Ahmed, S., Wallace K.M., Blessing, LT. (2003), Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Research in Engineering Design, 14(1), 1-11.
Akın, Ö., Akın, C. (1996). Frames of reference in architectural design: analyzing the hyperacclamination (A-h-a ). Design Studies, (4), 341 -36’l
Akın Ö., Lin C. (1995). Design Protocol Data and Novel Design
Decisions. Design Studies, 16(2), 211-236. Atman, C.J, Chimka, J.R., Bursic, K. M., Nachtmann, H. L. (1999).
A Comparison of Freshman and Senior Engineering Design Processes. Design Studies, 20(2), 131-152. Card, S. K., Moran, T.P., Newell, A. (1980). Computer text-editing:
An information-processing analysis of a routine cognitive skill. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 32-74. Christiaans H., Dorst C. (1992). Cognitive Models in Industrial
Design Engineering: a protocol study, Design Theory and Methodology DTM 92 , D.L. Taylor ve D. A. Stauffer (Editörler), Amer Society of Mechanical, New York. Cutkosky, M.R., Tenenbaum, J.M. (1990). A Methodology and computational framework for concurrent product and process design.
Mechanism and Machine Theory, 25(3), 365-381. Deubel, P. (2003). An investigation of behaviorist and cognitive approaches to instructional multimedia design. Journal of Educational
Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12(1): 63-90. Dorst, K., Dijkhuis, J., (1995). Comparing paradigms for describing design activity . Design Studies, 16(2), 261 -274.
Dorst, K. (1995). Analyzing Design Activity: new direction in protocol analyze. Design Studies, 16(2), 139-142.
Dorst, K., Cross, N., (2001). Creativity in the design process: co- evolution of problem—solution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425-437.
Eckersley, M. (1988). The form of design processes: a protocol analysis study. Design Studies, 9(2), 86-94.
Gero, J. S., Tang, H. (2001). The differences between retrospective and concurrent protocols in revealing the process oriented aspects of the design process. Design Studies, 22(3), 283-295.
Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity
Research Journal, 4(2), 123-143. Göker, M. H. (1997). The Effects of Experience During Design
Problem Solving. Design Studies, 18(4), 405-426. Guindon, R. (1990). Designing the design procees: exploiting opportunistic thoughts. Human- Computer Interaction, 5, 305-344.
Kavaklı M., Scrivener S., Ball, L.J. (1999). Structure in Idea
Sketching Behavior. Design Studies, 19(4), 485-517. Kavaklı, M., Gero J.S. (2001). Sketching as mental imagery processing. Design Studies, 22(4), 347-364.
Kintsch, W, Keenan, J. (1973). Reading rate and retention as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 5(3), 257-274.
Lundberg, G. (1984). Protocol Analysis and Spatial Behavior. Human Geography, 66(2), 91-97.
Lloyd, P., Lawson, B., Scott, P. (1995). Can concurrent verbalization reveal design cognition?. Design Studies, 16(2), 237-259.
Mandler, M., Johnson, N.S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed:
Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9(1), 11-151. Mc Neill, T., Gero J., Warren, J. (1998). Understanding conceptual electronic design using protocol analysis. Research in Engineering Design. 10(3), 129-140.
Önal Ketizmen, G. (2010). Mimari Tasarım Eğitiminde Öğrenciye
Ait Kültürel Şemanın Tasarım Sürecindeki Etkilerinin Araştırılmasında Kullanılacak Bir Yöntem, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul, Türkiye: lstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul. Stauffer, L.A. , Ullman, D.G. (1991). Fundamental process of mechanical designers based on emprical data. Journal of Engineering Design, 2(2), 113-125.
Suwa, M. ,Tversky, B. (1997). What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A Protocol Analysis. Design Studies, (4), 385-403.
Suwa, M. , Purcell, T., Gero, J. S. (1998). Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers' cognitive actions. Design Studies, 19, 455—483.
Tang, J.C., Leifer, L.J. (1991). An observational methodology for studying group design activity. Research in Engineering Design, 2(4), 219.
Valkenburg, R. , Dorst, K. (1998). The reflective practice of design teams. Design Studies, 19(3), 249-271.
Wagner ,D.A, Scurrah M.J., Some characteristics of human problem-solving in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 2(4), 1971:454-478.
Yao, S. (2007). Experimental Approaches for Understanding
Conceptual Design Activities, Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaCanada: Concordia University, USA. Yao, S., Zeng, Y. (2006, 24-26 July). A new approach for protocol analysis on design activities using axiomatic theory of design modeling. rd CDEN/RCCI International Design Conference , Toronto, Canada.
Yao, S., Zeng, Y. (2007). Preliminary Study of Cognitive Model of
Designer's Creativity by Using Formal Protocol Analysis. F.L.Krause (Editör). The Future of Prodcut Development: : Proceedings of the 17th CIRP Design Conference, Springer -Verlag Berlin, 5. 165-174. Internet Kaynakları: Internet: Cross, N. (1996). Design Cognition: Results From Protocol and Other Empirical Studies of Design Activity, Knowing and Learning to Design,
Web:http://www.cc.gatech.edu/classes/AY201 3/cs7601_spring/ p apers/Cross-DesignCognition.pdf adresinden 12 Kasım 2014'de alınmıştır.
Internet: Jiang, H. ,Yen, C. (2010). Protocol Analysis in Design Research: a review,
Design_Research_a_review adresinden 3 Mayıs 2014'de alınmıştır.
Internet: Engineering Design Center, Improving the Design Process, Web: https://www-edc.eng.cam.ac.uk/ 10 Kasım 2014'de alınmıştır.
Internet: Design Lab, Environment Based Design, Web:http://users.encs.concordia.ca/Hdesign/index.html 10 Kasım 'de alınmıştır. Internet: Stanford University, Center for Design Research, Web :http://me.stanford.edu/research/labs-and-centers/center-design- research 10 Kasım 2014'de alınmıştır.
Internet: University of Sydney, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, Web:http://trove.nla.gov.au/people/1309186?c=people 10
Ahmed, S., Wallace K.M., Blessing, LT. (2003), Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Research in Engineering Design, 14(1), 1-11.
Akın, Ö., Akın, C. (1996). Frames of reference in architectural design: analyzing the hyperacclamination (A-h-a ). Design Studies, (4), 341 -36’l
Akın Ö., Lin C. (1995). Design Protocol Data and Novel Design
Decisions. Design Studies, 16(2), 211-236. Atman, C.J, Chimka, J.R., Bursic, K. M., Nachtmann, H. L. (1999).
A Comparison of Freshman and Senior Engineering Design Processes. Design Studies, 20(2), 131-152. Card, S. K., Moran, T.P., Newell, A. (1980). Computer text-editing:
An information-processing analysis of a routine cognitive skill. Cognitive Psychology, 12(1), 32-74. Christiaans H., Dorst C. (1992). Cognitive Models in Industrial
Design Engineering: a protocol study, Design Theory and Methodology DTM 92 , D.L. Taylor ve D. A. Stauffer (Editörler), Amer Society of Mechanical, New York. Cutkosky, M.R., Tenenbaum, J.M. (1990). A Methodology and computational framework for concurrent product and process design.
Mechanism and Machine Theory, 25(3), 365-381. Deubel, P. (2003). An investigation of behaviorist and cognitive approaches to instructional multimedia design. Journal of Educational
Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12(1): 63-90. Dorst, K., Dijkhuis, J., (1995). Comparing paradigms for describing design activity . Design Studies, 16(2), 261 -274.
Dorst, K. (1995). Analyzing Design Activity: new direction in protocol analyze. Design Studies, 16(2), 139-142.
Dorst, K., Cross, N., (2001). Creativity in the design process: co- evolution of problem—solution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425-437.
Eckersley, M. (1988). The form of design processes: a protocol analysis study. Design Studies, 9(2), 86-94.
Gero, J. S., Tang, H. (2001). The differences between retrospective and concurrent protocols in revealing the process oriented aspects of the design process. Design Studies, 22(3), 283-295.
Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity
Research Journal, 4(2), 123-143. Göker, M. H. (1997). The Effects of Experience During Design
Problem Solving. Design Studies, 18(4), 405-426. Guindon, R. (1990). Designing the design procees: exploiting opportunistic thoughts. Human- Computer Interaction, 5, 305-344.
Kavaklı M., Scrivener S., Ball, L.J. (1999). Structure in Idea
Sketching Behavior. Design Studies, 19(4), 485-517. Kavaklı, M., Gero J.S. (2001). Sketching as mental imagery processing. Design Studies, 22(4), 347-364.
Kintsch, W, Keenan, J. (1973). Reading rate and retention as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 5(3), 257-274.
Lundberg, G. (1984). Protocol Analysis and Spatial Behavior. Human Geography, 66(2), 91-97.
Lloyd, P., Lawson, B., Scott, P. (1995). Can concurrent verbalization reveal design cognition?. Design Studies, 16(2), 237-259.
Mandler, M., Johnson, N.S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed:
Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9(1), 11-151. Mc Neill, T., Gero J., Warren, J. (1998). Understanding conceptual electronic design using protocol analysis. Research in Engineering Design. 10(3), 129-140.
Önal Ketizmen, G. (2010). Mimari Tasarım Eğitiminde Öğrenciye
Ait Kültürel Şemanın Tasarım Sürecindeki Etkilerinin Araştırılmasında Kullanılacak Bir Yöntem, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul, Türkiye: lstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul. Stauffer, L.A. , Ullman, D.G. (1991). Fundamental process of mechanical designers based on emprical data. Journal of Engineering Design, 2(2), 113-125.
Suwa, M. ,Tversky, B. (1997). What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A Protocol Analysis. Design Studies, (4), 385-403.
Suwa, M. , Purcell, T., Gero, J. S. (1998). Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers' cognitive actions. Design Studies, 19, 455—483.
Tang, J.C., Leifer, L.J. (1991). An observational methodology for studying group design activity. Research in Engineering Design, 2(4), 219.
Valkenburg, R. , Dorst, K. (1998). The reflective practice of design teams. Design Studies, 19(3), 249-271.
Wagner ,D.A, Scurrah M.J., Some characteristics of human problem-solving in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 2(4), 1971:454-478.
Yao, S. (2007). Experimental Approaches for Understanding
Conceptual Design Activities, Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaCanada: Concordia University, USA. Yao, S., Zeng, Y. (2006, 24-26 July). A new approach for protocol analysis on design activities using axiomatic theory of design modeling. rd CDEN/RCCI International Design Conference , Toronto, Canada.
Yao, S., Zeng, Y. (2007). Preliminary Study of Cognitive Model of
Designer's Creativity by Using Formal Protocol Analysis. F.L.Krause (Editör). The Future of Prodcut Development: : Proceedings of the 17th CIRP Design Conference, Springer -Verlag Berlin, 5. 165-174. Internet Kaynakları: Internet: Cross, N. (1996). Design Cognition: Results From Protocol and Other Empirical Studies of Design Activity, Knowing and Learning to Design,
Web:http://www.cc.gatech.edu/classes/AY201 3/cs7601_spring/ p apers/Cross-DesignCognition.pdf adresinden 12 Kasım 2014'de alınmıştır.
Internet: Jiang, H. ,Yen, C. (2010). Protocol Analysis in Design Research: a review,
Design_Research_a_review adresinden 3 Mayıs 2014'de alınmıştır.
Internet: Engineering Design Center, Improving the Design Process, Web: https://www-edc.eng.cam.ac.uk/ 10 Kasım 2014'de alınmıştır.
Internet: Design Lab, Environment Based Design, Web:http://users.encs.concordia.ca/Hdesign/index.html 10 Kasım 'de alınmıştır. Internet: Stanford University, Center for Design Research, Web :http://me.stanford.edu/research/labs-and-centers/center-design- research 10 Kasım 2014'de alınmıştır.
Internet: University of Sydney, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, Web:http://trove.nla.gov.au/people/1309186?c=people 10
Önal, G. K. (2014). Tasarım Aktivitelerini Araştırmak: Protokol Analizi Yönetimi. Sanat Ve Tasarım Dergisi, 1(14), 65-80. https://doi.org/10.18603/std.24481
AMA
Önal GK. Tasarım Aktivitelerini Araştırmak: Protokol Analizi Yönetimi. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi. December 2014;1(14):65-80. doi:10.18603/std.24481
Chicago
Önal, Gökçe Ketizmen. “Tasarım Aktivitelerini Araştırmak: Protokol Analizi Yönetimi”. Sanat Ve Tasarım Dergisi 1, no. 14 (December 2014): 65-80. https://doi.org/10.18603/std.24481.
EndNote
Önal GK (December 1, 2014) Tasarım Aktivitelerini Araştırmak: Protokol Analizi Yönetimi. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi 1 14 65–80.
IEEE
G. K. Önal, “Tasarım Aktivitelerini Araştırmak: Protokol Analizi Yönetimi”, Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, vol. 1, no. 14, pp. 65–80, 2014, doi: 10.18603/std.24481.
ISNAD
Önal, Gökçe Ketizmen. “Tasarım Aktivitelerini Araştırmak: Protokol Analizi Yönetimi”. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi 1/14 (December 2014), 65-80. https://doi.org/10.18603/std.24481.
JAMA
Önal GK. Tasarım Aktivitelerini Araştırmak: Protokol Analizi Yönetimi. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi. 2014;1:65–80.
MLA
Önal, Gökçe Ketizmen. “Tasarım Aktivitelerini Araştırmak: Protokol Analizi Yönetimi”. Sanat Ve Tasarım Dergisi, vol. 1, no. 14, 2014, pp. 65-80, doi:10.18603/std.24481.
Vancouver
Önal GK. Tasarım Aktivitelerini Araştırmak: Protokol Analizi Yönetimi. Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi. 2014;1(14):65-80.