A preliminary study on salt tolerance of some barley genotypes

Year 2019, , 755 - 762, 01.10.2019

Ali Doğru , Merve Yılmaz Kaçar

https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.371055

Cited By: 8

Abstract

In
this study, salt (NaCl) tolerance of five barley genotypes (Avcı-2002,
Aydanhanım, Bülbül-89, Orza-96, Tarm-92) was investigated. For this purpose,
plants were exposed to different salt concentrations (0 mM (control), 100 mM, 200 mM and 300 mM) and some basic
growth parameters (root length, shoot length total plant length, fresh weight,
dry weight) were determined on the 18 d old plants. Tolerance indices for each genotype
was calculated on the basis of root and shoot length. Our results showed that salt
stress inhibited root and shoot growth in all genotypes significantly except
Bülbül-89. Inhibition degree of root and shoot growth was found to be
proportional to the salt concentrations applied. Maximum inhibitory effect of
salinity on root and shoot growth, for example, was observed in Avcı-2002 at
300 mM salinity level, while Bülbül-89 was less affected by salt stress. In
addition, we found that salt stress disturbed water relation between barley
genotypes and growth medium dependent on the organ type, as demonstrated by more
severe inhibition in shoot fresh weight as compared to root fresh weight. These
results may show that salt stress reduced translocation of water from roots to
shoots rather than water uptake from soil in barley genotypes used in this
study. Changes in dry weight of root and shoot barley genotypes indicated that
salt stress reduced biomass accumulation in roots. As a result, we concluded
that Bülbül-89 is the most tolerant barley cultivars while Avcı-2002 is the
most susceptible one, as indicated by the calculated tolerance indices. 

Keywords

Barley, Hordeum vulgare, salt tolerance

References

• [1] P. Rengasamy, “World salinization with emphasis on Australia,” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 57, pp. 1017–1023, 2006.
• [2] N. Y. Bolat, “Doğal ekosistemde bulunan mikoriza türlerinin kültür bitkilerine adaptasyonunun sağlanması,” Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, s. 14, 2006.
• [3] H. Tuncay, “Söke ovası tuzlu ve sodyumlu toprakların ıslahında esas olacak özelliklerin tespitine dair çalışmalar,” Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, Bornova, İzmir, 1978.
• [4] B. Seçkin, “Tuzluluk stresinin bazı arpa (Hordeum ssp.) türleri üzerindeki fizyolojik ve biyokimyasal etkilerinin araştırılması,” Doktora Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, pp. 15-38, 2010.
• [5] A. Ergene, “Toprak Bilgisi,” Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, Erzurum, 1982.
• [6] A. Cesur, “Tuzlu koşullarda çimlendirilen arpa köklerinde hücre döngüsü, mitotik indeks ve kromozom yapısına H2O2 ön muamelesinin etkileri,” Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, pp. 1-3, 2007.
• [7] K. Çavuşoğlu, “Geleneksel hormonlarla son yıllarda bulunan bazı hormonların ve büyüme düzenleyicilerinin yüksek sıcaklık ve tuz (NaCl) stresleri altındaki arpa ve turp tohumlarının çimlenmesi üzerindeki etkilerinin karşılaştırılması,” Doktora Tezi, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, pp. 1-5, 2006.
• [8] I. Öncel and Y. Keleş, “Tuz stresi altındaki buğday genotiplerinde büyüme, pigment içeriği ve çözünür madde kompozisyonunda değişmeler,” Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi, Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi, Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 23, no. 2, 2002.
• [9] Anonymous, “FAO Land and Plant Nutrition Management Service,” http://www.fao.org/ag/ag/agll/spush, 2008.
• [10] M. Ashraf, “Breeding for salinity tolerance in plants,” Critical Review of Plant Sciences, vol. 13, pp. 17–42, 1994.
• [11] H. Marschner, “Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants,” Academic Press, London 1995.
• [12] R. Munns, “Comparative physiology of salt and water stress,” Plant Cell and Environment, vol. 25, pp. 239–250, 2002.
• [13] J. C. Papp, M. C. Ball and N. Terry, “A comparative study of the effects of NaCl salinity on respiration, photosynthesis, and leaf extension growth in Beta vulgaris L. (sugar beet),” Plant Cell and Environment, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 675-677, 1983.
• [14] M. Hasanuzzaman, M. Fujita, M. N. Islam, K. U. Ahamed and K. Nahar, “Performance of four irrigated rice varieties under different levels of salinity stress,” International Journal of Integrative Biology, vol. 6, pp. 85–90, 2009.
• [15] B. Guan, J. Yu, X. Chen, W. Xie and Z. Lu, “Effects of salt stress and nitrogen application on growth and ion accumulation of Suaeda salsa plants,” International Conferance of Remote Sensing, Environment and Transportation Engineering, pp. 8268-8272, 2011.
• [16] L. F. M. Marcelis and J. van Hooijdonk, “Effect of salinity on growth, water use and nutrient use in radish (Raphanus sativus L.),” Plant and Soil, vol. 215, pp. 57–64, 1999.
• [17] E. O. Leidi and J. F. Saiz, “Is salinity tolerance related to Na acculumation in upland cotton seedlings,” Plant and Soil, vol. 190, pp. 67-75, 1997.
• [18] H. Kurban, H. Saneoka, K. Nehira, R. Adilla, G. S. Premachandra and K. Fujita, “Effect of salinity on growth, photosynthesis and mineral composition in leguminous plant Alhagi pseudoalhagi (Bieb.),” Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, vol. 45, pp. 851–862, 1999.
• [19] E. R. Lamond and A. D. Whitney, “Management soline and sodik soils, cooperative extension service,” Kansas State University, Kansas, U.S.A., 1991.
• [20] M. Ayyıldız, “Sulama suyu kalitesi ve tuzluluk problemleri”, Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları Ders Kitabı, Ankara, pp. 244-250, 1983.
• [21] M. N. Khalid, H. F. Iqbal, A. Tahir and A. N. Ahmad, “Germination potential of chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) under saline conditions,” Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 395-396, 2001.
• [22] A. K. Parida, A. B. Das, “Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review,” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, vol. 60, pp. 324-349, 2005.
• [23] S. A. Bağcı, H. Ekiz and A. Yılmaz, “Determination of the salt tolerance of some barley genotypes and the characteristics affecting tolerance,” Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, vol. 27, pp. 253-260, 2003.
• [24] B. Ayhan, Y. Ekmekçi and D. Tanyolaç, “Erken fide evresindeki bazı mısır çeşitlerinin ağır metal (kadmiyum ve kurşun) stresine karşı dayanıklılığının araştırılması,” Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 411-422, 2007.
• [25] P. E. Verslues, M. Agarwal, S. K. Agarwal, J. Zhu and J. K. Zhu, “Methods and concepts in quantifying resistance to drought, salt and freezing, abiotic stresses that affect plant water status,” Plant Journal, vol. 45, pp. 523–539, 2006.
• [26] M. Ashraf and P. J. C. Harris, “Potential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants,” Plant Science, vol. 166, pp. 3-16, 2004.
• [27] S. Zaimoğlu and A. Doğru, “Farklı Mısır Genotiplerinde Tuz Stresinin Bazı Büyüme Parametreleri ve Fotosentetik Aktivite Üzerindeki Etkileri,” 23. Ulusal Biyoloji Kongresi, pp. 270, 2016.
• [28] M. Pessarakli, K. B. Marcum and D. M. Kopec, “Growth response of desert saltgrass under salt stres, turfgrass landscape and urban IPM research summary,” Cooperative Extension, Agricultural Experiment Station, The University of Arizona, Tuscon AZ1246 series, 70-73, 2001.
• [29] R. Munns, “Comparative physiology of salt and water stress,” Plant Cell and Environment, vol. 25, pp. 239–250, 2002.
• [30] M. C. Shannon and C. M. Grieve, “Tolerance of vegetable crops to salinity,” Scientia Horticulturae, vol. 78, pp. 5–38, 1999.
• [31] M. A. Anjum, “Effect of NaCl concentrations in irrigation water on growth and polyamine metabolism in two citrus rootstocks with different levels of salinity tolerance,” Acta Physiologia Plantarum, vol. 30, pp. 43–52, 2008.
• [32] H. J. Bohnert, D. E. Nelson and R. G. Jensen, “Adaptation to environmental stresses,” Plant Cell, vol. 7, pp. 1099-1111, 1995.
• [33] M. M. F. Mansour, “Protection of plasma membrane of onion epidermal cells by glycinebetaine and proline against NaCl stress,” Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 36, pp. 767–772, 1998.
• [34] M. M. F. Mansour, K.H.A. Salama, F.Z.M. Ali, and A.F.A. Hadid, “Cell and plant responses to NaCl in Zea mays L. cultivars differing in salt tolerance,” General and Applied Plant Physiology, vol. 31, pp. 29-41, 2005.
• [35] R. Davenport, R. James, A. Zakrisson-Plogander, M. Tester and R. Munns, “Control of sodium transport in durum wheat,” Plant Physiology, vol. 137, pp. 807-818, 2005.
• [36] R. Munns and M. Tester, “Mechanisms of salinity tolerance,” Annual Review of Plant Biology, vol. 59, pp. 651-681, 2008.