Effect of Utilization of Different Type of Mineral Admixture On Fresh And Hardened Properties of Cementitious Systems

Year 2019, Volume: 23 Issue: 2, 213 - 223, 01.04.2019

Ali Mardani-aghabaglou , Ali Nematzadeh Ece Geven

https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.461646

Cited By: 1

Abstract

In this study, the effect of mineral admixture utilization on fresh and
some hardened state properties of cement paste and mortar mixtures were
investigated. For this purpose, in addition to the control mixture containing
no mineral admixture, three more series of mixtures were prepared. In the first
and second mixtures 30% and 10 w.t% of cement was replaced with silica fume and
fly ash respectively. In the third series, cement was replaced with both of
silica fume and fly ash by 30% and 10%, respectively. According to test
results, fresh state properties of paste mixtures were affected by mineral
admixture use positively in general. However, a reverse result was observed for
the fresh state properties of mortar mixtures. Compressive strength values of
the mixtures including fly ash as well as the ones including silica fume and
fly ash was found to be less than that of control mixture. Nevertheless, the
difference between those values reduced at the end of 90 days. Mixture
including silica fume showed the highest strength value from the beginning.
90-day water absorption values of the mortar mixtures were observed to be less
compared to that of control mixtures with the use of mineral admixture. The
mixture having ternary binder system (including cement, silica fume and fly ash)
showed better performance in terms of hardened properties. The water absorption
capacity value of mentioned mixture was observed as 42% less than that of
control mixture.

Keywords

Mineral admixture, Marsh funnel, mini-slump, flow, compressive strength, water absorption capacity

References

• 1. Mehta, P.K. and Monteiro, P.J.M., Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, And Materials. 3th ed. McGraw- Hill, 2010.
• 2. Topçu, İ.B., Canbaz, M., “The Effect of Silica Fume on Mechanical Crack Formation in Concrete“, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Journal of Faculty of Engineering and Architecture 21:17-26, December, 2008 (in Turkish).
• 3. Aïtcin, P.C., Laplante, P., “ Long-Term Compressive Strength of Silica Fume Concrete “, J. Materials in Civil Engineering 3(3):164-170., 1990
• 4. Yeğinobalı, A., “Utilization of Silica Fume and Cement in the Concrete Mixture”, TÇMB, Ankara, 2009 (in Turkish).
• 5. Hassan, K.E., Cabrera, J.G., Maliche, R.S., “The Effect of Mineral Admixtures on the Properties of High-Performance Concrete”, Cement and Concrete Composites Vol. 22:267-271., 2000.
• 6. Dinçer, R., Çağatay, İ.H., “Mechanical Properties of Fly Ash-Bearing Concrete Mixture”, Çukurova University, Journal of Faculty of Engineering and Architecture 19(2): 235-246, 2004 (in Turkish).
• 7. Güçlüer, K., Ünal, O., “Investigation of the Effect of Fly Ash Chemical Composition on Compressive Strength and Permeability of Concrete Mixtures“, Journal of Technology Structure 6(1): 11-18, 2010 (in Turkish).
• 8. Delikurt, B.C., Sevim, U.K., “The Effect of Sugözü Fly Ash on Mechanical and Durability Performance of Concrete “, Journal of Niğde University 4(1): 47-58, 2015 (in Turkish).
• 9. Mardani-Aghabaglou, A., Sezer, G.I., Ramyar, K., “Comparison of fly ash, silica fume and metakaolin from mechanical properties and durability performance of mortar mixtures view point “, Construction and Building Materials 70: 17-25, 15 November 2014. 10. Pandey, S.P., Sharma, R.L., “ The Influence of Mineral Additives on the Strength and Porosity of OPC Mortar “, Cement and Conrete Research 30: 19-23., 2000.
• 11. Ahari, S.R., Erdem, K.T., Ramyar, K., “ Time-dependent rheological characteristics of self-consolidating concrete containing various mineral admixtures “ , Construction and Building Materials 88: 134-142, 30 July 2015.
• 12. Tanyildizi, H., “The investigation of microstructure and strength properties of lightweight mortar containing mineral admixture exposed to sulfate attack “ , Measurement 77: 143-154, January 2016.
• 13. TS EN 197-1, Cement-Part 1: General cements-Composition, properties and conformity criteria, TSE, Ankara, 2012.
• 14. TS EN 196-1, Methods of Testing Cement- Part 1, Determination of Strength, TSE, Ankara, 2016.
• 15. TS EN 1097-6, Test for mechanical and physical properties of aggregates - Part 6: Determination of particle density and water absorption ratio, TSE, Ankara, 2013.
• 16. Aïtcin P.C., ‘’High Performance Concrete,’’ E&FN SPON, New York, 2004.
• 17. ASTM C109, Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens).
• 18. Kantro DL. Influence of Water Reducing Admixtures on Properties of Cement Paste-A Miniature Slump Test, Cement, Concrete and Aggregates 1980;2:95-02.
• 19. ASTM C1437, Standard Test Method for Flow of Hydraulic Cement Mortar.
• 20. ASTM C642–13, Standard Test Method for Density, Absorption and Voids in Hardened Concrete, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA., 2013.
• 21. Mardani-Aghabaglou, A., Son, A. E., Felekoğlu, B., Ramyar, K., Effect of cement fineness on properties of cementitious materials containing high range water reducing admixture, Journal of Green Building, 12(1): 142-167., 2017.
• 22. Mardani-Aghabaglou, A., Boyacı, O. C., Hosseinnezhad, H., Felekoğlu, B., & Ramyar, K. Effect of gypsum type on properties of cementitious materials containing high range water reducing admixture. Cement and Concrete Composites, 68: 15-26., 2016.