Sustainable Maintenance Strategy for Wood Windows Defects

Year 2020, , 914 - 935, 01.10.2020

Özlem Eren , Emine Merve Okumuş

https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.687722

Abstract

Regular maintenance and repair of window systems in the existing building stock provide both resource and energy savings. While planning the maintenance strategy of window systems that offer benefit in terms of two different aspects, first of all, the possible damage types should be known. Then, what is the damage to the scope of this study? The question was investigated, and the causes and types of defects in the wooden windows were listed. The proposed maintenance planning method is based on 5 tools. The tools that can be used for maintenance planning are listed in the literature. First, the defect levels of the wood windows were specified and then the AHP method was used to select among the alternative maintenance according to the severity of the defect. The study was planned according to the 6 Sigma tool. Firstly, the causes of the defects were investigated and then these defects were evaluated by assigning numbers to each defect by experts. Finally, the AHP method was used to select the right alternative among proposed maintenance alternatives according to the level of defects. By using this simple method while choosing the window maintenance strategy according to the demands, wrong decision-making will be prevented.

Keywords

maintenance, wood window, defect

References

• S. S. Liu and G. Ramadhan, “Conditioned –Based Building Maintenance Strategy Selection Using Constraint Programming,” Facility Maintenance and Management, pp. 345-351, 2017.
• M. Y. L. Chew, S. S. Tan, and K. H. Kong, “Building Maintainability-Review of State of the Art,” Journal of Architectural Engineering, pp 80-87, 2004.
• A. Santos, M. Vicente, J. de Brito, I. Flores-Colen, and A. Castelo, "Inspection, Diagnosis, and Rehabilitation System of Door and Window Frames," Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, vol. 31, no. 3, pp 04016118-1-12, 2017.
• M. Macarulla, N. Forcada, M. Casals, M. Gangolells, A. Fuertes, and X. Roca, “Standardizing housing defects: classification, validation, and benefits,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 139, no. 8, pp. 968-976, 2013.
• J. Morgado, “Inspection and maintenance plan for roofs in current buildings,” Ph.D. thesis, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal (in Portuguese), 2012.
• I. Flores-Colen, and J. de Brito, “Plan of inspection and maintenance of a school building—A case study.” Proc., QIC, National, Meeting on Quality and Innovation in Construction, LNEC, Lisbon, Portugal, 569–580, 2006.
• H. Lind, and H. Muyingo, H, “Building maintenance strategies: planning under uncertainty,” Property Management, Vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 14-28, 2012.
• Lopes J.N.P., Morgado V., 2012, Inspection and Maintenance Plan for Roofs in Current Buildings, Instıtuto Superior Tecnico.
• I. Flores-Colen, and J. de Brito, “A systematic approach for maintenance budgeting of buildings façades based on predictive and preventive strategies,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 1718-1729, 2010.
• A. Straub, “Using a condition-dependent approach to maintenance to control costs and performances,” Journal of Facilities Management, vol 1, no. 4, pp. 380-395, 2002.
• M. Riley, A. Cotgrave, “The Technology of refurbishment and Maintenance,” Palgrave Macmillan. Basingstoke, 2005.
• T. Damen, L K. Quah, and H. C. M. van Egmond, “Improving the art and science of condition-based maintenance systems”, in Quah, L.K. (Ed.), Proceedings of the CIB W070 Symposium, The Way Ahead into the Millennium, Singapore, McGraw-Hill, Singapore, pp. 141-8, 1998.
• M. H. Hermans, “Deterioration characteristics of building components: a data collecting model to support performance management,” Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 1995.
• L.W. Masters, (Ed.), “Problems in service life prediction of building and construction materials” vol. 95, Springer Science and Business Media, 2012.
• S. Madureira, I. Flores-Colen, J. de Brito, and C. Pereira, C, “Maintenance planning of facades in current buildings,” Construction and Building Materials, no 147, pp. 790-802, 2017.
• R. A. Munro, M. J. Maio, M. B. Nawaz, G. Ramu, D. J. Zrymiak, “The Six Sigma Green Belt Handbook,” Wisconsin: ASQ, 2007.
• P. Pande, and L. Holpp, “What is six sigma?,” New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001.
• M. Ben-Daya, S. O. Duffuaa, A. Raouf, J. Knezevic and D. Ait-Kadi, “Handbook of maintenance Management and Engineering,” Springer, London, 2009.
• Z. Sönmez, “Six Sima methodology process improvement and an application in service sector,” Istanbul Kultur University, Master thesis, İstanbul, 2013.
• L. A. Zadeh, “The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—I,” Information sciences, vol. 8, no.4, pp. 301-357, 1975.
• T. L. Saaty, and L. G. Vargas, L. G, “Decision making with the analytic network proceses Economic, Political, Social and Technological Applications with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, New York, USA, 2006.
• T. L. Saaty, “How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process,” Interfaces, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 19-43, 1994.
• G. Pahl, W. Beitz, and K. Wallace, “Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach,” London: Springer, 1996.
• M. H. Tooley, and Knovel, “Design Engineering Manual (1st ed),” Amsterdam; London; Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2010.
• T. Tomiyama, P. Gu, Y. Jin, D. Lutters, C. Kind, and F. Kimura, “Design Methodologies: Industrial and Educational Applications,” CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, vol 58, no.2, pp. 543-565, 2009.
• D. Shetty, “Product Design for Engineers,” Boston: Cengage Learning, 2016.
• G. Atkinson, “A century of defects.” Building,” 54–55, 1987.
• CIB Working Commission W86, “Building Pathology: A State-ofthe Art Rep, International Council for Building Research Studies and Documentation,” Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1993. .