BibTex RIS Cite

Tasarım Aktivitelerini Araştırmak: Protokol Analizi Yönetimi

Year 2014, Issue: 14, 65 - 80, 01.12.2014

Gökçe Ketizmen Önal

https://doi.org/10.18603/std.24481
Cited By: 3

Keywords

Protocol Analizi Tasarım Aktivitesi Biliş Literatür Çalışması

References

  • Ahmed, S., Wallace K.M., Blessing, LT. (2003), Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Research in Engineering Design, 14(1), 1-11.
  • Akın, Ö., Akın, C. (1996). Frames of reference in architectural design: analyzing the hyperacclamination (A-h-a ). Design Studies, (4), 341 -36’l
  • Akın Ö., Lin C. (1995). Design Protocol Data and Novel Design
  • Decisions. Design Studies, 16(2), 211-236. Atman, C.J, Chimka, J.R., Bursic, K. M., Nachtmann, H. L. (1999).
  • A Comparison of Freshman and Senior Engineering Design Processes. Design Studies, 20(2), 131-152. Card, S. K., Moran, T.P., Newell, A. (1980). Computer text-editing:
  • An information-processing analysis of a routine cognitive skill. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 32-74. Christiaans H., Dorst C. (1992). Cognitive Models in Industrial
  • Design Engineering: a protocol study, Design Theory and Methodology DTM 92 , D.L. Taylor ve D. A. Stauffer (Editörler), Amer Society of Mechanical, New York. Cutkosky, M.R., Tenenbaum, J.M. (1990). A Methodology and computational framework for concurrent product and process design.
  • Mechanism and Machine Theory, 25(3), 365-381. Deubel, P. (2003). An investigation of behaviorist and cognitive approaches to instructional multimedia design. Journal of Educational
  • Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12(1): 63-90. Dorst, K., Dijkhuis, J., (1995). Comparing paradigms for describing design activity . Design Studies, 16(2), 261 -274.
  • Dorst, K. (1995). Analyzing Design Activity: new direction in protocol analyze. Design Studies, 16(2), 139-142.
  • Dorst, K., Cross, N., (2001). Creativity in the design process: co- evolution of problem—solution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425-437.
  • Eckersley, M. (1988). The form of design processes: a protocol analysis study. Design Studies, 9(2), 86-94.
  • Gero, J. S., Tang, H. (2001). The differences between retrospective and concurrent protocols in revealing the process oriented aspects of the design process. Design Studies, 22(3), 283-295.
  • Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity
  • Research Journal, 4(2), 123-143. Göker, M. H. (1997). The Effects of Experience During Design
  • Problem Solving. Design Studies, 18(4), 405-426. Guindon, R. (1990). Designing the design procees: exploiting opportunistic thoughts. Human- Computer Interaction, 5, 305-344.
  • Kavaklı M., Scrivener S., Ball, L.J. (1999). Structure in Idea
  • Sketching Behavior. Design Studies, 19(4), 485-517. Kavaklı, M., Gero J.S. (2001). Sketching as mental imagery processing. Design Studies, 22(4), 347-364.
  • Kintsch, W, Keenan, J. (1973). Reading rate and retention as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 5(3), 257-274.
  • Lundberg, G. (1984). Protocol Analysis and Spatial Behavior. Human Geography, 66(2), 91-97.
  • Lloyd, P., Lawson, B., Scott, P. (1995). Can concurrent verbalization reveal design cognition?. Design Studies, 16(2), 237-259.
  • Mandler, M., Johnson, N.S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed:
  • Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9(1), 11-151. Mc Neill, T., Gero J., Warren, J. (1998). Understanding conceptual electronic design using protocol analysis. Research in Engineering Design. 10(3), 129-140.
  • Önal Ketizmen, G. (2010). Mimari Tasarım Eğitiminde Öğrenciye
  • Ait Kültürel Şemanın Tasarım Sürecindeki Etkilerinin Araştırılmasında Kullanılacak Bir Yöntem, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul, Türkiye: lstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul. Stauffer, L.A. , Ullman, D.G. (1991). Fundamental process of mechanical designers based on emprical data. Journal of Engineering Design, 2(2), 113-125.
  • Suwa, M. ,Tversky, B. (1997). What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A Protocol Analysis. Design Studies, (4), 385-403.
  • Suwa, M. , Purcell, T., Gero, J. S. (1998). Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers' cognitive actions. Design Studies, 19, 455—483.
  • Tang, J.C., Leifer, L.J. (1991). An observational methodology for studying group design activity. Research in Engineering Design, 2(4), 219.
  • Valkenburg, R. , Dorst, K. (1998). The reflective practice of design teams. Design Studies, 19(3), 249-271.
  • Wagner ,D.A, Scurrah M.J., Some characteristics of human problem-solving in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 2(4), 1971:454-478.
  • Yao, S. (2007). Experimental Approaches for Understanding
  • Conceptual Design Activities, Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaCanada: Concordia University, USA. Yao, S., Zeng, Y. (2006, 24-26 July). A new approach for protocol analysis on design activities using axiomatic theory of design modeling. rd CDEN/RCCI International Design Conference , Toronto, Canada.
  • Yao, S., Zeng, Y. (2007). Preliminary Study of Cognitive Model of
  • Designer's Creativity by Using Formal Protocol Analysis. F.L.Krause (Editör). The Future of Prodcut Development: : Proceedings of the 17th CIRP Design Conference, Springer -Verlag Berlin, 5. 165-174. Internet Kaynakları: Internet: Cross, N. (1996). Design Cognition: Results From Protocol and Other Empirical Studies of Design Activity, Knowing and Learning to Design,
  • Web:http://www.cc.gatech.edu/classes/AY201 3/cs7601_spring/ p apers/Cross-DesignCognition.pdf adresinden 12 Kasım 2014'de alınmıştır.
  • Internet: Jiang, H. ,Yen, C. (2010). Protocol Analysis in Design Research: a review,
  • Web:https://www.academia.edu/5038270/Protocol_Analysis_in_
  • Design_Research_a_review adresinden 3 Mayıs 2014'de alınmıştır.
  • Internet: Engineering Design Center, Improving the Design Process, Web: https://www-edc.eng.cam.ac.uk/ 10 Kasım 2014'de alınmıştır.
  • Internet: Design Lab, Environment Based Design, Web:http://users.encs.concordia.ca/Hdesign/index.html 10 Kasım 'de alınmıştır. Internet: Stanford University, Center for Design Research, Web :http://me.stanford.edu/research/labs-and-centers/center-design- research 10 Kasım 2014'de alınmıştır.
  • Internet: University of Sydney, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, Web:http://trove.nla.gov.au/people/1309186?c=people 10
  • Kasım 2014'de alınmıştır.

Year 2014, Issue: 14, 65 - 80, 01.12.2014

Gökçe Ketizmen Önal

https://doi.org/10.18603/std.24481
Cited By: 3

References

  • Ahmed, S., Wallace K.M., Blessing, LT. (2003), Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Research in Engineering Design, 14(1), 1-11.
  • Akın, Ö., Akın, C. (1996). Frames of reference in architectural design: analyzing the hyperacclamination (A-h-a ). Design Studies, (4), 341 -36’l
  • Akın Ö., Lin C. (1995). Design Protocol Data and Novel Design
  • Decisions. Design Studies, 16(2), 211-236. Atman, C.J, Chimka, J.R., Bursic, K. M., Nachtmann, H. L. (1999).
  • A Comparison of Freshman and Senior Engineering Design Processes. Design Studies, 20(2), 131-152. Card, S. K., Moran, T.P., Newell, A. (1980). Computer text-editing:
  • An information-processing analysis of a routine cognitive skill. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 32-74. Christiaans H., Dorst C. (1992). Cognitive Models in Industrial
  • Design Engineering: a protocol study, Design Theory and Methodology DTM 92 , D.L. Taylor ve D. A. Stauffer (Editörler), Amer Society of Mechanical, New York. Cutkosky, M.R., Tenenbaum, J.M. (1990). A Methodology and computational framework for concurrent product and process design.
  • Mechanism and Machine Theory, 25(3), 365-381. Deubel, P. (2003). An investigation of behaviorist and cognitive approaches to instructional multimedia design. Journal of Educational
  • Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12(1): 63-90. Dorst, K., Dijkhuis, J., (1995). Comparing paradigms for describing design activity . Design Studies, 16(2), 261 -274.
  • Dorst, K. (1995). Analyzing Design Activity: new direction in protocol analyze. Design Studies, 16(2), 139-142.
  • Dorst, K., Cross, N., (2001). Creativity in the design process: co- evolution of problem—solution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425-437.
  • Eckersley, M. (1988). The form of design processes: a protocol analysis study. Design Studies, 9(2), 86-94.
  • Gero, J. S., Tang, H. (2001). The differences between retrospective and concurrent protocols in revealing the process oriented aspects of the design process. Design Studies, 22(3), 283-295.
  • Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity
  • Research Journal, 4(2), 123-143. Göker, M. H. (1997). The Effects of Experience During Design
  • Problem Solving. Design Studies, 18(4), 405-426. Guindon, R. (1990). Designing the design procees: exploiting opportunistic thoughts. Human- Computer Interaction, 5, 305-344.
  • Kavaklı M., Scrivener S., Ball, L.J. (1999). Structure in Idea
  • Sketching Behavior. Design Studies, 19(4), 485-517. Kavaklı, M., Gero J.S. (2001). Sketching as mental imagery processing. Design Studies, 22(4), 347-364.
  • Kintsch, W, Keenan, J. (1973). Reading rate and retention as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 5(3), 257-274.
  • Lundberg, G. (1984). Protocol Analysis and Spatial Behavior. Human Geography, 66(2), 91-97.
  • Lloyd, P., Lawson, B., Scott, P. (1995). Can concurrent verbalization reveal design cognition?. Design Studies, 16(2), 237-259.
  • Mandler, M., Johnson, N.S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed:
  • Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9(1), 11-151. Mc Neill, T., Gero J., Warren, J. (1998). Understanding conceptual electronic design using protocol analysis. Research in Engineering Design. 10(3), 129-140.
  • Önal Ketizmen, G. (2010). Mimari Tasarım Eğitiminde Öğrenciye
  • Ait Kültürel Şemanın Tasarım Sürecindeki Etkilerinin Araştırılmasında Kullanılacak Bir Yöntem, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul, Türkiye: lstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul. Stauffer, L.A. , Ullman, D.G. (1991). Fundamental process of mechanical designers based on emprical data. Journal of Engineering Design, 2(2), 113-125.
  • Suwa, M. ,Tversky, B. (1997). What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A Protocol Analysis. Design Studies, (4), 385-403.
  • Suwa, M. , Purcell, T., Gero, J. S. (1998). Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers' cognitive actions. Design Studies, 19, 455—483.
  • Tang, J.C., Leifer, L.J. (1991). An observational methodology for studying group design activity. Research in Engineering Design, 2(4), 219.
  • Valkenburg, R. , Dorst, K. (1998). The reflective practice of design teams. Design Studies, 19(3), 249-271.
  • Wagner ,D.A, Scurrah M.J., Some characteristics of human problem-solving in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 2(4), 1971:454-478.
  • Yao, S. (2007). Experimental Approaches for Understanding
  • Conceptual Design Activities, Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaCanada: Concordia University, USA. Yao, S., Zeng, Y. (2006, 24-26 July). A new approach for protocol analysis on design activities using axiomatic theory of design modeling. rd CDEN/RCCI International Design Conference , Toronto, Canada.
  • Yao, S., Zeng, Y. (2007). Preliminary Study of Cognitive Model of
  • Designer's Creativity by Using Formal Protocol Analysis. F.L.Krause (Editör). The Future of Prodcut Development: : Proceedings of the 17th CIRP Design Conference, Springer -Verlag Berlin, 5. 165-174. Internet Kaynakları: Internet: Cross, N. (1996). Design Cognition: Results From Protocol and Other Empirical Studies of Design Activity, Knowing and Learning to Design,
  • Web:http://www.cc.gatech.edu/classes/AY201 3/cs7601_spring/ p apers/Cross-DesignCognition.pdf adresinden 12 Kasım 2014'de alınmıştır.
  • Internet: Jiang, H. ,Yen, C. (2010). Protocol Analysis in Design Research: a review,
  • Web:https://www.academia.edu/5038270/Protocol_Analysis_in_
  • Design_Research_a_review adresinden 3 Mayıs 2014'de alınmıştır.
  • Internet: Engineering Design Center, Improving the Design Process, Web: https://www-edc.eng.cam.ac.uk/ 10 Kasım 2014'de alınmıştır.
  • Internet: Design Lab, Environment Based Design, Web:http://users.encs.concordia.ca/Hdesign/index.html 10 Kasım 'de alınmıştır. Internet: Stanford University, Center for Design Research, Web :http://me.stanford.edu/research/labs-and-centers/center-design- research 10 Kasım 2014'de alınmıştır.
  • Internet: University of Sydney, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, Web:http://trove.nla.gov.au/people/1309186?c=people 10
  • Kasım 2014'de alınmıştır.
There are 42 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Gökçe Ketizmen Önal This is me

Publication Date December 1, 2014
Published in Issue Year 2014 Issue: 14

Cite

APA Önal, G. K. (2014). Tasarım Aktivitelerini Araştırmak: Protokol Analizi Yönetimi. Sanat Ve Tasarım Dergisi, 1(14), 65-80. https://doi.org/10.18603/std.24481
AMA Önal GK. Tasarım Aktivitelerini Araştırmak: Protokol Analizi Yönetimi. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi. December 2014;1(14):65-80. doi:10.18603/std.24481
Chicago Önal, Gökçe Ketizmen. “Tasarım Aktivitelerini Araştırmak: Protokol Analizi Yönetimi”. Sanat Ve Tasarım Dergisi 1, no. 14 (December 2014): 65-80. https://doi.org/10.18603/std.24481.
EndNote Önal GK (December 1, 2014) Tasarım Aktivitelerini Araştırmak: Protokol Analizi Yönetimi. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi 1 14 65–80.
IEEE G. K. Önal, “Tasarım Aktivitelerini Araştırmak: Protokol Analizi Yönetimi”, Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, vol. 1, no. 14, pp. 65–80, 2014, doi: 10.18603/std.24481.
ISNAD Önal, Gökçe Ketizmen. “Tasarım Aktivitelerini Araştırmak: Protokol Analizi Yönetimi”. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi 1/14 (December 2014), 65-80. https://doi.org/10.18603/std.24481.
JAMA Önal GK. Tasarım Aktivitelerini Araştırmak: Protokol Analizi Yönetimi. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi. 2014;1:65–80.
MLA Önal, Gökçe Ketizmen. “Tasarım Aktivitelerini Araştırmak: Protokol Analizi Yönetimi”. Sanat Ve Tasarım Dergisi, vol. 1, no. 14, 2014, pp. 65-80, doi:10.18603/std.24481.
Vancouver Önal GK. Tasarım Aktivitelerini Araştırmak: Protokol Analizi Yönetimi. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi. 2014;1(14):65-80.

Cited By

Eskiz Yaparken Görsel ve Sözel Düşünmenin Yaratıcılığa Etkisinin İncelenmesi
bab Journal of FSMVU Faculty of Architecture and Design
https://doi.org/10.61807/babdergisi.1442874
MİMARİ TASARIMIN ERKEN TASARIM EVRESİNDE ESKİZİN YARATICI DÜŞÜNMEYE ETKİSİ
Beykoz Akademi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.14514/beykozad.1369449
MODA TASARIMI ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN TASARIM BİLİŞ TÜRLERİNİN BELİRLENMESİ
Anadolu Üniversitesi Sanat & Tasarım Dergisi
Sema ÇAĞLAR
https://doi.org/10.20488/sanattasarim.970721