Dil öğrenenlerin cinsiyet, akademik dallar ve sınıf düzeyleri arasındaki farklılıkların dil öğrenme stratejilerinin kullanımına ilişkin incelenmesi

Year 2020, Issue: Ö8, 563 - 582, 21.11.2020

Ülkü Kölemen

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.816957

Abstract

Bu çalışma, ikinci dil öğrenme stratejisi kullanımı, akademik alan, cinsiyet ve sınıf düzeyi arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bosna Hersek'ten 252 Bosnalı üniversite öğrencisi çalışmaya katılmıştır. Araştırma verileri iki envanterden toplandı: bireysel bilgi anketi ve Dil Öğrenme Strateji Envanteri (SILL) (Oxford, 1990). Verileri analiz etmek için betimleyici nicel yöntem kullanılmıştır. Betimleyici ve çıkarımsal istatistiki veriler, dil öğrenme stratejilerinin kullanımı ile cinsiyet (erkekler ve kadınlar), akademik alan (eğitim, ekonomi ve mühendislik gibi) ve sınıf seviyeleri (birinci, iikinci ve üçüncü sınflar) değişkenleri bakımından raporlanmıştır. Sonuçlar, erkeklerin kadınlara göre daha sık ve farklı strateji türlerini kullandığını göstermiştir. Akademik alan açısından da istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılıklar bulunmuştur: Ekonomi alanından öğrenciler hafıza, telafi ve sosyal stratejileri tercih ederken, mühendislik alanından öğrenciler daha çok duyuşsal, üstbilişsel ve bilişsel stratejileri tercih etmişlerdir. Eğitim alanındaki öğrenciler ise diğerlerine kıyasla en az strateji türlerini tercih etmişlerdir. Bosnalı üniversite öğrencileri arasında dil öğrenme stratejisi kullanımında sınıf düzeyi bakımından istatistiksel olarak bir ilişki bulunamamıştır. Sonuçlar, dil öğrenimi ve öğretimi ile ilgili önemli uygulamalı ve pedagojik çıkarımlar sağlamakta ve bireysel farklılıklar kavramının dil eğitimindeki rolünü anlamaya yönelik katkıda bulunmaktadır.

Keywords

Akademik alan, Bosna bağlamı, cinsiyet, sınıf düzeyi, dil öğrenme stratejileri

An examination of differences between genders, academic majors and grade levels of language learners on the use of language learning strategies

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the relationship between the second language learning strategy use, academic major, gender and grade level. 252 Bosnian university students studying in Bosnia and Herzegovina participated in the study. The research data were collected from two inventories: an individual background questionnaire and the Strategy Inventory of Language Learning (SILL) (Oxford, 1990). To analyze the data, the descriptive quantitative method was used. Descriptive and referential statistics were reported by taking gender (males vs females), academic major (education vs engineering vs economics) and grade levels ( freshmen, sophomores vs juniors) as the variables. The results indicated that the males employed different types of strategies more frequently than the females. In terms of the academic majors, statistically significant differences were found: The students majoring in economics preferred memory, compensation and social strategies while students majoring in engineering preferred affective, metacognitive and cognitive ones more. Students majoring in the field of education preferred all the strategy types the least. The grade level was found to be statistically insignificant on the use of the language learning strategies of the Bosnian university students. The results provided significant practical and pedagogical implications regarding language learning and teaching, understanding the role of individual differences in language education.

Keywords

Academic major, Bosnian context, gender, grade level, language learning strategies

References

• Abbasian, R., Khajavi, Y. & Mardani, A. (2012). Language learning strategies of Iranian EFL learners: Are gender and educational level important? Academic Research International, Vol. 3(2) Retrieved from http://www.savap.org.pk/journals/ARInt./Vol.3(2)/2012(3.2-46).pdf
• Akın, H. & Çetin, M. (2016). Cinsiyet Faktörünün Yabancı Dil Olarak Türkçe Öğrenim Stratejilerine Etkisi (Bosna Hersek Örneği). Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim Dergisi, 5(2), 1021-1032.
• Aliakbari, M. & Hayatzadeh, A. (2008). Variation of language strategies among Iranian English students: The effect of gender. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 4(3), 72-87.
• Božinović, N. & Sindik, J. (2011). Gender differences in the use of learning strategies in adult foreign language learners. Metodički obzori 6(1).
• Cesur, O. (2008). Üniversite hazırlık sınıfı örgencilerinin yabancı dil öğrenme stratejileri, öğrenme stili tercihi ve yabancı dil akademik başarısı arasındaki açıklayıcı ve yordayıcı ilişkiler örüntüsü. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Yıldız Teknik University, İstanbul.
• Chamot, A. U. & O'Malley, J. (1986). A cognitive academic language learning approach: An ESL content-based curriculum. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.
• Charoento, M. (2017). Individual Learner Differences and Language Learning Strategies. Contemporary Educational Researches Journal. 7(57) Doi: 10.18844/cerj.v7i2.875.
• Chou, Y. (2002). An exploratory study of language learning strategies and the relationship of these strategies to motivation and language proficiency among EFL Taiwanese technological and vocational college students. PhD Dissertation. University of Iowa.
• Cohen, A. & Griffiths, C. (2015) Revisiting LLS research 40 years later. TESOL Quarterly, 49, 414-429.
• Cohen, A. (1998a). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Harlow: Longman.
• Cohen, A. (2012b). L2 learner strategies. In E. Hinkel (Ed.) Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, Vol: 2, 681-698. London and New York: Routledge.
• Cohen, A. (2014c). Strategies in learning and using second language. London and New York: Routledge.
• Demirel, M. (2012). Language learning strategies of undergraduate students. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 43, 141-153.
• Doró, K. & Habók, A. (2013). Language learning strategies in elementary school: The effect of age and gender in an EFL context. Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 4(2), 24-37.
• Dreyer, C. & Oxford, R. L. (1996) Learning Strategies and other predictors of ESL proficiency among Afrikaans speakers in South Africa. In Rebecca Oxford (ed.), Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives. Tech. Rep. No. 13, 61-74. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai Press.
• El-Dib, M. (1999a). Male/Female differences in language learning strategies reconsidered. Journal of the Faculty of Language and Translation Studies, AL Azhar University, 30, 1–24.
• El-Dib, M. (2004b). Language learning strategies in Kuwait: Links to gender, language level and culture in a hybrid context. Foreign Language Annals, 37, 85-95.
• Gavriilidou, Z. & Papanis, A. (2010). The effect of strategy instruction on strategy use by Muslim pupils learning English as a second language. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 25, 47–63.
• Foong, K. P. & Goh C. (1997). Chinese ESL students’ learning strategies: A look at frequency, proficiency, and gender. Hong Kong. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 39-53.
• Green, J. M. & Oxford, R. L. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 261-297.
• Griffiths, C. & Oxford, R. L. (2014). The twenty first century landscape of language learning strategies: Introduction to this special issue. System, 43, 1-10.
• Griffiths, C. (2003) Patterns of language learning strategy use. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 31, 376-383.
• Gu, Y. (2002). Gender, Academic Major, and Vocabulary Learning Strategies of Chinese EFL Learners. RELC Journal, 33, 135-154, doi: 10.1177/003368820203300102.
• Gülsoy, D. (2011). İngilizce okutmanlarının ve hazırlık sınıfı öğrencilerinin dil öğrenme stratejilerinin kullanımına ve öğretimine ilişkin görüşleri. (Unpublished MA thesis). Hacettepe University, Ankara.
• Gürata, A. (2008). The grammar learning strategies employed by Turkish university preparatory school EFL students. (Unpublished MA Thesis). Bilkent University, Ankara.
• Javed, M. & Ali, A. (2018). Analyzing the use of language learning strategies among high and low achievers. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 12(1), 25-44.
• Kang, S. (2012). Individual differences in language acquisition: personality traits and language learning strategies of Korean university students studying English as a foreign language (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana State University, Indiana.
• Kayaoğlu, M. N. (2012). Gender-based differences in language learning strategies of science students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 9(2), 12-24.
• Kaylani, C. (1996). The influence of gender and motivation of EFL learning strategy use in Jordan. In Rebecca Oxford, (ed.) Language learning strategies around the world: cross-cultural perspectives, (pp. 75-88). Honololu: University of Hawai'i: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
• Khalil, A. (2005). Assessment of language learning strategies used by Palestinian EFL learners. Foreign Language Annals, 38(1), 108-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02458.x
• Kiram, J. J., Sulaiman, J., Swanto, S. & Din, W. A. (2014). The relationship between English language learning strategies and proficiency of pre-university students: A study case of UMS. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1605(1), 775-780).
• Lan, R. & Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning strategy profiles of elementary school students in Taiwan. IRAL, 41, 339–379
• Lee, C. K. (2010). An overview of language learning strategies. ARECLS, 7,132-152.
• Liu, Y. (2010) Social media tools as a learning resource. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 3(1), 101-114.
• Marsh, D. (1994). Bilingual Education and Content and Language Integrated Learning. Paris: International Association for Cross-cultural Communication, Language Teaching in the Member States of the European Union (Lingua), University of Sorbonne.
• Mitits, L. (2014). Language learning strategy use by early adolescent monolingual EFL and multilingual EFL/L2 Greek learners in the Greek educational context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Democritus University of Thrace, Komotini, Greece
• Mochizuki, A. (1999). Language learning strategies used by Japanese university students. RELC, 30, 101-113.
• Mullins, P. Y. (1992). Successful English Language Learner Strategies of Students Enrolled in the Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
• Unpublished doctoral dissertation. San Diego, CA: United States International University.
• Nisbet, J. & Shucksmith, J. (1986). Learning strategies. Boston, MA: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
• Nisbet, D., Tindall E. & Arroyo A. (2005). Language Learning Strategies and English Proficiency of Chinese University Students. Foreign Language Annals, 38 (1), ProQuest Research Library: Literature & Language, p. 100.
• O’Malley, J. M. and Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Ok, L. K. (2003). The relationship of school year, sex and proficiency on the use of learning strategies in learning English of Korean junior high school students. Asian EFL Journal, 5(3), 1-36.
• Oxford, R. L. (1990a). Language learning strategies: What every good teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.
• Oxford, R. L. (2011b). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Harlow: Pearson Longman.
• Oxford, R. L. (2017c). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context (Second Edition). Routledge; NY.
• Oxford, R. L. & Amerstorfer, C. (Eds.) (2018). Language learning strategies and individual learner characteristics: Situating strategy use in diverse contexts. London: Bloomsbury.
• Oxford, R. L. & Burry-Stock, J. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL). System, 23(1), 1-23.
• Oxford, R. L. and Ehrman, M. E. (1995). Adults’ language learning strategies in an intensive foreign language program in the United States. System, 23, 359–386.
• Oxford, R. L. & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. The Modern Language Journal, 73(3), 291- 300.
• Özmen, D. T. & Gülleroğlu, H. D. (2013). Determining Language Learning Strategies Used by The Students at Faculty of Educational Sciences Based on Some Variables. Eğitim ve Bilim, 38(169), 30- 40.
• Pawlak, M. & Oxford R. L. (2018). Conclusion: The future of research into language learning strategies. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 8(2), 1-11.
• Pawlak, M. (2011). Research into language learning strategies: Taking stock and looking ahead. In, Adam Wojtaszek and Janusz Arabski (Eds), Individual differences in SLA (pp. 17-37). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
• Peacock, M. (2001). Language learning strategies and EAP proficiency: Teacher views, student views, and tests results. In John Flowerdew and Matthew Peacock (Eds.), Research perspective on English for academic purpose (268-285). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Peacock, M. & Ho, B. (2003). Student language learning strategies across eight disciplines. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 179-200.
• Politzer, R. and McGroarty, M. (1985). An exploratory study of learning behaviors and their relationship to gains in linguistic and communicative competence. TESOL Quarterly, 19(1), 103-123
• Psaltou-Joycey, A. (2008). Cross-cultural differences in the use of learning strategies by students of Greek as a second language. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 29(3), 310–324. http://dx.doi.org/10.2167/jmmd566.0
• Punithavalli, K.M. (2003). Strategi pembelajaran bahasa oleh pelajar-pelajar menengahrendah dalam mempelajari bahasa Inggeris sebagai bahasa kedua. Unpublished MA thesis. University Kebangsaan Malaysia.
• Rahimi, M., Riazi, A. & Saif, S. (2008). An investigation into the factors affecting the use of language learning strategies by Persian EFL learners. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics. 11. 31-60.
• Ramirez, A. G. (1986). Language learning strategies used by adolescents studying French in New York schools. Foreign Language Annals, 19 (2), 131-138.
• Rao, Z. & Liu, F. (2011). Effect of academic major on students' use of language learning strategies: A diary study in a Chinese context. Language Learning Journal. 39, 43-55. DOI: 10.1080/09571731003653565.
• Reid, J. M. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 21(1), DOI: 10.2307/3586356.
• Riding, R. (2000). Cognitive style: A review. In Richard Riding, and Stephen Rayner (Eds.), Interpersonal perspectives on individual differences, Cognitive Styles, 315-344). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
• Riding, R. & Rayner, S. (1998). Cognitive styles and learning strategies understanding style differences in learning and behaviour. London: David Fulton Publishers. Rigney, J. (1978). Learning Strategies: A Theoretical Perspective. Academic Press, New York.
• Rong, M. 1999) Language learning strategies of a sample of tertiary-level students in the P. R. China. Guidelines, 21(1), 1-11.
• Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies: Theoretical assumption, research history and typology. In A. Wenden, and Joan Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning, 15-29. UK: University press, Cambridge.
• Scarcella, R. C. & Oxford, R. L. (1992). The tapestry of language learning: The individual in the communicative classroom (p. 63). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
• Tahriri, A. & Divsar, H. (2011). Male and Female EFL Learners’ Self-Perceived Strategy Use across Various Educational Levels: A Case Study. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 181-194. Doi: 10.5539/elt.v4n4p181
• Torres, G. (2013). Empowering the language learner: language learning strategy training and self-regulation in an EFL classroom. Journal of International Education Research, 9 (3), 267-276.
• Tseng, W., Dörnyei, Z. and Schmitt, N. (2006). A new approach to assessing strategic learning: The case of self-regulation in vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics 27(1) 78–102. Doi: 10.1093/applin/ami046
• Vandergrift, L. (1997). The comprehension strategies of second language (French) listeners: A descriptive study. Foreign Language Annals, 30(3), 387-409.
• Vidal, R. T. (2002). Is there a correlation between reported language learning strategy use, actual strategy use and achievement? Linguagem & Ensino, 5, 43-73.
• Wenden, A. (1987). Conceptual background and utility. In A. Wenden and Joan Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 3-13). Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall International.
• Wharton, G. (2000). Language learning strategy use of bilingual foreign language learners in Singapore. Language Learning, 50, 203-243. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00117
• Willing, K. (1989). Teaching how to learn: Learning strategies in ESL. Sydney: National Centre for English Language teaching and Research
• Yunus, M., Sulaiman, N. & Amin, M. (2013). Malaysian Gifted Students’ Use of English Language Learning Strategies. English Language Teaching. 6, 97-109. 10.5539/elt.v6n4p97.