3-19, New York: Plenum Press.
36. Schmeck, R. R. & Meier, S. T. (1984). SeIf-reference as a learning strategy and a learning style. Human Learning, 13, 9-17.
37. Schunk D. H. & Zimmerman B. J. (1994). Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
38. Simsek, A. & Balaban, J. (2010). Learning Strategies of Successful and Unsuccessful University Students. Contemporary Educational Technology, 1(1), 36-45.
39. Stern, H. H. (1975). What Can We Learn from the Good Language Learner? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 31(4), 304-319.
40. Tardif, J. (2006). L’évaluation des compétences : documenter le parcours de développement. Montréal, Québec : Éditions de la Chenelière.
41. United Nations (2020). “COVID-19 and Higher Education: Venezuelan University Works to Protect First Responders”. Website: https://www.un.org/en/academic-impact/covid-19-and-higher-education-venezuelan-university-works-protect-first-responders (28.10.2021)
42. Weinstein, C. E. (1996). Learning how to learn: An essential skill for the 21st century. Educational Record, 77, 48-52.
43. Weinstein, C. E. & Hume, L. (1998). Study strategies for lifelong learning. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
44. Weinstein, C. E., & Underwood, W. L. (1985). Learning strategies: The how of learning. In: Segal, J. W., Chipman, S. F. & Glaser, P. (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills: Relating instruction to research, 1, 241-258. Hillsdale, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45. Wenden, A. (1991). Learner Strategies for Learner Autonomy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
46. Wolfs, J.-L. (1998). Méthodes de travail et stratégies d’apprentissage. Bruxelles, Belgique : De Boeck.
47. World Health Organization (2020). “Archived: WHO Timeline - COVID-19”. Website: https://www.who.int/news/item/27-04-2020-who-timeline---covid-19 (25.10.2021)
48. Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview. Educational Psychologist, 25, 3-17.