Uzatılmış bekleme süresi odağında öğretmen adaylarının sınıf etkileşimi yönetimi için bir farkındalık arttırma uygulaması

Year 2020, Issue: Ö8, 831 - 848, 21.11.2020

Cihat Atar

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.827633

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Bu çalışma farkındalık arttırmanın İngilizce öğretmen adaylarının sınıf ve materyal modlarında yabancı dil olarak İngilizce bağlamında uzatılmış bekleme zamanı kullanmasına etkisini araştırmaktadır ve uzatılmış bekleme zamanının sınıfta etkileşim ihtimallerini arttırmadaki yerini göz önünde bulundurmuştur. Uzatılmış bekleme zamanından faydalanmak Sınıf Etkileşimsel Edincinin bir göstergesidir ve dolayısıyla başarılı dil öğretmenleri için gerekli bir beceridir. Bu sebeple, bu çalışma öğretmen adaylarının uzatılmış bekleme zamanı kullanımını ve farkındalık arttırmanın daha başarılı bir kullanıma yol açıp açmadığını incelemektedir. Bu çalışma yedi sınıf video kaydı ve öğretmen adaylarıyla yapılan iki geri bildirim görüşmesini analiz eden nitel bir desene sahiptir. Sınıf video kayıtları Konuşma Çözümlemesinin dizi düzeni, söz sırası alma ve onarım yöntemleriyle incelenmiştir ve yansıtıcı görüşme oturumları katılımcıların uygulama hakkındaki görüş ve algılarına odaklanarak Betimsel Analiz ile analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular yapılan farkındalık arttırma eğitiminin katılımcıların uzatılmış bekleme zamanını Sınıf Etkileşimsel Edinç bağlamının bir parçası olarak etkin kullanımını geliştirdiğini göstermektedir, ve öğrencilerin katılım ve konuşmak için kendi kendini seçmesinde de faydalı etkileri olduğu bulunmuştur. Çalışma daha özel olarak uzatılmış bekleme zamanı açısından Sınıf Etkileşimsel Edincinin gelişiminin bir süreç halinde gerçekleştiğini tespit etmiştir. Bu çalışma sınıf etkileşiminin yönetimi hakkında içgörüler sunmaktadır ve İngilizce öğretmeni eğitim ve gelişimi için öneriler sunmaktadır.

Keywords

Bekleme zamanı, sınıf etkileşimsel edinci, konuşma çözümlemesi, farkındalık arttırma, İngiliz dili eğitimi

The Implementation of awareness raising for pre-service teachers’ management of classroom interaction with a focus on extended wait-time

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of awareness raising on pre-service English teachers’ utilization of extended wait-time in an English as a foreign language context in material and classroom context modes, and it considers the place of extended wait-time in increasing the prospects of interaction in classrooms. Utilizing extended wait-time is an indicator of Classroom Interactional Competence, and thus it is an essential skill for successful language teachers. Accordingly, this paper studies pre-service English teachers’ extended wait-time use, and whether awareness raising gives way to teachers’ more successful utilization of it. This study has a qualitative methodological design analyzing seven classroom video recordings and two feedback interviews with the pre-service teachers. The classroom video recordings were analyzed considering the sequential analysis, turn-taking and repair mechanism of Conversation Analysis, and the reflection interview sessions were analyzed via Descriptive Analysis focusing on the participants’ views and perceptions about the implementation. The findings suggested that the training in the form of awareness raising improved the participants’ efficient use of extended wait-time as a part of Classroom Interactional Competence, and it was also found to have beneficial effects on students’ participation and self-selection. The study more specifically found that the development in Classroom Interactional Competence with regard to extended wait-time happens in a continuum. This study offers insights into management of classroom interaction, and it provides some suggestions for English language teacher training and development.

Keywords

Wait-time, classroom interactional competence, conversation analysis, awareness raising, English language teaching

References

• Alsaadi, N. S. M., & Atar, C. (2019). Wait-time in material and classroom context modes. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 6(1), 53-69. Anshutz, R. J. (1975). An investigation of wait-time and questioning techniques as an instructional variable for science methods students’ microteaching elementary school children. Dissertation Abstracts International, 35, 5978A.
• Atwood, V. A. (1991). Wait time and effective social studies instruction: What can research in science education tell us? Social Education, 55(3), 179-81.
• Barnette, J., Orletsky, S., Sattes, B., & Walsh, J. (1995, April 18-22). Wait-time: Effective and Trainable [Conference presentation]. The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, United States.
• Beyerbach, B. A. (1988a, April 5-9). The interaction of research, policy, and practice: A case study of a research group attempting to implement wait time [Conference presentation]. The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, United States.
• Beyerbach, B. A. (1988b). Comparing researchers', teachers', and students' perspectives on a line of research attempting to implement wait time in classrooms. ERIC Number, ED292883.
• Bozbıyık, M. (2017). The implementation of VEO in an English language education context: A focus on teacher questioning practices [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Gazi University.
• Cullen, R. (1998). Teacher talk and classroom context. English Language Teaching Journal, 25, 179-87.
• Gooding, C. T., Swift, P. R., & Swift, J. N. (1983, April). An analysis of classroom discussion based on teacher success in observing wait time. The Annual Conference of the New England Educational Research Organization, Rockport, M.E.
• Fowler, T. W. (1975). An investigation of the teacher behavior of wait-time during an inquiry science lesson. ERIC Number, ED108872.
• Gooding, T., Swift, J.N., and Swift, P. R. (1984). Development and field testing of a wait time feedback device for monitoring and improving classroom interaction. ERIC Number, ED241482.
• Heinze, A., & Erhard, M. (2006). How much time do students have to think about teacher questions? An investigation of the quick succession of teacher questions and student responses in the German mathematics classroom. Zdm, 38, 388-398.
• Honea, M. J. (1982). Wait time as an instructional variable: An influence on teacher and student. Clearinghouse, 56(4), 167-70.
• Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis: Principles, practices and applications. Oxford: Polity Press.
• Jefferson, G. (1989).Preliminary notes on a possible metric which provides for “standard maximum” silences of approximately one second in conversation. In D. Roger & P. Bull (Eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 166-196). Clevedon, OH: Multilingual Matters.
• Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Eds.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13-31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Liddicoat, A. J. (2011). An Introduction to Conversation Analysis (Second Edition). Continuum International Publishing group.
• Long, M. H., & Sato, C. J. (1983). Classroom foreigner talk discourse: Forms and functions of teachers’ questions. In H.W. Seliger & M. H. Long (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 268-285). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
• Mark, B. (2011). An exploration of speaking-in-class anxiety with Chinese ESL leaners. Fuel and Energy Abstracts, 39(2), 202-214.
• Nunan, D. (1991) Language teaching methodology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Pekarek Doehler, S. (2010) Conceptual changes and methodological challenges: on language, learning and documenting learning in conversation analytic SLA research. In P. Seedhouse, S. Walsh. & C. Jenks (Eds.), Conceptualising learning in Applied Linguistics (pp. 105-126). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
• Rowe, M. B. (1974). Wait time and reward: as instructional variables, their influence on language, logic and fate control: Part one-wait time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11(2), 81-94.
• Rowe, M. B. (1978). Teaching science as continuous inquiry: A basic. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Rowe, M. B. (1986). Wait time: Slowing down may be a way of speeding up! Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 43-50. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. A primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass.
• Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden: Blackwell.
• Sert, O. (2015). Social interaction and L2 classroom discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Sert, O. (2019). Classroom Interaction and Language Teacher Education. In S. Walsh & S. Mann (Eds.), The routledge handbook of English language teacher education (pp. 216-238.). London: Routledge.
• Sert, O. & Bozbıyık, M. (2017, January 18-20 ). A Technology Enhanced and Reflective Teacher Education Programme: Implications for Teaching L2 Interactional Competence. ICOP-L2, Neuchatel, Switzerland.
• Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. Wiley-Blackwell.
• Stahl, R. J. (1994). Using ''think-time'' and ''wait-time'' skillfully in the classroom. ERIC, ED370885.
• Tobin, K. G. (1980). The effect of an extended teacher wait-time on science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 17, 469-75.
• Süt, A. M. (2020). Wait-time in an English for Academic Purposes (EAP) context: A Conversation Analytic perspective. Language Teaching and Educational Research (LATER), 3(1), 149-162.
• Swift, J. N., & Gooding, T. (1983). Interaction of wait time feedback and questioning instruction on middle school science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(8), 721-730.
• Tobin, K. G. (1980). The effect of an extended teacher wait-time on science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 17, 469-75.
• Tobin, K. (1986). Effects of teacher wait time on discourse characteristics in mathematics and language arts classes. American Educational Research Journal, 23(2), 191-200.
• Tsui, A. B. M. (1996). Reticence and anxiety in second language learning. In K. M. Bailey & D. Nunan (Eds.), Voices from the Language Classroom (pp.145-167). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Walsh, S. (2002). Construction or obstruction: teacher talk and learner involvement in the EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research, 6, 3-23.
• Walsh, S. (2003). Developing interactional awareness in the second language classroom through teacher self-evaluation. Language Awareness, 12(2), 124–142.
• Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating classroom discourse. London: Routledge.
• Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. Oxen: Routledge.
• Walsh, S., & Li, L. (2013). Conversations as space for learning. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 23(2), 247-66.
• Waring, H. Z. (2011). Learner initiatives and learning opportunities in the language classroom. Classroom Discourse 2(2), 201–18.
• White, J., & Lightbown, P. M. (1984). Asking and answering in EFL classes. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 40(2), 228-44.
• Yaqubi, B., & Rokni, M. P. (2012). Teachers’ limited wait-time practice and learners’ participation opportunities in EFL classroom interaction. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 10, 127-61.
• Yatağanbaba, E., & Yıldırım, R. (2016). Teacher interruptions and limited wait time in EFL young learner classrooms. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 689–695.
• Yıldırım, A., Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (7th ed.), Ankara: Seçkin Yay.
• Young, R. F. (2008) Language and Interaction: A Resource Book. Oxon: Routledge.