Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2023, Volume: 27 Issue: 2, 398 - 407, 30.04.2023

Seda Kontaş

https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.1215970

Abstract

Keywords

Condition factor length-weight relationship length-length relationship Mullus barbatus Mersin Bay

References

  • [1] K. I. Stergiou, D. K. Moutopoulos, “A review of length-weight relationships of fishes from Greek Marine Waters,” Naga, The ICLARM Quarterly, vol. 24, pp. 23-39, 2001.
  • [2] O. Samsun, O. Akyol, T. Ceyhan, Y. Erdem, “Length-weight relationships for 11 fish species from the Central Black Sea, Turkey,” Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 455-458, 2017.
  • [3] M. N. Santos, M. B. Gaspar, P. Vasconcelos, C. C. Monteiro, “Weight-length relationships for 50 selected fish species of the Algarve (Southern Portugal,” Fisheries Research, vol. 59, no. 1-2, pp. 289-295, 2002.
  • [4] L. Sangun, E. Akamca, M. Akar, “Weight-length relationships for 39 fish species from the north-eastern Mediterranean coast of Turkey,” Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, vol. 7, pp. 37-40, 2007.
  • [5] D. K. Moutopoulos, K. I. Stergiou, “Length–weight and length–length relationships of fish species from the Aegean Sea (Greece),” Journal of Applied Ichthyology, vol 18, no. 3, pp. 200-203, 2002.
  • [6] S. Yedier, “Estimation of some population parameters of Squalius cephalus (Linnaeus 1758) in Tabakhane Stream (Ordu-Turkey),” Sakarya University Journal of Science, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 14-23, 2022.
  • [7] M. Tsoumani, R. Liasko, P. Moutsaki, I. Kagalou, I. Leonardos, “Length-weight relationships of an invasive cyprinid fish (Carassius gibelio) from 12 Greek lakes in relation to their trophic states,” Journal of Applied Ichthyology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 281-284, 2006.
  • [8] A. Van, A. Gümüş, S. Süer, “Length-weight relationships and condition factors of 15 fish species from Kizilirmak-Yesilirmak shelf area, the southeastern Black Sea,” NESciences, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 21-27, 2019.
  • [9] C. D. Le Cren, “The Length-weight relationship and seasonal cycle in gonad weight and condition in perch, Perca fluviatilis,” Journal of Animal Ecology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 201-219, 1951.
  • [10] B. J. Muus, J. G. Nielsen, Sea fish: Scandinavian Fishing Year Book, Hedehusene, Denmark, 340 p, 1999.
  • [11] J. C. Hureau, “Mullidae,” in Fishes of the north-aestern Atlantic and the Mediterranean, P. J. P. Whitehead, M. L. Bauchot, J. C. Hureau, J. Nielsen, E. Tortonese Eds. UNESCO, Paris, 1986, pp. 877-882.
  • [12] T. D. Bok, D. Gokturk, A. E. Kahraman, T. Z. Alicli, T. Acun, C. Ates, “Length-weight relationships of 34 fish species from the Sea of Marmara, Turkey,” Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, vol. 10, no. 23, pp. 3037-3042, 2011.
  • [13] F. S. Karakulak, H. Erk, B. Bilgin, “Length–weight relationships for 47 coastal fish species from the northern Aegean Sea, Turkey,” Journal of Applied Ichthyology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 274-278, 2006.
  • [14] E. Taskavak, M. Bilecenoglu, “Length-weight relationships for 18 Lessesian (Red Sea) immigrant fish species from the Mediterranean coast of Turkey,” Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 895-896, 2001.
  • [15] G. Morey, J. Moranta, E. Massuti, A. Grau, M. Linde, F. Riera, B. Morales-Nin, “Weight–length relationships of littoral to lower slope fishes from the western Mediterranean,”. Fisheries Research, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 89-96, 2003.
  • [16] E. Cicek, D. Avsar, H. Yeldan, M. Ozutok, “Length–weight relationships for 31 teleost fishes caught by bottom trawl net in the Babadillimani Bight (northeastern Mediterranean),”. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 290-292, 2006.
  • [17] S. A. Demirhan, M. F. Can, “Length–weight relationships for seven fish species from the southeastern Black Sea,” Journal of Applied Ichthyology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 282-283, 2007.
  • [18] F. Kalaycı, N. Samsun, S. Bilgin, O. Samsun, “Length-weight relationship of 10 fish species caught by bottom trawl and midwater trawl from the Middle Black Sea, Turkey,” Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 33-36, 2007.
  • [19] O. Ak, S. Kutlu, İ. Aydın, “Length-weight relationship for 16 fish species from the eastern Black Sea, Turkey,” Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 125-126, 2009.
  • [20] S. Çalık, N. Erdoğan Sağlam, “Length-weight relationships of demersal fish species caught by bottom trawl from Eastern Black Sea (Turkey),” Cahiers de Biologie Marine, vol. 58, pp. 485-490, 2017.
  • [21] N. Demirel, E. M. Dalkara, “Weight−length relationships of 28 fish species in the Sea of Marmara,” Turkish Journal of Zoology, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 785-791, 2012.
  • [22] İ. B. Daban, M. Arslan İhsanoğlu, A. İşmen, H. İnceoğlu, “Length-weight relationships of 17 teleost fishes in the Marmara Sea, Turkey,” KSU Journal Of Agriculture and Nature, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1245-1256, 2020.
  • [23] G. Gökçe, İ. Aydın, C. Metin, “Length–weight relationships of 7 fish species from the north Aegean Sea, Turkey,” International Journal of Natural and Engineering Sciences, vol. 1, pp. 51-52, 2007.
  • [24] D. Türker, H. Bal, “Length–weight relationship and condition factor of Red mullet (Mullus barbatus barbatus Linnaeus, 1758) from the western Black Sea, Turkey,” NESciences, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 120-127, 2018. [25] E. H. K. Akel, “Length-weight relationships and condition factors for fifteen species caught by experimental bottom trawl along the Egyptian Mediterranean Coast,” Acta Velit, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 15-19, 2016.
  • [26] H. H. Atar, T. Mete, “Investigating of some biological features of Red mullet (Mullus sp. Linnaeus, 1758) distributing in Mersin Bay,” Research Journal of Biology Sciences, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 29-34, 2009.
  • [27] M. Ok, “Evaluation of the demersal fish assemblages of the northeastern Levant Sea,” Ph.D. dissertations, Department of Marine Biology and Fisheries, Middle East Technical Univ., Ankara, 2012.
  • [28] C. E. Özyurt, E. Çiçek, D. Avşar, H. Yeldan, M. Manaşırlı, “The relationship among spawning period, length at first maturity and depth distribution of Mullus barbatus and Upeneus moluccensis inhabiting the northeastern Mediterranean coast of Turkey,” International Journal of Aquatic Biology, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 215-222, 2014.
  • [29] S. Gündoğdu, M. Baylan, “Analyzing growth studies of four Mullidae species distributed in Mediterranean Sea and Black Sea,” Pakistan Journal of Zoology, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 435-446, 2016.
  • [30] T. E. Bagenal, W. F. Tesch, “Age and growth,” in Methods for assessment of fish production in freswater, Bagenal, T. Eds. Blackwell Scientific publications, Oxford and Edinburgh, 1978, pp. 101-136.
  • [31] R. R. Sokal, F. L. Rohlf, Introduction to biostatistics, Freeman, New York, 363 p, 1987.
  • [32] C. Valle, J. T. Bayle, A. A. Ramos, “Weight-length relationships for selected fish species of the western Mediterranean Sea,” Journal of Applied Ichthyology, vol. 19, no 4, pp. 261-262, 2003.
  • [33] R. Froese, “Cube law, condition factor and weight–length relationships: history, meta‐analysis and recommendations,” Journal of Applied Ichthyology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 241-253, 2006.
  • [34] W. E. Ricker, Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations, Bulletin-Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 1975, pp. 1-382.
  • [35] P. Sparre, “Introduction to Tropical Fish Stock Assessment,” in Part I Manual. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 306/1. Rev 1. Rome, 1992, 376 pp.
  • [36] T. Yeşilçiçek, F. Kalayci, C. Şahin, “Length-weight relationships of 10 fish species from the southern Black Sea, Turkey,” Journal of Fisheries Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 19-23, 2015.
  • [37] Y. Özvarol, “Length–weight relationships of 14 fish species from the gulf of Antalya (northeastern Mediterranean Sea, Turkey),” Turkish Journal of Zoology, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 342-346, 2014.
  • [38] E. Çiçek, “Age, growth and mortality parameters of Mullus barbatus Linnaeus, 1758 (Perciformes: Mullidae) in İskenderun Bay, northeastern Mediterranean,” Iranian Journal of Ichthyology, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 262-269, 2015.
  • [39] H. Onay, G. Dalgıç, “Length-weight relationships for fourteen fish species collected by bottom trawl from the Eastern Black Sea coast, Turkey,” Marine Science and Technology Bulletin, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 326-332, 2021.
  • [40] N. Kasapoğlu, E. Düzgüneş, “Length-weight relationships of marine species caught by five gears from the Black Sea,” Mediterranean Marine Science, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 95-100, 2013.
  • [41] D. Türker, H. Bal, “Length–weight relationships of 13 fish species from the western Black Sea (Zonguldak-Amasra), Turkey,” Journal of Black Sea/Mediterranean Environment, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 115-127, 2018.
  • [42] O. Özaydın, E. Taskavak, “Length-weight relationships for 47 fish species from Izmir Bay (eastern Aegean Sea, Turkey),” Acta Adriatica, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 211-216, 2006.
  • [43] E. M. Tıraşın, “Investigations of the growth parameters of fish populations,” Turkish Journal of Zoology, vol 17, pp. 29-82, 1993.

Length-Weight, Length-Length Relationships, and Condition Factor of Red Mullet (Mullus barbatus Linnaeus, 1758) Inhabiting Mersin Bay

Year 2023, Volume: 27 Issue: 2, 398 - 407, 30.04.2023

Seda Kontaş

https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.1215970

Abstract

This study reports the condition factor, length-weight, and length-length relationships in females, males, and all samples of Mullus barbatus inhabiting Mersin Bay. A total of 152 individuals were sampled. The mean weight (W) was 18.01 ± 0.573 g, and the mean total length (TL), fork length (FL), and standard length (SL) were 12.0 ± 0.094 cm, 11.0 ± 0,086 cm, and 9.9 ± 0.080 cm for all M. barbatus, respectively. The total length-weight relationship was determined as W=0.0033TL3.444 (R2=0.90). The b value was calculated as 3.444 and it showed positive allometric growth for all M. barbatus inhabiting Mersin Bay. The LLRs were calculated as TL=1.0706FL+0.1386 (R2=0.95), TL=1.1634SL+0.371 (R2=0.97), and FL=1.0541SL+0.543 (R2=0.96) for all individuals, respectively. The mean value of the condition factor was calculated as 1.00 ± 0,0093 for all M. barbatus samples. The values of the condition factor in M. barbatus ranged from 0.740 to 1.274. There are few studies about M. barbatus population inhabiting Mersin Bay. In this study, condition factor, length-weight and length-length relationships were determined for M. barbatus inhabiting this region (the northeastern Mediterranean Sea).

Keywords

Condition factor length-weight relationship length-length relationship Mullus barbatus Mersin Bay

References

  • [1] K. I. Stergiou, D. K. Moutopoulos, “A review of length-weight relationships of fishes from Greek Marine Waters,” Naga, The ICLARM Quarterly, vol. 24, pp. 23-39, 2001.
  • [2] O. Samsun, O. Akyol, T. Ceyhan, Y. Erdem, “Length-weight relationships for 11 fish species from the Central Black Sea, Turkey,” Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 455-458, 2017.
  • [3] M. N. Santos, M. B. Gaspar, P. Vasconcelos, C. C. Monteiro, “Weight-length relationships for 50 selected fish species of the Algarve (Southern Portugal,” Fisheries Research, vol. 59, no. 1-2, pp. 289-295, 2002.
  • [4] L. Sangun, E. Akamca, M. Akar, “Weight-length relationships for 39 fish species from the north-eastern Mediterranean coast of Turkey,” Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, vol. 7, pp. 37-40, 2007.
  • [5] D. K. Moutopoulos, K. I. Stergiou, “Length–weight and length–length relationships of fish species from the Aegean Sea (Greece),” Journal of Applied Ichthyology, vol 18, no. 3, pp. 200-203, 2002.
  • [6] S. Yedier, “Estimation of some population parameters of Squalius cephalus (Linnaeus 1758) in Tabakhane Stream (Ordu-Turkey),” Sakarya University Journal of Science, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 14-23, 2022.
  • [7] M. Tsoumani, R. Liasko, P. Moutsaki, I. Kagalou, I. Leonardos, “Length-weight relationships of an invasive cyprinid fish (Carassius gibelio) from 12 Greek lakes in relation to their trophic states,” Journal of Applied Ichthyology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 281-284, 2006.
  • [8] A. Van, A. Gümüş, S. Süer, “Length-weight relationships and condition factors of 15 fish species from Kizilirmak-Yesilirmak shelf area, the southeastern Black Sea,” NESciences, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 21-27, 2019.
  • [9] C. D. Le Cren, “The Length-weight relationship and seasonal cycle in gonad weight and condition in perch, Perca fluviatilis,” Journal of Animal Ecology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 201-219, 1951.
  • [10] B. J. Muus, J. G. Nielsen, Sea fish: Scandinavian Fishing Year Book, Hedehusene, Denmark, 340 p, 1999.
  • [11] J. C. Hureau, “Mullidae,” in Fishes of the north-aestern Atlantic and the Mediterranean, P. J. P. Whitehead, M. L. Bauchot, J. C. Hureau, J. Nielsen, E. Tortonese Eds. UNESCO, Paris, 1986, pp. 877-882.
  • [12] T. D. Bok, D. Gokturk, A. E. Kahraman, T. Z. Alicli, T. Acun, C. Ates, “Length-weight relationships of 34 fish species from the Sea of Marmara, Turkey,” Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, vol. 10, no. 23, pp. 3037-3042, 2011.
  • [13] F. S. Karakulak, H. Erk, B. Bilgin, “Length–weight relationships for 47 coastal fish species from the northern Aegean Sea, Turkey,” Journal of Applied Ichthyology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 274-278, 2006.
  • [14] E. Taskavak, M. Bilecenoglu, “Length-weight relationships for 18 Lessesian (Red Sea) immigrant fish species from the Mediterranean coast of Turkey,” Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 895-896, 2001.
  • [15] G. Morey, J. Moranta, E. Massuti, A. Grau, M. Linde, F. Riera, B. Morales-Nin, “Weight–length relationships of littoral to lower slope fishes from the western Mediterranean,”. Fisheries Research, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 89-96, 2003.
  • [16] E. Cicek, D. Avsar, H. Yeldan, M. Ozutok, “Length–weight relationships for 31 teleost fishes caught by bottom trawl net in the Babadillimani Bight (northeastern Mediterranean),”. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 290-292, 2006.
  • [17] S. A. Demirhan, M. F. Can, “Length–weight relationships for seven fish species from the southeastern Black Sea,” Journal of Applied Ichthyology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 282-283, 2007.
  • [18] F. Kalaycı, N. Samsun, S. Bilgin, O. Samsun, “Length-weight relationship of 10 fish species caught by bottom trawl and midwater trawl from the Middle Black Sea, Turkey,” Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 33-36, 2007.
  • [19] O. Ak, S. Kutlu, İ. Aydın, “Length-weight relationship for 16 fish species from the eastern Black Sea, Turkey,” Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 125-126, 2009.
  • [20] S. Çalık, N. Erdoğan Sağlam, “Length-weight relationships of demersal fish species caught by bottom trawl from Eastern Black Sea (Turkey),” Cahiers de Biologie Marine, vol. 58, pp. 485-490, 2017.
  • [21] N. Demirel, E. M. Dalkara, “Weight−length relationships of 28 fish species in the Sea of Marmara,” Turkish Journal of Zoology, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 785-791, 2012.
  • [22] İ. B. Daban, M. Arslan İhsanoğlu, A. İşmen, H. İnceoğlu, “Length-weight relationships of 17 teleost fishes in the Marmara Sea, Turkey,” KSU Journal Of Agriculture and Nature, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1245-1256, 2020.
  • [23] G. Gökçe, İ. Aydın, C. Metin, “Length–weight relationships of 7 fish species from the north Aegean Sea, Turkey,” International Journal of Natural and Engineering Sciences, vol. 1, pp. 51-52, 2007.
  • [24] D. Türker, H. Bal, “Length–weight relationship and condition factor of Red mullet (Mullus barbatus barbatus Linnaeus, 1758) from the western Black Sea, Turkey,” NESciences, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 120-127, 2018. [25] E. H. K. Akel, “Length-weight relationships and condition factors for fifteen species caught by experimental bottom trawl along the Egyptian Mediterranean Coast,” Acta Velit, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 15-19, 2016.
  • [26] H. H. Atar, T. Mete, “Investigating of some biological features of Red mullet (Mullus sp. Linnaeus, 1758) distributing in Mersin Bay,” Research Journal of Biology Sciences, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 29-34, 2009.
  • [27] M. Ok, “Evaluation of the demersal fish assemblages of the northeastern Levant Sea,” Ph.D. dissertations, Department of Marine Biology and Fisheries, Middle East Technical Univ., Ankara, 2012.
  • [28] C. E. Özyurt, E. Çiçek, D. Avşar, H. Yeldan, M. Manaşırlı, “The relationship among spawning period, length at first maturity and depth distribution of Mullus barbatus and Upeneus moluccensis inhabiting the northeastern Mediterranean coast of Turkey,” International Journal of Aquatic Biology, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 215-222, 2014.
  • [29] S. Gündoğdu, M. Baylan, “Analyzing growth studies of four Mullidae species distributed in Mediterranean Sea and Black Sea,” Pakistan Journal of Zoology, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 435-446, 2016.
  • [30] T. E. Bagenal, W. F. Tesch, “Age and growth,” in Methods for assessment of fish production in freswater, Bagenal, T. Eds. Blackwell Scientific publications, Oxford and Edinburgh, 1978, pp. 101-136.
  • [31] R. R. Sokal, F. L. Rohlf, Introduction to biostatistics, Freeman, New York, 363 p, 1987.
  • [32] C. Valle, J. T. Bayle, A. A. Ramos, “Weight-length relationships for selected fish species of the western Mediterranean Sea,” Journal of Applied Ichthyology, vol. 19, no 4, pp. 261-262, 2003.
  • [33] R. Froese, “Cube law, condition factor and weight–length relationships: history, meta‐analysis and recommendations,” Journal of Applied Ichthyology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 241-253, 2006.
  • [34] W. E. Ricker, Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations, Bulletin-Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 1975, pp. 1-382.
  • [35] P. Sparre, “Introduction to Tropical Fish Stock Assessment,” in Part I Manual. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 306/1. Rev 1. Rome, 1992, 376 pp.
  • [36] T. Yeşilçiçek, F. Kalayci, C. Şahin, “Length-weight relationships of 10 fish species from the southern Black Sea, Turkey,” Journal of Fisheries Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 19-23, 2015.
  • [37] Y. Özvarol, “Length–weight relationships of 14 fish species from the gulf of Antalya (northeastern Mediterranean Sea, Turkey),” Turkish Journal of Zoology, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 342-346, 2014.
  • [38] E. Çiçek, “Age, growth and mortality parameters of Mullus barbatus Linnaeus, 1758 (Perciformes: Mullidae) in İskenderun Bay, northeastern Mediterranean,” Iranian Journal of Ichthyology, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 262-269, 2015.
  • [39] H. Onay, G. Dalgıç, “Length-weight relationships for fourteen fish species collected by bottom trawl from the Eastern Black Sea coast, Turkey,” Marine Science and Technology Bulletin, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 326-332, 2021.
  • [40] N. Kasapoğlu, E. Düzgüneş, “Length-weight relationships of marine species caught by five gears from the Black Sea,” Mediterranean Marine Science, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 95-100, 2013.
  • [41] D. Türker, H. Bal, “Length–weight relationships of 13 fish species from the western Black Sea (Zonguldak-Amasra), Turkey,” Journal of Black Sea/Mediterranean Environment, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 115-127, 2018.
  • [42] O. Özaydın, E. Taskavak, “Length-weight relationships for 47 fish species from Izmir Bay (eastern Aegean Sea, Turkey),” Acta Adriatica, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 211-216, 2006.
  • [43] E. M. Tıraşın, “Investigations of the growth parameters of fish populations,” Turkish Journal of Zoology, vol 17, pp. 29-82, 1993.
There are 42 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Seda Kontaş 0000-0002-6582-6722

Publication Date April 30, 2023
Submission Date December 7, 2022
Acceptance Date January 31, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023 Volume: 27 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Kontaş, S. (2023). Length-Weight, Length-Length Relationships, and Condition Factor of Red Mullet (Mullus barbatus Linnaeus, 1758) Inhabiting Mersin Bay. Sakarya University Journal of Science, 27(2), 398-407. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.1215970
AMA Kontaş S. Length-Weight, Length-Length Relationships, and Condition Factor of Red Mullet (Mullus barbatus Linnaeus, 1758) Inhabiting Mersin Bay. SAUJS. April 2023;27(2):398-407. doi:10.16984/saufenbilder.1215970
Chicago Kontaş, Seda. “Length-Weight, Length-Length Relationships, and Condition Factor of Red Mullet (Mullus Barbatus Linnaeus, 1758) Inhabiting Mersin Bay”. Sakarya University Journal of Science 27, no. 2 (April 2023): 398-407. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.1215970.
EndNote Kontaş S (April 1, 2023) Length-Weight, Length-Length Relationships, and Condition Factor of Red Mullet (Mullus barbatus Linnaeus, 1758) Inhabiting Mersin Bay. Sakarya University Journal of Science 27 2 398–407.
IEEE S. Kontaş, “Length-Weight, Length-Length Relationships, and Condition Factor of Red Mullet (Mullus barbatus Linnaeus, 1758) Inhabiting Mersin Bay”, SAUJS, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 398–407, 2023, doi: 10.16984/saufenbilder.1215970.
ISNAD Kontaş, Seda. “Length-Weight, Length-Length Relationships, and Condition Factor of Red Mullet (Mullus Barbatus Linnaeus, 1758) Inhabiting Mersin Bay”. Sakarya University Journal of Science 27/2 (April 2023), 398-407. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.1215970.
JAMA Kontaş S. Length-Weight, Length-Length Relationships, and Condition Factor of Red Mullet (Mullus barbatus Linnaeus, 1758) Inhabiting Mersin Bay. SAUJS. 2023;27:398–407.
MLA Kontaş, Seda. “Length-Weight, Length-Length Relationships, and Condition Factor of Red Mullet (Mullus Barbatus Linnaeus, 1758) Inhabiting Mersin Bay”. Sakarya University Journal of Science, vol. 27, no. 2, 2023, pp. 398-07, doi:10.16984/saufenbilder.1215970.
Vancouver Kontaş S. Length-Weight, Length-Length Relationships, and Condition Factor of Red Mullet (Mullus barbatus Linnaeus, 1758) Inhabiting Mersin Bay. SAUJS. 2023;27(2):398-407.
 Download Cover Image

Sakarya University Journal of Science (SAUJS)