Case Report
BibTex RIS Cite

Göz protezi yapımında çalışma modelinin modifiye edilmesi: Olgu sunumu

Year 2017, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 132 - 141, 28.08.2017
https://doi.org/10.25279/sak.321059

Abstract

Yüz bölgesinde
çeşitli etkenlerle meydana gelen doku kayıpları hastalarda fizyolojik, estetik
ve psikolojik problemleri beraberinde getirmektedir. Yüz protezleri bozulan yüz
bütünlüğünü gerçeğe en yakın şekilde restore etmeyi ve hastaların toplum içine
çıkabilmesini sağlayan bir tedavi yöntemidir. Yüz protezlerinin yapımı hem
klinik hem de laboratuvar aşamaları uzun zaman alan, zahmetli ve hassas bir
işlemdir. Yüz protezlerinin yapımında önemli bir aşama çalışma modeli elde
edilmesidir. Çalışma modeli üzerinde protezlerin mum örneği hazırlanır ve mum
örnek üzerinde yapılan modelaj çalışmaları tamamlandıktan sonra çalışma modeli
silikonun polimerize edileceği alçı kalıbın bir parçasını oluşturur. Mum
örneğin çalışma modeline iyi bir adaptasyonunun sağlanması ve provalar
esnasında bu adaptasyonunun bozulmaması yapılacak silikon protezin çevre
dokularla uyumlu olması açısından önem taşımaktadır. Bu vaka raporunda göz
protez yapımı esnasında çalışma modelinin modifiye edilmesi ile kenar
kısımlarında meydana gelebilecek deformasyonun önlenmesi anlatılmaktadır.

References

  • 1. Markt JC, Lemon JC. Extraoral maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center: a survey of patient attitudes and opinions. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:608-613.
  • 2. Taylor TD. Clinical maxillofacial prosthetics. 1st ed. Chicago: Quintessence; 2000. p. 233-44.
  • 3. Hooper SM, Westcott T, Evans PL, Bocca AP, Jagger DC. Implant-supported facial prostheses provided by a maxillofacial unit in a U.K. regional hospital: longevity and patient opinions. J Prosthodont 2005;14:32-38.
  • 4. Karakoca Nemli S, Aydin C, Yilmaz H, Sarısoy Ş, Kaşko Y. Retrospective study of implant-retained orbital prostheses: implant survival and patient satisfaction. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21(4):1178-1183.
  • 5. McKinstry Fundamentals of facial prosthetics. St. Petersburg: ABI Professional Publications; 1995. p. 139-146.
  • 6. Wolfaardt JF, Hacqueboard A, Els JM. A mold technique for construction of orbital prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:224-6
  • 7. Veerareddy C, Nair KC, Reddy GR. Simplified technique for orbital prosthesis fabrication: a clinical report. J Prosthodont. 2012 Oct;21(7):561-8.
  • 8. Levy M, Schortz RH, Blumenfeld I, Lepley JB. A flexible moulage for the fabrication of an orbital prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent. 1980 Apr;43(4):436-8.
  • 9. Salinas TJ, Penchas J, Prada-Valverde V, Guerra LR. A multiple tray technique for implant-retained orbital prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1995 Feb;73(2):158-61.
  • 10. Bi Y, Wu S, Zhao Y, Bai S. A new method for fabricating orbital prosthesis with a CAD/CAM negative mold. J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Nov;110(5):424-8.
  • 11. Kesting MR, Koerdt S, Rommel N, Mücke T, Wolff KD, Nobis CP, Ringel F, Frohwitter G.Classification of orbital exenteration and reconstruction.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017 Apr;45(4):467-473.
  • 12. Gliklich RE, Rounds MF, Cheney ML, et al. Combining free flap reconstruction and craniofacial prosthetic technique for orbit, scalp, and temporal defects. Laryngoscope 1998;108:482Y487
  • 13. Joseph ST, Thankappan K, Mathew J, Vijayamohan M, Sharma M, Iyer S. Defect components and reconstructive options in composite orbitomaxillary defects with orbital exenteration. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Sep;72(9):1869.e1-9.
  • 14. Kubon TM. Creating an adaptable anterior margin for an implant-retained auricular prosthesis.J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Sep;86(3):233-40.
  • 15. Dumbrigue HB, Fyler A, Mercier LA. Anterior margin adaptation for implant-retained auricular prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1997 Oct;78(4):425-8.
  • 16. Jooste C, Bester D, Roets R. A mold technique for orbital prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1992 Mar;67(3):380-2.
  • 17. Chambers MS, Lemon JC, Martin JW, Wesley PJ. A hybrid-mold technique for fabricating facial prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:53-5.
  • 18. Mekayarajjananonth T, Salinas TJ, Chambers MS, Lemon JC. A mold-making procedure for multiple orbital prostheses fabrication. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:97-100.
Year 2017, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 132 - 141, 28.08.2017
https://doi.org/10.25279/sak.321059

Abstract

References

  • 1. Markt JC, Lemon JC. Extraoral maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center: a survey of patient attitudes and opinions. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:608-613.
  • 2. Taylor TD. Clinical maxillofacial prosthetics. 1st ed. Chicago: Quintessence; 2000. p. 233-44.
  • 3. Hooper SM, Westcott T, Evans PL, Bocca AP, Jagger DC. Implant-supported facial prostheses provided by a maxillofacial unit in a U.K. regional hospital: longevity and patient opinions. J Prosthodont 2005;14:32-38.
  • 4. Karakoca Nemli S, Aydin C, Yilmaz H, Sarısoy Ş, Kaşko Y. Retrospective study of implant-retained orbital prostheses: implant survival and patient satisfaction. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21(4):1178-1183.
  • 5. McKinstry Fundamentals of facial prosthetics. St. Petersburg: ABI Professional Publications; 1995. p. 139-146.
  • 6. Wolfaardt JF, Hacqueboard A, Els JM. A mold technique for construction of orbital prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:224-6
  • 7. Veerareddy C, Nair KC, Reddy GR. Simplified technique for orbital prosthesis fabrication: a clinical report. J Prosthodont. 2012 Oct;21(7):561-8.
  • 8. Levy M, Schortz RH, Blumenfeld I, Lepley JB. A flexible moulage for the fabrication of an orbital prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent. 1980 Apr;43(4):436-8.
  • 9. Salinas TJ, Penchas J, Prada-Valverde V, Guerra LR. A multiple tray technique for implant-retained orbital prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1995 Feb;73(2):158-61.
  • 10. Bi Y, Wu S, Zhao Y, Bai S. A new method for fabricating orbital prosthesis with a CAD/CAM negative mold. J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Nov;110(5):424-8.
  • 11. Kesting MR, Koerdt S, Rommel N, Mücke T, Wolff KD, Nobis CP, Ringel F, Frohwitter G.Classification of orbital exenteration and reconstruction.J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017 Apr;45(4):467-473.
  • 12. Gliklich RE, Rounds MF, Cheney ML, et al. Combining free flap reconstruction and craniofacial prosthetic technique for orbit, scalp, and temporal defects. Laryngoscope 1998;108:482Y487
  • 13. Joseph ST, Thankappan K, Mathew J, Vijayamohan M, Sharma M, Iyer S. Defect components and reconstructive options in composite orbitomaxillary defects with orbital exenteration. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Sep;72(9):1869.e1-9.
  • 14. Kubon TM. Creating an adaptable anterior margin for an implant-retained auricular prosthesis.J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Sep;86(3):233-40.
  • 15. Dumbrigue HB, Fyler A, Mercier LA. Anterior margin adaptation for implant-retained auricular prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1997 Oct;78(4):425-8.
  • 16. Jooste C, Bester D, Roets R. A mold technique for orbital prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1992 Mar;67(3):380-2.
  • 17. Chambers MS, Lemon JC, Martin JW, Wesley PJ. A hybrid-mold technique for fabricating facial prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:53-5.
  • 18. Mekayarajjananonth T, Salinas TJ, Chambers MS, Lemon JC. A mold-making procedure for multiple orbital prostheses fabrication. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:97-100.
There are 18 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Case Reports
Authors

Seçil Karakoca Nemli

Merve Bankoğlu Güngör This is me

Publication Date August 28, 2017
Submission Date June 12, 2017
Acceptance Date July 27, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 2 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Karakoca Nemli, S., & Bankoğlu Güngör, M. (2017). Göz protezi yapımında çalışma modelinin modifiye edilmesi: Olgu sunumu. Health Academy Kastamonu, 2(2), 132-141. https://doi.org/10.25279/sak.321059

Health Academy Kastamonu is included in the class of 1-b journals (journals scanned in international indexes other than SCI, SSCI, SCI-expanded, ESCI) according to UAK associate professorship criteria. HEALTH ACADEMY KASTAMONU Journal cover is registered by the Turkish Patent Institute.