İngilizce karşılıklı konuşma becerisinde söz eylem öğretimine yönelik öğretmen ve öğrenci inanışları

Year 2024, Issue: 38, 1488 - 1510, 21.02.2024

Sıla Ay Kübra Kıraç Demiray

https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1440013

Abstract

Yabancı dil olarak İngilizce öğretimi bağlamında B1 düzeyindeki öğrencilerin söz eylemleri büyük ölçüde kullanabildikleri varsayılmaktadır. Ancak bu duruma tezat oluşturacak şekilde yabancı dil olarak İngilizce hazırlık sınıflarındaki öğrencilerin çeşitli iletişimsel bağlamlarda uygun söz eylemleri kullanmada zorluk yaşadıkları ve İngilizce hazırlık sınıflarında kullanılan ders kitaplarının söz eylemleri öğretmede yetersiz olduğu çeşitli çalışmalarla gözlemlenmiştir. Tüm bu nedenlerle bu araştırmanın amacı, yabancı dil olarak İngilizce karşılıklı konuşma becerisinde söz eylem öğretimine yönelik öğretmen ve öğrenci inanışlarını betimlemektir. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu yabancı dil olarak İngilizce hazırlık sınıflarında ders vermekte olan öğretim görevlileri, hazırlık sınıflarında öğrenim görmekte olan öğrenciler ile söz konusu hazırlık eğitimini başarıyla tamamlayarak lisans eğitimini almak üzere ilgili bölümlere devam etmekte olan öğrenciler oluşturmaktadır. Çalışmanın katılımcı grubuna yönelik olan veri toplama araçlarından sormacalar ve yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme soruları araştırmacı tarafından uzman görüşü alınarak oluşturulmuştur. Araştırmanın bulguları yabancı dil olarak İngilizce sınıflarında kullanımbilimsel unsurların halen göz ardı edildiği yönünde bir inanış olduğunu göstermektedir. Araştırma sonucunda elde edilen bulgular ışığında yabancı dil olarak İngilizce sınıflarında söz eylem öğretiminin geliştirilmesi için bazı önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Keywords

Söz eylem, kullanımbilim, yabancı dil, öğretmen bilişi, öğrenci inanışı

References

• Abe, H. ve Suezawa, A. (2018). Raising pragmatic awareness in the efl classroom. Asphodel, (53), 47-67.
• Akinwotu S.A. (2013). A speech act analysis of the acceptance of nomination speeches of chief obafemi awolowo and chief M.K.O. Abiola. English Linguistic Research, 2 (1), 43-51.
• Alemi, M. ve Iraandoost, R. (2012). A textbook evaluation of speech acts: The case of English. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 1(6), 199-209.
• Alhadi Ali Ahmed F., Mohammadzadeh B. ve Mazlum F. (2023). An in-depth analysis of the representation of speech acts and language functions in Libyan public high school English textbooks. FrontiersinPsychology.13,1-12. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1056745
• Alhamami, M. (2019). Learners’ beliefs about language-learning abilities in face-to-face & online settings. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16 (31),1-23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0162-1Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Bacelarda Silva, A. J. (200 3). The effects of instruction on pragmatic development: teaching polite refusals in English. Second Language Studies,22 (1), 55- 106.
• Baleghizadeh, S. (2007). Speech acts in English language teaching. Iranian Journal of Language Studies, (1-2), 143-154.
• Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2001). Evaluating the empirical evidence: Grounds for instruction in pragmatics. In Kasper, G., & Rose, K. (Eds.). Pragmatics and language teaching, (pp.11-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Bardovi‐Harlig, K. (2018). Teaching of pragmatics. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1- 7.
• Birner, B.J. (2013). Introduction to pragmatics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Borer, B. (2018). Teaching and learning pragmatics and speech acts: An instructional pragmatics curriculum development project for EFL learners. School of Education Student Capstone Projects. 176.
• Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81-109.
• Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. London: Continuum.
• Borg, S. (2011). Language teacher education. In J. Simpson (Eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Applied Linguistics, (pp. 215-228). London: Routledge.
• Bouftira, M., El Messaoudi, M. ve Li, S. (2022). Developing efl learners’ pragmatic competence through a blended learning model: A quasi-experimental study. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 18(16), 105. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2022.v18n16p105
• Breen, M.P., Hird, B., Milton, M. Oliver, R. ve Thwaite, A. (2001). Making sense of language teaching: teachers' principles and classroom practices. Applied Linguistics, 22(4),470–501. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.4.470
• Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. C. Richard, & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.). Language and communication (pp. 2-14). London: Longman.
• Canale, M. ve Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics,1, 1-47.
• Celaya, M.L. ve Barón, J. (2015). The interface between grammar and pragmatics in EFL measurement and development. European Journal of Applied Linguistics (EJUAL), 3 (2), 181-203.
• Celce-Murcia, M. (2007). Rethinking the role of communicative competence in language teaching. In E.Soler & M. Jordà (Eds.). Intercultural language use and language learning (pp. 41–57). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
• Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
• Cohen, A. D. (2006). Strategies for learning and performing L2 speech acts. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2(3), 275-301. https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2005.2.3.275
• Cohen, A.D., ve Ishihara, N. (2010). Teaching and learning pragmatics: where language and culture meet. London: Routledge.
• Council of Europe. (2018/2020). The CEFR Companion Volume with New Descriptors. https://rm.coe.int/common-european-framework-of-reference-for-languages learningteaching/16809ea0d4
• Cutting, J. (2008). Pragmatics and discourse: A resource book for students (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
• Dawson, H. ve Phelan, M. (2016). Language files: Materials for an introduction to language and linguistics. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
• Delen, B. ve Tavil, Z. M. (2010). Evaluation of four coursebooks in terms of three speech acts: requests, refusals and complaints. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 692–697.
• Gazioğlu, T. ve Çiftçi, H. (2017). İngilizce sınıflarında rica söz eylemlerini öğreterek pragmatik yeterliği geliştirme. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30 (1), 139-165. DOI: 10.19171/uefad.323400
• Gu, Q. (2005). Intercultural experience and teacher professional development. Regional Language Centre Journal, 36, 5–22.
• Gustafsson, T. (2021). Acquiring pragmatic knowledge through Textbooks. BEd diss., Mid Sweden University.Retrieved from https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1578029/FULLTEXT01.pdf (Erişim Tarihi:05/11/2023)
• Halenko, N. ve Jones, C. (2011). Teaching pragmatic awareness of spoken requests to Chinese EAP learners in the UK: Is explicit instruction effective? System, 39(2), 240–250. doi:10.1016/j.system.2011.05.0
• Holmes, J. ve Brown, Y. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
• Hymes, D. (1967). Models of the interaction of language and social setting. Journal of Social Issues, 23(2), 8–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1967.tb00572.x
• Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. Pride, & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269-285). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
• Idris, A. M. S., Gusnawaty, G., Hasjim, M. ve Kamsinah, K. (2023). The lecturers and students’ speech act used in classroom interaction: a case study. HUMANIKA, 30(1), 91-103. https://doi.org/10.14710/humanika.v30i1.55300
• Ishihara, N. (2010a). Teachers’ pragmatics: Knowledge, beliefs, and practice. In N. Ishihara & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet (pp. 21-36). Routledge.
• Ishihara, N. (2010b). Incorporating technology into pragmatics-focused instruction. In Ishihara, N. & Cohen, A. D. (Eds.), Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet (pp. 244-263). Harlow, England: Pearson.
• Ishihara, N. ve Cohen, A. D. (2010). Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet. Harlow, Essex, England: Longman/Pearson Education.
• Jeon, E. H. ve Kaya, T. (2006). Effects of L2 instruction on interlanguage pragmatic development. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 165-211). John Benjamins.
• Karatepe, Ç. ve Civelek, M. (2021). A case study on EFL teachers’ views on material adaptation for teaching pragmatics. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 23, 894-910. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.953259
• Kasper, G. (1997). Can pragmatics be taught? Plenary speech presented at the Annual TESOL Convention (March, the 32nd conference, International), Orlando, Florida.
• Kasper, G. (2001). Four perspectives on L2 pragmatic development. Applied Linguistics. 22(4), 502–530. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.4.502
• Kasper, G. ve Rose, K. (1999). Pragmatics and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 81- 104.
• Khader, F. R. (2012). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and actual classroom practices in social studies instruction. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 2(1), 73-92.
• Kıyançiçek, E. ve Karatepe, Ç. (2023). The analysis of a textbook activity on suggestions according to speaking framework by Hymes and its adaptation. Kapadokya Eğitim Dergisi, 4(1), 28-48.
• Kroeger, P.R. (2018). Analyzing meaning: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. Textbooks in language sciences 5. Berlin: Language Science Press.
• Kumaravadivelu, B. (1994). The post method condition: (e)merging strategies for second/foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587197
• Lee, S. J. ve Branch, R. M. (2018). Students' beliefs about teaching and learning and their perceptions of student-centered learning environments. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(5), 602-610.
• Li, R. ve Suleiman, R. R. R. (2017). Language proficiency and speech act of complaint of Chinese efl learners. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 23(1): 60–74. http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2017-2301-05
• Limberg, H. (2016). Teaching how to apologize: EFL textbooks and pragmatic input. Language Teaching Research, 20(6), 700–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815590
• Martínez-Flor, A. ve Fukuya, Y. J. (2005). The effects of instruction on learners’ production of appropriate and accurate suggestions. System, 33(3), 463–480. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2005.06.007
• McNamara, T. F. ve Roever, C. (2006). The social dimension of proficiency: How test able is it? In Language testing: The social dimension (pp. 43-79). Maiden, MA: Blackwell. Merriam, S. B.
• Miller, G. (1974). Psychology, language, and levels of communication. In A. Silverstein (ed.), Human communication: Theoretical explorations(pp.1-17). Lawrence Erlboum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
• Miller, J. E. ve Brown, E. K. (2013). The Cambridge dictionary of linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
• Moorhouse, B. L. ve Harfitt, G. J. (2021). Pre-service and in-service teachers’ professional learning through the pedagogical exchange of ideas during a teaching abroad experience. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 49(2), 230-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2019.1694634
• Muyesser, M. (2020). English as a second language (ESL) teachers’ experiences and perceptions of teaching and learning pragmatics in ESL classrooms: A case study. (Doktora tezi, Northcentral University). ProQuest.
• Pérez-Hernández, L. (2019). From research to the textbook: assessing speech acts representation in course book series for students of English as an L2. Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics. 32(1),248-276.
• Ren, W. ve Han, Z. (2016). The representation of pragmatic knowledge in recent ELT textbooks. ELT Journal, 70, 424-434.
• Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 102-119). New York: Macmillan.
• Rueda, Y.T. (2006). Developing pragmatic competence in a foreign language. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, (8), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.14483/22487085.177
• Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics,13, 206-226. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500002476
• Searle, J.R. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Searle, J.R. (1976). The philosophy of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Shavelson, R. J. ve Stern, P. (1981) Research on teachers' pedagogical thoughts, judgments, decisions, and behavior. Review of Educational Research, 51 (4), 455-498.
• Shih, H. Y. (2006). An interlanguage study of the speech act of apology made by EFL learners in Taiwan (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). National Sun Yat-Sen University, Taiwan.
• Siegel, J. (2016). Pragmatic activities for the speaking classroom. English Teaching Forum, 54 (1), 12-19.
• Tahr, A.S., Mohammadzadesh, B., Singh, U.S. (2023). Speech acts and language function’s representation in efl high school English textbooks leading towards educational sustainability of northern Iraq. Preprints 2023051060. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202305.1060.v1
• Takkaç Tulgar, A. (2016). The role of pragmatic competence in foreign language education. Turkish Online Journal of English Language Teaching, 1 (1), 10-19. https://doi.org/10.32959/tojelt.229304
• Tas, T. ve Khan, O. (2020). On the models of communicative competence. Proceedings of GLOBETSonline: International Conference on Education, Technology and Science (pp. 86–96). http://www.globets.org/files/Globetsonline_proceedings.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 07/11/2023)
• Tatsuki, D. (2019). Instructional material development in L2 pragmatics. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of SLA and pragmatics (pp. 322–337). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351164085-21
• Verschueren, J. (1978). Pragmatics: An annotated bibliography. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Williams, M. and Burden, R. (1997). Psychology for language teachers: A social constructivist approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Yamashita, S. (2008) Investigating interlanguage pragmatic ability: What are we testing? In E. Alcón Soler and A. Martínez-Flor (eds), Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 201–23). Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters.
• Yan, Y. (2022). The effect of pragmatic competence on the communicative competence of second language learners. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 673,368-372.
• Zhang, Y. (1995). Indirectness in Chinese requesting. In G. Kasper (Ed.), Pragmatics of Chinese as native and target language, (pp. 69-118). Hawai’i: University of Hawai’i Press.