A promise of ‘The Good Place’: Dystopia in Kate Wilhelm’s The Funeral and Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go.

Abstract

Dystopia which is presumed to be the antonym of the word utopia instigates the idea that a given society is governed by a totalitarian regime in which constructs fear and anxiety to its people. In many dystopian texts, the main aim of the rulers is to create a better world according to their own ideologies by believing that they are creating a ‘utopia’. This conviction divides society into two; the ones who join the cause and the ones who are against it. However, the most loyal to the cause are the creators of the so called ‘utopia’ and the ones who are afraid to die. As a result, the promise of ‘the good place’ triumphs only to establish a community that is portrayed as oppressed with constant unhappiness. This article analyses both the individuals and the dystopian society while taking into consideration dystopian elements like totalitarian regime and fear, pseudo-utopia, and division in society that takes place in the short story The Funeral (1972) by Kate Wilhelm and the novel Never Let Me Go (2005) by Kazuo Ishiguro. The purpose of this article is to investigate the concept of dystopia in these texts by engaging Adorno and Horkheimer’s ‘administered world’, Plato’s ‘social classes’, Louis Althusser’s ‘interpellation’ and ‘Repressive State Apparatus’ along with his ‘Ideological State Apparatus’, Mihail Bakhtin’s ‘authoritative language’, and finally Michel Foucault’s ‘carceral society’ in connection with Jeremy Bentham’s ‘panopticon’.

Keywords

• Dystopia
• administered world
• interpellation
• authoritative language
• carceral society

References

1. Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (2002). Dialectic of Enlightenment. California: Stanford University Press.
2. Althusser, L. (2014). On the Reproduction of Capitalism. London: Verso.
3. Anthony, R. B. (1972). The Clearing House. Plato and the Social Studies, 47(4), 253-254. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30186012
4. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: The University of Texas Press.
5. Barry, P. (2002). Beginning Theory: An Introduction to Literary and Cultural Theory. New York: Manchester University Press.
6. Beiner, R. (2014). Political Philosophy: What It Is and Why It Matters. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Bentham, J. (1995). The Panopticon Writings. (M. Bozovic, Ed.) London: Verso.
8. Bhattacharya, N. (2006, January-February). Two Dystopian Fantasies. Indian Literature, 50(1 (231) ), 172-177. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23346372

9. Booker, M. K. (1994). Dystopian Literature: A Theory and Research Guide. London: Greenwood Press.
10. Claeys, G. (2017). Dystopia: A Natural History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Epstein, M. N., & Adler, E. (2002). On the Totalitarianism of Ideas. New England Review, 23(2), 7-14. http://jstor.org/stable/40244088
12. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish. New York: Vintage Books.
13. Ishiguro, K. (2005). Never Let Me Go. London: Faber and Faber.
14. More, T. (2003). Utopia. (G. M. Logan, & R. M. Adams, Eds.) Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
15. Plato. (2003). The Republic. (G. Ferrari, Ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Popper, K. R. (1945). The Open Society and Its Enemies. London: George Routledge & Sons.
17. Sargent, L. (2010). Utopianism: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press Inc. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20719246
18. Wilhelm, K. (1972). The Funeral. In H. Ellison, Again, Dangerous Visions. New York: Doubleday & Company, Inc.