Hedonik Açlık Durumunun Besinlere Karşı Duyulan İstek ve Beslenme Alışkanlıkları ile İlişkisi

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, üniversite öğrencilerinin besin alımlarının hedonik açlıkla olan ilişkisinin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Kesitsel, tanımlayıcı tipte olan bu çalışma Şubat- Mayıs 2022 tarihleri arasında bir vakıf üniversitesinin sağlık bilimleri fakültesinde öğrenim gören gönüllü katılımcılar ile yürütülmüştür. Örneklem büyüklüğü G*Power 3.1.9.7 programı ile etki büyüklüğü 0,25 hata oranı 0,05 ve yüzde 95 güçle 197 kişi olarak belirlenmiştir. Çalışmanın örneklemini çalışmaya katılmayı kabul eden 199 öğrenci oluşturmuştur. Katılımcıların demografik bilgileri ve beslenme alışkanlıkları genel bilgi formu ile hedonik açlık durumu ise besin gücü ölçeği (BGÖ) ile çevrimiçi olarak sorgulanmıştır. Beslenme alışkanlıkları BGÖ puanı ile ilişkilendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Erkek cinsiyette kadın cinsiyetine göre BGÖ puanı daha yüksek bulunmuştur. (p<0,05). BKİ sınıflandırmasında da hafif şişman katılımcılarda BGÖ puanı daha yüksek bulunmuştur. (p<0,05). Yemek seçiminde bulunan katılımcıların BGÖ besine ulaşılabilirlik, besin mevcudiyeti, besin tadına bakılması düzeyleri yemek seçmeyenlere göre anlamlı derecede düşük bulunmuştur (p<0,05). Sonuç: Özellikle lezzetli besinlerin bulunduğu obezojenik ortamda hedonik açlığın obeziteye yol açacağını düşündürmektedir. Hedonik açlıkta cinsiyet farklılıkları ve BKİ ile BGÖ puanları arasında korelasyon gözlemlenmiştir. Ayrıca beslenme alışkanlıkları cinsiyet, BKİ ve hedonik açlığın ölçümünde kullanılan BGÖ puanları ile yakından ilişkili bulunmuştur. Bu alışkanlıkların saptanması obezite gibi beslenme alışkanlıkları ile ilişkili kronik hastalıkların önlenmesinde tedavi stratejisi olarak kullanılabilir.

Keywords

• hedonik açlık
• obezite
• beslenme alışkanlıkları
• beden kütle indeksi
• besin gücü ölçeği

Relationship between Hedonic Hunger Status and Desire for Food, and Eating Habits

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to investigate the relationship between hedonic hunger and food intake among university students. Material and Methods: This cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted with voluntary participants enrolled in the faculty of health sciences of a foundation university between February and May 2022. The sample size was determined as 197 individuals using G*Power 3.1.9.7 software, with an effect size of 0.25, an error rate of 0.05, and a 95% power. A total of 199 students who agreed to participate formed the study's sample. Participants' demographic information and eating habits were collected through a general information form, while hedonic hunger status was assessed online using the power of food scale (PFS). Eating habits were correlated with PFS scores. Results: In comparison to the female gender, the BMI score was found to be higher in the male gender (p<0.05). Additionally, within the BMI classification, participants categorized as mildly obese exhibited a higher BMI score (p<0.05). Participants who made food choices had significantly lower levels of PFS in terms of food accessibility, food availability, and tasting food compared to non-choosers (p <0.05). Conclusion: The presence of particularly palatable foods in an obesogenic environment suggests that hedonic hunger may contribute to obesity. Gender differences in hedonic hunger, as well as correlations between BMI and WHR scores, have been observed. Furthermore, dietary habits have been found to be closely associated with gender, BMI, and the WHR scores used in the measurement of hedonic hunger. Identifying these habits can be utilized as a therapeutic strategy in the prevention and treatment of chronic diseases associated with dietary habits, such as obesity.

Keywords

• hedonic hunger
• obesity
• eating habits
• Power of food scale
• body mass index

References

1. Aliasghari F, Asghari Jafarabadi M, Lotfi Yaghin N, Mahdavi R. Psychometric properties of Power of Food Scale in Iranian adult population: gender-related differences in hedonic hunger. Eat Weight Disord. 2020; 25(1): 185-93.
2. Perdomo CM, Cohen RV, Sumithran P, Clément K, Frühbeck G. Contemporary medical, device, and surgical therapies for obesity in adults. Lancet. 2023; 401(10382): 1116-30.
3. Cifuentes L, Acosta A. Homeostatic regulation of food intake. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2022; 46(2): 101794.
4. Takgbajouah M, Buscemi J. Applying the developmental model of use disorders to hedonic hunger: a narrative review. J Addict Dis. 2022; 40(1): 47-55.
5. Morales I, Berridge KC. 'Liking' and 'wanting' in eating and food reward: Brain mechanisms and clinical implications. Physiol Behav. 2020; 227: 113152.
6. Buczek L, Migliaccio J, Petrovich GD. Hedonic eating: Sex differences and characterization of orexin activation and signaling. Neuroscience. 2020; 436: 34-45.
7. Schulte EM, Tuerk PW, Wadden TA, Garvey WT, Weiss D, Hermayer KL, et al. Changes in weight control behaviors and hedonic hunger in a commercial weight management program adapted for individuals with type 2 diabetes. Int J Obes (Lond). 2020; 44(5): 990-8.
8. Smith R, Kelly B, Yeatman H, Boyland E. Food marketing ınfluences children's attitudes, preferences and consumption: A systematic critical review. Nutrients. 2019; 11(4): 875.

9. Cappelleri JC, Bushmakin AG, Gerber RA, Leidy NK, Sexton CC, Karlsson J, et al. Evaluating the Power of Food Scale in obese subjects and a general sample of individuals: development and measurement properties. Int J Obes (Lond). 2009; 33(8): 913-22.
10. Ülker İ, Ayyıldız F, Yıldıran H. Validation of the Turkish version of the power of food scale in adult population. Eating and Weight Disorders- Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity. 2021; 26: 1179-86.
11. Kalaycı, Ş. SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. Vol. 5. Ankara, Turkey: Asil Yayın Dağıtım, 2010.
12. Sharan P, Sundar AS. Eating disorders in women. Indian J Psychiatry. 2015; 57(Suppl 2): S286.
13. Appelhans BM, Woolf K, Pagoto SL, Schneider KL, Whited MC, Liebman R. Inhibiting food reward: delay discounting, food reward sensitivity, and palatable food intake in overweight and obese women. Obesity. 2011; 19(11): 2175-82.
14. Asarian L, Geary N. Sex differences in the physiology of eating. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2013; 305(11): R1215-R1267.
15. Mead BR, Boyland EJ, Christiansen P, Halford JCG, Jebb SA, Ahern AL. Associations between hedonic hunger and BMI during a two-year behavioural weight loss trial. PLoS One. 2021;16(6): e0252110.
16. Lipsky LM, Nansel TR, Haynie DL, Liu D, Eisenberg Colman MH, Simons-Morton B. Lack of prospective relationships of the Power of Food Scale with Body Mass Index and dieting over 2 years in U.S. emerging adults. Eat Behav. 2019; 34: 101302.
17. Chmurzynska A, Mlodzik-Czyzewska MA, Radziejewska A, Wiebe DJ. Hedonic hunger ıs associated with ıntake of certain high-fat food types and BMI in 20- to 40-year-old adults. J Nutr. 2021; 151(4): 820-5.
18. Schüz B, Schüz N, Ferguson SG. It's the power of food: individual differences in food cue responsiveness and snacking in everyday life. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015; 12: 149.
19. Forman EM, Hoffman KL, McGrath KB, Herbert JD, Brandsma LL, Lowe MR. A comparison of acceptance- and control-based strategies for coping with food cravings: an analog study. Behav Res Ther. 2007; 45(10): 2372-86.
20. Nolan‐Poupart S, Veldhuizen MG, Geha P, Small DM. Midbrain response to milkshake correlates with ad libitum milkshake intake in the absence of hunger. Appetite. 2013; 60(1): 168-74.
21. Forman EM, Hoffman KL, Juarascio AS, Butryn ML, Herbert JD. Comparison of acceptance‐based and standard cognitive‐based coping strategies for craving sweets in overweight and obese women. Eat Behav. 2013; 14(1): 64-8.