Research Article

Video-accompanied vs. handout-accompanied assignments: Effects on EFL learners’ descriptive paragraphs

Number: 28 June 21, 2022
  • Mohammadreza Valizadeh *
TR EN

Video-accompanied vs. handout-accompanied assignments: Effects on EFL learners’ descriptive paragraphs

Abstract

This study compared the effects of videos and handouts, accompanied by the paragraph assignments, on the quality of English language learners’ written descriptive paragraphs. The study was quasi-experimental and quantitative. It had a pretest-treatment-posttest design. As the treatments, either videos or handouts were accompanied by descriptive paragraph assignments which the participating students were required to write. The purpose of accompanying either videos or handouts was providing the learners with additional guides to help them write appropriate and accurate descriptive paragraphs. The study was conducted during the Covid-19 crisis. The participants were 56 Turkish learners of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) at pre-intermediate level of proficiency. They were receiving virtual education due to school closures because of the Covid-19 pandemic. The participants were assigned to two groups, each of which included 28 learners. One group was provided with educational videos, relevant to the given assignment. The other group was given similar information via handouts. The results of the independent samples t-test indicated that the group that received videos significantly outperformed the one that received handouts. Consequently, the study highly recommends EFL teachers utilize this technique in their classrooms.

Keywords

References

  1. Ali, A. D. (2016). Effectiveness of using screencast feedback on EFL students’ writing and perception. English Language Teaching, 9(8), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n8p106
  2. Ansarimoghaddam, S., & Tan, B. H. (2014). Undergraduates’ experiences and attitudes of writing in L1 and English. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 14(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.17576/GEMA-2014-1401-02
  3. Barkaoui, K. (2007). Teaching writing to second language learners: Insights from theory and research. TESL Reporter, 40(1), 35–48. http://ojs-dev.byuh.edu/index.php/Issue1/article/view/1112
  4. Canning-Wilson, C. (2000). Practical aspects of using video in the foreign language classroom. The Internet TESL Journal, 6(11). http://iteslj.org/Articles/Canning-Video.html
  5. Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., & Snow, M. A. (2014). Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (4th ed.). National Geographic Learning, a part of Heinle Cengage Learning.
  6. Chae, S. E. (2018). Effects of video-based e-learning on EFL achievement: The mediation effect of behavior control strategies. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 15(2), 398–413. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2018.15.2.1.398
  7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  8. Crews, T. B., & Wilkinson, K. (2010). Students’ perceived preference for visual and auditory assessment with e-handwritten feedback. Business Communication Quarterly, 73(4), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569910385566

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Linguistics

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Mohammadreza Valizadeh * This is me
0000-0002-4312-9731
Türkiye

Publication Date

June 21, 2022

Submission Date

April 24, 2022

Acceptance Date

June 20, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Number: 28

APA
Valizadeh, M. (2022). Video-accompanied vs. handout-accompanied assignments: Effects on EFL learners’ descriptive paragraphs. RumeliDE Dil Ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 28, 439-445. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1132582